[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Do you still Believe in Donnie and Mike?
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/2/2010  9:50 AM
BasketballJones wrote:And it's true that DJ and me don't watch the Knick games. On Knick game nights, we're out looking for hookers. Is that wrong?

AUTOADVERT
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/2/2010  10:20 AM
TMS wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:I also belive If hughs would have kept his mouth shut and handle his beef with MDA instead of running to the media and donnie walsh like a brat, he would be playing by now. It's probably a little personal by now ( nobody wants an employee going over his head) but I'm not entirely going to blame MDA,s judgment on a player who has been on 4 teams in the last 5 seasons, and bandish by his previous team all together.

what??? personal??? but MDA would never ever dream of making anything personal, didn't you get the memo?... he's the most impersonal person to ever exist on the face of the planet!

Right..and marburys half chinese

ES
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
2/2/2010  10:28 AM
IF we don't get at least one top tier free agent THEN Walsh has failed us and the organization.

You put all your eggs in one basket, you better not drop it.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/2/2010  11:04 AM
fishmike wrote:
franco12 wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
franco12 wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:why should we ask this question during a really bad stretch..perfect time to get honest opions ya think.

I'm looking at the suns game now and there's no question in my mind that if mike had an all star pg on this same roster, we would have a similar record to the hawks if not better.

With that being said, donnie did entertain some PGs, maybe some of you forgot how short this team was, how can you really knock the hill pick or the TD pick, it's still an attemp to solve two dire positions. I think some of us were expecting a little more out of the rooks' but anyone can see that there play doesn't warrant consistant minutes. Both have very low IQ's and only derserve spot minutes.

I also belive If hughs would have kept his mouth shut and handle his beef with MDA instead of running to the media and donnie walsh like a brat, he would be playing by now. It's probably a little personal by now ( nobody wants an employee going over his head) but I'm not entirely going to blame MDA,s judgment on a player who has been on 4 teams in the last 5 seasons, and bandish by his previous team all together.

Mda n donnie are trying to get it right.

If I were coach and had an all star PG, I'd have this team better than the Hawks!

Then why does anything else matter if it's that plain jane simple.

I can only imagine David lee playing with d will, paul or nash..that's and extra 5pg making him a 25 and 12 player..

There's your franchise player

your logic or conception of a franchise player is flawed.

a franchise player puts those numbers up with out the aid of an all star pg or a system.

if Lee really were a franchise player, he would be putting those numbers up in spite of the talent around him.

and an all star pg isn't going to get lee an extra board every game. n fact, he'd probably get one less as there would be less to have were our offense more efficient.

as it stands we will just have to accept he's just your run of the mill 20/11/3.5/55% guy.

His impact would be much greater if he didn't have to play point/center..(Which up until now, I never heard of such a position) his #s are franchise type, but his impact is a star type player. Simple becuase he doesn't get take enough fts. When a player gets to the ft line with great regularity, his impact is enormus.

ES
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
2/2/2010  11:38 AM
Jeez and some of you say you have the stomach to rebuild. Doesn't look like it.

We're on track and both Mike and Donnie are doing their respective jobs so far. There was a poll that someone bumped up from before the season that showed over 80% of us didn't think this was a playoff team. Why are people surprised at the results then? We don't have the talent and balance right now to compete with other teams and if any of you think that we do, then you are just delusional.

If you want to ask this question a year from now, it would make more sense but why question Mike and Donnie when they basically told you that this was going to happen? It's not like Donnie said "we're going to compete in 2009." The primary goal has always been to gain cap space, even if it means sucking for a couple of seasons.

This will be the first off-season that Donnie truly has some flexibility to improve this team. How about we give him a chance to show that his plan could work?

And those that want to blame D'Antoni for the current record are being ridiculous. We all bitch about how flawed this team is and still expect Mike to take this team to the playoffs? Come on now. Would I like to see this team rally and get that 8th seed? Of course, I would. I've watched this team live about a dozen times this season and I can't tell you how many stinkers I've seen in person. Still, I came into this season expecting another transitional year and I can't say that I'm discouraged or surprised by the results. Consequently, it is hard for me to understand why some of you don't have the patience to see this thing through.

"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/2/2010  11:41 AM
s3231 just layed the smack down on all your asses (of the candy variety)...
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

2/2/2010  11:46 AM
If we were playing to win this yr we could have take a talent like Iverson for one yr. I don't see the logic from these two.

The Marbury debacle proved that dantoni and walsh weren't on the same page back then. Walsh thought Marbury would play and danphoney had no intention of playing him, even though he played better than duhon in preseason.

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
Panos
Posts: 30383
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
2/2/2010  11:48 AM
playa2 wrote:If we were playing to win this yr we could have take a talent like Iverson for one yr. I don't see the logic from these two.

The Marbury debacle proved that dantoni and walsh weren't on the same page back then. Walsh thought Marbury would play and danphoney had no intention of playing him, even though he played better than duhon in preseason.

You have the answer in your own post.
After finally being rid of one headcase (Marbury) I don't think they were keen on bringing in another malcontent.

franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
2/2/2010  12:18 PM
I have two words for the D'Antoni Fans: Anthony Roberson.

If everything is about 2010 and the upcoming free agency, why can't Jordan Hill get regular minutes? Same for Toney.

The Bucks are playing Jennings - who was available where we picked and I don't buy Walsh throwing 'unnamed' scouts under the bus- major minutes and are just outside of the play off picture.

Giving Hill and Douglas minutes does what, put our 32 win season in jeopardy? requires MDA to maybe work hard to teach the young players?

I was a big fan of MDA, and defended him against the criticism that he didn't believe in defense.


But after 2 years, sorry, I no longer believe in them.

Is it wrong to want the best for my team?

Sorry, Walsh, you blew it on Jennings. You made a stupid signing with Roberson. Duhon was stop gap, and crap, we would have been better off without him because maybe we would have lost more games last year and maybe we would have gotten a higher draft position

and maybe we could have landed Curry instead of some player that clearly Mike, in spite of what he may say, is not in love with.

Panos
Posts: 30383
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
2/2/2010  12:21 PM
Roberson?! Who gives a crap about Roberson? If we sign a big time FA this offseason you really going to care who was the 12th man on the bench last year? Seriously?
Panos
Posts: 30383
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
2/2/2010  12:22 PM
franco12 wrote:
Is it wrong to want the best for my team?


franco12 wrote:Duhon was stop gap, and crap, we would have been better off without him because maybe we would have lost more games last year and maybe we would have gotten a higher draft position

Make up your mind.

sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/2/2010  12:39 PM
Missing so badly on Jennings has made my faith in Walsh and D'Antoni waver a bit. I dont think anybody reasonably expected the Knicks to be any better than they are now.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Panos
Posts: 30383
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
2/2/2010  12:43 PM
sebstar wrote:Missing so badly on Jennings has made my faith in Walsh and D'Antoni waver a bit. I dont think anybody reasonably expected the Knicks to be any better than they are now.

I'll be honest, I don't remember too many people talking up Jennings before the draft. He got picked about where he was expected to go or higher. While Hill was considered a #3-4 pick going into the draft. I dunno, you could say he should have known better then the guys making the mock polls, but to me it seems like a bit of 20/20 hindsight.
Its not like a single guy on here complained that we missed out on Jennings before the season started and he started lighting it up.

GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
2/2/2010  12:43 PM
sebstar wrote:Missing so badly on Jennings has made my faith in Walsh and D'Antoni waver a bit. I dont think anybody reasonably expected the Knicks to be any better than they are now.

Toronto, Golden State, Minnesota, Oklahoma City, Memphis and LAC all passed on him too.

Tyreke Evans and Curry are nasty. Jury is out on everyone else's picks, including Jordan Hill.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
Panos
Posts: 30383
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
2/2/2010  12:44 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
sebstar wrote:Missing so badly on Jennings has made my faith in Walsh and D'Antoni waver a bit. I dont think anybody reasonably expected the Knicks to be any better than they are now.

Toronto, Golden State, Minnesota, Oklahoma City, Memphis and LAC all passed on him too.

Tyreke Evans and Curry are nasty. Jury is out on everyone else's picks, including Jordan Hill.

Not only did Minnesota miss, they missed twice, and with 2 point guard picks!!

sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/2/2010  12:50 PM
Panos wrote:
sebstar wrote:Missing so badly on Jennings has made my faith in Walsh and D'Antoni waver a bit. I dont think anybody reasonably expected the Knicks to be any better than they are now.

I'll be honest, I don't remember too many people talking up Jennings before the draft. He got picked about where he was expected to go or higher. While Hill was considered a #3-4 pick going into the draft. I dunno, you could say he should have known better then the guys making the mock polls, but to me it seems like a bit of 20/20 hindsight.
Its not like a single guy on here complained that we missed out on Jennings before the season started and he started lighting it up.

Why are you putting cats on a message board on the same level as executives who are paid millions of dollars to make, talent-related scouting decisions?

I dont care that Joe Knicks222 didnt hype Jennings up...thats Walsh's job. Jennings was over in Europe, how the hell were we supposed to know that duke could ball?

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/2/2010  12:54 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/2/2010  1:25 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
sebstar wrote:Missing so badly on Jennings has made my faith in Walsh and D'Antoni waver a bit. I dont think anybody reasonably expected the Knicks to be any better than they are now.

Toronto, Golden State, Minnesota, Oklahoma City, Memphis and LAC all passed on him too.

Tyreke Evans and Curry are nasty. Jury is out on everyone else's picks, including Jordan Hill.

A lot of those teams picked players they are satisfied with and are giving good playing time to. Besides, how many of those teams needed a PG?

Our PG situation is in dire straits. Plus, the cat that we drafted doesnt see a lick of playing time and we are a squad that wont even make the playoffs so there is no excuse why he is riding pine.

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Panos
Posts: 30383
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
2/2/2010  12:59 PM
sebstar wrote:
Panos wrote:
sebstar wrote:Missing so badly on Jennings has made my faith in Walsh and D'Antoni waver a bit. I dont think anybody reasonably expected the Knicks to be any better than they are now.

I'll be honest, I don't remember too many people talking up Jennings before the draft. He got picked about where he was expected to go or higher. While Hill was considered a #3-4 pick going into the draft. I dunno, you could say he should have known better then the guys making the mock polls, but to me it seems like a bit of 20/20 hindsight.
Its not like a single guy on here complained that we missed out on Jennings before the season started and he started lighting it up.

Why are you putting cats on a message board on the same level as executives who are paid millions of dollars to make, talent-related scouting decisions?

I dont care that Joe Knicks222 didnt hype Jennings up...thats Walsh's job. Jennings was over in Europe, how the hell were we supposed to know that duke could ball?

I'll grant you most of that, just not going to roast him on it.

franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
2/2/2010  1:42 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
sebstar wrote:Missing so badly on Jennings has made my faith in Walsh and D'Antoni waver a bit. I dont think anybody reasonably expected the Knicks to be any better than they are now.

Toronto, Golden State, Minnesota, Oklahoma City, Memphis and LAC all passed on him too.

Tyreke Evans and Curry are nasty. Jury is out on everyone else's picks, including Jordan Hill.

Other teams passed on him- yes. But is it wrong to expect my front office to be better than those other teams?

Crap, the Knicks should have more scouts than any other team, unless there is something in the NBA by laws that prevents it.

If if they can't have more, they should have better decision makers.

It starts at the top.

Anthony Roberson is a symbol of the poor evaluation skills that MDA & Walsh have combined for.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/2/2010  1:52 PM
Dolan wouldn't let DW bring in more of his guys to the scouting crew. Dolan decided to keep Zeke's guys. I seem to recall DW had some health issues and wasn't able to travel so he was reliant upon the scouts more. I think DW publically complained so Dolan would let him bring in more of his own guys.
Do you still Believe in Donnie and Mike?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy