[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

God is there even one plyer to build around?
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
11/3/2008  10:04 AM
Posted by tkf:

so after just 3 games and a 1-2 record we came to this conclusion:

We stink
We have no hope
Bring back mebury

wow, what patience.

We all knew this team was flawed, we knew it would take some time to get mikes system going, we know changes are going to have to happen, but after three games, all of that is thrown out the window... LOL... OK..

patience for the players is different than patience for the front office.

[Edited by - djsunyc on 11-03-2008 10:05 AM]
AUTOADVERT
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
11/3/2008  10:05 AM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by PresIke:

The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

su...Mark Jackson?

C'mon man...

i think it's backwards logic. d'antoni, imho, is not a rebuilding coach. his hiring was another starphuck move. it's a waste to have him here with this roster. they need to make major moves otherwise he's going to get frustrated lb style. if d'antoni is the hire, they should've continued the expiring deal philosophy, but this time, targetting players that would work together.

with jackson, that would've been a true signal of a rebuild - ala the raptors hiring sam mitchell 4 years ago. look at how he grew into the job. i only bring up mark jackson b/c he was a finalist for the job.

I dunno. I think D'Antoni wants to show that he can build a team. I don't think this is an LB situation because he and Walsh are working together. I just think that the idea that you bring a good coach in when the team is ready is not necessarily something I agree with at all.

As a former teacher, I will tell you that having a veteran who commands respect and creates a good culture is vital. A novice teacher or coach is less likely to know how to do this, and from what I gather, Jax was just not ready for the job.

Hiring a complete rookie coach for a "rebuild" is very dangerous. D'Antoni knows the situation, don't you think?

You seem to be assuming that he didn't know what he was getting into, or didn't care because of the $$$ or something. I think you have to give him more credit than that at this point.

Steph is still here, and look at the problems it is causing.

Getting a coach to establish a culture and system is tremendously vital to rebuilding. They are assessing players so they can make more educated decisions down the road.

So, D'Antoni got pissed about the calls for Steph.

How many fans actually disagree with him? It's really a small percentage.

We ARE rebuilding, and I think that's obvious, otherwise why is Steph on the bench.

Since D'Antoni is the one who has him on the bench and inactive, how is it that he is not aware that he is doing a rebuilding job here?
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
11/3/2008  10:07 AM
Posted by PresIke:
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by PresIke:

The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

su...Mark Jackson?

C'mon man...

i think it's backwards logic. d'antoni, imho, is not a rebuilding coach. his hiring was another starphuck move. it's a waste to have him here with this roster. they need to make major moves otherwise he's going to get frustrated lb style. if d'antoni is the hire, they should've continued the expiring deal philosophy, but this time, targetting players that would work together.

with jackson, that would've been a true signal of a rebuild - ala the raptors hiring sam mitchell 4 years ago. look at how he grew into the job. i only bring up mark jackson b/c he was a finalist for the job.

I dunno. I think D'Antoni wants to show that he can build a team. I don't think this is an LB situation because he and Walsh are working together. I just think that the idea that you bring a good coach in when the team is ready is not necessarily something I agree with at all.

As a former teacher, I will tell you that having a veteran who commands respect and creates a good culture is vital. A novice teacher or coach is less likely to know how to do this, and from what I gather, Jax was just not ready for the job.

Hiring a complete rookie coach for a "rebuild" is very dangerous. D'Antoni knows the situation, don't you think?

You seem to be assuming that he didn't know what he was getting into, or didn't care because of the $$$ or something. I think you have to give him more credit than that at this point.

Steph is still here, and look at the problems it is causing.

Getting a coach to establish a culture and system is tremendously vital to rebuilding. They are assessing players so they can make more educated decisions down the road.

So, D'Antoni got pissed about the calls for Steph.

How many fans actually disagree with him? It's really a small percentage.

We ARE rebuilding, and I think that's obvious, otherwise why is Steph on the bench.

Since D'Antoni is the one who has him on the bench and inactive, how is it that he is not aware that he is doing a rebuilding job here?

i didn't mean lb like the media war w/ players and his gm. i meant not seeing a set rotation and constantly jumbling lineups to find something that works. game 3 into the season and he was talking about lack of energy. what happens after 50 more games with this media?
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
11/3/2008  10:09 AM
In other words, D'Antoni knows we ain't going to win every game, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't have high expectations for players.

All of the educational psychology out there says teachers/coaches must maintain and communicate that.

A huge difference between D'Antoni and Brown is the other variables about their approach that made Brown lose respect with the players while I suspect D'Antoni will keep it.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
11/3/2008  10:12 AM
i see your points ike, but i don't think it matters b/c no more than 2 players on this current roster will be here in 2010.
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
11/3/2008  10:15 AM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by PresIke:
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by PresIke:

The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

su...Mark Jackson?

C'mon man...

i think it's backwards logic. d'antoni, imho, is not a rebuilding coach. his hiring was another starphuck move. it's a waste to have him here with this roster. they need to make major moves otherwise he's going to get frustrated lb style. if d'antoni is the hire, they should've continued the expiring deal philosophy, but this time, targetting players that would work together.

with jackson, that would've been a true signal of a rebuild - ala the raptors hiring sam mitchell 4 years ago. look at how he grew into the job. i only bring up mark jackson b/c he was a finalist for the job.

I dunno. I think D'Antoni wants to show that he can build a team. I don't think this is an LB situation because he and Walsh are working together. I just think that the idea that you bring a good coach in when the team is ready is not necessarily something I agree with at all.

As a former teacher, I will tell you that having a veteran who commands respect and creates a good culture is vital. A novice teacher or coach is less likely to know how to do this, and from what I gather, Jax was just not ready for the job.

Hiring a complete rookie coach for a "rebuild" is very dangerous. D'Antoni knows the situation, don't you think?

You seem to be assuming that he didn't know what he was getting into, or didn't care because of the $$$ or something. I think you have to give him more credit than that at this point.

Steph is still here, and look at the problems it is causing.

Getting a coach to establish a culture and system is tremendously vital to rebuilding. They are assessing players so they can make more educated decisions down the road.

So, D'Antoni got pissed about the calls for Steph.

How many fans actually disagree with him? It's really a small percentage.

We ARE rebuilding, and I think that's obvious, otherwise why is Steph on the bench.

Since D'Antoni is the one who has him on the bench and inactive, how is it that he is not aware that he is doing a rebuilding job here?

i didn't mean lb like the media war w/ players and his gm. i meant not seeing a set rotation and constantly jumbling lineups to find something that works. game 3 into the season and he was talking about lack of energy. what happens after 50 more games with this media?

I hear you. I don't think we are going to see constant lineup changes, but some guys may not start if they don't perform.

It is harder when you don't have guys that can come in and outplay the starter and you want to hold players accountable.

He did this in pre-season, but I think he wants to settle on a rotation.

The other thing is to see if some guys who he doesn't think fits can be moved.

It ain't gonna be easy, but if Jamal is not consistent I think they may look to move him, even though as I know you have stated the organization likes him.

In the end, it's business, not personal.

I also think you and I agree that we should move him anyway.

What team wants him is the harder question to answer.

Let's see how some players do over the next few weeks/months and then I suspect we will see guys get settled in or moved.

Of course, the big problem is the size of the contracts of some of these guys, and the desire for teams (including us) to get under the cap by 2010.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

11/3/2008  10:15 AM
Posted by djsunyc:


i didn't mean lb like the media war w/ players and his gm. i meant not seeing a set rotation and constantly jumbling lineups to find something that works. game 3 into the season and he was talking about lack of energy. what happens after 50 more games with this media?

what diff does it make in the end. Jax would be saying the same thing, the coach just can't say we suck and have no expectations of winning, so they talk about energy, or possibly having to tweak the lineups, or improve their conditioning to go 48 mins, or play both ends of the floor, or make their free throws, or believe in themselves. it's the same prosaic bulldoo over and over.

we need a roster overhaul, and such would be the case whoever was in charge.
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
11/3/2008  10:17 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

i see your points ike, but i don't think it matters b/c no more than 2 players on this current roster will be here in 2010.

su, I think you are right that a lot of guys are at risk for being moved. That's part of the reason we need to see them play now. It may very well come at the expense of wins...but isn't that what a lot of us who are up in arms over the last two games want anyway?

Absolutely, this is not the same team we will have in two years.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
11/3/2008  10:27 AM
The way some of chicken liver sized hearts are running around parroting the press you would think that the Knicks are doomed forever after three freakin' games.

Damn, can somebody around here grow a pair?

This makeover edition of the Knicks roster is in the first stages of ripping out the moldy drywall (Curry), overhauling the plumbing (Marbury) and switching out the septic system (James).

Walsh is already headed to Home Depot to check out the paint colors.

C'mon...
once a knick always a knick
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/3/2008  10:29 AM
Posted by misterearl:

The way some of chicken liver sized hearts are running around parroting the press you would think that the Knicks are doomed forever after three freakin' games.

Damn, can somebody around here grow a pair?

This makeover edition of the Knicks roster is in the first stages of ripping out the moldy drywall (Curry), overhauling the plumbing (Marbury) and switching out the septic system (James).

Walsh is already headed to Home Depot to check out the paint colors.

C'mon...

Same post different season.

Don't hate on objectiveness Earl. we're still rooting.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
11/3/2008  10:29 AM
you don't build around one player anymore. See Paul Pierce in Boston?

You need three.

ETA Eastern Conference Finals is 2010.

Enjoy The Ride
once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
11/3/2008  10:32 AM
The Answer Man Never Hates On Anything Or Anybody

Objectiveness? There is absolutely nothing objective about being a fan.

Next thing you will be claiming "Fair And Balanced"
once a knick always a knick
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/3/2008  10:40 AM
Posted by misterearl:

The Answer Man Never Hates On Anything Or Anybody

Objectiveness? There is absolutely nothing objective about being a fan.

Next thing you will be claiming "Fair And Balanced"

You are correct that their is no objectivity to being in a fan in that we all (generally) root no matter what.

But we have to call it like we see it. Heck, even you do -- witness your comments on Eddy Corny et al. That is your last shred of objectivity.

Or else, I would expect to see you saying: Corny is in the weight room and working on his game to become better than ever. We know that isn't true.

Here is something that also isn't true: Chris Duhon is a really good PG that is going to lead a team to a surprisingly good season.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
11/3/2008  10:44 AM
oohah - are you really ready to give a final grade on Chris Duhon after three games?

c'mon. Toughen up dude. It's a long season.
once a knick always a knick
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/3/2008  10:51 AM
Posted by misterearl:

oohah - are you really ready to give a final grade on Chris Duhon after three games?

c'mon. Toughen up dude. It's a long season.

I watched during Marvin Webster so I don't need to toughen up any. Duhon's grade is not based on 3 games it is based on his career.

I hope they win next game!

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
11/3/2008  11:03 AM
2010

The question is not whether you want them to win the next game. We are all patriotic Knicks supporters. There are no blue Knicks fans, or orange Knicks fans. No conservative or liberal Knicks fans. Just Knicks fans.

The question is how many years you give the Walsh/D'Antoni paradigm shift to cohere?

once a knick always a knick
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
11/3/2008  11:04 AM
Posted by oohah:
Posted by misterearl:

oohah - are you really ready to give a final grade on Chris Duhon after three games?

c'mon. Toughen up dude. It's a long season.

I watched during Marvin Webster so I don't need to toughen up any. Duhon's grade is not based on 3 games it is based on his career.

I hope they win next game!

oohah

oohah, stop being such a hater
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
11/3/2008  11:21 AM
Posted by misterearl:

2010

The question is not whether you want them to win the next game. We are all patriotic Knicks supporters. There are no blue Knicks fans, or orange Knicks fans. No conservative or liberal Knicks fans. Just Knicks fans.

The question is how many years you give the Walsh/D'Antoni paradigm shift to cohere?

Walsh has 4 years. D'Antoni has two years. The fans won't be giving them that time, that the time Dolan's normally has set up in his mind. I give Dolan one year and half before he steps into the picture.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34074
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

11/3/2008  11:30 AM
Posted by tkf:

so after just 3 games and a 1-2 record we came to this conclusion:

We stink
We have no hope
Bring back mebury

wow, what patience.

We all knew this team was flawed, we knew it would take some time to get mikes system going, we know changes are going to have to happen, but after three games, all of that is thrown out the window... LOL... OK..

I disagree... a few of us knew this team was garbage, regardless of who the new GM and coach were. However, there was change coming into this year. Change sometimes gets people to believe, to be hopeful.

The players are the same though, so they'll stink. But this year was the first cause for genuine optimism in sometime. And the fact that this team stinks is evident.

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
God is there even one plyer to build around?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy