[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Donnie Walsh hurt the Knicks!! He is at best an average GM who doesn't take risks.
Author Thread
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
8/13/2013  8:23 AM
arkrud wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Donnie was doing ok until the Amare deal and not presenting a proper backup plan to Dolan after Lebron went to Miami. I'm not sure if its fair to kill Donnie for where the Knicks stand today though. The Knicks failed as an organization. Constantly changing plans since striking out on Lebron. Keeping Dantoni then adding Melo and Tyson. Not amnestying Amare. We are stuck with Amare. There is nothing to even talk about til 2015. The current team should play decent basketball now that they actually have a pg who can see the floor, make the right pass and actually hit an open jumpshot like an NBA pg. don't see us finishing any better than 5th though and 1st or 2nd rd exit unless we get it right after 2015

Donny did the team a disservice by not adding conditions to the contract like, an ability to play a specific amount of games per season. The report out of Phoenix said he would need more surgery within a year or so which proved prophetic. Instead, he signed a guy who was a huge injury risk without any sort of protection.

what would you have had walsh do instead? stoudemire says "no i won't agree to those terms i want a max guaranteed contract" and so he passes on stoudemire and does what instead in summer 2010?

to me it's dolan's money at stake at that point and really nothing else. therefore it is what occurs SUBSEQUENT to that investment, poor or not, that counts.

The entire plan was wrong. If you want to dissect what Walsh should have done you start with the coach he hired and his first draft and move on from there. He was desperate and had to come away with something after fleecing the franchise of talent and picks. When you ask, What would you have done? My answer would be a lot of things differently so that I wasn't in that situation.

i don't see the fleecing that you see i see clearing out isiah thomas's garbage in as short a time as possible. kind of like hercules's first labor of clearing out the augean stables.

then i would have hired mark jackson.

I agree about Jackson. I think the coaching hire influenced the draft picks taken. I think the McGrady trade was horrific and I think the way D'Antoni handled the 09'-10 season and the roster should have cost him his job.

Mark Jackson and Dolan... LOL
Mark is not an idiot to work for Dolan and MSG.
He is a guy with integrity and will not be anyonce bitch.
Walsh was there because his heart was hurting about what a joke Dolan/IT and their chronies made out of the game of basketball in NY.
At his age and his carier track he does not give a sht of what anyone thinks.
And D'Antony was there because of his ego. He regeret it very fast and was trying to get out desperately... but Dolan refused to see the signals.

he sure was buthurt when he didn't get the job. I remember statements to that fact that he believed he was the the leading candidate for the job.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
AUTOADVERT
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
8/13/2013  9:08 AM
arkrud wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Donnie was doing ok until the Amare deal and not presenting a proper backup plan to Dolan after Lebron went to Miami. I'm not sure if its fair to kill Donnie for where the Knicks stand today though. The Knicks failed as an organization. Constantly changing plans since striking out on Lebron. Keeping Dantoni then adding Melo and Tyson. Not amnestying Amare. We are stuck with Amare. There is nothing to even talk about til 2015. The current team should play decent basketball now that they actually have a pg who can see the floor, make the right pass and actually hit an open jumpshot like an NBA pg. don't see us finishing any better than 5th though and 1st or 2nd rd exit unless we get it right after 2015

Donny did the team a disservice by not adding conditions to the contract like, an ability to play a specific amount of games per season. The report out of Phoenix said he would need more surgery within a year or so which proved prophetic. Instead, he signed a guy who was a huge injury risk without any sort of protection.

what would you have had walsh do instead? stoudemire says "no i won't agree to those terms i want a max guaranteed contract" and so he passes on stoudemire and does what instead in summer 2010?

to me it's dolan's money at stake at that point and really nothing else. therefore it is what occurs SUBSEQUENT to that investment, poor or not, that counts.

The entire plan was wrong. If you want to dissect what Walsh should have done you start with the coach he hired and his first draft and move on from there. He was desperate and had to come away with something after fleecing the franchise of talent and picks. When you ask, What would you have done? My answer would be a lot of things differently so that I wasn't in that situation.

i don't see the fleecing that you see i see clearing out isiah thomas's garbage in as short a time as possible. kind of like hercules's first labor of clearing out the augean stables.

then i would have hired mark jackson.

I agree about Jackson. I think the coaching hire influenced the draft picks taken. I think the McGrady trade was horrific and I think the way D'Antoni handled the 09'-10 season and the roster should have cost him his job.

Mark Jackson and Dolan... LOL
Mark is not an idiot to work for Dolan and MSG.
He is a guy with integrity and will not be anyonce bitch.
Walsh was there because his heart was hurting about what a joke Dolan/IT and their chronies made out of the game of basketball in NY.
At his age and his carier track he does not give a sht of what anyone thinks.
And D'Antony was there because of his ego. He regeret it very fast and was trying to get out desperately... but Dolan refused to see the signals.

where the rubber meets the road i think you're right about the impossibility of jackson working for dolan. as i have said many times, an inferior lowlife like dolan does not tolerate his betters for very long.

also lets not forget that the first two years were throwaway phony campaigns as walsh cleared out isiah's mess. would jackson have been prepared to hang on through hopeless situations like d'antoni?

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
foosballnick
Posts: 21534
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2010
Member: #3148

8/13/2013  9:10 AM
arkrud wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Donnie was doing ok until the Amare deal and not presenting a proper backup plan to Dolan after Lebron went to Miami. I'm not sure if its fair to kill Donnie for where the Knicks stand today though. The Knicks failed as an organization. Constantly changing plans since striking out on Lebron. Keeping Dantoni then adding Melo and Tyson. Not amnestying Amare. We are stuck with Amare. There is nothing to even talk about til 2015. The current team should play decent basketball now that they actually have a pg who can see the floor, make the right pass and actually hit an open jumpshot like an NBA pg. don't see us finishing any better than 5th though and 1st or 2nd rd exit unless we get it right after 2015

Donny did the team a disservice by not adding conditions to the contract like, an ability to play a specific amount of games per season. The report out of Phoenix said he would need more surgery within a year or so which proved prophetic. Instead, he signed a guy who was a huge injury risk without any sort of protection.

what would you have had walsh do instead? stoudemire says "no i won't agree to those terms i want a max guaranteed contract" and so he passes on stoudemire and does what instead in summer 2010?

to me it's dolan's money at stake at that point and really nothing else. therefore it is what occurs SUBSEQUENT to that investment, poor or not, that counts.

The entire plan was wrong. If you want to dissect what Walsh should have done you start with the coach he hired and his first draft and move on from there. He was desperate and had to come away with something after fleecing the franchise of talent and picks. When you ask, What would you have done? My answer would be a lot of things differently so that I wasn't in that situation.

i don't see the fleecing that you see i see clearing out isiah thomas's garbage in as short a time as possible. kind of like hercules's first labor of clearing out the augean stables.

then i would have hired mark jackson.

I agree about Jackson. I think the coaching hire influenced the draft picks taken. I think the McGrady trade was horrific and I think the way D'Antoni handled the 09'-10 season and the roster should have cost him his job.

Mark Jackson and Dolan... LOL
Mark is not an idiot to work for Dolan and MSG.
He is a guy with integrity and will not be anyonce bitch.
Walsh was there because his heart was hurting about what a joke Dolan/IT and their chronies made out of the game of basketball in NY.
At his age and his carier track he does not give a sht of what anyone thinks.
And D'Antony was there because of his ego. He regeret it very fast and was trying to get out desperately... but Dolan refused to see the signals.


Very nice fable. Back in the real world sports executives and coaches get paid somewhat handsomely to do a job. They all have egos in that they believe they are the ones who will "get it done". Walsh and MDA were better than IT and his cadre of coaches, however they still failed to get it done. This does not take any blame off of Dolan. However it does not canonnonize Walsh to sainthood either. At the end of the day, the coach he brought in eventually quit mid-season, Walsh left the team with a broken $20 million dollar PF/C, several draft picks were sent out and the team was bereft of much of the back up talent that he tried to amass when IT left.


I find it silly to lament about Dolan. He is the owner and that will not change. Our hope is that the people he picks to run Basketball are strong enough or smart enough to enhance any positives that Dolan brings to the table and work around any negatives. Walsh was not that guy.

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
8/13/2013  9:22 AM
Agree 100% with the last part Foos. Well said. Walsh should've presented a better backup plan to Dolan beforehand. That plan should not have included Amare for $100mil despite the fact you were trying to get Lebron to come. It was pretty obvious Lebron wasn't coming to New York over Miami Chicago and Cleveland. He wanted the easiest route and that was Miami
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/13/2013  9:37 AM
dk7th wrote:
arkrud wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Donnie was doing ok until the Amare deal and not presenting a proper backup plan to Dolan after Lebron went to Miami. I'm not sure if its fair to kill Donnie for where the Knicks stand today though. The Knicks failed as an organization. Constantly changing plans since striking out on Lebron. Keeping Dantoni then adding Melo and Tyson. Not amnestying Amare. We are stuck with Amare. There is nothing to even talk about til 2015. The current team should play decent basketball now that they actually have a pg who can see the floor, make the right pass and actually hit an open jumpshot like an NBA pg. don't see us finishing any better than 5th though and 1st or 2nd rd exit unless we get it right after 2015

Donny did the team a disservice by not adding conditions to the contract like, an ability to play a specific amount of games per season. The report out of Phoenix said he would need more surgery within a year or so which proved prophetic. Instead, he signed a guy who was a huge injury risk without any sort of protection.

what would you have had walsh do instead? stoudemire says "no i won't agree to those terms i want a max guaranteed contract" and so he passes on stoudemire and does what instead in summer 2010?

to me it's dolan's money at stake at that point and really nothing else. therefore it is what occurs SUBSEQUENT to that investment, poor or not, that counts.

The entire plan was wrong. If you want to dissect what Walsh should have done you start with the coach he hired and his first draft and move on from there. He was desperate and had to come away with something after fleecing the franchise of talent and picks. When you ask, What would you have done? My answer would be a lot of things differently so that I wasn't in that situation.

i don't see the fleecing that you see i see clearing out isiah thomas's garbage in as short a time as possible. kind of like hercules's first labor of clearing out the augean stables.

then i would have hired mark jackson.

I agree about Jackson. I think the coaching hire influenced the draft picks taken. I think the McGrady trade was horrific and I think the way D'Antoni handled the 09'-10 season and the roster should have cost him his job.

Mark Jackson and Dolan... LOL
Mark is not an idiot to work for Dolan and MSG.
He is a guy with integrity and will not be anyonce bitch.
Walsh was there because his heart was hurting about what a joke Dolan/IT and their chronies made out of the game of basketball in NY.
At his age and his carier track he does not give a sht of what anyone thinks.
And D'Antony was there because of his ego. He regeret it very fast and was trying to get out desperately... but Dolan refused to see the signals.

where the rubber meets the road i think you're right about the impossibility of jackson working for dolan. as i have said many times, an inferior lowlife like dolan does not tolerate his betters for very long.

also lets not forget that the first two years were throwaway phony campaigns as walsh cleared out isiah's mess. would jackson have been prepared to hang on through hopeless situations like d'antoni?

MJax wanted the job really badly and appeared to be the top candidate until the Suns and D'Antoni let everyone know that D'Antoni was on the market. I have thought about what kind of players Jax would have wanted to draft in the first two years of Walsh's tenure and also how he would have handled the roster. I think the Knicks would be a lot farther a long just with a different approach and probably different guys selected with those lottery picks the Knicks would be in a much better place. Also, NY fans would have loved Jax.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
8/13/2013  10:00 AM
The reason we hired D'Antoni was:

1) to inflate our players stats and value, to make them more tradeable.
2) Attract FA's for when we finally got cap space- a lot of players used to think his system was fun and that he was a players coach. Not sure he's as popular as he used to be.

It wasn't about winning.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/13/2013  10:23 AM
smackeddog wrote:The reason we hired D'Antoni was:

1) to inflate our players stats and value, to make them more tradeable.
2) Attract FA's for when we finally got cap space- a lot of players used to think his system was fun and that he was a players coach. Not sure he's as popular as he used to be.

It wasn't about winning.

I think it was his big name also. Too bad he didn't elevate Jordan Hill's value.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
NUPE
Posts: 21221
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/29/2012
Member: #4205

8/14/2013  8:56 AM

This thread makes me laugh. Donnie did a great job with the hand he was dealt. I will leave it at that.
Nalod
Posts: 71312
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/14/2013  10:03 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
smackeddog wrote:The reason we hired D'Antoni was:

1) to inflate our players stats and value, to make them more tradeable.
2) Attract FA's for when we finally got cap space- a lot of players used to think his system was fun and that he was a players coach. Not sure he's as popular as he used to be.

It wasn't about winning.

I think it was his big name also. Too bad he didn't elevate Jordan Hill's value.

Or Landry? DLee? Moz? ExtraE? Novak? Lin?............These guys did pretty well.

MDA stood up and kicked Marbury off the team.

Lamenting Jordan Hill? Dude did not pan out. Is he starting anywhere? Injury prone? What did MDA not do that he got turned around?

BTW, I don't think Jennings would have turned the franchise around.

Pop cut Danny Green once and dude eventually figured things out. Sometimes its the coach, often its the player.

Damn, look at me getting sucked into an old ass arguement.

Ok, yeah, MDA sucked and its all his fault too!!!!

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/14/2013  1:30 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/14/2013  1:32 PM
Nalod wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
smackeddog wrote:The reason we hired D'Antoni was:

1) to inflate our players stats and value, to make them more tradeable.
2) Attract FA's for when we finally got cap space- a lot of players used to think his system was fun and that he was a players coach. Not sure he's as popular as he used to be.

It wasn't about winning.

I think it was his big name also. Too bad he didn't elevate Jordan Hill's value.

Or Landry? DLee? Moz? ExtraE? Novak? Lin?............These guys did pretty well.

MDA stood up and kicked Marbury off the team.

Lamenting Jordan Hill? Dude did not pan out. Is he starting anywhere? Injury prone? What did MDA not do that he got turned around?

BTW, I don't think Jennings would have turned the franchise around.

Pop cut Danny Green once and dude eventually figured things out. Sometimes its the coach, often its the player.

Damn, look at me getting sucked into an old ass arguement.

Ok, yeah, MDA sucked and its all his fault too!!!!

Well D'Antoni is at fault at least partially for a lot of things. Landry Fields was a good Knick but the Knicks could have had Lance Stephenson. Speculation at the time was that D'Antoni struggled with guys that needed mentoring and leadership and needed less talented guys that could play right away like Landry. Moz only became a name in NY because D'Antoni was forced to play him when Stat was out and Shawne was suspended. Moz blew up and got some regular minutes for about three weeks and then was traded. Moz rode the pine almost that entire year. And you know D'Antoni didn't kick Marbury off the team. The reports were that nothing was communicated between the two as to why Marbury was treated the way he was. Similar to many of the players that D'Antoni 'handled', he was never told anything by D'Antoni. Walsh wanted Marbs to have some trade value. D'Antoni's silent banishing of Marbs cost the Knicks the chance at trading a large expiring deal. And yeah Jordan Hill was mishandled. The entire team wasn't under contract the following year and couldn't win 30 games and yet the coach still couldn't find time for his lottery pick. Bender and Jeffries were getting regular minutes and Hill couldn't get off the pine at all. Also, it isn't just Jordan Hill, it was that the 8th pick in the draft wasn't enough value to go along with Jeffries contract in the McGrady trade. Hill was a Bad pick but speculation was that D'Antoni didn't want any part of Jennings in that draft because he was a bit immature(remember he was bragging on a radio show and sounded a bit 'punky' prior to the draft) despite filling a huge need and being the best player available when the Knicks drafted. Last I heard D'Antoni was working on Hill being a stretch 4 for him next year.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Nalod
Posts: 71312
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/14/2013  3:24 PM
What ever, its old already. Every coach has players he benches and every Gm has thier ups and downs. Lance Stevenson finally playeed well after how long? Landry got the start his rookie year!

My point is ever coach gets their pet project favorites and others rub them the wrong way.

I you look at the moment the decision is made, instead of hindsight the view is often different.

Sorry I chimed in to an old arguement!

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/14/2013  3:41 PM
Nalod wrote:What ever, its old already. Every coach has players he benches and every Gm has thier ups and downs. Lance Stevenson finally playeed well after how long? Landry got the start his rookie year!

My point is ever coach gets their pet project favorites and others rub them the wrong way.

I you look at the moment the decision is made, instead of hindsight the view is often different.

Sorry I chimed in to an old arguement!

Yeah I try to stay away from that as well.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Donnie Walsh hurt the Knicks!! He is at best an average GM who doesn't take risks.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy