tkf wrote:

joec32033 wrote:Andre Aldridge via twitter...

I think the Bulls announcers are doing their audience a disservice in saying Chris Duhon "beat out" Stephon Marbury, Nate Robinson & others.
4 minutes ago from Tweetie

bulls announcers are dumb asses.. they said david lee is a good defender while saying gallo and chandler were poor defenders.. LOL.. stacy king is a jackass..

they were also praising Duhon.. "He's a tough guy". Just as horrible announcers as the Danish announcers. FFS

skeng wrote:

tkf wrote:

joec32033 wrote:Andre Aldridge via twitter...

I think the Bulls announcers are doing their audience a disservice in saying Chris Duhon "beat out" Stephon Marbury, Nate Robinson & others.
4 minutes ago from Tweetie

bulls announcers are dumb asses.. they said david lee is a good defender while saying gallo and chandler were poor defenders.. LOL.. stacy king is a jackass..

they were also praising Duhon.. "He's a tough guy". Just as horrible announcers as the Danish announcers. FFS

Hmm... I guess they wouldn't mind trading Pooh for him.

BRIGGS wrote:

TMS wrote:LMAO! this is so pathetic it's reached hilarious levels... we're talking about giving up every future asset we have to get rid of Fishlips' contract, then Nate's going to Boston for a collection of garbage, & now we're getting embarassed in Chicago by the Bulls & we're watching Bender & Landry chucking up 3's... u cannot write this stuff.

They are at the mercy of any deal. If they dont get rid of Jefferies and Hill --they have one spot for a team that has holes up and down the roster. They are shipping out a 1-5 pick to Utah[which will be 4 weeks of embarrassment when it comes]

They are really working from a position if weakness. To be honest with you--I would wait for the draft and try to trade off Gallinari and Chandler IF they bring back two top 10 picks where I can get Monroe and one of the C's. If I can start with an infrastructure up the middle--then I can work backwards. Gallinari is so overhyped but maybe one team in the top 10 will take him--Chandler couldve got pick 5 last year[what a blunder--but oh wel]

if u can trade Gallo or Wislon for top 10 picks in this draft it's a no brainer, but i don't see any of the bad teams in the NBA being willing to do that.

BRIGGS wrote:

TMS wrote:LMAO! this is so pathetic it's reached hilarious levels... we're talking about giving up every future asset we have to get rid of Fishlips' contract, then Nate's going to Boston for a collection of garbage, & now we're getting embarassed in Chicago by the Bulls & we're watching Bender & Landry chucking up 3's... u cannot write this stuff.

They are at the mercy of any deal. If they dont get rid of Jefferies and Hill --they have one spot for a team that has holes up and down the roster. They are shipping out a 1-5 pick to Utah[which will be 4 weeks of embarrassment when it comes]

They are really working from a position if weakness. To be honest with you--I would wait for the draft and try to trade off Gallinari and Chandler IF they bring back two top 10 picks where I can get Monroe and one of the C's. If I can start with an infrastructure up the middle--then I can work backwards. Gallinari is so overhyped but maybe one team in the top 10 will take him--Chandler couldve got pick 5 last year[what a blunder--but oh wel]

so briggs, you think gallo and chandler can get top 10 picks.. so why trade them? unless you are saying there are other GM's who feel they are better than any possible top 10 pick.. and if they are saying that, then are you telling us, your talent evaluating skills are better than theirs? I understand you want to start with getting a center, but you wanted brook lopez, and his team just has 5 wins.. got their 5th win tonight... Knicks problems are not all about personell, but philosophy if you ask me....

TMS wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

TMS wrote:LMAO! this is so pathetic it's reached hilarious levels... we're talking about giving up every future asset we have to get rid of Fishlips' contract, then Nate's going to Boston for a collection of garbage, & now we're getting embarassed in Chicago by the Bulls & we're watching Bender & Landry chucking up 3's... u cannot write this stuff.

They are at the mercy of any deal. If they dont get rid of Jefferies and Hill --they have one spot for a team that has holes up and down the roster. They are shipping out a 1-5 pick to Utah[which will be 4 weeks of embarrassment when it comes]

They are really working from a position if weakness. To be honest with you--I would wait for the draft and try to trade off Gallinari and Chandler IF they bring back two top 10 picks where I can get Monroe and one of the C's. If I can start with an infrastructure up the middle--then I can work backwards. Gallinari is so overhyped but maybe one team in the top 10 will take him--Chandler couldve got pick 5 last year[what a blunder--but oh wel]

if u can trade Gallo or Wislon for top 10 picks in this draft it's a no brainer, but i don't see any of the bad teams in the NBA being willing to do that.

but where does that get us? starting all over again... lets say we do that and the picks turn out to be , blah players... even busts.. then what? honestly any pick that comes here outside of wall will ride the bench with dantoni as coach. you can bet your dollar on that!

tkf wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

TMS wrote:LMAO! this is so pathetic it's reached hilarious levels... we're talking about giving up every future asset we have to get rid of Fishlips' contract, then Nate's going to Boston for a collection of garbage, & now we're getting embarassed in Chicago by the Bulls & we're watching Bender & Landry chucking up 3's... u cannot write this stuff.

They are at the mercy of any deal. If they dont get rid of Jefferies and Hill --they have one spot for a team that has holes up and down the roster. They are shipping out a 1-5 pick to Utah[which will be 4 weeks of embarrassment when it comes]

They are really working from a position if weakness. To be honest with you--I would wait for the draft and try to trade off Gallinari and Chandler IF they bring back two top 10 picks where I can get Monroe and one of the C's. If I can start with an infrastructure up the middle--then I can work backwards. Gallinari is so overhyped but maybe one team in the top 10 will take him--Chandler couldve got pick 5 last year[what a blunder--but oh wel]

so briggs, you think gallo and chandler can get top 10 picks.. so why trade them? unless you are saying there are other GM's who feel they are better than any possible top 10 pick.. and if they are saying that, then are you telling us, your talent evaluating skills are better than theirs? I understand you want to start with getting a center, but you wanted brook lopez, and his team just has 5 wins.. got their 5th win tonight... Knicks problems are not all about personell, but philosophy if you ask me....

I don't know--I do know that I would blow this thing up.

Final  
CHI 118 NYK 85

TMS wrote:

tkf wrote:

TMS wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

TMS wrote:LMAO! this is so pathetic it's reached hilarious levels... we're talking about giving up every future asset we have to get rid of Fishlips' contract, then Nate's going to Boston for a collection of garbage, & now we're getting embarassed in Chicago by the Bulls & we're watching Bender & Landry chucking up 3's... u cannot write this stuff.

They are at the mercy of any deal. If they dont get rid of Jefferies and Hill --they have one spot for a team that has holes up and down the roster. They are shipping out a 1-5 pick to Utah[which will be 4 weeks of embarrassment when it comes]

They are really working from a position if weakness. To be honest with you--I would wait for the draft and try to trade off Gallinari and Chandler IF they bring back two top 10 picks where I can get Monroe and one of the C's. If I can start with an infrastructure up the middle--then I can work backwards. Gallinari is so overhyped but maybe one team in the top 10 will take him--Chandler couldve got pick 5 last year[what a blunder--but oh wel]

if u can trade Gallo or Wislon for top 10 picks in this draft it's a no brainer, but i don't see any of the bad teams in the NBA being willing to do that.

but where does that get us? starting all over again... lets say we do that and the picks turn out to be , blah players... even busts.. then what? honestly any pick that comes here outside of wall will ride the bench with dantoni as coach. you can bet your dollar on that!

Wall is a stud but there are other big impact level prospects in the lottery this year... DeMarcus Cousins is a beast, then u have guys like Turner & Johnson who many are high on & i've read some good things about... Favors looks like he could be special too & then there's that euro kid from Lithuania who they're hyping up to be the next Sabonis/Dirk clone... don't get me wrong here, i like Gallo & Wilson, but we're talking about top 10 picks in a talent rich draft... but u'r probably right, i don't wanna arm DW with any more picks he might get some bright ideas about trying to dump Curry's contract.

but TMS, Jordan hill looked like a beast last year.. If gallo played college ball, I wouldnt' doubt he would be a beast.. at what point do we say. Ok coach, these kids have talent, develop them properly. I have no doubt if gallo was on a team like the kings with westphal as coach, he would be a hell of a player right now and we would be regretting we passed him up... the teams philosophy and how we treat young players has to change.. for years we have had coaches that ignored young players... gallo and chandler can play, I have no doubt they are as good as anyone in this draft, this year should have been spent developing the kids.. and so far, we faield at that!!

Pharzeone wrote:

tkf wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

TMS wrote:LMAO! this is so pathetic it's reached hilarious levels... we're talking about giving up every future asset we have to get rid of Fishlips' contract, then Nate's going to Boston for a collection of garbage, & now we're getting embarassed in Chicago by the Bulls & we're watching Bender & Landry chucking up 3's... u cannot write this stuff.

They are at the mercy of any deal. If they dont get rid of Jefferies and Hill --they have one spot for a team that has holes up and down the roster. They are shipping out a 1-5 pick to Utah[which will be 4 weeks of embarrassment when it comes]

They are really working from a position if weakness. To be honest with you--I would wait for the draft and try to trade off Gallinari and Chandler IF they bring back two top 10 picks where I can get Monroe and one of the C's. If I can start with an infrastructure up the middle--then I can work backwards. Gallinari is so overhyped but maybe one team in the top 10 will take him--Chandler couldve got pick 5 last year[what a blunder--but oh wel]

so briggs, you think gallo and chandler can get top 10 picks.. so why trade them? unless you are saying there are other GM's who feel they are better than any possible top 10 pick.. and if they are saying that, then are you telling us, your talent evaluating skills are better than theirs? I understand you want to start with getting a center, but you wanted brook lopez, and his team just has 5 wins.. got their 5th win tonight... Knicks problems are not all about personell, but philosophy if you ask me....

So when is this GM going to address this? It appears like he is ready to reward him instead.

honestly, it should have been addressed after that 1-9 start.. LOL.. this was supposed to be an important year for gallo and chandler and so far, they were treated like they were not priorities..