BRIGGS wrote:TKF---The fact is Gallo is shooting 35.7% on his first 5 shots--that is not opinion that is fact. This thread started off as Gallo should be option 1 on the Knicks right now--my counter is he isnt doing it when it counts---translation--he starts the game off so poorly too consistently that he cannot be the man right now.
To be honest, I would rather have a guy who is a bit cold at the beginning and comes on strong down the stretch, than a guy who starts strong and is invisible as you approach the finish line.
For me, the go to guy on the team should be the guy you want taking shots and making decisions at the end of the game, and Gallo is usually able to give us a scoring burst in the second half when we need it.
I am not pushing for Gallo to be the #1 scoring option on the team. He is still on the "young side" of 21, is coming off surgery, continues to defer to the vets, and he is clearly not in the kind of physical shape that he will be in when he is 23. Lee, and maybe Harrington,(if he is hot), may be better options at this point, but if you want a clutch 3 down the stretch, Gallinari is the guy who you may want to go to on the Knicks. There will come a day, though, when Gallinari will get many more touches and the green light to do more things when he has the ball.
The fact that we can even discuss and debate this is also amazing, considering where Gallo's career was last season. He has made excellent progress, and is developing into the kind of complete player that has even surprised me, a major Gallinari booster.
How many folks on UK called him a bust last year? How many guys were critical when he started off slow in pre-season and his shot was off? It would be great to see some old posts from guys who think they can evaluate players without all the evidence being in.
Before he played for us he was criticized because people thought he was a soft Euro who coudn't play D. Now we know he is not soft, and can play D quite well for a big man guarding smaller/quicker opponents.
Next he is criticized because he is only a jump shooter. Now he is driving to the basket and showing creativity around the hoop. (He needs to do this more, BUT now we realize he has the ability to do it.)
Now he is taking hits because his early game shooting stats don't measure up in the eyes of some?!
I am looking forward to the day when he is playing great and averaging 20PPG and guys are critical because his dunks are not thunderous enough.
Folks who want to be critical will always find ways to attack a player they don't like or did not want on the team. Now that Hill is getting some play and doing some things on the court, people will be focusing on the things he cannot yet do, and not looking at the positive things he can now do on for the team.
Guys seem to manufacture unrealistic standards when judging certain young players (Including the idea that Gallo should be our #1 scoring option at this point!). It goes on a lot around here, so I have come to expect it, but it is annoying nonetheless.
I think Gallinari has the potential to be a special player in the NBA. I think that Hill can be a fine big man in this league. I think that Douglas can be an excellent 25-30 MPG guard on a winning team.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee