Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by EwingsGlass:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by EwingsGlass:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by PhilinLA:
? He has been a double double machine since we got him and now that he has a jumper, people want to wait to see him in the regular season? Wow.
If I was David Lee agent--I would ask for the max. I would ask who is more valuable to you Zach or David?
This is absurd. Who is more valuable? We are talking cost, not value... of course Lee is more value... would you pay Randolph the same amount again? Clearly not. Otherwise people would be on this board talking about what a great contract Randolph has... you can't benchmark Randolph as the contract that the Knicks should be dishing out. Chris Paul gets max dollars...Lebron gets max dollars... Lee does not get max dollars... he gets a 3 year deal as a role player... not "the man" dollars on a contender... lets lost the NY-centric view on this... if he needs those kinds of dollars to stay in NY, see what kind of draft pick you can get in a sign and trade for contracts expiring in 2010. Giving Lee max dollars would make him the next Allan Houston...sure you are rewarding a great teamate and good player... but you will make the fans resent his paycheck when he has an off night. Let's keep things in the right ballpark...
I think any good agent would ask for the maximum for Lee.
No harm in asking, I guess. But, I think Lee is more likely to command Drew Gooden money.... 3 years/23 mill. Maybe a little more... but max contract is out of reach... Lee doesn't play defense and I think his '20/10' prediction will be tougher against top starters... we are talking about a guy who has not really started and predicting he is a max contract player because he can now (in pre-season) know down a 14 ft jumper. Still doesn't play defense. I think he is awesome and want to see him continue to develop, but if I am choosing between paying someone like Chris Bosh or Chris Paul max money and David Lee max money... I think the choice is clear... he hasn't even made an all-star team...
Lee is a much better player than Drew Gooden. Drew also has a lot of baggage, which is why he's played on 4 teams in 6 seasons. If the Bulls offered me Gooden for Lee, I'd demand two 1st round draft picks.
I like David Lee too, but he doesn't walk on water...I agree, and I think he is better than Drew Gooden, but
David Lee
07-08 NYK 29mins 0.552FG 0.819FT% 8.9Rebs 1.2ast 0.7st 0.4bl 1.20to 2.60pf 10.8pts
Drew Gooden
07-08 CLE/CHI 30.8mins 0.449FG 0.753FT% 8.6Rebs 1.2ast 0.7st 0.8bl 1.77to 2.90pf 12.0pts
So, besides a much better FG% and FT%, their stats are pretty much the same. The major difference is that Lee scores off of putbacks... but on a stat level at least, I don't think that David Lee deserves much more than the 7-8m a year that Drew got on a three year contract.