[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Tyson & Felton to Dallas
Author Thread
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/25/2014  6:29 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:Would a win now team take Calderon? There are several teams that could use him as a back up pg. The Blazers, Clippers, Indy, Miami, Houston, and etc.

Phil might not be done yet....


I don't think any of those teams has the luxury of paying $7M per to a backup.

The dude shot 46% and 45% from three over the last two years. That will always make him attractive. He is the pg version of Kyle Korver right now but he can handle the ball.

Yes, Calderon WAS a good player to have around but are you really going to want him at $7.8 million when he is 36 years old and no franchise player around?

AUTOADVERT
Dagger
Posts: 22065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/12/2012
Member: #4184

6/25/2014  6:30 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/25/2014  6:32 PM
This is a very good first move for Phil. 2 second round picks, a former first round pick in Larkin, and a point guard upgrade in Calderon. Dalembert is somewhat serviceable to fill the dead season. Very well done. This is the most knick-favoring deal I've seen in a while. Chandler was not valuable at all last season and this year would have been more of the same and you just know he was planning on walking out next year for nothing.

Bravo Phil, thanks for giving us all a reason to watch draft night!

Also we get rid of Felton.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
6/25/2014  6:31 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:Would a win now team take Calderon? There are several teams that could use him as a back up pg. The Blazers, Clippers, Indy, Miami, Houston, and etc.

Phil might not be done yet....


I don't think any of those teams has the luxury of paying $7M per to a backup.

No but as an expiring down the road he will. We just got someone to take Raymond James Felton off our hands for crying out loud. Maybe Calderon is packaged with Bargnani!

Agree about getting rid of Tyson and Felton. Also, I believe Larkin was hurt (broken leg?) for a good part of last season. Larkin is a high character guy, had a 44 inch vertical at the combine last year, and was seen by some as the future point guard for Dallas. I think Calderon is a huge upgrade. I think he improves Bargs game and makes the game easier for Melo if he stays.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/25/2014  6:31 PM
nyvector16 wrote:The only negative of the deal for the Knicks is the extra salary...
Let's break that down...


Next Season - 15/16 Season - 16/17 Season
Felton - 4.3M - 4.5M -
Calderon - 7M - 7.4M - 7.7M

Difference: 2.7M - 2.9M - 7.7M

This amount to a total of 13.3M total....
And we got a 2013 1st rounder, TWO 2014 2nd rounders , and a big upgrade at Point guard


I don't see how this was anything but a steal....

It's because you're playing the short game and have not taken into consideration the long term ramifications of the deal. This is the type of dumb moves we made in the past that led us to Amar'e Stoudemire and squandered Melo's prime.

newyorknewyork
Posts: 30166
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
6/25/2014  6:31 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/25/2014  6:32 PM
Maybe we can forward Calderon & Larkin to the Jazz who have a ton of cap space and need a PG.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/25/2014  6:32 PM
We just package Felton with Tyson. Bargs & Calderon is similar money wise.

Dallas is trying to recreate 2010 for one more to around with Dirk. If it doesn't work they will gladly let Tyson come off the books and rebuild in a year

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
6/25/2014  6:33 PM
nyvector16 wrote:The only negative of the deal for the Knicks is the extra salary...
Let's break that down...


Player - Next Season - 15/16 Season - 16/17 Season
Felton - 4.3M - 4.5M -
Calderon - 7M - 7.4M - 7.7M

Difference: 2.7M - 2.9M - 7.7M

This amount to a total of 13.3M total....
And we got a 2013 1st rounder, TWO 2014 2nd rounders , and a big upgrade at Point guard


I don't see how this was anything but a steal....


I think you are right. Thrilled with Phil's first move.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/25/2014  6:33 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:Would a win now team take Calderon? There are several teams that could use him as a back up pg. The Blazers, Clippers, Indy, Miami, Houston, and etc.

Phil might not be done yet....


I don't think any of those teams has the luxury of paying $7M per to a backup.

The dude shot 46% and 45% from three over the last two years. That will always make him attractive. He is the pg version of Kyle Korver right now but he can handle the ball.

Yup and you need a pg who can shoot in the triangle and doesn't dominate the ball. Defense and age is definitely a concern but he might not be here for the entire 3yr duration of his contract

yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

6/25/2014  6:39 PM
Chris Herring @HerringWSJ · 11m

I'm hearing the Knicks are trying to move Dalembert and Larkin in a separate deal, according to a person familiar with the matter.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39942
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

6/25/2014  6:42 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
Chris Herring @HerringWSJ · 11m

I'm hearing the Knicks are trying to move Dalembert and Larkin in a separate deal, according to a person familiar with the matter.


Really? Larkin is the only person in this deal that I was excited about lol I'll reserve judgment until everything is finalized.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

6/25/2014  6:45 PM
Damn i hope we keep larkin. He was injured last year BUT he has talent/potential. It looks like Phil is trying to get as many picks as he can which i like beacause we all know the Knicks never valued draft picks
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/25/2014  6:52 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/25/2014  7:15 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
Chris Herring @HerringWSJ · 11m

I'm hearing the Knicks are trying to move Dalembert and Larkin in a separate deal, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Wow Herring does not mess around. Those 2 guys in a package can maybe net us a great PG. Maybe Lowry or Bledsoe????

EwingsGlass
Posts: 27537
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/25/2014  7:00 PM
I would guess this is a clear sign that Melo is signing elsewhere. I see this as an economic move that acquires some future assets. More importantly, it means the Knicks can actually be under the cap this year if they end up cutting Dalembert (meaning not exercising his option).

Correct me if I am wrong, but being under the cap this year would allow us to not be in the repeater tax penalty for a few years after the 2015 class comes out. So, by biting the bullet this year and rebuilding this year, they can have 3 years more of exceeding the salary cap without higher luxury tax.

I think the Calderon contract is moveable still before the trade deadline. Perhaps the hope is Calderon can bring the best back out of Bargnani.

I like the deal, but wonder what this year will look like in terms of rebuilding.

By my estimations, this leaves one roster spot. I would expect to see one more triangle player. My prediction, is that Gasol maybe ends up here on a relationship special.

Calderon/Larkin/Prigs
Hardaway/Smith/Ellington
Odom/Shumpert
Bargnani/Stoudemire
[Gasol][Dalembert?]/Tyler

[#34][#51]

You know I gonna spin wit it
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/25/2014  7:14 PM
EwingsGlass wrote:I would guess this is a clear sign that Melo is signing elsewhere. I see this as an economic move that acquires some future assets. More importantly, it means the Knicks can actually be under the cap this year if they end up cutting Dalembert (meaning not exercising his option).

Correct me if I am wrong, but being under the cap this year would allow us to not be in the repeater tax penalty for a few years after the 2015 class comes out. So, by biting the bullet this year and rebuilding this year, they can have 3 years more of exceeding the salary cap without higher luxury tax.

I think the Calderon contract is moveable still before the trade deadline. Perhaps the hope is Calderon can bring the best back out of Bargnani.

I like the deal, but wonder what this year will look like in terms of rebuilding.

By my estimations, this leaves one roster spot. I would expect to see one more triangle player. My prediction, is that Gasol maybe ends up here on a relationship special.

Calderon/Larkin/Prigs
Hardaway/Smith/Ellington
Odom/Shumpert
Bargnani/Stoudemire
[Gasol][Dalembert?]/Tyler

[#34][#51]

Even with Melo and Dalembert not on the payroll, we'd still have $64 million of contracts on the books. The cap is at $63 million and I'm not sure if we can get far enough below it for cap space to be consequential. That being said, Pau Gasol is not signing up for the midlevel exception to play for a rebuilding team. It just isn't going to happen.

EwingsGlass
Posts: 27537
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/25/2014  7:17 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/25/2014  7:21 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
EwingsGlass wrote:I would guess this is a clear sign that Melo is signing elsewhere. I see this as an economic move that acquires some future assets. More importantly, it means the Knicks can actually be under the cap this year if they end up cutting Dalembert (meaning not exercising his option).

Correct me if I am wrong, but being under the cap this year would allow us to not be in the repeater tax penalty for a few years after the 2015 class comes out. So, by biting the bullet this year and rebuilding this year, they can have 3 years more of exceeding the salary cap without higher luxury tax.

I think the Calderon contract is moveable still before the trade deadline. Perhaps the hope is Calderon can bring the best back out of Bargnani.

I like the deal, but wonder what this year will look like in terms of rebuilding.

By my estimations, this leaves one roster spot. I would expect to see one more triangle player. My prediction, is that Gasol maybe ends up here on a relationship special.

Calderon/Larkin/Prigs
Hardaway/Smith/Ellington
Odom/Shumpert
Bargnani/Stoudemire
[Gasol][Dalembert?]/Tyler

[#34][#51]

Even with Melo and Dalembert not on the payroll, we'd still have $64 million of contracts on the books. The cap is at $63 million and I'm not sure if we can get far enough below it for cap space to be consequential. That being said, Pau Gasol is not signing up for the midlevel exception to play for a rebuilding team. It just isn't going to happen.

Perhaps my math is off, but I believe cutting Dalembert brings us down to $61MM. Regardless, even if over by $1mm -$2mm, that can be solved with a move or two. The purpose of being under the cap wouldnt be to sign other players, but instead to not be a repeat offender next year in terms of exceeding the cap.

You know I gonna spin wit it
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/25/2014  7:22 PM
EwingsGlass wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
EwingsGlass wrote:I would guess this is a clear sign that Melo is signing elsewhere. I see this as an economic move that acquires some future assets. More importantly, it means the Knicks can actually be under the cap this year if they end up cutting Dalembert (meaning not exercising his option).

Correct me if I am wrong, but being under the cap this year would allow us to not be in the repeater tax penalty for a few years after the 2015 class comes out. So, by biting the bullet this year and rebuilding this year, they can have 3 years more of exceeding the salary cap without higher luxury tax.

I think the Calderon contract is moveable still before the trade deadline. Perhaps the hope is Calderon can bring the best back out of Bargnani.

I like the deal, but wonder what this year will look like in terms of rebuilding.

By my estimations, this leaves one roster spot. I would expect to see one more triangle player. My prediction, is that Gasol maybe ends up here on a relationship special.

Calderon/Larkin/Prigs
Hardaway/Smith/Ellington
Odom/Shumpert
Bargnani/Stoudemire
[Gasol][Dalembert?]/Tyler

[#34][#51]

Even with Melo and Dalembert not on the payroll, we'd still have $64 million of contracts on the books. The cap is at $63 million and I'm not sure if we can get far enough below it for cap space to be consequential. That being said, Pau Gasol is not signing up for the midlevel exception to play for a rebuilding team. It just isn't going to happen.

Perhaps my math is off, but I believe cutting Dalembert brings us down to $61MM. Regardless, even if over by $1mm -$2mm, that can be solved with a move or two. The purpose of being under the cap wouldnt be to sign other players, but instead to not be a repeat offender next year in terms of exceeding the cap.

Who cares if we're a repeat offender? I'm not footing the bill? Are you?

fishmike
Posts: 53864
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/25/2014  7:25 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
nyvector16 wrote:The only negative of the deal for the Knicks is the extra salary...
Let's break that down...


Next Season - 15/16 Season - 16/17 Season
Felton - 4.3M - 4.5M -
Calderon - 7M - 7.4M - 7.7M

Difference: 2.7M - 2.9M - 7.7M

This amount to a total of 13.3M total....
And we got a 2013 1st rounder, TWO 2014 2nd rounders , and a big upgrade at Point guard


I don't see how this was anything but a steal....

It's because you're playing the short game and have not taken into consideration the long term ramifications of the deal. This is the type of dumb moves we made in the past that led us to Amar'e Stoudemire and squandered Melo's prime.


no it isn't. Does Calderon have bad knees? No. Has he had previous surgeries? No. Is his game predicated on athleticism? No. He's a heady floor general and a shooter.

Please tell me what the long term ramifications are? Seriously, Jose has a great contract. He's paid probably below market value. Jose is making 7.7mm at 36. Not $25mm. I cant see what the issue is with having this guy around for that price. Honestly... what is your concern?

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30166
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
6/25/2014  7:26 PM
EwingsGlass wrote:I would guess this is a clear sign that Melo is signing elsewhere. I see this as an economic move that acquires some future assets. More importantly, it means the Knicks can actually be under the cap this year if they end up cutting Dalembert (meaning not exercising his option).

Correct me if I am wrong, but being under the cap this year would allow us to not be in the repeater tax penalty for a few years after the 2015 class comes out. So, by biting the bullet this year and rebuilding this year, they can have 3 years more of exceeding the salary cap without higher luxury tax.

I think the Calderon contract is moveable still before the trade deadline. Perhaps the hope is Calderon can bring the best back out of Bargnani.

I like the deal, but wonder what this year will look like in terms of rebuilding.

By my estimations, this leaves one roster spot. I would expect to see one more triangle player. My prediction, is that Gasol maybe ends up here on a relationship special.

Calderon/Larkin/Prigs
Hardaway/Smith/Ellington
Odom/Shumpert
Bargnani/Stoudemire
[Gasol][Dalembert?]/Tyler

[#34][#51]

I don't think even Melo knows what he is going to decide. He wants a team to blow him away and make the decision for him. If not then he will just come back to the Knicks.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27537
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/25/2014  7:27 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
EwingsGlass wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
EwingsGlass wrote:I would guess this is a clear sign that Melo is signing elsewhere. I see this as an economic move that acquires some future assets. More importantly, it means the Knicks can actually be under the cap this year if they end up cutting Dalembert (meaning not exercising his option).

Correct me if I am wrong, but being under the cap this year would allow us to not be in the repeater tax penalty for a few years after the 2015 class comes out. So, by biting the bullet this year and rebuilding this year, they can have 3 years more of exceeding the salary cap without higher luxury tax.

I think the Calderon contract is moveable still before the trade deadline. Perhaps the hope is Calderon can bring the best back out of Bargnani.

I like the deal, but wonder what this year will look like in terms of rebuilding.

By my estimations, this leaves one roster spot. I would expect to see one more triangle player. My prediction, is that Gasol maybe ends up here on a relationship special.

Calderon/Larkin/Prigs
Hardaway/Smith/Ellington
Odom/Shumpert
Bargnani/Stoudemire
[Gasol][Dalembert?]/Tyler

[#34][#51]

Even with Melo and Dalembert not on the payroll, we'd still have $64 million of contracts on the books. The cap is at $63 million and I'm not sure if we can get far enough below it for cap space to be consequential. That being said, Pau Gasol is not signing up for the midlevel exception to play for a rebuilding team. It just isn't going to happen.

Perhaps my math is off, but I believe cutting Dalembert brings us down to $61MM. Regardless, even if over by $1mm -$2mm, that can be solved with a move or two. The purpose of being under the cap wouldnt be to sign other players, but instead to not be a repeat offender next year in terms of exceeding the cap.

Who cares if we're a repeat offender? I'm not footing the bill? Are you?

If it means we have greater ability to add salary in 2015-2018, yeah, I care. The Knicks pockets are deep, not unlimited.

You know I gonna spin wit it
TheSage
Posts: 21039
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/20/2003
Member: #386
6/25/2014  7:33 PM
Calderon's contract can be restructured so the hit in year 3 is reduced so that it is not consequential
Tyson & Felton to Dallas

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy