[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Lovely article on Stoudemire in NYT by Araton
Author Thread
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

3/28/2014  7:56 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/28/2014  7:59 PM
smackeddog wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
mreinman wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
mreinman wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
nyk4ever wrote: i'm still glad we signed him

are you really?

I actually want to win. I don't care about a guys back story when it costs 100 million and sinks the ship.

I think your being a little ungreatfull. When someone one comes through for you when your down and out, you don't kick them to the curb when your back on top. We had 10 yrs of hard to watch basketball. Signing amare was a no brainer

You seem like you would hve been content with gallo, lee and chandler winning an avg of 40 games a season. Yeah we would have had cap space, but honestly since amare has gotten here, what big name FA did we miss out on because of cap space.

David Lee
DRAGIC
Chris Paul
Dwight Howard
Paul Milsap

Pick any, but that is not even the point. We don't need tier 1's. We need to build an efficient team not blow the bank on Amare when the only offer he got was 3 years to remain in PHX. His crash was not that hard to predict.

Amare came through for us? How by giving us a half of a good season of a 5 year cap killer?

Fans follow their hearts way too much. Do you think that the knicks brass thinks that they made a huge mistake?

Dude that is the ultimate bull sht (his crash was easy to predict) how in the world can you say that..You think donnie was dumb enogh to sign a player who had 6 months left in his tank for a 100 mill.

Howard never ever wanted to play in ny

Dragic is a good player, but the suns are not elite, and no ones flocking over there to play with him

Milsap, you mean the guy on the stuggling hawks

chris paul wasn't coming over here to play with gallo and chandler, and after getting melo we had nothing to offer in a trade..

Ultimate BS? Why was he not insured? Why did teams not tender offers?

I would take Dragic over any of our players. Dude is great! Who says a team has to be elite? They are playing solid bball at 43-29 I would give my left nut for that record and him as our PG.

I find it funny how fans globally measure a teams success by one player. Its a "team".

Hmm, so the list of players you've said you like is : Dragic, Kevin Love, Jeff Hornacek... I'm starting to see a pattern...

You forgot the other 3 players on the list (CP3, Howard, Millsap) who are all Black.

They are?

I like those 3 because they are super efficient and Hornacek was so damn good and got zero props. He also made 25 million for his entire career. He was/is proof that most GM's back then did not have a clue as to what constitutes value.

And by the way I am a bigot to any inefficient / overrated player.

I knew that much about you, which made his inquiry so bizarre. Even if you listed just the players he mentioned, I'm not sure why anyway would object. Dragic and Love with Melo would put us in the stratosphere of the Pacers.

It was mainly from other threads- it's like when people say their favorite rappers are Eminem and the Beastie Boys- might just be a coincidencebut I do always think "hmmm"! Probably also I'm a bit snarky because he keeps blasting players I like- Allan Houston and Amar'e !

I definitely get what you mean because that stuff irritated the **** out of me growing up as a minority. I use to have this one Jewish kid ride the dick of Tamir Goodman aka the "Jewish Jordan" and try to suggest that he was "better than Michael Jordan" but didn't go to the NBA because he was "smart (while I guess all the Black multi-millionaires were just dumb)". Nothing I've read of mreinman striked me as the type though. All he did was list a group of star-caliber players that were available recently, which just so happen to include Kevin Love and Goran Dragic.

AUTOADVERT
OldFan
Posts: 21456
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2003
Member: #446
3/28/2014  7:59 PM
Dagger wrote:
mreinman wrote:
nyk4ever wrote: i'm still glad we signed him

are you really?

I actually want to win. I don't care about a guys back story when it costs 100 million and sinks the ship.

+1, it's all fluff all I care about about is the W-L column, to which his contributions have been sporadic at best.

Honestly, a lot of guys in the NBA had tough experiences before life in the NBA, there's no need to look at that when evaluating a player's value. Although I did read amare had to spend like 20 hours a day lying face down for a couple of weeks for his eye injury, which must have been a challenge, but that doesn't interfere with my perception of him as a player.

I'm not saying you're wrong everyone roots for their own reason.

Personally - it's not all about wins and losses to me. I would have enjoyed seeing Ewing win one 10x more then if the Knicks signed Lebron and won a championship. Even if Marbury actually helped the Knicks win it would have been hard for me to be very excited. Not saying winning doesn't matter but some players are just more appealing to me then others. Not like I know these guys I guess I'm a bit of a sucker for the back story.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

3/28/2014  8:11 PM
smackeddog wrote:
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
mreinman wrote:
My favorite player as I've stated many times is Noah. I reckon that he black.

Perhaps you be verbalizing your own internal subliminal hate / racism?

If you actually read my posts before you idiotically inferred a racial bias, you would have a better idea of where I stand and the kind of players that I like.

I loved Chauncy Billups I beh-lee dat he black too.

But ... carry on

To be honest, I haven't even noticed you on these boards until a few weeks ago- only really noticed you on threads when you were praising guys like Dragic (who I like), Kevin love (whom I hate!), Hornacek (who I'm indifferent towards), etc- didn't see you proclaim your like of Noah (we're agreed on that!), or you mentioning of Billups.

You're in my bad books for attacking Allan Houston though- I get protective of my 90s Knicks!

I actually liked Allen Houston and will never forget the shot he hit against Miami. I just think that he was overrated by knick fans just like we (way) overrate most of our players.

Comparing Houston to hornacek who made bubkes and Hornacek was a much better player yet most knick fans will probably say Houston was better. There was also very little data that was available then about players. Now things are viewed far differently and more correctly.

Hornacek was a grossly underrated player and will probably be underrated as a coach too. Most experts had the suns winning < 20 games this year yet they are at 43 wins and counting.

What do you hate about KLove? His defense?

My hate of Kevin love is probably not based on reason- he's just one of those players that annoys me. I'm also suspicious of players that put up monster stats but somehow their team doesn't win- I genuinely don't know why Kevin Loves stats don't translate to more wins, I know his teammates have been pretty poor so maybe that's it. The lack of defense also bothers me. I guess I worry that he'll be a Knick and we'll spend another 4/5 years with a main player who doesn't play defense- I'm sick of that.

I've been quite resistant to these advanced stats being brought into the game too- I suppose I can see the importance of efficient player, but I just end up liking players on things other than efficiency- grit, fire, competitiveness, toughness, heart- stuff that's hard to quantify.

I'm skeptical of advanced stats as well, or at least of the context we use them in. People try to establish causality with one or a few metrics and I don't think that is very effective in determining the worth of a player. For one, it suggests that every element of the game could be quantified, which is nonsense. After all, how do you quantify a hustle play, a player's penchant for hitting a timely shot, a player's intimidation factor, etc.?

As for Kevin Love, I feel the exact opposite to you. I think the guy is the real deal and that his defensive woes are grossly overrated. He is no defensive stalwart but how many franchise caliber players that play the minutes he plays, with as little help as he has, can lay claim to that? Physically speaking, there is nothing wrong with him that would stop him from being an effective defender because he is strong as an ox and is quick enough laterally to be a real pest. Give him some help and I think he'd also be more than willing to get in foul trouble if it allowed him to defend his position more aptly. I definitely think certain players have been overrated because they are white (among other factors) like Steve Nash but Kevin Love definitely isn't one of them, IMO.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

3/28/2014  8:19 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/28/2014  8:25 PM
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
mreinman wrote:
My favorite player as I've stated many times is Noah. I reckon that he black.

Perhaps you be verbalizing your own internal subliminal hate / racism?

If you actually read my posts before you idiotically inferred a racial bias, you would have a better idea of where I stand and the kind of players that I like.

I loved Chauncy Billups I beh-lee dat he black too.

But ... carry on

To be honest, I haven't even noticed you on these boards until a few weeks ago- only really noticed you on threads when you were praising guys like Dragic (who I like), Kevin love (whom I hate!), Hornacek (who I'm indifferent towards), etc- didn't see you proclaim your like of Noah (we're agreed on that!), or you mentioning of Billups.

You're in my bad books for attacking Allan Houston though- I get protective of my 90s Knicks!

I actually liked Allen Houston and will never forget the shot he hit against Miami. I just think that he was overrated by knick fans just like we (way) overrate most of our players.

Comparing Houston to hornacek who made bubkes and Hornacek was a much better player yet most knick fans will probably say Houston was better. There was also very little data that was available then about players. Now things are viewed far differently and more correctly.

Hornacek was a grossly underrated player and will probably be underrated as a coach too. Most experts had the suns winning < 20 games this year yet they are at 43 wins and counting.

What do you hate about KLove? His defense?

My hate of Kevin love is probably not based on reason- he's just one of those players that annoys me. I'm also suspicious of players that put up monster stats but somehow their team doesn't win- I genuinely don't know why Kevin Loves stats don't translate to more wins, I know his teammates have been pretty poor so maybe that's it. The lack of defense also bothers me. I guess I worry that he'll be a Knick and we'll spend another 4/5 years with a main player who doesn't play defense- I'm sick of that.

I've been quite resistant to these advanced stats being brought into the game too- I suppose I can see the importance of efficient player, but I just end up liking players on things other than efficiency- grit, fire, competitiveness, toughness, heart- stuff that's hard to quantify.

Ok so you just don't like him. Ok ... everyone is entitled to not like a player without a specific reason. I never blame a player for his team's failure. A team is not just one guy. Rubio who I really loved coming in to NBA has not lived up to expectations. He is a great passer but a horrid shooter. The reason why they lose (according to advanced stats) is because outside of Love they have been a really bad shooting team.

There is a difference between liking players because of grit, fire, heart etc ... and them actually being good.

Rodman was a gritty player with a lot of heart but he was actually really great. So was garnett.

I here this argument about not being keen on advanced stats but that's just people talking because they don't know much about it and they think that their eyes are a better judge of talent. Every team is turning to advanced stats since they work and its proven. Any team that does not will suck because they acquire the wrong players like we have for years.

The eye test had me thinking that L. Aldridge was a top notch player but someone pointed me to his stats and they are very unimpressive. I would take Love over his in a heartbeat.

Like I have said before, if you start reading and following advanced stats your eyes will be opened to a new world and you will see badly you misinterpreted value before. In 3 years you won't ever hear anybody including fans saying that they don't buy into advanced stats.

You got to take advanced stats with a grain of salt though. Sometimes you don't need numbers to tell you what your eyes already see. And sometimes the numbers are flat out misleading e.g. Kyle Korver being a more efficient scorer than Wilt Chamberlain, Michael Jordan and the like(based on TS%). At their best, I think that they are just mere bread crumbs that require you to look at a broader-based picture (that involves the eye test) to get any real value out of them.

As for Aldridge, I've always thought that the guy was overrated. Big men whose primary offensive weapon are jump shots, should always be looked at suspiciously. As much as Love's jumper is a big part of his offensive game, he has a diverse enough repertoire to keep defenses honest. When you factor in Love's vastly superior rebounding numbers and passing abilities, Love has got to be the pick in a landslide. In fact, I don't think there is a big man at the 4 or 5 spot that I would take ahead of Kevin Love at the moment. He just has the great misfortune of having to deal with the fallout from David Kahn. He'd look good in a Knick jersey though, lol.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

3/28/2014  8:22 PM
OldFan wrote:
Dagger wrote:
mreinman wrote:
nyk4ever wrote: i'm still glad we signed him

are you really?

I actually want to win. I don't care about a guys back story when it costs 100 million and sinks the ship.

+1, it's all fluff all I care about about is the W-L column, to which his contributions have been sporadic at best.

Honestly, a lot of guys in the NBA had tough experiences before life in the NBA, there's no need to look at that when evaluating a player's value. Although I did read amare had to spend like 20 hours a day lying face down for a couple of weeks for his eye injury, which must have been a challenge, but that doesn't interfere with my perception of him as a player.

I'm not saying you're wrong everyone roots for their own reason.

Personally - it's not all about wins and losses to me. I would have enjoyed seeing Ewing win one 10x more then if the Knicks signed Lebron and won a championship. Even if Marbury actually helped the Knicks win it would have been hard for me to be very excited. Not saying winning doesn't matter but some players are just more appealing to me then others. Not like I know these guys I guess I'm a bit of a sucker for the back story.

Sports is kinda like a soap opera from men. I don't think you and I are alone in enjoying the back-story of the game. I much rather watch the Heat-Pacers a thousand times more than the Heat-Thunder because of the drama and physicality that surround the former matchup.

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

3/28/2014  8:31 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
OldFan wrote:
Dagger wrote:
mreinman wrote:
nyk4ever wrote: i'm still glad we signed him

are you really?

I actually want to win. I don't care about a guys back story when it costs 100 million and sinks the ship.

+1, it's all fluff all I care about about is the W-L column, to which his contributions have been sporadic at best.

Honestly, a lot of guys in the NBA had tough experiences before life in the NBA, there's no need to look at that when evaluating a player's value. Although I did read amare had to spend like 20 hours a day lying face down for a couple of weeks for his eye injury, which must have been a challenge, but that doesn't interfere with my perception of him as a player.

I'm not saying you're wrong everyone roots for their own reason.

Personally - it's not all about wins and losses to me. I would have enjoyed seeing Ewing win one 10x more then if the Knicks signed Lebron and won a championship. Even if Marbury actually helped the Knicks win it would have been hard for me to be very excited. Not saying winning doesn't matter but some players are just more appealing to me then others. Not like I know these guys I guess I'm a bit of a sucker for the back story.

Sports is kinda like a soap opera from men. I don't think you and I are alone in enjoying the back-story of the game. I much rather watch the Heat-Pacers a thousand times more than the Heat-Thunder because of the drama and physicality that surround the former matchup.

I think what he means is that he believes the stories writers write about certain individuals and he is often swayed by the writers point of view be it wrong or right..

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/29/2014  10:56 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
mreinman wrote:
My favorite player as I've stated many times is Noah. I reckon that he black.

Perhaps you be verbalizing your own internal subliminal hate / racism?

If you actually read my posts before you idiotically inferred a racial bias, you would have a better idea of where I stand and the kind of players that I like.

I loved Chauncy Billups I beh-lee dat he black too.

But ... carry on

To be honest, I haven't even noticed you on these boards until a few weeks ago- only really noticed you on threads when you were praising guys like Dragic (who I like), Kevin love (whom I hate!), Hornacek (who I'm indifferent towards), etc- didn't see you proclaim your like of Noah (we're agreed on that!), or you mentioning of Billups.

You're in my bad books for attacking Allan Houston though- I get protective of my 90s Knicks!

I actually liked Allen Houston and will never forget the shot he hit against Miami. I just think that he was overrated by knick fans just like we (way) overrate most of our players.

Comparing Houston to hornacek who made bubkes and Hornacek was a much better player yet most knick fans will probably say Houston was better. There was also very little data that was available then about players. Now things are viewed far differently and more correctly.

Hornacek was a grossly underrated player and will probably be underrated as a coach too. Most experts had the suns winning < 20 games this year yet they are at 43 wins and counting.

What do you hate about KLove? His defense?

My hate of Kevin love is probably not based on reason- he's just one of those players that annoys me. I'm also suspicious of players that put up monster stats but somehow their team doesn't win- I genuinely don't know why Kevin Loves stats don't translate to more wins, I know his teammates have been pretty poor so maybe that's it. The lack of defense also bothers me. I guess I worry that he'll be a Knick and we'll spend another 4/5 years with a main player who doesn't play defense- I'm sick of that.

I've been quite resistant to these advanced stats being brought into the game too- I suppose I can see the importance of efficient player, but I just end up liking players on things other than efficiency- grit, fire, competitiveness, toughness, heart- stuff that's hard to quantify.

Ok so you just don't like him. Ok ... everyone is entitled to not like a player without a specific reason. I never blame a player for his team's failure. A team is not just one guy. Rubio who I really loved coming in to NBA has not lived up to expectations. He is a great passer but a horrid shooter. The reason why they lose (according to advanced stats) is because outside of Love they have been a really bad shooting team.

There is a difference between liking players because of grit, fire, heart etc ... and them actually being good.

Rodman was a gritty player with a lot of heart but he was actually really great. So was garnett.

I here this argument about not being keen on advanced stats but that's just people talking because they don't know much about it and they think that their eyes are a better judge of talent. Every team is turning to advanced stats since they work and its proven. Any team that does not will suck because they acquire the wrong players like we have for years.

The eye test had me thinking that L. Aldridge was a top notch player but someone pointed me to his stats and they are very unimpressive. I would take Love over his in a heartbeat.

Like I have said before, if you start reading and following advanced stats your eyes will be opened to a new world and you will see badly you misinterpreted value before. In 3 years you won't ever hear anybody including fans saying that they don't buy into advanced stats.

You got to take advanced stats with a grain of salt though. Sometimes you don't need numbers to tell you what your eyes already see. And sometimes the numbers are flat out misleading e.g. Kyle Korver being a more efficient scorer than Wilt Chamberlain, Michael Jordan and the like(based on TS%). At their best, I think that they are just mere bread crumbs that require you to look at a broader-based picture (that involves the eye test) to get any real value out of them.

As for Aldridge, I've always thought that the guy was overrated. Big men whose primary offensive weapon are jump shots, should always be looked at suspiciously. As much as Love's jumper is a big part of his offensive game, he has a diverse enough repertoire to keep defenses honest. When you factor in Love's vastly superior rebounding numbers and passing abilities, Love has got to be the pick in a landslide. In fact, I don't think there is a big man at the 4 or 5 spot that I would take ahead of Kevin Love at the moment. He just has the great misfortune of having to deal with the fallout from David Kahn. He'd look good in a Knick jersey though, lol.

Kyle Korver is much more efficient than those guys. Does not mean he is the better player. There are other things to look at such as usg%.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/29/2014  11:00 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
mreinman wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
mreinman wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
nyk4ever wrote: i'm still glad we signed him

are you really?

I actually want to win. I don't care about a guys back story when it costs 100 million and sinks the ship.

I think your being a little ungreatfull. When someone one comes through for you when your down and out, you don't kick them to the curb when your back on top. We had 10 yrs of hard to watch basketball. Signing amare was a no brainer

You seem like you would hve been content with gallo, lee and chandler winning an avg of 40 games a season. Yeah we would have had cap space, but honestly since amare has gotten here, what big name FA did we miss out on because of cap space.

David Lee
DRAGIC
Chris Paul
Dwight Howard
Paul Milsap

Pick any, but that is not even the point. We don't need tier 1's. We need to build an efficient team not blow the bank on Amare when the only offer he got was 3 years to remain in PHX. His crash was not that hard to predict.

Amare came through for us? How by giving us a half of a good season of a 5 year cap killer?

Fans follow their hearts way too much. Do you think that the knicks brass thinks that they made a huge mistake?

Dude that is the ultimate bull sht (his crash was easy to predict) how in the world can you say that..You think donnie was dumb enogh to sign a player who had 6 months left in his tank for a 100 mill.

Howard never ever wanted to play in ny

Dragic is a good player, but the suns are not elite, and no ones flocking over there to play with him

Milsap, you mean the guy on the stuggling hawks

chris paul wasn't coming over here to play with gallo and chandler, and after getting melo we had nothing to offer in a trade..

Ultimate BS? Why was he not insured? Why did teams not tender offers?

I would take Dragic over any of our players. Dude is great! Who says a team has to be elite? They are playing solid bball at 43-29 I would give my left nut for that record and him as our PG.

I find it funny how fans globally measure a teams success by one player. Its a "team".

Hmm, so the list of players you've said you like is : Dragic, Kevin Love, Jeff Hornacek... I'm starting to see a pattern...

You forgot the other 3 players on the list (CP3, Howard, Millsap) who are all Black.

They are?

I like those 3 because they are super efficient and Hornacek was so damn good and got zero props. He also made 25 million for his entire career. He was/is proof that most GM's back then did not have a clue as to what constitutes value.

And by the way I am a bigot to any inefficient / overrated player.

I knew that much about you, which made his inquiry so bizarre. Even if you listed just the players he mentioned, I'm not sure why anyway would object. Dragic and Love with Melo would put us in the stratosphere of the Pacers.

It was mainly from other threads- it's like when people say their favorite rappers are Eminem and the Beastie Boys- might just be a coincidencebut I do always think "hmmm"! Probably also I'm a bit snarky because he keeps blasting players I like- Allan Houston and Amar'e !

I definitely get what you mean because that stuff irritated the **** out of me growing up as a minority. I use to have this one Jewish kid ride the dick of Tamir Goodman aka the "Jewish Jordan" and try to suggest that he was "better than Michael Jordan" but didn't go to the NBA because he was "smart (while I guess all the Black multi-millionaires were just dumb)". Nothing I've read of mreinman striked me as the type though. All he did was list a group of star-caliber players that were available recently, which just so happen to include Kevin Love and Goran Dragic.

Tamir Goodman was just a coaches sell of an overrated orthodox jewish kid. He was sold to Maryland from a video and they made a mistake.

I actually played with the kid and he was great but he could never really crack a team of actually talented players. He failed in Towson and could not even make the Macabee team.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/30/2014  12:11 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/30/2014  12:17 PM
smackeddog wrote:
mreinman wrote:
My favorite player as I've stated many times is Noah. I reckon that he black.

Perhaps you be verbalizing your own internal subliminal hate / racism?

If you actually read my posts before you idiotically inferred a racial bias, you would have a better idea of where I stand and the kind of players that I like.

I loved Chauncy Billups I beh-lee dat he black too.

But ... carry on

To be honest, I haven't even noticed you on these boards until a few weeks ago- only really noticed you on threads when you were praising guys like Dragic (who I like), Kevin love (whom I hate!), Hornacek (who I'm indifferent towards), etc- didn't see you proclaim your like of Noah (we're agreed on that!), or you mentioning of Billups.

You're in my bad books for attacking Allan Houston though- I get protective of my 90s Knicks!

How you liking Dragic now? 32 point on 17 shots? Sweet-ish? Of course! A freakin TS of almost 80!!!! Wonder who guarded him hhhhmmmmmm.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Lovely article on Stoudemire in NYT by Araton

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy