| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
s3231
Posts: 23162 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #544 USA |
I love Gallo as much as anyone but I don't see any concrete evidence anyone can offer up to prove that he has a higher ceiling than Lopez does.
Even if you want to say that Lopez's team has a 2-18 record, fact is that he has the best +/- of any player getting significant minutes on that team. http://www.82games.com/0910/0910NJN.HTM Yeah he probably takes too many jump shots at this point (eFG% of 38%) but guess what, the guy is still shooting 49% from the field and he is an 83% free throw shooter. If that isn't impressive, how about the fact that he is 3rd in blocks right now in the NBA? How can you say he won't improve? For people that say he never shot a good FG%, he shot 53% from the field in his rookie season! Don't get me wrong, I love Gallo and I'm happy we have him, but when I was there at the draft, I was praying we took Lopez at the time. I didn't boo the pick and I've really warmed to Danilo in the last couple of years but part of me still wonders how nice a Lopez/Lee frontcourt would be right about now. I don't see why people can't just be happy with Gallo and acknowledge that Lopez is a very good young talent for the Nets. I mean if you want to suggest that Gallo might have higher upside than Brook, fine. To say it is a fact though is foolish when you consider that the Knicks are 8 games under .500 right now and while they may not be as bad as the Nets, they still aren't a good team at this point (hopefully we change that). "This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
|
|
djsunyc
Posts: 44929 Alba Posts: 42 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #536 |
they're all gonna give bargs grandchildren...
|