[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Bargs starting isnt woking wont work and we will LOSE games if it continues
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/6/2013  12:14 AM
nixluva wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:This will be the end of Bargs in the SL. Kenyon Martin or Aldich will be starting if Chandler is out. Must move Bargs to 6th or 7th man for offense off the bench--he is who he is

Bargs played well with KMart in there. I see no reason they can't play with each other. There's this MYTH that it's Bargs presence that is causing all the problems on D, but just watch Felton and Melo on D and try to pay attention to what they're doing for once and you'll see that they're really making even more mistakes as is Shump when he gambles too much. This is not to say that Bargs isn't making some mistakes but more mistakes are being made by other guys in the SL that are having a bigger impact.

Not to mention the huge issues on offense. Just look at the shooting % for the other players on the team particularly Felton and Melo.

Nope disagree we have 7 pre season and 4 regular season games as a sample were 3-8 and Bargs is terrible for chemistry in unit 1. We could use him off the bench--this line up featuring Bargs in unit 1 is likely done. I have to think Woodson has seen enough--and maybe for Bargs its fair--hes played sparingly for two years now.. Why not 18-22 minutes off the bench in an offensive role?

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
11/6/2013  12:23 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
nixluva wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:This will be the end of Bargs in the SL. Kenyon Martin or Aldich will be starting if Chandler is out. Must move Bargs to 6th or 7th man for offense off the bench--he is who he is

Bargs played well with KMart in there. I see no reason they can't play with each other. There's this MYTH that it's Bargs presence that is causing all the problems on D, but just watch Felton and Melo on D and try to pay attention to what they're doing for once and you'll see that they're really making even more mistakes as is Shump when he gambles too much. This is not to say that Bargs isn't making some mistakes but more mistakes are being made by other guys in the SL that are having a bigger impact.

Not to mention the huge issues on offense. Just look at the shooting % for the other players on the team particularly Felton and Melo.

Nope disagree we have 7 pre season and 4 regular season games as a sample were 3-8 and Bargs is terrible for chemistry in unit 1. We could use him off the bench--this line up featuring Bargs in unit 1 is likely done. I have to think Woodson has seen enough--and maybe for Bargs its fair--hes played sparingly for two years now.. Why not 18-22 minutes off the bench in an offensive role?


The things is all bargs does is score, but his scoring cannot offset his liabilities.

I liability that does not rebound, or help on defense or pass and watches opponents blow right by them cannot be in the starting lineup.

Bargnani is a good individual player, and those types belong on the bench.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/6/2013  12:30 AM    LAST EDITED: 11/6/2013  12:48 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
nixluva wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:This will be the end of Bargs in the SL. Kenyon Martin or Aldich will be starting if Chandler is out. Must move Bargs to 6th or 7th man for offense off the bench--he is who he is

Bargs played well with KMart in there. I see no reason they can't play with each other. There's this MYTH that it's Bargs presence that is causing all the problems on D, but just watch Felton and Melo on D and try to pay attention to what they're doing for once and you'll see that they're really making even more mistakes as is Shump when he gambles too much. This is not to say that Bargs isn't making some mistakes but more mistakes are being made by other guys in the SL that are having a bigger impact.

Not to mention the huge issues on offense. Just look at the shooting % for the other players on the team particularly Felton and Melo.

Nope disagree we have 7 pre season and 4 regular season games as a sample were 3-8 and Bargs is terrible for chemistry in unit 1. We could use him off the bench--this line up featuring Bargs in unit 1 is likely done. I have to think Woodson has seen enough--and maybe for Bargs its fair--hes played sparingly for two years now.. Why not 18-22 minutes off the bench in an offensive role?

I think the idea that Bargs is the reason for the poor chemistry is misleading. Felton and Melo aren't playing well and it has nothing to do with Bargnani. Neither Felton nor Melo is shooting well, executing well, defending well... doing nothing well. Bargnani is supposed to be an outlet not the major cog in the SL. He's there to take up the slack scoring the ball and they're not even using him correctly. If Felton and Melo are playing better we wouldn't be talking about Bargnani.

Bargs is one of the best PnP bigs and they don't use him that way. Everyone knows that's his strength. For that matter the offense is a disaster to be honest. The turnovers and missed shots are leading to fast breaks which makes it look much worse for the SL defense. Felton isn't fighting over picks, Melo and Shump keep losing their man on D. How often has Bargnani's man just flat beat him in a man to man situation? People want him to cover for the poor defense of Felton and Melo but he's not a great help defender.

Sure the defense could be better and that would be the only reason to take Bargs out of the starting lineup, but that doesn't solve the issues with Felton and Melo. It's a trap to think that all that matters is taking Bargs out of the starting lineup. He's not even playing starting minutes and still the team is floundering when he's not on the floor.

The answer is gonna be getting JR back in there and Woody living off the ISO plays of Melo and JR rather than running a high performance, high efficiency offense.

This is the problem:


Player G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF TOT APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
Carmelo 4 4 42.0 0.371 0.300 0.885 2.00 7.50 9.50 3.0 2.25 0.50 3.50 2.25 23.8
Felton 4 4 36.5 0.396 0.214 0.889 1.30 2.00 3.30 5.8 2.00 0.75 2.50 2.25 13.3

Iman 4 4 29.3 0.457 0.333 0.923 0.80 3.80 4.50 1.3 1.50 0.25 1.50 3.75 12.3
Metta 4 0 23.0 0.463 0.375 0.750 0.50 3.50 4.00 0.5 1.75 0.50 1.00 2.50 11.8
Andrea 4 3 21.0 0.484 0.333 1.000 0.80 1.30 2.00 0.5 0.50 0.00 2.50 2.00 8.8
Tyson 4 4 26.8 0.600 0.000 0.714 3.80 5.30 9.00 1.3 1.00 2.50 1.75 2.50 7.3
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/6/2013  1:59 AM
No one is saying that scoring is a big problem for Bargnani. I don't get why you keep posting FG% stats.
It's all the other phases of the game that are problematic for him.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/6/2013  3:30 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:No one is saying that scoring is a big problem for Bargnani. I don't get why you keep posting FG% stats.
It's all the other phases of the game that are problematic for him.

I'm not talking about Bargnani as an individual. I'm talking about what is really wrong with the Knicks. It's not the 20 minutes that Bargnani is playing. It's the 35 plus that Felton and Melo are playing at a low level right now. Both under 40% and 21% and 30% from 3pt range respectively. Felton and Melo are taking the most shots on the team. Melo at 89 and Felton at 53 shots so far and if they're the ones taking the most shots but shooting the worst % that is a HUGE problem. Bargnani is an easy target but that SL has multiple issues. No one would really be talking about Bargnani if Felton and Melo were shooting at their career avg's and all 3 of them have the most TO's on the team so they need to find a flow together and execute at a higher level than they have as a starting trio.

callmened
Posts: 24448
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/26/2012
Member: #4234

11/6/2013  3:47 AM
Bargnani isnt the problem; however hes not the solution. His scoring or defense hasnt been spectacular. I thinkmknick fans were hoping he would average 17ppg and take us to the next level. But hes not, hes simply an offensive role player. I cant blame him or praise him for anything that happensncuz hes simply not that significant.

There are other things like: the collective defense, turnovers, bad rotations and most of all BAD PLAYCALLING. I wouldnt start bargnani cuz I would focus on defense first. Prigoni should be STARTING with artest. Set the tone with defense, add offense later

Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
11/6/2013  6:14 AM    LAST EDITED: 11/6/2013  6:15 AM
nixluva wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:No one is saying that scoring is a big problem for Bargnani. I don't get why you keep posting FG% stats.
It's all the other phases of the game that are problematic for him.

I'm not talking about Bargnani as an individual. I'm talking about what is really wrong with the Knicks. It's not the 20 minutes that Bargnani is playing. It's the 35 plus that Felton and Melo are playing at a low level right now. Both under 40% and 21% and 30% from 3pt range respectively. Felton and Melo are taking the most shots on the team. Melo at 89 and Felton at 53 shots so far and if they're the ones taking the most shots but shooting the worst % that is a HUGE problem. Bargnani is an easy target but that SL has multiple issues. No one would really be talking about Bargnani if Felton and Melo were shooting at their career avg's and all 3 of them have the most TO's on the team so they need to find a flow together and execute at a higher level than they have as a starting trio.


He was booed in our only win, so yes, he would be talked about.

You still can ignore we havent won since he was inserted and Pablo taken out.

Hes a major factor, just not the only one.

-38 and counting.

Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

11/6/2013  7:23 AM
knickscity wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:No one is saying that scoring is a big problem for Bargnani. I don't get why you keep posting FG% stats.
It's all the other phases of the game that are problematic for him.

I'm not talking about Bargnani as an individual. I'm talking about what is really wrong with the Knicks. It's not the 20 minutes that Bargnani is playing. It's the 35 plus that Felton and Melo are playing at a low level right now. Both under 40% and 21% and 30% from 3pt range respectively. Felton and Melo are taking the most shots on the team. Melo at 89 and Felton at 53 shots so far and if they're the ones taking the most shots but shooting the worst % that is a HUGE problem. Bargnani is an easy target but that SL has multiple issues. No one would really be talking about Bargnani if Felton and Melo were shooting at their career avg's and all 3 of them have the most TO's on the team so they need to find a flow together and execute at a higher level than they have as a starting trio.


He was booed in our only win, so yes, he would be talked about.

You still can ignore we havent won since he was inserted and Pablo taken out.

Hes a major factor, just not the only one.

-38 and counting.

Thats the +- right. -7 last night was his best game of the season in that regard. This team is in trouble

Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/6/2013  6:35 PM
Woodson is now going to start Bargs at C Melo at 4.


We wont win many games like this.


Please remove Chris Smith and bring in Ike Diogu

RIP Crushalot😞
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
11/6/2013  6:41 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Woodson is now going to start Bargs at C Melo at 4.


We wont win many games like this.


Please remove Chris Smith and bring in Ike Diogu


Woody wants to be fired.

Starting Bargnani at center is equivalent to starting Toney Douglas at pg.

If this happens, Dolan should fire this guy before halftime, I dont care if it's a road game, take commercial back home.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/7/2013  12:26 AM
knickscity wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Woodson is now going to start Bargs at C Melo at 4.


We wont win many games like this.


Please remove Chris Smith and bring in Ike Diogu


Woody wants to be fired.

Starting Bargnani at center is equivalent to starting Toney Douglas at pg.

If this happens, Dolan should fire this guy before halftime, I dont care if it's a road game, take commercial back home.

Woody got that extension and now sits on a pile of cash+ he won 54 games last year was also successful at Atlanta--would u care if you were woody and got fired--sit back and collect 10mm $ on a boat while I wait for the next 10-15mm gig? Woody's in the driver seat.

RIP Crushalot😞
JamesKPolk
Posts: 21204
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/15/2012
Member: #4093

11/7/2013  1:29 AM
Dolan runs the show. Woodson, Mills, Grunwald, etc are all puppets.
"Peace, plenty, and contentment reign throughout our borders, and our beloved country presents a sublime moral spectacle to the world." - James K Polk
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
11/7/2013  1:59 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:Toronto must be laughing at us. They were basically begging teams to take him for nothing and we gave them 3 picks including a 1st

already been said. but can't be said enough.

classic knicks not understanding LEVERAGE in FA signings, trades, etc

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
11/7/2013  7:50 AM
nixluva wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
nixluva wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:This will be the end of Bargs in the SL. Kenyon Martin or Aldich will be starting if Chandler is out. Must move Bargs to 6th or 7th man for offense off the bench--he is who he is

Bargs played well with KMart in there. I see no reason they can't play with each other. There's this MYTH that it's Bargs presence that is causing all the problems on D, but just watch Felton and Melo on D and try to pay attention to what they're doing for once and you'll see that they're really making even more mistakes as is Shump when he gambles too much. This is not to say that Bargs isn't making some mistakes but more mistakes are being made by other guys in the SL that are having a bigger impact.

Not to mention the huge issues on offense. Just look at the shooting % for the other players on the team particularly Felton and Melo.

Nope disagree we have 7 pre season and 4 regular season games as a sample were 3-8 and Bargs is terrible for chemistry in unit 1. We could use him off the bench--this line up featuring Bargs in unit 1 is likely done. I have to think Woodson has seen enough--and maybe for Bargs its fair--hes played sparingly for two years now.. Why not 18-22 minutes off the bench in an offensive role?

I think the idea that Bargs is the reason for the poor chemistry is misleading. Felton and Melo aren't playing well and it has nothing to do with Bargnani. Neither Felton nor Melo is shooting well, executing well, defending well... doing nothing well. Bargnani is supposed to be an outlet not the major cog in the SL. He's there to take up the slack scoring the ball and they're not even using him correctly. If Felton and Melo are playing better we wouldn't be talking about Bargnani.

Bargs is one of the best PnP bigs and they don't use him that way. Everyone knows that's his strength. For that matter the offense is a disaster to be honest. The turnovers and missed shots are leading to fast breaks which makes it look much worse for the SL defense. Felton isn't fighting over picks, Melo and Shump keep losing their man on D. How often has Bargnani's man just flat beat him in a man to man situation? People want him to cover for the poor defense of Felton and Melo but he's not a great help defender.

Sure the defense could be better and that would be the only reason to take Bargs out of the starting lineup, but that doesn't solve the issues with Felton and Melo. It's a trap to think that all that matters is taking Bargs out of the starting lineup. He's not even playing starting minutes and still the team is floundering when he's not on the floor.

The answer is gonna be getting JR back in there and Woody living off the ISO plays of Melo and JR rather than running a high performance, high efficiency offense.

This is the problem:


Player G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF TOT APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
Carmelo 4 4 42.0 0.371 0.300 0.885 2.00 7.50 9.50 3.0 2.25 0.50 3.50 2.25 23.8
Felton 4 4 36.5 0.396 0.214 0.889 1.30 2.00 3.30 5.8 2.00 0.75 2.50 2.25 13.3

Iman 4 4 29.3 0.457 0.333 0.923 0.80 3.80 4.50 1.3 1.50 0.25 1.50 3.75 12.3
Metta 4 0 23.0 0.463 0.375 0.750 0.50 3.50 4.00 0.5 1.75 0.50 1.00 2.50 11.8
Andrea 4 3 21.0 0.484 0.333 1.000 0.80 1.30 2.00 0.5 0.50 0.00 2.50 2.00 8.8
Tyson 4 4 26.8 0.600 0.000 0.714 3.80 5.30 9.00 1.3 1.00 2.50 1.75 2.50 7.3

Nixluva, great post this is exactly what I'm seening. We are pointing at the wrong guy Bargs isn't the reason for the poor defense and his poor offensive showing. Woodson runs a stale offense they create absolutely very little easy offense. The team has to work so hard to get its points. There are no cutter, no sets, execution offense is practically non existent.

The Knicks have to think about getting the ball out of Felton and Melo's hand. Get another guard to play with Felton make him play off the ball. I know this is a gimmick offense which won't get the Knicks anywhere in the playoffs but it will get them to the playoffs.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/7/2013  7:53 AM
knickscity wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Woodson is now going to start Bargs at C Melo at 4.


We wont win many games like this.


Please remove Chris Smith and bring in Ike Diogu


Woody wants to be fired.

Starting Bargnani at center is equivalent to starting Toney Douglas at pg.

If this happens, Dolan should fire this guy before halftime, I dont care if it's a road game, take commercial back home.

No, starting Bargnani at center is equivalent to starting mugsy bogues at center

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/7/2013  8:11 AM
Vmart wrote:
nixluva wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
nixluva wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:This will be the end of Bargs in the SL. Kenyon Martin or Aldich will be starting if Chandler is out. Must move Bargs to 6th or 7th man for offense off the bench--he is who he is

Bargs played well with KMart in there. I see no reason they can't play with each other. There's this MYTH that it's Bargs presence that is causing all the problems on D, but just watch Felton and Melo on D and try to pay attention to what they're doing for once and you'll see that they're really making even more mistakes as is Shump when he gambles too much. This is not to say that Bargs isn't making some mistakes but more mistakes are being made by other guys in the SL that are having a bigger impact.

Not to mention the huge issues on offense. Just look at the shooting % for the other players on the team particularly Felton and Melo.

Nope disagree we have 7 pre season and 4 regular season games as a sample were 3-8 and Bargs is terrible for chemistry in unit 1. We could use him off the bench--this line up featuring Bargs in unit 1 is likely done. I have to think Woodson has seen enough--and maybe for Bargs its fair--hes played sparingly for two years now.. Why not 18-22 minutes off the bench in an offensive role?

I think the idea that Bargs is the reason for the poor chemistry is misleading. Felton and Melo aren't playing well and it has nothing to do with Bargnani. Neither Felton nor Melo is shooting well, executing well, defending well... doing nothing well. Bargnani is supposed to be an outlet not the major cog in the SL. He's there to take up the slack scoring the ball and they're not even using him correctly. If Felton and Melo are playing better we wouldn't be talking about Bargnani.

Bargs is one of the best PnP bigs and they don't use him that way. Everyone knows that's his strength. For that matter the offense is a disaster to be honest. The turnovers and missed shots are leading to fast breaks which makes it look much worse for the SL defense. Felton isn't fighting over picks, Melo and Shump keep losing their man on D. How often has Bargnani's man just flat beat him in a man to man situation? People want him to cover for the poor defense of Felton and Melo but he's not a great help defender.

Sure the defense could be better and that would be the only reason to take Bargs out of the starting lineup, but that doesn't solve the issues with Felton and Melo. It's a trap to think that all that matters is taking Bargs out of the starting lineup. He's not even playing starting minutes and still the team is floundering when he's not on the floor.

The answer is gonna be getting JR back in there and Woody living off the ISO plays of Melo and JR rather than running a high performance, high efficiency offense.

This is the problem:


Player G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF TOT APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
Carmelo 4 4 42.0 0.371 0.300 0.885 2.00 7.50 9.50 3.0 2.25 0.50 3.50 2.25 23.8
Felton 4 4 36.5 0.396 0.214 0.889 1.30 2.00 3.30 5.8 2.00 0.75 2.50 2.25 13.3

Iman 4 4 29.3 0.457 0.333 0.923 0.80 3.80 4.50 1.3 1.50 0.25 1.50 3.75 12.3
Metta 4 0 23.0 0.463 0.375 0.750 0.50 3.50 4.00 0.5 1.75 0.50 1.00 2.50 11.8
Andrea 4 3 21.0 0.484 0.333 1.000 0.80 1.30 2.00 0.5 0.50 0.00 2.50 2.00 8.8
Tyson 4 4 26.8 0.600 0.000 0.714 3.80 5.30 9.00 1.3 1.00 2.50 1.75 2.50 7.3

Nixluva, great post this is exactly what I'm seening. We are pointing at the wrong guy Bargs isn't the reason for the poor defense and his poor offensive showing. Woodson runs a stale offense they create absolutely very little easy offense. The team has to work so hard to get its points. There are no cutter, no sets, execution offense is practically non existent.

The Knicks have to think about getting the ball out of Felton and Melo's hand. Get another guard to play with Felton make him play off the ball. I know this is a gimmick offense which won't get the Knicks anywhere in the playoffs but it will get them to the playoffs.

Vmart--no pointing fingers at anyone. Carmelo needs space to start the game--I dont believe the team with Bargs on the floor creates the right space.

With Chandler out we should go to this--counting JR

C-Kenyon
F-CA
F-Metta
G Smith
G Felton
C Bargs
F Shumpert
G Prigioni
G Udirih

9 man thats it. Give Carmelo the space he needs to start both halves and the 2nd unit is a 4-1 with Bargs in the middle. CUT OUT HARDAWAY AND AMARE

RIP Crushalot😞
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

11/7/2013  9:54 AM    LAST EDITED: 11/7/2013  9:55 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
Vmart wrote:
nixluva wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
nixluva wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:This will be the end of Bargs in the SL. Kenyon Martin or Aldich will be starting if Chandler is out. Must move Bargs to 6th or 7th man for offense off the bench--he is who he is

Bargs played well with KMart in there. I see no reason they can't play with each other. There's this MYTH that it's Bargs presence that is causing all the problems on D, but just watch Felton and Melo on D and try to pay attention to what they're doing for once and you'll see that they're really making even more mistakes as is Shump when he gambles too much. This is not to say that Bargs isn't making some mistakes but more mistakes are being made by other guys in the SL that are having a bigger impact.

Not to mention the huge issues on offense. Just look at the shooting % for the other players on the team particularly Felton and Melo.

Nope disagree we have 7 pre season and 4 regular season games as a sample were 3-8 and Bargs is terrible for chemistry in unit 1. We could use him off the bench--this line up featuring Bargs in unit 1 is likely done. I have to think Woodson has seen enough--and maybe for Bargs its fair--hes played sparingly for two years now.. Why not 18-22 minutes off the bench in an offensive role?

I think the idea that Bargs is the reason for the poor chemistry is misleading. Felton and Melo aren't playing well and it has nothing to do with Bargnani. Neither Felton nor Melo is shooting well, executing well, defending well... doing nothing well. Bargnani is supposed to be an outlet not the major cog in the SL. He's there to take up the slack scoring the ball and they're not even using him correctly. If Felton and Melo are playing better we wouldn't be talking about Bargnani.

Bargs is one of the best PnP bigs and they don't use him that way. Everyone knows that's his strength. For that matter the offense is a disaster to be honest. The turnovers and missed shots are leading to fast breaks which makes it look much worse for the SL defense. Felton isn't fighting over picks, Melo and Shump keep losing their man on D. How often has Bargnani's man just flat beat him in a man to man situation? People want him to cover for the poor defense of Felton and Melo but he's not a great help defender.

Sure the defense could be better and that would be the only reason to take Bargs out of the starting lineup, but that doesn't solve the issues with Felton and Melo. It's a trap to think that all that matters is taking Bargs out of the starting lineup. He's not even playing starting minutes and still the team is floundering when he's not on the floor.

The answer is gonna be getting JR back in there and Woody living off the ISO plays of Melo and JR rather than running a high performance, high efficiency offense.

This is the problem:


Player G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF TOT APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
Carmelo 4 4 42.0 0.371 0.300 0.885 2.00 7.50 9.50 3.0 2.25 0.50 3.50 2.25 23.8
Felton 4 4 36.5 0.396 0.214 0.889 1.30 2.00 3.30 5.8 2.00 0.75 2.50 2.25 13.3

Iman 4 4 29.3 0.457 0.333 0.923 0.80 3.80 4.50 1.3 1.50 0.25 1.50 3.75 12.3
Metta 4 0 23.0 0.463 0.375 0.750 0.50 3.50 4.00 0.5 1.75 0.50 1.00 2.50 11.8
Andrea 4 3 21.0 0.484 0.333 1.000 0.80 1.30 2.00 0.5 0.50 0.00 2.50 2.00 8.8
Tyson 4 4 26.8 0.600 0.000 0.714 3.80 5.30 9.00 1.3 1.00 2.50 1.75 2.50 7.3

Nixluva, great post this is exactly what I'm seening. We are pointing at the wrong guy Bargs isn't the reason for the poor defense and his poor offensive showing. Woodson runs a stale offense they create absolutely very little easy offense. The team has to work so hard to get its points. There are no cutter, no sets, execution offense is practically non existent.

The Knicks have to think about getting the ball out of Felton and Melo's hand. Get another guard to play with Felton make him play off the ball. I know this is a gimmick offense which won't get the Knicks anywhere in the playoffs but it will get them to the playoffs.

Vmart--no pointing fingers at anyone. Carmelo needs space to start the game--I dont believe the team with Bargs on the floor creates the right space.

With Chandler out we should go to this--counting JR

C-Kenyon
F-CA
F-Metta
G Smith
G Felton
C Bargs
F Shumpert
G Prigioni
G Udirih

9 man thats it. Give Carmelo the space he needs to start both halves and the 2nd unit is a 4-1 with Bargs in the middle. CUT OUT HARDAWAY AND AMARE

I dunno about that. I don't think you shorten it to that point yet -- we're suddenly in crisis mode and need to figure out things some more...That lineup gets destroyed on the glass on a nightly basis too btw. Absolutely DESTROYED -- as in a 20 reb/night disparity minimum...Think about it -- the only rebounder/only source of toughness in that lineup is a 35-year-old K-Mart, a guy they never had any intention of even playing every day. I say one more big minimum, more like 2 -- Aldrich and Amar'e. Aldrich, even though he looked like **** in the pre-season, was a good player in college and a former lottery pick. Out of necessity, he needs to get a sustained look now (at least a week straight, more like 2+) to see if he can channel any of the standout play we saw in college. The Kansas Jayhawk version of Cole Aldrich we can definitely use. Maybe he just played nervous & tight during training camp/pre-season, who knows. Give this kid 2 weeks to see if he can help...If he can't -- cut him. At least give him a shot though for now -- otherwise, why did he make the team? For moments like these, no?

And we need to play Amar'e a little every game. It's gonna take time and it's not gonna look pretty early on at all but he needs to be re-established -- we need to see if we can get this guy back to last year's level before he went down where he was excelling in his role off the bench. I get we'd want to tighten the rotation down eventually to 9 or 10 max but right now, it should 11.

I like Udrih over THJ for now -- let's see if we can get some more efficient offense from Udrih.

And for God's sake, cut C. Smith and import another big. I still like Ike Diogu.

raven
Posts: 22454
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #316
Canada
11/7/2013  10:26 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
knickscity wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Woodson is now going to start Bargs at C Melo at 4.


We wont win many games like this.


Please remove Chris Smith and bring in Ike Diogu


Woody wants to be fired.

Starting Bargnani at center is equivalent to starting Toney Douglas at pg.

If this happens, Dolan should fire this guy before halftime, I dont care if it's a road game, take commercial back home.

No, starting Bargnani at center is equivalent to starting mugsy bogues at center

No, starting Bargnani at center is equivalent to starting Bargnani at center, and there is just no equivalent to this.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/7/2013  2:41 PM
It seems to me that Woodson is trying to eat up some minutes at C and he can't burnout his older guys KMart in particular. It's a numbers game. He's gonna look to survive with Bargs at C for some minutes until he can bring in other guys off the bench. Bargs should be fine in stretches at C. He's played there before and in truth if the other players on the floor are defending their positions better it won't be such a layup fest as we've seen. Our C's have to work too hard to cover for the poor defense on the perimeter. Love Shump but he gambles too much, Felton can't hold anyone and we know Melo isn't really defending at a high level either. Defense is a team thing. Tyson just covers up so much that is wrong defensively with the rest of the floor.

I've said this before, but Bargs isn't the one getting beat by his man all game. Also if you pay attention Bargs has done a good job closing out on shooters and getting a hand up and distracting shooters. He moves very well. Bargs only issue is that he's not a natural shot blocker and help defender in the paint, cuz he plays like a SF. We'll see what Woody can do with Bargs and if he can teach him better Center defense. WIth a more of a concentration on what he's doing defensively it might help Bargs in the long run.

StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

11/7/2013  3:24 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/7/2013  3:25 PM
nixluva wrote:It seems to me that Woodson is trying to eat up some minutes at C and he can't burnout his older guys KMart in particular. It's a numbers game. He's gonna look to survive with Bargs at C for some minutes until he can bring in other guys off the bench. Bargs should be fine in stretches at C. He's played there before and in truth if the other players on the floor are defending their positions better it won't be such a layup fest as we've seen. Our C's have to work too hard to cover for the poor defense on the perimeter. Love Shump but he gambles too much, Felton can't hold anyone and we know Melo isn't really defending at a high level either. Defense is a team thing. Tyson just covers up so much that is wrong defensively with the rest of the floor.

I've said this before, but Bargs isn't the one getting beat by his man all game. Also if you pay attention Bargs has done a good job closing out on shooters and getting a hand up and distracting shooters. He moves very well. Bargs only issue is that he's not a natural shot blocker and help defender in the paint, cuz he plays like a SF. We'll see what Woody can do with Bargs and if he can teach him better Center defense. WIth a more of a concentration on what he's doing defensively it might help Bargs in the long run.

Bargs hanst been terrible but he hasnt been good either which makes the trade a little upsetting. Hopefully he has a string of good games
Bargs starting isnt woking wont work and we will LOSE games if it continues

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy