martin wrote:Finestrg wrote:knicks1248 wrote:Are they going to ever sign this guy? a report 2 weeks ago said they were working on a contract, how in the world does that take 2 wks for a role player
Seriously...The only thing I can think of is that the Knicks are not making this sound like an attractive situation and are not guaranteeing playing time. They should be playing every card they have up their sleeve -- if you don't have the money, the next best thing you can offer a potential FA is playing time, esp. a guy that's looking to claw his way back to the NBA...To me, they don't owe Prigioni a damn thing -- decent player, good dude, glad he's back but HE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN guaranteed the primary backup PG spot yet. When/if they decide to bring in a 3rd PG, they need to keep an open mind & there needs to be a competition for those mins...They might not be telling these potential PG signees that and it might be giving all of them pause as far as signing here. Bottom line -- if we would've told Bobby Brown he'll be the backup PG (along with the possibility of playing alongside Felton for stretches, something Woody liked to do last year), or at least that the backup spot is wide open right now and that there's an opportunity to earn the spot, this guy would've taken the $800k or whatever and he would've been in a Knick uniform already. That goes for all of these guys so far -- Darren Collison, Aaron Brooks...I just get the feeling they're not presenting the situation like that -- I feel they might be telling these guys that PP is the backup PG and we're only looking for a 3rd string guy for depth. That's simply not attractive enough, esp. if the money is better somewhere else...I mean how bad do they want this guy Brown? Pursue the guy like you want him dammit!
guarantee a 3rd string PG who has been out of the league playing time? What world is this?
I'm talking about playing the cards that you're dealt here, man. Plain and simple...How are the Knicks supposed to compete for these FAs' services when other teams can flat out offer more money than we can? Answer is - they don't. Not if money is the sole motivation. Sometime money's not the only factor though -- if the money is slightly less yet the Knicks are offering a rotation spot & playing time, I think they could still keep themselves in the mix for players, possibly elevate themselves over other teams even. That could be attractive for a player, esp. for a fringe (up to this point) player that wants back into the NBA...That's also assuming a guy like Bobby Brown has other offers on the table, which doesn't appear to be the case at this point....I don't think that's that far fetched...I don't feel the Knicks are approaching this particular player like this however. From this guy's twitter comments, you get the feeling that this is up to the Knicks, that he's ready to sign on the dotted line.
I know exactly what Pablo Prigioni is btw. I know he's a guy that makes people better for the most part, I know he's a guy that can move the ball, stick an open 3, shows uncanny timing reaching in and stealing an inbound pass, seems like a good character guy etc...The bottom line on him for me is that he's 36, past his prime with virtually zero ability to break down a defense. You can't possibly argue that...That puts us at a serious disadvantage in my book. If Ray ever broke down and we had to turn it over to this guy for a long stretch -- I dunno man, that kinda scares the piss outta me...We can't possibly have a roster with only one PG that can penetrate and push the pace. I'm not gonna profess to know much about Bobby Brown other than what I've read and saw on clips just like everybody else. But from what I can tell -- he passes the eye test as far as what we could use out of an additional PG. There's potential for a lot of excitement and productivity with this guy...I like what I see and I'd be willing to take a chance here, esp. with all these other attractive options (Collison, Brooks, Harris) off the board at this point.