Let's not discount the postive impact that Fisher could have on Iman. Woodsen's double standard last season was a lot for the kid to handle. If he is humble and hungry he could prove to be a valuable player and increase his trade value.

Amare is what he is at this point, but will be playing for a new contract. At 20 minutes a night we would be hard pressed to add someone with his offensive talent.

dwiley20 wrote:I love Amares game..his numbers doesnt look good because he didnt start last year...but he definitly is a 18 and 8 per game guy.....But my question is COntract expiring contracts use to be a hot commodity, where you wouldnt have to give up a first round pick...WHat changed, because ive been wondering for the longest...I mean if we trade him and dont sign anyone good....I just say keep him then...Unless phil gets the nod that Lebron wants to trade him....

Exactly, nothing has changed...we dumped chandler's expiring for multiple picks...no way you say felton got us those picks...i'm telling you, don't fall for it.

Then if Amare looks good this season, we can sign him for a reasonable contract next off season.

yellowboy90 wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:If the 76ers are willing to give up noel and young, plus swap picks for next yrs draft, I'll give them Amare and shump.

Then if Amare looks good this season, we can sign him for a reasonable contract next off season.

Wait you think Philly should give the Knicks prospects and take on salary?

Yes, a 23 million dollar expiring contract.

BigDaddyG wrote:

NardDogNation wrote:Do we still have $1.2 million to include in trades? I know we spent about $1.8 million on the Frenchmen.

I think we have the full $3M. I think we used the remainder of our allocation from last season on the French man.

I sure hope so. I didn't even think that we had that much left over from last season. Might as well toss in the full amount if we really could get a $7 million trade exception from Philly.

smackeddog wrote:If we shifted Bargs in a separate deal as that fantasy-based Moke Hamilton article suggested, then I would be for this (though I'd rather we got rid of Tim Jr), but losing Shump just to get rid of Amar'es contract makes no sense

What did he suggest we do? Personally, I've been a bit torn about Bargnani. His talent is intriguing but his fire for the game is not. Since he's due a big payday though, I could see him being the most likely of our disappointments, to have a big season. That would help us at least get back a few second rounders at the trade deadline for him. But if a team were willing to absorb his salary, I might just be tempted to do that. If Milwaukee approached me today about absorbing Bargnani's $12 million deal for Mayo's $8 million deal ($16 million/2 years), I'd do it. We'd get another ($4 million) trade exception and upgrade the guard position.

NardDogNation wrote:How do you guys think that Thaddeus Young would fit with Melo? I kinda like Young but I'm a bit skeptical of those two gelling with one another.

Similar how he fit with kenyon Martin as a 4.

yellowboy90 wrote:

NardDogNation wrote:How do you guys think that Thaddeus Young would fit with Melo? I kinda like Young but I'm a bit skeptical of those two gelling with one another.

Similar how he fit with kenyon Martin as a 4.

This may be the route to take going forward. Rather then overpay a free agent trade for unwanted expiring deals and assets.