gunsnewing wrote:dk7th wrote:he has not a had a chance to develop. he was injured and then he was dicked around. he is the kind of guy who clearly needs a healthy work environment in order to thrive. it's a real shame that he was out most of last season but then again without kidd and prigioni the wheels would have fallen off the knicks rickety bus and badly. it's great for the delusional that shumpert was injured or they could not have enjoyed the 54 wins before getting exposed. not good for those who would have preferred to allow the kid to develop in the normal course of time in a functional organization.with sheriff jackson in town maybe things will work out.
Exactly. Why people are eager to give him up for the 29th mother****in pick is beyond me
I guarantee you if Shump played for okc this entire time he would be looked at a lot differently
If sefolosa was here he would've got ran out of town like Landry fields
I'm convinced Knicks fans are the worst basketball fans in the country. Worst than Miami fans
there is a really good reason to move Shump for a late pick like that. Next year is Shump's contract year and the last of his rookie deal. So play it out... if he has the breakout year we all want he's going to get paid. So do you pay Shump and pass on possibly getting max players in FA? If Shump has his 15-5-5 season while playing great defense whats he worth? $7mm? $10mm?
Its money.
If the plan is get Melo at a discount, then add another max guy summer of 2015 and another almost max guy the same summer to build your new big 3 then Shumpert and his new contract dont fit into the big picture.
If the play is use Amare/Chandler/Bargs expiring deals to add salary and just pack in the talent then you ride with Shump and if he blows up great... pay him.
Two very different roads. One Shump has to go. One it really just depends on how he plays
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs