the lottery hasn't hurt San Antonio sub? it's not just getting the picks it's doing the right thing when you get a pick. Had the knicks drafted well we have a dynasty like no other we all know that.

sub the reason why we want to scrap the team, is not just to gain lottery positions, it's that this team has no talent is every position exept shooting guard(even that position is just above average) and the rest of the team is Overpriced,old out sized. We got like three 6'6 power fowards. so yes it's time to scrap this team go in another direction, hold a few lottery picks instead of trading them for damaged goods.

I wanted mcdeyyes don't get me wrong but never knew why we had to give up a pick for him in last years lottery. i mean he did have two surgeries in two years. some people were naive and thought he would save the season, coming off magor knee surgery (playa2) but it's crazy how last year had more dept in the draft we trade the pick and this year we look to keep it.

of course it's all hindsight but imagine how we look in the trade if we gave this years pick got mcdeyyes and used last years pick on caron or amare.

Now i'm not holding ARES,Vmart ,Sub zero, or tkf to these standards of cousre we are not GM's, but it would be nice to have some one that can forecast this or other sucessful scenario's.
A lot of basket ball is anticipation, on the court and off the court.
Being patient is for punks.

last post is jordan lost the series, not team.

When you play russian roulette, better known as the over the CAP game the Knicks play... you are at a much greater risk to make mistakes to compound the situation. The reason being is, obviously, you can't participate in the free agent market and the team is held captive by their current set of players... the only players team can sign.

The perfect example of which, is Allan Houston. Team runs risk of losing him for nothing, has this win now mentality and Layden signs him to a contract 30-40 million more than was necessary.

ok nice one vmart, but you know daiv don't count. he aint a superstar either, he is a christian ewing.You beat me too the punch, Ewing had some ood games against Zo. but Zo gave him some good games back. Ew had some good moments but domination......And smiits, that game ewing had a sore hammy, still one point is inexcuseable, even in his prime ewing got manhandled by smits come on vmart admit it. but what bothered me both was the bulls. i still think we could never beat them. but it would of been nice to see ewing did what duncan did against the lakers 30 and 15 every game, or get like 12 in a quarter to dominate and seal the deal.

But we just proved the point ewing was a good player no superstar, i mean plenty of players never won, and was by them self but never got dominated by clearly infereior players like my man no heart.