[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Year 2 of the Melo trade. Where are they now?
Author Thread
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
5/8/2012  3:51 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:I give JRod a lot of credit for knowing how to take the high road.

With props to Nalod for making absolutely no sense at all.

When the knicks eclipse the Knuggs and do something then Denver accomplishments, or lack of are not relevant.

WTF????

The Knicks eclipse the Knuggs by simply existing.

Whats funny is your actually more attune to what is going on in Denver than anyone here.


It's hilarious. JRod actually knows what's being discussed on Nuggets boards? I seriously hope he was just making that up and doesn't actually spend time reading Nuggets boards.

Like I said, who needs to go to Nugget's boards? Read the posts. We might as well be a Nuggets board.


Only because you talk so much about the Nuggets.

You said it first.

Nope. You mentioned Denver first in this thread.

Wrong again. You first mentioned not mentioning Denver in a thread that's primarily about Denver.

Except that Nalod thinks I'm nixluva, for some reason.

While Buick is convinced I'm Bippity, for no reason whatsoever.

At least it's all about me.

And not Denver.

AUTOADVERT
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

5/8/2012  3:51 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

It disregards context so the answer is yes. It is irrational.

AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
5/8/2012  3:58 PM
The Nuggets best player is Ty Lawson. Nuff said.

Gallinari has the tools to be very good player. He is STILL inconsistent though. Plus for a guy who is the best shooter D'Antoni has ever seen, he misses a lot of wide open 3's.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
5/8/2012  4:00 PM
AnubisADL wrote:The Nuggets best player is Ty Lawson. Nuff said.

Gallinari has the tools to be very good player. He is STILL inconsistent though. Plus for a guy who is the best shooter D'Antoni has ever seen, he misses a lot of wide open 3's.

Ty Lawson is one of the most overrated players on the league. I don't get it at all. Ray Felton is WAY better than Ty Lawson and so is Gallo. The Nuggets dependence on Ty Lawson is why they won't progress further than where they are now.

Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/8/2012  4:02 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

It disregards context so the answer is yes. It is irrational.


What context is that? Whatever context you have in mind, I do not see how the most logical conclusion is to ignore the actual wins and losses.
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

5/8/2012  4:06 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

It disregards context so the answer is yes. It is irrational.


What context is that? Whatever context you have in mind, I do not see how the most logical conclusion is to ignore the actual wins and losses.

Do arrive at the logical conclusion that MDA was an awful coach based on his record here?

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/8/2012  4:14 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/8/2012  4:16 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

It disregards context so the answer is yes. It is irrational.


What context is that? Whatever context you have in mind, I do not see how the most logical conclusion is to ignore the actual wins and losses.

Do arrive at the logical conclusion that MDA was an awful coach based on his record here?


No. Likewise, I never said that Melo was an awful player. Now are you going to answer the question about context? "Context" is often though not always just a vague way of saying "Please don't judge me by my results."
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/8/2012  4:28 PM
MDA did not have a losing record last year. This year with Melo playing his worst BB for most of the season, that was a major contributor to the losing record. Yeah we had the stretch with the no PG thing, but even in that instance if Melo was playing great they could've overcome the lack of a PG. Sometimes you have to look at the players as the PRIMARY source of why a team plays well or not. Take Tyson and Jared off the floor and the team still stinks on D even with Woody. The players are the bulk of the reason teams win. The coach can set an agenda and get a team to operate at a higher level in many areas, but the bulk of the work is still on the players. This is why Melo get's so much blame for the teams record since he's come here.

Just think about how little press Scott Brooks gets in OKC. The credit goes mostly to the players. No one thinks that they win because Brooks is such a masterful head coach. Tho he's doing a GREAT job and should get more credit. It's just that people rightly acknowledge that it's the great talent they have and the players holding up their end of the bargain. Doc Rivers is a great coach, but it's not like he doesn't have a top tier level of talent in KG, Pierce, Allen and Rondo. Melo has had GOOD coaches. He's really only got himself to blame for not doing more in his career. He can look in the mirror and say to himself that he needs to take his conditioning MUCH more seriously. He needs to listen to his coaches that have tried to get him to play more team oriented. Karl and MDA have very good track records for getting players to play team ball at a high level. There's no excuse for Melo not to have learned the lessons. Instead now he has a coach that believes in ISO ball and Melo is happy. I can only hope that Woody can get thru to Melo about taking things more seriously.

Uptown
Posts: 31323
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

5/8/2012  4:38 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/8/2012  4:39 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

Or is it rational to see that we were 18-6 (.700) once Woodson took over and recognized that the previous coach was trying to hammer sqaure pegs into round holes?

Uptown
Posts: 31323
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

5/8/2012  4:52 PM
nixluva wrote:MDA did not have a losing record last year. This year with Melo playing his worst BB for most of the season, that was a major contributor to the losing record. Yeah we had the stretch with the no PG thing, but even in that instance if Melo was playing great they could've overcome the lack of a PG. Sometimes you have to look at the players as the PRIMARY source of why a team plays well or not. Take Tyson and Jared off the floor and the team still stinks on D even with Woody. The players are the bulk of the reason teams win. The coach can set an agenda and get a team to operate at a higher level in many areas, but the bulk of the work is still on the players. This is why Melo get's so much blame for the teams record since he's come here.

Just think about how little press Scott Brooks gets in OKC. The credit goes mostly to the players. No one thinks that they win because Brooks is such a masterful head coach. Tho he's doing a GREAT job and should get more credit. It's just that people rightly acknowledge that it's the great talent they have and the players holding up their end of the bargain. Doc Rivers is a great coach, but it's not like he doesn't have a top tier level of talent in KG, Pierce, Allen and Rondo. Melo has had GOOD coaches. He's really only got himself to blame for not doing more in his career. He can look in the mirror and say to himself that he needs to take his conditioning MUCH more seriously. He needs to listen to his coaches that have tried to get him to play more team oriented. Karl and MDA have very good track records for getting players to play team ball at a high level. There's no excuse for Melo not to have learned the lessons. Instead now he has a coach that believes in ISO ball and Melo is happy. I can only hope that Woody can get thru to Melo about taking things more seriously.

Woodson recognized the strength of the roster and planned accordingly to play to that strength. He's a coach not a GM. Coach what you have and make it work. Woodson coached this team to an over .700 win percentage and had this team playing better than any team in the league that didn't play in San Antonio. The Previous coach ignored the strength, and didn't coach the players he had but coached them into what he wanted them to be. It was foolish; it didn't work and MDA knew this thats why he quit.

Also, what do you mean Melo has only himself to blame for not doing more i his career? In terms of what? Going further in the playoffs? Those Denver teams were not better than the Lakers or Spurs the teams they lost to and you know it. Was he supposed to beat Boston by himself last year while Stat and Billups sat on the bench?

These top teir players you speak of are successful because they ave each other. KG, Ray and Pierce were on losing teams until they teamed up. What the hell did KG do in the playoffs in Minny? The Celts and Pierce were as bad as us before KG and Allen. The Sonics never did a thing in the playoffs either. Swap and Pierce and Melo and Pierce would be the one we would call and under achiever and Melo would be the standard for Pierce.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/8/2012  4:56 PM
Uptown wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

Or is it rational to see that we were 18-6 (.700) once Woodson took over and recognized that the previous coach was trying to hammer sqaure pegs into round holes?


Actually it's not rational - it's unrealistic fan optimism - to place a lot of emphasis in a sample the size of one-fourth of one normal season. Regardless, people knew MDA was the coach of the team and knew MDA's philosophy when they predicted this was going to be a .750 team.
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

5/8/2012  5:05 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

It disregards context so the answer is yes. It is irrational.


What context is that? Whatever context you have in mind, I do not see how the most logical conclusion is to ignore the actual wins and losses.

Do arrive at the logical conclusion that MDA was an awful coach based on his record here?


No. Likewise, I never said that Melo was an awful player. Now are you going to answer the question about context? "Context" is often though not always just a vague way of saying "Please don't judge me by my results."

That makes absolutely no sense! What are "results"? How are results measured? If Charlotte wins 30 games next year is that a success or failure? How would you measure their results?

Analytical reasoning and CONTEXT might help you get passed simplistic thinking and and non-quantifiable measurements.

A team is in the lottery every year, drafts a player, for the next 8 years they are in the playoff in the 6-8th seeds with the 10th best talent ...

Simplistic comparisons make one seem foolish and uneducated - now I know you are educated ...

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/8/2012  5:10 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/8/2012  5:11 PM
Uptown wrote:
nixluva wrote:MDA did not have a losing record last year. This year with Melo playing his worst BB for most of the season, that was a major contributor to the losing record. Yeah we had the stretch with the no PG thing, but even in that instance if Melo was playing great they could've overcome the lack of a PG. Sometimes you have to look at the players as the PRIMARY source of why a team plays well or not. Take Tyson and Jared off the floor and the team still stinks on D even with Woody. The players are the bulk of the reason teams win. The coach can set an agenda and get a team to operate at a higher level in many areas, but the bulk of the work is still on the players. This is why Melo get's so much blame for the teams record since he's come here.

Just think about how little press Scott Brooks gets in OKC. The credit goes mostly to the players. No one thinks that they win because Brooks is such a masterful head coach. Tho he's doing a GREAT job and should get more credit. It's just that people rightly acknowledge that it's the great talent they have and the players holding up their end of the bargain. Doc Rivers is a great coach, but it's not like he doesn't have a top tier level of talent in KG, Pierce, Allen and Rondo. Melo has had GOOD coaches. He's really only got himself to blame for not doing more in his career. He can look in the mirror and say to himself that he needs to take his conditioning MUCH more seriously. He needs to listen to his coaches that have tried to get him to play more team oriented. Karl and MDA have very good track records for getting players to play team ball at a high level. There's no excuse for Melo not to have learned the lessons. Instead now he has a coach that believes in ISO ball and Melo is happy. I can only hope that Woody can get thru to Melo about taking things more seriously.

Woodson recognized the strength of the roster and planned accordingly to play to that strength. He's a coach not a GM. Coach what you have and make it work. Woodson coached this team to an over .700 win percentage and had this team playing better than any team in the league that didn't play in San Antonio. The Previous coach ignored the strength, and didn't coach the players he had but coached them into what he wanted them to be. It was foolish; it didn't work and MDA knew this thats why he quit.

Also, what do you mean Melo has only himself to blame for not doing more i his career? In terms of what? Going further in the playoffs? Those Denver teams were not better than the Lakers or Spurs the teams they lost to and you know it. Was he supposed to beat Boston by himself last year while Stat and Billups sat on the bench?

These top teir players you speak of are successful because they ave each other. KG, Ray and Pierce were on losing teams until they teamed up. What the hell did KG do in the playoffs in Minny? The Celts and Pierce were as bad as us before KG and Allen. The Sonics never did a thing in the playoffs either. Swap and Pierce and Melo and Pierce would be the one we would call and under achiever and Melo would be the standard for Pierce.

The team as a whole was not against MDA!!! This so called ignored strength is 100% total BS. In what way did MDA not use Melo? He put the ball in his hands and basically allowed him to do whatever he wanted for most of the year. The only time Melo was restricted in any way was when he came back in the 10 game stretch before MDA resigned. The TEAM was winning before Melo came back and it was clear that the LOVED playing team ball MDA's way just like MOST players love playing in that system. You NEVER hear any player saying "OH NO! I don't wanna play in that players system and score a ton of points".
The team was winning with Defense and offense before Melo came back. People don't want to admit the defense part, even tho it's true!!! They didn't only start defending under Woody!!!

As for Melo not going further, he was part of a TEAM and only one time did that team advance playing TEAM BALL because Billups made sure they did!!!

mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

5/8/2012  5:15 PM
nixluva wrote:
Uptown wrote:
nixluva wrote:MDA did not have a losing record last year. This year with Melo playing his worst BB for most of the season, that was a major contributor to the losing record. Yeah we had the stretch with the no PG thing, but even in that instance if Melo was playing great they could've overcome the lack of a PG. Sometimes you have to look at the players as the PRIMARY source of why a team plays well or not. Take Tyson and Jared off the floor and the team still stinks on D even with Woody. The players are the bulk of the reason teams win. The coach can set an agenda and get a team to operate at a higher level in many areas, but the bulk of the work is still on the players. This is why Melo get's so much blame for the teams record since he's come here.

Just think about how little press Scott Brooks gets in OKC. The credit goes mostly to the players. No one thinks that they win because Brooks is such a masterful head coach. Tho he's doing a GREAT job and should get more credit. It's just that people rightly acknowledge that it's the great talent they have and the players holding up their end of the bargain. Doc Rivers is a great coach, but it's not like he doesn't have a top tier level of talent in KG, Pierce, Allen and Rondo. Melo has had GOOD coaches. He's really only got himself to blame for not doing more in his career. He can look in the mirror and say to himself that he needs to take his conditioning MUCH more seriously. He needs to listen to his coaches that have tried to get him to play more team oriented. Karl and MDA have very good track records for getting players to play team ball at a high level. There's no excuse for Melo not to have learned the lessons. Instead now he has a coach that believes in ISO ball and Melo is happy. I can only hope that Woody can get thru to Melo about taking things more seriously.

Woodson recognized the strength of the roster and planned accordingly to play to that strength. He's a coach not a GM. Coach what you have and make it work. Woodson coached this team to an over .700 win percentage and had this team playing better than any team in the league that didn't play in San Antonio. The Previous coach ignored the strength, and didn't coach the players he had but coached them into what he wanted them to be. It was foolish; it didn't work and MDA knew this thats why he quit.

Also, what do you mean Melo has only himself to blame for not doing more i his career? In terms of what? Going further in the playoffs? Those Denver teams were not better than the Lakers or Spurs the teams they lost to and you know it. Was he supposed to beat Boston by himself last year while Stat and Billups sat on the bench?

These top teir players you speak of are successful because they ave each other. KG, Ray and Pierce were on losing teams until they teamed up. What the hell did KG do in the playoffs in Minny? The Celts and Pierce were as bad as us before KG and Allen. The Sonics never did a thing in the playoffs either. Swap and Pierce and Melo and Pierce would be the one we would call and under achiever and Melo would be the standard for Pierce.

The team as a whole was not against MDA!!! This so called ignored strength is 100% total BS. In what way did MDA not use Melo? He put the ball in his hands and basically allowed him to do whatever he wanted for most of the year. The only time Melo was restricted in any way was when he came back in the 10 game stretch before MDA resigned. The TEAM was winning before Melo came back and it was clear that the LOVED playing team ball MDA's way just like MOST players love playing in that system. You NEVER hear any player saying "OH NO! I don't wanna play in that players system and score a ton of points".
The team was winning with Defense and offense before Melo came back. People don't want to admit the defense part, even tho it's true!!! They didn't only start defending under Woody!!!

As for Melo not going further, he was part of a TEAM and only one time did that team advance playing TEAM BALL because Billups made sure they did!!!

Wow they got Billups and he made sure they did!

Kobe never won without Shaq or Gasol but they made sure the lakers won!

Hilarious!

And Billups was almost as good as the aforementioned (shaq/gasol)

Why don't you say that "finally when they got a half decent player as a (sort of) second option, though not shaq, gasol or steve nash, they advanced

Uptown
Posts: 31323
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

5/8/2012  6:15 PM
nixluva wrote:
Uptown wrote:
nixluva wrote:MDA did not have a losing record last year. This year with Melo playing his worst BB for most of the season, that was a major contributor to the losing record. Yeah we had the stretch with the no PG thing, but even in that instance if Melo was playing great they could've overcome the lack of a PG. Sometimes you have to look at the players as the PRIMARY source of why a team plays well or not. Take Tyson and Jared off the floor and the team still stinks on D even with Woody. The players are the bulk of the reason teams win. The coach can set an agenda and get a team to operate at a higher level in many areas, but the bulk of the work is still on the players. This is why Melo get's so much blame for the teams record since he's come here.

Just think about how little press Scott Brooks gets in OKC. The credit goes mostly to the players. No one thinks that they win because Brooks is such a masterful head coach. Tho he's doing a GREAT job and should get more credit. It's just that people rightly acknowledge that it's the great talent they have and the players holding up their end of the bargain. Doc Rivers is a great coach, but it's not like he doesn't have a top tier level of talent in KG, Pierce, Allen and Rondo. Melo has had GOOD coaches. He's really only got himself to blame for not doing more in his career. He can look in the mirror and say to himself that he needs to take his conditioning MUCH more seriously. He needs to listen to his coaches that have tried to get him to play more team oriented. Karl and MDA have very good track records for getting players to play team ball at a high level. There's no excuse for Melo not to have learned the lessons. Instead now he has a coach that believes in ISO ball and Melo is happy. I can only hope that Woody can get thru to Melo about taking things more seriously.

Woodson recognized the strength of the roster and planned accordingly to play to that strength. He's a coach not a GM. Coach what you have and make it work. Woodson coached this team to an over .700 win percentage and had this team playing better than any team in the league that didn't play in San Antonio. The Previous coach ignored the strength, and didn't coach the players he had but coached them into what he wanted them to be. It was foolish; it didn't work and MDA knew this thats why he quit.

Also, what do you mean Melo has only himself to blame for not doing more i his career? In terms of what? Going further in the playoffs? Those Denver teams were not better than the Lakers or Spurs the teams they lost to and you know it. Was he supposed to beat Boston by himself last year while Stat and Billups sat on the bench?

These top teir players you speak of are successful because they ave each other. KG, Ray and Pierce were on losing teams until they teamed up. What the hell did KG do in the playoffs in Minny? The Celts and Pierce were as bad as us before KG and Allen. The Sonics never did a thing in the playoffs either. Swap and Pierce and Melo and Pierce would be the one we would call and under achiever and Melo would be the standard for Pierce.

The team as a whole was not against MDA!!! This so called ignored strength is 100% total BS. In what way did MDA not use Melo? He put the ball in his hands and basically allowed him to do whatever he wanted for most of the year. The only time Melo was restricted in any way was when he came back in the 10 game stretch before MDA resigned. The TEAM was winning before Melo came back and it was clear that the LOVED playing team ball MDA's way just like MOST players love playing in that system. You NEVER hear any player saying "OH NO! I don't wanna play in that players system and score a ton of points".
The team was winning with Defense and offense before Melo came back. People don't want to admit the defense part, even tho it's true!!! They didn't only start defending under Woody!!!

As for Melo not going further, he was part of a TEAM and only one time did that team advance playing TEAM BALL because Billups made sure they did!!!

The team as a whole was not against MDA!!! This so called ignored strength is 100% total BS. In what way did MDA not use Melo? He put the ball in his hands and basically allowed him to do whatever he wanted for most of the year.

Having Melo run point forward setting up plays 30 feet from the basket is not playing to his strength. When Melo came back, he was camping out on the wing behind the 3 point line like Shawne Williams. Melo is a career 31% 3 pt shooter. That is not a strength. He's a high post rhythm shooter who excells mid range and in. That wasn't happening on a consistant level.

The TEAM was winning before Melo came back and it was clear that the LOVED playing team ball MDA's way just like MOST players love playing in that system. You NEVER hear any player saying "OH NO! I don't wanna play in that players system and score a ton of points".

The team won some games before Melo came back and won way more after MDA left. So whats your point? Its not about loving a system its about winning with the players you have. Yes, they played defense during the Linsanity streak and they played even better defense when Woodson took over. They won more games when Lin and Stat sat-out than they did when Melo was out. Theres no way they win those games without Lin had MDA not resigned.

As for Melo not going further, he was part of a TEAM and only one time did that team advance playing TEAM BALL because Billups made sure they did!!!

So the only reason the Nuggs advanced is because Billups made sure they played team ball? Dude, how biased does that sound?! How about, they advanced because Melo finally had a legit second option and a legit PG to play alongside him. Just like KG finally advanced because he was paired with a legit 2nd and third option.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/8/2012  6:24 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/8/2012  6:25 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

It disregards context so the answer is yes. It is irrational.


What context is that? Whatever context you have in mind, I do not see how the most logical conclusion is to ignore the actual wins and losses.

Do arrive at the logical conclusion that MDA was an awful coach based on his record here?


No. Likewise, I never said that Melo was an awful player. Now are you going to answer the question about context? "Context" is often though not always just a vague way of saying "Please don't judge me by my results."

That makes absolutely no sense! What are "results"? How are results measured? If Charlotte wins 30 games next year is that a success or failure? How would you measure their results?

Analytical reasoning and CONTEXT might help you get passed simplistic thinking and and non-quantifiable measurements.

A team is in the lottery every year, drafts a player, for the next 8 years they are in the playoff in the 6-8th seeds with the 10th best talent ...

Simplistic comparisons make one seem foolish and uneducated - now I know you are educated ...


Again, they're not in the playoffs because of the sub .500 ball they've played in games Melo has played in. Making the playoffs is no accomplishment anyway. The *majority* of the teams in the league make the playoffs.
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

5/8/2012  6:30 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

It disregards context so the answer is yes. It is irrational.


What context is that? Whatever context you have in mind, I do not see how the most logical conclusion is to ignore the actual wins and losses.

Do arrive at the logical conclusion that MDA was an awful coach based on his record here?


No. Likewise, I never said that Melo was an awful player. Now are you going to answer the question about context? "Context" is often though not always just a vague way of saying "Please don't judge me by my results."

That makes absolutely no sense! What are "results"? How are results measured? If Charlotte wins 30 games next year is that a success or failure? How would you measure their results?

Analytical reasoning and CONTEXT might help you get passed simplistic thinking and and non-quantifiable measurements.

A team is in the lottery every year, drafts a player, for the next 8 years they are in the playoff in the 6-8th seeds with the 10th best talent ...

Simplistic comparisons make one seem foolish and uneducated - now I know you are educated ...


Again, they're not in the playoffs because of the sub .500 ball they've played in games Melo has played in. Making the playoffs is no accomplishment anyway. The *majority* of the teams in the league make the playoffs.

You are really reaching - now you're not even trying.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/8/2012  6:41 PM
Uptown wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Uptown wrote:
nixluva wrote:MDA did not have a losing record last year. This year with Melo playing his worst BB for most of the season, that was a major contributor to the losing record. Yeah we had the stretch with the no PG thing, but even in that instance if Melo was playing great they could've overcome the lack of a PG. Sometimes you have to look at the players as the PRIMARY source of why a team plays well or not. Take Tyson and Jared off the floor and the team still stinks on D even with Woody. The players are the bulk of the reason teams win. The coach can set an agenda and get a team to operate at a higher level in many areas, but the bulk of the work is still on the players. This is why Melo get's so much blame for the teams record since he's come here.

Just think about how little press Scott Brooks gets in OKC. The credit goes mostly to the players. No one thinks that they win because Brooks is such a masterful head coach. Tho he's doing a GREAT job and should get more credit. It's just that people rightly acknowledge that it's the great talent they have and the players holding up their end of the bargain. Doc Rivers is a great coach, but it's not like he doesn't have a top tier level of talent in KG, Pierce, Allen and Rondo. Melo has had GOOD coaches. He's really only got himself to blame for not doing more in his career. He can look in the mirror and say to himself that he needs to take his conditioning MUCH more seriously. He needs to listen to his coaches that have tried to get him to play more team oriented. Karl and MDA have very good track records for getting players to play team ball at a high level. There's no excuse for Melo not to have learned the lessons. Instead now he has a coach that believes in ISO ball and Melo is happy. I can only hope that Woody can get thru to Melo about taking things more seriously.

Woodson recognized the strength of the roster and planned accordingly to play to that strength. He's a coach not a GM. Coach what you have and make it work. Woodson coached this team to an over .700 win percentage and had this team playing better than any team in the league that didn't play in San Antonio. The Previous coach ignored the strength, and didn't coach the players he had but coached them into what he wanted them to be. It was foolish; it didn't work and MDA knew this thats why he quit.

Also, what do you mean Melo has only himself to blame for not doing more i his career? In terms of what? Going further in the playoffs? Those Denver teams were not better than the Lakers or Spurs the teams they lost to and you know it. Was he supposed to beat Boston by himself last year while Stat and Billups sat on the bench?

These top teir players you speak of are successful because they ave each other. KG, Ray and Pierce were on losing teams until they teamed up. What the hell did KG do in the playoffs in Minny? The Celts and Pierce were as bad as us before KG and Allen. The Sonics never did a thing in the playoffs either. Swap and Pierce and Melo and Pierce would be the one we would call and under achiever and Melo would be the standard for Pierce.

The team as a whole was not against MDA!!! This so called ignored strength is 100% total BS. In what way did MDA not use Melo? He put the ball in his hands and basically allowed him to do whatever he wanted for most of the year. The only time Melo was restricted in any way was when he came back in the 10 game stretch before MDA resigned. The TEAM was winning before Melo came back and it was clear that the LOVED playing team ball MDA's way just like MOST players love playing in that system. You NEVER hear any player saying "OH NO! I don't wanna play in that players system and score a ton of points".
The team was winning with Defense and offense before Melo came back. People don't want to admit the defense part, even tho it's true!!! They didn't only start defending under Woody!!!

As for Melo not going further, he was part of a TEAM and only one time did that team advance playing TEAM BALL because Billups made sure they did!!!

The team as a whole was not against MDA!!! This so called ignored strength is 100% total BS. In what way did MDA not use Melo? He put the ball in his hands and basically allowed him to do whatever he wanted for most of the year.

Having Melo run point forward setting up plays 30 feet from the basket is not playing to his strength. When Melo came back, he was camping out on the wing behind the 3 point line like Shawne Williams. Melo is a career 31% 3 pt shooter. That is not a strength. He's a high post rhythm shooter who excells mid range and in. That wasn't happening on a consistant level.

The TEAM was winning before Melo came back and it was clear that the LOVED playing team ball MDA's way just like MOST players love playing in that system. You NEVER hear any player saying "OH NO! I don't wanna play in that players system and score a ton of points".

The team won some games before Melo came back and won way more after MDA left. So whats your point? Its not about loving a system its about winning with the players you have. Yes, they played defense during the Linsanity streak and they played even better defense when Woodson took over. They won more games when Lin and Stat sat-out than they did when Melo was out. Theres no way they win those games without Lin had MDA not resigned.

As for Melo not going further, he was part of a TEAM and only one time did that team advance playing TEAM BALL because Billups made sure they did!!!

So the only reason the Nuggs advanced is because Billups made sure they played team ball? Dude, how biased does that sound?! How about, they advanced because Melo finally had a legit second option and a legit PG to play alongside him. Just like KG finally advanced because he was paired with a legit 2nd and third option.

The team most certainly would've won a ton of games with the same D they played during Linsanity and Melo actually trying like he did the second that MDA resigned. There's not a thing you or anyone else can say that will change my mind about Melo dogging in and then flipping a switch the day MDA resigned. Had he given the same effort the last 10 games MDA was coach, there's no way this team ends up in the 7th spot.

Same goes for Melo slumping for the majority of the season. If he's playing at his usual level and in shape enough to play on both ends without hurting himself, the team would've won games even with MDA. This whole idea that the team couldn't win with MDA is utter BULL!!! This entire thing has been about Melo since the day he got here. That's what happens when a team banks it's future on a star player. He has to play like a star and be the leader of the team. Melo did that for exactly one month this year. It wasn't anything that Woody did, despite what people seem to think. Woody didn't improve the offense!!! When asked the players admitted that there really weren't any changes to what they do on defense. The big difference was Melo from day one. He played like he gave a damn. If Melo plays great and leads his team with a winning attitude this team would've won more games this year PERIOD!!!

mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

5/8/2012  6:44 PM
nixluva wrote:
Uptown wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Uptown wrote:
nixluva wrote:MDA did not have a losing record last year. This year with Melo playing his worst BB for most of the season, that was a major contributor to the losing record. Yeah we had the stretch with the no PG thing, but even in that instance if Melo was playing great they could've overcome the lack of a PG. Sometimes you have to look at the players as the PRIMARY source of why a team plays well or not. Take Tyson and Jared off the floor and the team still stinks on D even with Woody. The players are the bulk of the reason teams win. The coach can set an agenda and get a team to operate at a higher level in many areas, but the bulk of the work is still on the players. This is why Melo get's so much blame for the teams record since he's come here.

Just think about how little press Scott Brooks gets in OKC. The credit goes mostly to the players. No one thinks that they win because Brooks is such a masterful head coach. Tho he's doing a GREAT job and should get more credit. It's just that people rightly acknowledge that it's the great talent they have and the players holding up their end of the bargain. Doc Rivers is a great coach, but it's not like he doesn't have a top tier level of talent in KG, Pierce, Allen and Rondo. Melo has had GOOD coaches. He's really only got himself to blame for not doing more in his career. He can look in the mirror and say to himself that he needs to take his conditioning MUCH more seriously. He needs to listen to his coaches that have tried to get him to play more team oriented. Karl and MDA have very good track records for getting players to play team ball at a high level. There's no excuse for Melo not to have learned the lessons. Instead now he has a coach that believes in ISO ball and Melo is happy. I can only hope that Woody can get thru to Melo about taking things more seriously.

Woodson recognized the strength of the roster and planned accordingly to play to that strength. He's a coach not a GM. Coach what you have and make it work. Woodson coached this team to an over .700 win percentage and had this team playing better than any team in the league that didn't play in San Antonio. The Previous coach ignored the strength, and didn't coach the players he had but coached them into what he wanted them to be. It was foolish; it didn't work and MDA knew this thats why he quit.

Also, what do you mean Melo has only himself to blame for not doing more i his career? In terms of what? Going further in the playoffs? Those Denver teams were not better than the Lakers or Spurs the teams they lost to and you know it. Was he supposed to beat Boston by himself last year while Stat and Billups sat on the bench?

These top teir players you speak of are successful because they ave each other. KG, Ray and Pierce were on losing teams until they teamed up. What the hell did KG do in the playoffs in Minny? The Celts and Pierce were as bad as us before KG and Allen. The Sonics never did a thing in the playoffs either. Swap and Pierce and Melo and Pierce would be the one we would call and under achiever and Melo would be the standard for Pierce.

The team as a whole was not against MDA!!! This so called ignored strength is 100% total BS. In what way did MDA not use Melo? He put the ball in his hands and basically allowed him to do whatever he wanted for most of the year. The only time Melo was restricted in any way was when he came back in the 10 game stretch before MDA resigned. The TEAM was winning before Melo came back and it was clear that the LOVED playing team ball MDA's way just like MOST players love playing in that system. You NEVER hear any player saying "OH NO! I don't wanna play in that players system and score a ton of points".
The team was winning with Defense and offense before Melo came back. People don't want to admit the defense part, even tho it's true!!! They didn't only start defending under Woody!!!

As for Melo not going further, he was part of a TEAM and only one time did that team advance playing TEAM BALL because Billups made sure they did!!!

The team as a whole was not against MDA!!! This so called ignored strength is 100% total BS. In what way did MDA not use Melo? He put the ball in his hands and basically allowed him to do whatever he wanted for most of the year.

Having Melo run point forward setting up plays 30 feet from the basket is not playing to his strength. When Melo came back, he was camping out on the wing behind the 3 point line like Shawne Williams. Melo is a career 31% 3 pt shooter. That is not a strength. He's a high post rhythm shooter who excells mid range and in. That wasn't happening on a consistant level.

The TEAM was winning before Melo came back and it was clear that the LOVED playing team ball MDA's way just like MOST players love playing in that system. You NEVER hear any player saying "OH NO! I don't wanna play in that players system and score a ton of points".

The team won some games before Melo came back and won way more after MDA left. So whats your point? Its not about loving a system its about winning with the players you have. Yes, they played defense during the Linsanity streak and they played even better defense when Woodson took over. They won more games when Lin and Stat sat-out than they did when Melo was out. Theres no way they win those games without Lin had MDA not resigned.

As for Melo not going further, he was part of a TEAM and only one time did that team advance playing TEAM BALL because Billups made sure they did!!!

So the only reason the Nuggs advanced is because Billups made sure they played team ball? Dude, how biased does that sound?! How about, they advanced because Melo finally had a legit second option and a legit PG to play alongside him. Just like KG finally advanced because he was paired with a legit 2nd and third option.

The team most certainly would've won a ton of games with the same D they played during Linsanity and Melo actually trying like he did the second that MDA resigned. There's not a thing you or anyone else can say that will change my mind about Melo dogging in and then flipping a switch the day MDA resigned. Had he given the same effort the last 10 games MDA was coach, there's no way this team ends up in the 7th spot.

Same goes for Melo slumping for the majority of the season. If he's playing at his usual level and in shape enough to play on both ends without hurting himself, the team would've won games even with MDA. This whole idea that the team couldn't win with MDA is utter BULL!!! This entire thing has been about Melo since the day he got here. That's what happens when a team banks it's future on a star player. He has to play like a star and be the leader of the team. Melo did that for exactly one month this year. It wasn't anything that Woody did, despite what people seem to think. Woody didn't improve the offense!!! When asked the players admitted that there really weren't any changes to what they do on defense. The big difference was Melo from day one. He played like he gave a damn. If Melo plays great and leads his team with a winning attitude this team would've won more games this year PERIOD!!!

Won't be the first time a SUPERSTAR was accused of this and I am sure it won't be the last.

FOR ONCE NIXLUVA - PLEASE ADDRESS THE JOKE OF A SCHEDULE DURING LINSANITY - MAN UP AND STOP RUNNING FROM IT

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/8/2012  6:56 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

It disregards context so the answer is yes. It is irrational.


What context is that? Whatever context you have in mind, I do not see how the most logical conclusion is to ignore the actual wins and losses.

Do arrive at the logical conclusion that MDA was an awful coach based on his record here?


No. Likewise, I never said that Melo was an awful player. Now are you going to answer the question about context? "Context" is often though not always just a vague way of saying "Please don't judge me by my results."

That makes absolutely no sense! What are "results"? How are results measured? If Charlotte wins 30 games next year is that a success or failure? How would you measure their results?

Analytical reasoning and CONTEXT might help you get passed simplistic thinking and and non-quantifiable measurements.

A team is in the lottery every year, drafts a player, for the next 8 years they are in the playoff in the 6-8th seeds with the 10th best talent ...

Simplistic comparisons make one seem foolish and uneducated - now I know you are educated ...


Again, they're not in the playoffs because of the sub .500 ball they've played in games Melo has played in. Making the playoffs is no accomplishment anyway. The *majority* of the teams in the league make the playoffs.

You are really reaching - now you're not even trying.


I'll I did was state the factual record of the team with and without Melo. I didn't reach for anything that wasn't an immediately available fact.
Year 2 of the Melo trade. Where are they now?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy