Posted by misterearl:
MODI defined player transactions as a body of work, for their cumulative effect instead of the one-at-a-time approach which you seem bent on repeating.
The cumulative effect is that we're a losing squad until proven otherwise. The cumulative effect is that, until proven otherwise, that Isiah has had net gains worse than even Layden -- just look at our records. There's still time for Isiah to turn this all around, but I'm not holding my breath.
Also, I call total BS on the excuses in this thread. People complaining that we lost H20, when Isiah hand-picked multiple replacements before he went down... how about this, the Layden Knicks lost Antonio McDyess and still won 37 games! How does everyone forget that? Add McDyess, they likely win at least 45.
Posted by misterearl:
The arbitrary individual grades do not help to define the relative merit of any deal as the Knicks roster is a work in progress.
That sounds like an admission that Isiah has lost most of his individual trades, mostly by overpaying or trading for the sake of trading. If you take the trades as a whole, you have to discount most of the draft picks received in trades, since most of his gains with draft picks were merely to counteract all of the good draft picks he traded away!
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.