[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

"That little Man"


Author Poll
Nalod
Posts: 51226
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/nets/brooklyn-nets-owner-mikhail-prokhorov-calls-ny-knicks-owner-james-dolan-man-ny-magazine-story-article-1.1141309?localLinksEnabled=false
Dolan may "that little man", but he is our "little Man"! This means war bytches!
About time someone called the little Shyt out!
Funny as hell! Its not personal, its entertainment.
Keeping it real. I don't read
View Results


Author Thread
Nalod
Posts: 71226
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/23/2012  3:07 PM
DurzoBlint wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Nalod wrote:The record is irrelevant as they were rebuilding.

I don't hold Donnie accountable for the bad record as there was a plan.

I am not asking anyone to be a fan of his. The conversation was about him calling Dolan "that little man".

Perhaps to asnwer the question would be I might prefer just about any owner with very deep pockets and a reasonable buisness track record over what have.

Love the Knicks and hate the owner. Don't like many the decisions he has made and the way he makes them.

So a man of Prokhorovs means looks like a more attractive alternative to the Hobbit.

It's funny that you always seem to have some justification when it comes the Nyets record.

I'm half convinced he's a Nets fan. I mentioned the embarrassing record of their franchise which, he ignores.

That franchise has been pathetic. They have been trying to win games or gain assets for trade and caps space?

We dont' get Melo or AMare if we did not do the same.

Bropez plays 5 games? Looks like they tanked last year. Really, I can't say more because I did not watch them unless they played kNIcks.

At least I bring content to the discussion.

I watched like 55 Knick games last season. YEah, IM an Net Phan.

AUTOADVERT
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
8/23/2012  3:35 PM
Nalod wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Nalod wrote:The record is irrelevant as they were rebuilding.

I don't hold Donnie accountable for the bad record as there was a plan.

I am not asking anyone to be a fan of his. The conversation was about him calling Dolan "that little man".

Perhaps to asnwer the question would be I might prefer just about any owner with very deep pockets and a reasonable buisness track record over what have.

Love the Knicks and hate the owner. Don't like many the decisions he has made and the way he makes them.

So a man of Prokhorovs means looks like a more attractive alternative to the Hobbit.

It's funny that you always seem to have some justification when it comes the Nyets record.

I'm half convinced he's a Nets fan. I mentioned the embarrassing record of their franchise which, he ignores.

That franchise has been pathetic. They have been trying to win games or gain assets for trade and caps space?

We dont' get Melo or AMare if we did not do the same.

Bropez plays 5 games? Looks like they tanked last year. Really, I can't say more because I did not watch them unless they played kNIcks.

At least I bring content to the discussion.

I watched like 55 Knick games last season. YEah, IM an Net Phan.

I was being maybe over the top with you (sorry), Question: Why are you going out of your way to defend that pathetic franchise. I call them Pathetic because they haven't been relevant or good except for the JKidd era. That is beyond pathetic.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
Nalod
Posts: 71226
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/23/2012  5:32 PM
Why are you going out of your way to defend that pathetic franchise?

Im not, Im getting called out on some sterotypes and defending my position.

IM a life time hoops fan of the NBA and once the ABA. I love the history of the game and characters that make it up.

Even the owners. Prokhorov is someone I read up on. The guy and his life has been very interesting. Dolan hides and not much is written about him that is positive.

N*ts past ownership groups neglected the potential of the team and its geographic position. It failed to monetize on the largest city in the country.

So in a sense I was hoping to engage in some discussion about the two teams facing off but instead get some pretty simple generalizations that really are not very well written.

If the N*ts fail miserably it is interesting. If they succeed it is interesting. Im not promoting their success or trying to predict. I don't even do that with our team. The games will speak for themselves.

When you change ownership and funding while you clear cap space and collect youth and draft picks you gain the potential to turn around a franchise. I admire the job they have done to get to this point and as a Knick fan, and an NBA fan I am very excited to see not just how our team is, but theirs. I will follow the N*ts and watch some games. IN the past I used to Enjoy SSOL in PHX with Amare and Nash and had great respect for the Lakers with Kobe. The Wolves with Rubio and Love were fun to watch. As a kid we watched Pistol Pete. I watched the BUlls with great interest in the Jordan Era. Whats the big deal to follow other teams and discuss them?

Its a Knick site where we talk about Alba, politics, baseball, umbrella in drinks, etc etc. To have a few lame posters go off on me is confrontational and this is the place to stand up and debate.

To not recognize or respect as a fan is not to fully understand what your team is in for. To just focus on your team and then be blindsided by an unexpected result to me is ignorant when you pledge your undying support for a team. I sat and rooted for our knicks all while repulsed with the site of Isiah as the coach on the bench. I got to this point without bailing.

So if the kNicks record in the division disapppionts some it might serve to recognize Boston is still good, Philly is better (explained on the UK recently) and washington likely not a push over either. The Nets too. Only Toronto seems like a doormat.

So being a "TRUE KNICK FAN" means to consider all of the teams last year stay the same BUT we imporove is ignorant.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/23/2012  6:17 PM
Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Moonangie wrote:Props to the Russian mobster for calling him names and sticking out his tongue. Who cares if the Nyets have not won yet. They will (eventually) and it sucks to be the NY team racing them to not be known as the lamest hoops franchise in the City.

You're sort of right about two things:
1) Prokorov getting props for what he's good at. You need and deserve an owner who has that unique skill set.
2) No one cares if the Nyets win, because they won't.
3) It sucks for them because they already are the lamest hoops franchise in the City. Hands down. Although they might be tied for last with the Liberty.

Maybe we need a thread in the Nets forum about who might (or might not) win a chip before the Nyets:

Charlotte/New Orleans - Hornets (0 appearances)
Indiana - Pacers (1 appearance in NBA: 2000)
New Orleans/Utah - Jazz (2 appearances: 1997-1998)
Toronto - Raptors (0 appearances)
Minnesota - Timberwolves (0 appearances)
Cleveland- Cavaliers (1 appearance: 2007)
Vancouver/Memphis - Grizzlies (0 appearances)
Denver - Nuggets (0 appearances)
Orlando - Magic (2 appearances: 1995, 2009)
Phoenix - Suns (2 appearances: 1976, 1993)
San Diego/Los Angeles - Clippers (0 appearances)



We are orginal charter team and we only have two banners.

Lets not pretend we are some thick in legacy team.

Im not worried about other teams, Im worried about the Knicks!

Too bad Prokhorov did not buy the knicks!


I think we have the most non-championship winning seasons.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/23/2012  10:29 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/23/2012  10:33 PM
Nalod wrote:
foosballnick wrote:
Nalod wrote:The record is irrelevant as they were rebuilding.

I don't hold Donnie accountable for the bad record as there was a plan.

I am not asking anyone to be a fan of his. The conversation was about him calling Dolan "that little man".

Perhaps to asnwer the question would be I might prefer just about any owner with very deep pockets and a reasonable buisness track record over what have.

Love the Knicks and hate the owner. Don't like many the decisions he has made and the way he makes them.

So a man of Prokhorovs means looks like a more attractive alternative to the Hobbit.

The potential fallacy to this view is that Proko got rid of Thorne.

Rod Thorn keeping options open as he leaves Nets 'in very capable hands'
Published: Saturday, July 17, 2010, 7:00 AM
By Dave D'Alessandro/Star-Ledger Columnist The Star-Ledger

Mitsu Yasukawa/ The Star-Ledger'I think Avery’s going to do a really good job coaching,' says outgoing Nets president Rod Thorn, right, with new Nets coach Avery Johnson.
He came to work on his final day wearing blue sweats and a red tennis shirt containing the ubiquitous swoosh, apologizing for his attire because he had just come from shoulder rehab.

Rod Thorn was as casual as his shirt, moving seamlessly and cheerfully from one anecdote to another over 90 minutes, invoking a hundred names and re-telling a hundred memories that he had encountered and kept over his five decades in two leagues.

He laughed often — at times uproariously. His told tales about a life inside the NBA centrifuge, and it didn’t seem to bother him much that he was going to wake up today for the first time in about 45 years with nothing to do, at least in terms of basketball-related tasks.

He and his wife will go for a walk in the nature preserve behind his house in Westchester, Thorn figures. Maybe he’ll swim. And after that, he said, he’s open for anything.

“I’ve had some calls here in the last two or three weeks that have been interesting,” said the former Nets president, 69, who retired from the team Friday.

“But I want to see what kind of options I have, whether it’s to stay in (management) or maybe do something somewhere else. Right now I have some (offers, mostly in broadcasting), and we’ll see if any others come along.”

As untroubled as he is by his own prospects, he is very confident that the team he leaves behind is at the starting gate of what Pat Riley calls the “innocent climb” — that intangible, chemical reaction that triggers a significant move up the standings.

“I think it’s good,” Thorn said of the team’s future under Avery Johnson and Billy King. “I think Avery’s going to do a really good job coaching for them, and I think Billy’s going to do a really good job. And now, you have the wherewithal, if maybe there are some pieces that you need that’ll put you in the luxury tax, you just get them.”

Indeed, having a wealthy owner is what it’s all about in the NBA nowadays. That, Thorn admits, might be something he’ll come to regret, walking away at a time when they have a guy who is willing to pay the price of doing a billionaire’s business.

But what does Mikhail Prokhorov’s group not know about the NBA that might hurt them?

“Mikhail has owned a team in Europe,” Thorn said, referring to CSKA Moscow. “Mikhail was like the Yankees of European ball, in that we’re going to get all the best players. Here, with the salary cap, you have to go about it a little different way, and my advice as I gave it over the last two or three months is, you don’t get in the position the Nets are cap-wise but once about every 10 years. So take advantage of it. But, be prudent.”He has been preaching conservative management for years now. Some thought it was because of Bruce Ratner’s tight purse strings, but the truth is, Thorn was extremely cautious when it came to spending his owner’s money almost every step of the way over the past 10 years.

Only when he had a chance to elevate his team a notch or two or three — the Jason Kidd trade, the Vince Carter trade, their subsequent re-signings, the Alonzo Mourning deal of ’03, the futile free-agent pursuit of 2010 — did Thorn pull the trigger.

Those opportunities didn’t come around often, no matter how proactive an executive might be.

But now he has put King and Johnson in position to take the same kind of giant step, and it doesn’t bother him that he won’t be around to find out what happens next.

Thorn had but one regret in his valediction to a decade in East Rutherford: the awkward termination of Kiki Vandeweghe, which he admitted was an ownership decision.

“As we’re changing owners, owners come in, have certain ideas about how things were and how things weren’t, because they have people talk to them about things,” Thorn said. “I think that, had it been done a little bit differently, I think Kiki might have stayed on as GM.”

Virtually every Nets memory was a fond one, especially as he recalled Kidd (“You just had a special feeling for him”), Carter (“He saved us. He kept us competitive”), and Lawrence Frank (“Always prepared, working himself into exhaustion”).

“It’s been a heck of a tour here these last 10 years,” Thorn said. “It’s always hard to leave some place, particularly some place you put so much into. But I think we’re left in very capable hands, and I think the Nets have some good times ahead of them.”

By now, everyone has pretty much figured out why he’s leaving. There are about a dozen good reasons, none of them that really supercede Peggy Thorn’s desire to take more long walks.

“Sometimes it’s just a feeling that it’s time,” Thorn reiterated. “It’s going to be very interesting with the new ownership here. These guys, certainly on the surface, appear to be terrific. I may have second thoughts later about that part of it.

“But it’s something I’ve been thinking about for a while. I just felt it was time. It was time for me and time for the Nets to move on in a different direction.”

Dave D'Alessandro: ddalessandro@starledger.com

© 2012 NJ.com. All rights reserved.

Most new owners change management. Kiki Vandeweigh was the GM, Thorn president.


Thorn was the best basketball exec in the league during his tenure with the nets. Billy king isn't in the same league as thorn. I also disagree about Walsh. Walsh executed a simplistic plan that didn't workout. Everyone knew his plan and it compromised his position in every trade he made. Spending 3 years trying to prove his hiring of mike was not a mistake also cost the Knicks in my opinion.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

8/23/2012  10:47 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/23/2012  11:18 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
Nalod wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Nalod wrote:Dolan came aboard to run MSG in 1999 the same year Checketts hired Layden to replace "Interm" Tapscott.

Dolan fires Checketts beacause he was "the face of MSG".

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/16/sports/sports-business-with-checketts-out-dolan-steps-in-at-garden.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm

In 2007 Stern goes public that the knicks are "Not intellegently managed". While Stern is not the Beloved one (what comish is BTW?) imagine how bad it must be when the Commish has to make such a statement?

James Dolan is a moron. There is no arguement to make regarding his tenure (record) and influenece he has had on it.

Prokhorov has yet to distinguish himself but hardly has failed.

The Nyets haven't won jack since he took over. Empty vessels make the most noise!

You are so right! You must hear the echo every time you type.

You two are cute!

You should really get together and drink vodka - that would be an interesting illusion.

That was just a joke.

infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

8/23/2012  11:02 PM
DurzoBlint wrote:
Nalod wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Nalod wrote:Dolan came aboard to run MSG in 1999 the same year Checketts hired Layden to replace "Interm" Tapscott.

Dolan fires Checketts beacause he was "the face of MSG".

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/16/sports/sports-business-with-checketts-out-dolan-steps-in-at-garden.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm

In 2007 Stern goes public that the knicks are "Not intellegently managed". While Stern is not the Beloved one (what comish is BTW?) imagine how bad it must be when the Commish has to make such a statement?

James Dolan is a moron. There is no arguement to make regarding his tenure (record) and influenece he has had on it.

Prokhorov has yet to distinguish himself but hardly has failed.

The Nyets haven't won jack since he took over. Empty vessels make the most noise!

You are so right! You must hear the echo every time you type.

yes and they haven't really been relevant except for the JKidd Era. That franchise is a far/far bigger embarrassment. I still see no reason to support Prok unless your a closet Natz fan.


infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

8/23/2012  11:14 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/24/2012  12:05 AM
infinitilov100 wrote:
Nalod wrote:The record is irrelevant as they were rebuilding.

I don't hold Donnie accountable for the bad record as there was a plan.

I am not asking anyone to be a fan of his. The conversation was about him calling Dolan "that little man".Perhaps to asnwer the question would be I might prefer just about any owner with very deep pockets and a reasonable buisness track record over what have.

Love the Knicks and hate the owner. Don't like many the decisions he has made and the way he makes them.

So a man of Prokhorovs means looks like a more attractive alternative to the Hobbit.

The Russians comment was the result of a bruised ego from being turned down by Dolan and getting the attention of the press to try and sell more tickets. Remember how he bragged to the press about how he made Dolan give up a lot of players for Melo? Dolan's not taking the bait by talking a lot of crap to the press like that guy. Shows some class and Action speaks louder than Words.

Speaking of trying to sell more tickets, according to a news report, more than 95 percent of Knicks season-ticket holders have renewed their plans during the off-season. More season tickets have been sold for this upcoming season than last season. Knicks season tickets have almost been sold out. Eat your hearts out Pork and the Nyets.

infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

8/23/2012  11:30 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Moonangie wrote:Props to the Russian mobster for calling him names and sticking out his tongue. Who cares if the Nyets have not won yet. They will (eventually) and it sucks to be the NY team racing them to not be known as the lamest hoops franchise in the City.

You're sort of right about two things:
1) Prokorov getting props for what he's good at. You need and deserve an owner who has that unique skill set.
2) No one cares if the Nyets win, because they won't.
3) It sucks for them because they already are the lamest hoops franchise in the City. Hands down. Although they might be tied for last with the Liberty.

Maybe we need a thread in the Nets forum about who might (or might not) win a chip before the Nyets:

Charlotte/New Orleans - Hornets (0 appearances)
Indiana - Pacers (1 appearance in NBA: 2000)
New Orleans/Utah - Jazz (2 appearances: 1997-1998)
Toronto - Raptors (0 appearances)
Minnesota - Timberwolves (0 appearances)
Cleveland- Cavaliers (1 appearance: 2007)
Vancouver/Memphis - Grizzlies (0 appearances)
Denver - Nuggets (0 appearances)
Orlando - Magic (2 appearances: 1995, 2009)
Phoenix - Suns (2 appearances: 1976, 1993)
San Diego/Los Angeles - Clippers (0 appearances)



We are orginal charter team and we only have two banners.

Lets not pretend we are some thick in legacy team.

Im not worried about other teams, Im worried about the Knicks!

Too bad Prokhorov did not buy the knicks!


I think we have the most non-championship winning seasons.

Two championship banners are better than the Nyets big fat zero.

Nalod
Posts: 71226
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/23/2012  11:46 PM
Priceless!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/23/2012  11:56 PM
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Moonangie wrote:Props to the Russian mobster for calling him names and sticking out his tongue. Who cares if the Nyets have not won yet. They will (eventually) and it sucks to be the NY team racing them to not be known as the lamest hoops franchise in the City.

You're sort of right about two things:
1) Prokorov getting props for what he's good at. You need and deserve an owner who has that unique skill set.
2) No one cares if the Nyets win, because they won't.
3) It sucks for them because they already are the lamest hoops franchise in the City. Hands down. Although they might be tied for last with the Liberty.

Maybe we need a thread in the Nets forum about who might (or might not) win a chip before the Nyets:

Charlotte/New Orleans - Hornets (0 appearances)
Indiana - Pacers (1 appearance in NBA: 2000)
New Orleans/Utah - Jazz (2 appearances: 1997-1998)
Toronto - Raptors (0 appearances)
Minnesota - Timberwolves (0 appearances)
Cleveland- Cavaliers (1 appearance: 2007)
Vancouver/Memphis - Grizzlies (0 appearances)
Denver - Nuggets (0 appearances)
Orlando - Magic (2 appearances: 1995, 2009)
Phoenix - Suns (2 appearances: 1976, 1993)
San Diego/Los Angeles - Clippers (0 appearances)



We are orginal charter team and we only have two banners.

Lets not pretend we are some thick in legacy team.

Im not worried about other teams, Im worried about the Knicks!

Too bad Prokhorov did not buy the knicks!


I think we have the most non-championship winning seasons.

Two championship banners are better than the Nyets big fat zero.

Our 64 failed seasons are worse than their 36 (and worse than any other team in league history).

infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

8/24/2012  12:15 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/24/2012  12:18 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Moonangie wrote:Props to the Russian mobster for calling him names and sticking out his tongue. Who cares if the Nyets have not won yet. They will (eventually) and it sucks to be the NY team racing them to not be known as the lamest hoops franchise in the City.

You're sort of right about two things:
1) Prokorov getting props for what he's good at. You need and deserve an owner who has that unique skill set.
2) No one cares if the Nyets win, because they won't.
3) It sucks for them because they already are the lamest hoops franchise in the City. Hands down. Although they might be tied for last with the Liberty.

Maybe we need a thread in the Nets forum about who might (or might not) win a chip before the Nyets:

Charlotte/New Orleans - Hornets (0 appearances)
Indiana - Pacers (1 appearance in NBA: 2000)
New Orleans/Utah - Jazz (2 appearances: 1997-1998)
Toronto - Raptors (0 appearances)
Minnesota - Timberwolves (0 appearances)
Cleveland- Cavaliers (1 appearance: 2007)
Vancouver/Memphis - Grizzlies (0 appearances)
Denver - Nuggets (0 appearances)
Orlando - Magic (2 appearances: 1995, 2009)
Phoenix - Suns (2 appearances: 1976, 1993)
San Diego/Los Angeles - Clippers (0 appearances)



We are orginal charter team and we only have two banners.

Lets not pretend we are some thick in legacy team.

Im not worried about other teams, Im worried about the Knicks!

Too bad Prokhorov did not buy the knicks!


I think we have the most non-championship winning seasons.

Two championship banners are better than the Nyets big fat zero.

Our 64 failed seasons are worse than their 36 (and worse than any other team in league history).

Look who's back! Were you on another Knicks forum desperately trying to make the Nyets relevant again?

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/24/2012  12:18 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/24/2012  12:18 AM
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Moonangie wrote:Props to the Russian mobster for calling him names and sticking out his tongue. Who cares if the Nyets have not won yet. They will (eventually) and it sucks to be the NY team racing them to not be known as the lamest hoops franchise in the City.

You're sort of right about two things:
1) Prokorov getting props for what he's good at. You need and deserve an owner who has that unique skill set.
2) No one cares if the Nyets win, because they won't.
3) It sucks for them because they already are the lamest hoops franchise in the City. Hands down. Although they might be tied for last with the Liberty.

Maybe we need a thread in the Nets forum about who might (or might not) win a chip before the Nyets:

Charlotte/New Orleans - Hornets (0 appearances)
Indiana - Pacers (1 appearance in NBA: 2000)
New Orleans/Utah - Jazz (2 appearances: 1997-1998)
Toronto - Raptors (0 appearances)
Minnesota - Timberwolves (0 appearances)
Cleveland- Cavaliers (1 appearance: 2007)
Vancouver/Memphis - Grizzlies (0 appearances)
Denver - Nuggets (0 appearances)
Orlando - Magic (2 appearances: 1995, 2009)
Phoenix - Suns (2 appearances: 1976, 1993)
San Diego/Los Angeles - Clippers (0 appearances)



We are orginal charter team and we only have two banners.

Lets not pretend we are some thick in legacy team.

Im not worried about other teams, Im worried about the Knicks!

Too bad Prokhorov did not buy the knicks!


I think we have the most non-championship winning seasons.

Two championship banners are better than the Nyets big fat zero.

Our 64 failed seasons are worse than their 36 (and worse than any other team in league history).

Were you on another Knicks forum desperately trying to make the Nyets relevant?


No
And for the record, you talk about the Nets much more than I do.
infinitilov100
Posts: 20362
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2012
Member: #4318

8/24/2012  12:28 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Moonangie wrote:Props to the Russian mobster for calling him names and sticking out his tongue. Who cares if the Nyets have not won yet. They will (eventually) and it sucks to be the NY team racing them to not be known as the lamest hoops franchise in the City.

You're sort of right about two things:
1) Prokorov getting props for what he's good at. You need and deserve an owner who has that unique skill set.
2) No one cares if the Nyets win, because they won't.
3) It sucks for them because they already are the lamest hoops franchise in the City. Hands down. Although they might be tied for last with the Liberty.

Maybe we need a thread in the Nets forum about who might (or might not) win a chip before the Nyets:

Charlotte/New Orleans - Hornets (0 appearances)
Indiana - Pacers (1 appearance in NBA: 2000)
New Orleans/Utah - Jazz (2 appearances: 1997-1998)
Toronto - Raptors (0 appearances)
Minnesota - Timberwolves (0 appearances)
Cleveland- Cavaliers (1 appearance: 2007)
Vancouver/Memphis - Grizzlies (0 appearances)
Denver - Nuggets (0 appearances)
Orlando - Magic (2 appearances: 1995, 2009)
Phoenix - Suns (2 appearances: 1976, 1993)
San Diego/Los Angeles - Clippers (0 appearances)



We are orginal charter team and we only have two banners.

Lets not pretend we are some thick in legacy team.

Im not worried about other teams, Im worried about the Knicks!

Too bad Prokhorov did not buy the knicks!


I think we have the most non-championship winning seasons.

Two championship banners are better than the Nyets big fat zero.

Our 64 failed seasons are worse than their 36 (and worse than any other team in league history).

Were you on another Knicks forum desperately trying to make the Nyets relevant?


No
And for the record, you talk about the Nets much more than I do.

That's what happens when you bleed Orange & Blue. Gotta defend my team.

Nalod
Posts: 71226
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/24/2012  8:24 AM
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Moonangie wrote:Props to the Russian mobster for calling him names and sticking out his tongue. Who cares if the Nyets have not won yet. They will (eventually) and it sucks to be the NY team racing them to not be known as the lamest hoops franchise in the City.

You're sort of right about two things:
1) Prokorov getting props for what he's good at. You need and deserve an owner who has that unique skill set.
2) No one cares if the Nyets win, because they won't.
3) It sucks for them because they already are the lamest hoops franchise in the City. Hands down. Although they might be tied for last with the Liberty.

Maybe we need a thread in the Nets forum about who might (or might not) win a chip before the Nyets:

Charlotte/New Orleans - Hornets (0 appearances)
Indiana - Pacers (1 appearance in NBA: 2000)
New Orleans/Utah - Jazz (2 appearances: 1997-1998)
Toronto - Raptors (0 appearances)
Minnesota - Timberwolves (0 appearances)
Cleveland- Cavaliers (1 appearance: 2007)
Vancouver/Memphis - Grizzlies (0 appearances)
Denver - Nuggets (0 appearances)
Orlando - Magic (2 appearances: 1995, 2009)
Phoenix - Suns (2 appearances: 1976, 1993)
San Diego/Los Angeles - Clippers (0 appearances)



We are orginal charter team and we only have two banners.

Lets not pretend we are some thick in legacy team.

Im not worried about other teams, Im worried about the Knicks!

Too bad Prokhorov did not buy the knicks!


I think we have the most non-championship winning seasons.

Two championship banners are better than the Nyets big fat zero.

Our 64 failed seasons are worse than their 36 (and worse than any other team in league history).

Were you on another Knicks forum desperately trying to make the Nyets relevant?


No
And for the record, you talk about the Nets much more than I do.

That's what happens when you bleed Orange & Blue. Gotta defend my team.

Defending against what? Tyranny?

foosballnick
Posts: 21534
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2010
Member: #3148

8/24/2012  8:45 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Moonangie wrote:Props to the Russian mobster for calling him names and sticking out his tongue. Who cares if the Nyets have not won yet. They will (eventually) and it sucks to be the NY team racing them to not be known as the lamest hoops franchise in the City.

You're sort of right about two things:
1) Prokorov getting props for what he's good at. You need and deserve an owner who has that unique skill set.
2) No one cares if the Nyets win, because they won't.
3) It sucks for them because they already are the lamest hoops franchise in the City. Hands down. Although they might be tied for last with the Liberty.

Maybe we need a thread in the Nets forum about who might (or might not) win a chip before the Nyets:

Charlotte/New Orleans - Hornets (0 appearances)
Indiana - Pacers (1 appearance in NBA: 2000)
New Orleans/Utah - Jazz (2 appearances: 1997-1998)
Toronto - Raptors (0 appearances)
Minnesota - Timberwolves (0 appearances)
Cleveland- Cavaliers (1 appearance: 2007)
Vancouver/Memphis - Grizzlies (0 appearances)
Denver - Nuggets (0 appearances)
Orlando - Magic (2 appearances: 1995, 2009)
Phoenix - Suns (2 appearances: 1976, 1993)
San Diego/Los Angeles - Clippers (0 appearances)



We are orginal charter team and we only have two banners.

Lets not pretend we are some thick in legacy team.

Im not worried about other teams, Im worried about the Knicks!

Too bad Prokhorov did not buy the knicks!


I think we have the most non-championship winning seasons.

Two championship banners are better than the Nyets big fat zero.

Our 64 failed seasons are worse than their 36 (and worse than any other team in league history).

Were you on another Knicks forum desperately trying to make the Nyets relevant?


No
And for the record, you talk about the Nets much more than I do.


You are correct that infinite harps on the Nets. However it does appear that you constantly go out of your way to find stats that portray the Knicks players and organization in a bad light compared to other teams. Technically, 2 & 64 is better percentage than 0 & 36.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/24/2012  8:48 AM
foosballnick wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Moonangie wrote:Props to the Russian mobster for calling him names and sticking out his tongue. Who cares if the Nyets have not won yet. They will (eventually) and it sucks to be the NY team racing them to not be known as the lamest hoops franchise in the City.

You're sort of right about two things:
1) Prokorov getting props for what he's good at. You need and deserve an owner who has that unique skill set.
2) No one cares if the Nyets win, because they won't.
3) It sucks for them because they already are the lamest hoops franchise in the City. Hands down. Although they might be tied for last with the Liberty.

Maybe we need a thread in the Nets forum about who might (or might not) win a chip before the Nyets:

Charlotte/New Orleans - Hornets (0 appearances)
Indiana - Pacers (1 appearance in NBA: 2000)
New Orleans/Utah - Jazz (2 appearances: 1997-1998)
Toronto - Raptors (0 appearances)
Minnesota - Timberwolves (0 appearances)
Cleveland- Cavaliers (1 appearance: 2007)
Vancouver/Memphis - Grizzlies (0 appearances)
Denver - Nuggets (0 appearances)
Orlando - Magic (2 appearances: 1995, 2009)
Phoenix - Suns (2 appearances: 1976, 1993)
San Diego/Los Angeles - Clippers (0 appearances)



We are orginal charter team and we only have two banners.

Lets not pretend we are some thick in legacy team.

Im not worried about other teams, Im worried about the Knicks!

Too bad Prokhorov did not buy the knicks!


I think we have the most non-championship winning seasons.

Two championship banners are better than the Nyets big fat zero.

Our 64 failed seasons are worse than their 36 (and worse than any other team in league history).

Were you on another Knicks forum desperately trying to make the Nyets relevant?


No
And for the record, you talk about the Nets much more than I do.


You are correct that infinite harps on the Nets. However it does appear that you constantly go out of your way to find stats that portray the Knicks players and organization in a bad light compared to other teams. Technically, 2 & 64 is better percentage than 0 & 36.


The difference is that Inf is being serious and I'm just giving him a hard time.
Nalod
Posts: 71226
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/24/2012  9:14 AM
Nets won two championships in 74' and 76'. That makes it 2 and 42.

ABA championships are not world championships nor the quality of an NBA but fans do like it when they win championships. Do they count? Not if your "defending" the knicks and don't like the N*ts. Do the 74' or 76' team beat Dave Cowens Celtics? I seriously doubt it!

Dolan has not been in charge all 64 years so we don't "blame" his reign for all of history. Prokhorov has only owned the N*ts for two years.

I'd say the current ownerships should only be held accountable for the time they owned the team.

I think Dolan wants to win. I just think he lets his emotions drive decisions.

ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
8/24/2012  9:23 AM
Nalod wrote:Nets won two championships in 74' and 76'. That makes it 2 and 42.

ABA championships are not world championships nor the quality of an NBA but fans do like it when they win championships. Do they count? Not if your "defending" the knicks and don't like the N*ts. Do the 74' or 76' team beat Dave Cowens Celtics? I seriously doubt it!

Dolan has not been in charge all 64 years so we don't "blame" his reign for all of history. Prokhorov has only owned the N*ts for two years.

I'd say the current ownerships should only be held accountable for the time they owned the team.

I think Dolan wants to win. I just think he lets his emotions drive decisions.

When I think of ABA I think of Jackie Moon for some reason lol. I don't think anybody put much worth in USFL or XFL or any failed league either. Sure they had a few headliners in there, prominently your Nets hero "Dr J", but give me a break with your tired defense of the Nets and repetitive derision of Dolan, Nets still have 0 Championships dude.

DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
8/24/2012  9:37 AM
infinitilov100 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Moonangie wrote:Props to the Russian mobster for calling him names and sticking out his tongue. Who cares if the Nyets have not won yet. They will (eventually) and it sucks to be the NY team racing them to not be known as the lamest hoops franchise in the City.

You're sort of right about two things:
1) Prokorov getting props for what he's good at. You need and deserve an owner who has that unique skill set.
2) No one cares if the Nyets win, because they won't.
3) It sucks for them because they already are the lamest hoops franchise in the City. Hands down. Although they might be tied for last with the Liberty.

Maybe we need a thread in the Nets forum about who might (or might not) win a chip before the Nyets:

Charlotte/New Orleans - Hornets (0 appearances)
Indiana - Pacers (1 appearance in NBA: 2000)
New Orleans/Utah - Jazz (2 appearances: 1997-1998)
Toronto - Raptors (0 appearances)
Minnesota - Timberwolves (0 appearances)
Cleveland- Cavaliers (1 appearance: 2007)
Vancouver/Memphis - Grizzlies (0 appearances)
Denver - Nuggets (0 appearances)
Orlando - Magic (2 appearances: 1995, 2009)
Phoenix - Suns (2 appearances: 1976, 1993)
San Diego/Los Angeles - Clippers (0 appearances)



We are orginal charter team and we only have two banners.

Lets not pretend we are some thick in legacy team.

Im not worried about other teams, Im worried about the Knicks!

Too bad Prokhorov did not buy the knicks!


I think we have the most non-championship winning seasons.

Two championship banners are better than the Nyets big fat zero.

BINGO

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
"That little Man"

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy