[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Why some NY Knicks fans like Isiah?
Author Thread
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
9/25/2007  2:35 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by islesfan:

Using nixluva's definition for being a "better player", the CBA is filled with players who are better than Ariza.

nixluva, is Chandler a better player than Balkman, right now? And please explain why you do or don't believe that to be the case.
Obviously by the very nature of the fact that we're talking about a guy who hasn't played a game yet, we have to talk in terms of what we "believe" the players level of ability is. Just like Oden or Durant or any other player in this draft. Still people make assessments like this all the time.

Maybe the CBA is filled with guys who are better than Ariza, I don't know for sure. I doubt it tho. It's my opinion that Chan is a better overall player.

Balkman is not a better player skills wise, but he's got an unreal energy level and intangible effect on the game. It's impossible to judge intangibles completely without games played. I think Chan would be an effective player in our offense whereas Balk isn't a good enough shooter to fulfill that role. Balk does a lot of the garbage type work and I think Chan would be less impactful in those same areas. Balk tho is IMO better than Ariza. I think Balk is more productive and I think right now he's better at what he does than Chan is at what he does and his impact would be felt more. So i'd put Balk ahead of Chan and Ariza IMO.

why don't you just say it this way then: It's my opinion that Chan is GONNA BE a better overall player.

Because that would be much too easy and make way too much sense.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/25/2007  5:07 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by islesfan:

Using nixluva's definition for being a "better player", the CBA is filled with players who are better than Ariza.

nixluva, is Chandler a better player than Balkman, right now? And please explain why you do or don't believe that to be the case.
Obviously by the very nature of the fact that we're talking about a guy who hasn't played a game yet, we have to talk in terms of what we "believe" the players level of ability is. Just like Oden or Durant or any other player in this draft. Still people make assessments like this all the time.

Maybe the CBA is filled with guys who are better than Ariza, I don't know for sure. I doubt it tho. It's my opinion that Chan is a better overall player.

Balkman is not a better player skills wise, but he's got an unreal energy level and intangible effect on the game. It's impossible to judge intangibles completely without games played. I think Chan would be an effective player in our offense whereas Balk isn't a good enough shooter to fulfill that role. Balk does a lot of the garbage type work and I think Chan would be less impactful in those same areas. Balk tho is IMO better than Ariza. I think Balk is more productive and I think right now he's better at what he does than Chan is at what he does and his impact would be felt more. So i'd put Balk ahead of Chan and Ariza IMO.

why don't you just say it this way then: It's my opinion that Chan is GONNA BE a better overall player.
Let me put it this way. "Right Now" isn't about some esoteric moment of time, it's ALWAYS based on a season as a reference point. Since Chan doesn't have any NBA seasons played, we'd have to use this one to make any determination. Which is the whole entire point.

The only way to prove that is over time. I can't prove it any other way. So I can only offer my OPINION that he's a better player. Of course as it is, we may not be able to settle this due to a lack of opportunity for Chan. My point is if you don't use this season to determine who is better right now, then how do you determine it? If you say that LeBron is a better player than Melo "right now", you're basing it off of the last SEASON.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
9/25/2007  5:27 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by martin:
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by islesfan:

Using nixluva's definition for being a "better player", the CBA is filled with players who are better than Ariza.

nixluva, is Chandler a better player than Balkman, right now? And please explain why you do or don't believe that to be the case.
Obviously by the very nature of the fact that we're talking about a guy who hasn't played a game yet, we have to talk in terms of what we "believe" the players level of ability is. Just like Oden or Durant or any other player in this draft. Still people make assessments like this all the time.

Maybe the CBA is filled with guys who are better than Ariza, I don't know for sure. I doubt it tho. It's my opinion that Chan is a better overall player.

Balkman is not a better player skills wise, but he's got an unreal energy level and intangible effect on the game. It's impossible to judge intangibles completely without games played. I think Chan would be an effective player in our offense whereas Balk isn't a good enough shooter to fulfill that role. Balk does a lot of the garbage type work and I think Chan would be less impactful in those same areas. Balk tho is IMO better than Ariza. I think Balk is more productive and I think right now he's better at what he does than Chan is at what he does and his impact would be felt more. So i'd put Balk ahead of Chan and Ariza IMO.

why don't you just say it this way then: It's my opinion that Chan is GONNA BE a better overall player.
Let me put it this way. "Right Now" isn't about some esoteric moment of time, it's ALWAYS based on a season as a reference point. Since Chan doesn't have any NBA seasons played, we'd have to use this one to make any determination. Which is the whole entire point.

The only way to prove that is over time. I can't prove it any other way. So I can only offer my OPINION that he's a better player. Of course as it is, we may not be able to settle this due to a lack of opportunity for Chan. My point is if you don't use this season to determine who is better right now, then how do you determine it? If you say that LeBron is a better player than Melo "right now", you're basing it off of the last SEASON.

Again, why don't you just say it this way then: It's my opinion that Chan is GONNA BE a better overall player.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

9/25/2007  5:33 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:
Posted by djsunyc:

it seems like just yesterday when isiah said there was a "virus" here when he took over and he was going to rid the team of it.

Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease.


So much for the Hippocratic Oath and "First, do no harm."
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/25/2007  5:36 PM
Posted by islesfan:

Again, why don't you just say it this way then: It's my opinion that Chan is GONNA BE a better overall player.
Another way to say what i'm sying is that Chan will prove to be a better player than Ariza is, if he get's a chance to play this year. In saying that you have to feel that he's already a better player. If both are given the same amount of time, I would expect Chan to be the better player.


islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
9/25/2007  5:41 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by islesfan:

Again, why don't you just say it this way then: It's my opinion that Chan is GONNA BE a better overall player.
Another way to say what i'm sying is that Chan will prove to be a better player than Ariza is, if he get's a chance to play this year. In saying that you have to feel that he's already a better player. If both are given the same amount of time, I would expect Chan to be the better player.

LOL What?!? If you think that someone will prove to be better, you have to believe that to already be the case?!? That doesn't make any sense.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

9/25/2007  5:42 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by martin:
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by islesfan:

Using nixluva's definition for being a "better player", the CBA is filled with players who are better than Ariza.

nixluva, is Chandler a better player than Balkman, right now? And please explain why you do or don't believe that to be the case.
Obviously by the very nature of the fact that we're talking about a guy who hasn't played a game yet, we have to talk in terms of what we "believe" the players level of ability is. Just like Oden or Durant or any other player in this draft. Still people make assessments like this all the time.

Maybe the CBA is filled with guys who are better than Ariza, I don't know for sure. I doubt it tho. It's my opinion that Chan is a better overall player.

Balkman is not a better player skills wise, but he's got an unreal energy level and intangible effect on the game. It's impossible to judge intangibles completely without games played. I think Chan would be an effective player in our offense whereas Balk isn't a good enough shooter to fulfill that role. Balk does a lot of the garbage type work and I think Chan would be less impactful in those same areas. Balk tho is IMO better than Ariza. I think Balk is more productive and I think right now he's better at what he does than Chan is at what he does and his impact would be felt more. So i'd put Balk ahead of Chan and Ariza IMO.

why don't you just say it this way then: It's my opinion that Chan is GONNA BE a better overall player.
Let me put it this way. "Right Now" isn't about some esoteric moment of time, it's ALWAYS based on a season as a reference point. Since Chan doesn't have any NBA seasons played, we'd have to use this one to make any determination. Which is the whole entire point.

The only way to prove that is over time. I can't prove it any other way. So I can only offer my OPINION that he's a better player. Of course as it is, we may not be able to settle this due to a lack of opportunity for Chan. My point is if you don't use this season to determine who is better right now, then how do you determine it? If you say that LeBron is a better player than Melo "right now", you're basing it off of the last SEASON.


To be honest I seriously believe you didn't read what Earl originally stated... correctly, and ran with it. If you'd have taken the time to read his statement there's no way you'd come to this point. Which is what we were trying to tell you earlier in this thread. Just to show, you skip over the main points to drive your opinion hard hoping it miraculously turns into a fact here's what I said on the last page which isn't too different than what you stated above bolded....


Officially the answer is Who knows they haven't played a game this yr. Technically you'd have to say Ariza is better due to the fact he has more NBA experience and has played more games including many as a starter.


Discernment may have more room in your argument if someone said Ariza is already better than Chandler but no one really said that. A few of us argued why we feel Ariza may have the edge but no one made the direct statement. Earl's statementWilson Chandler is already better than Trevor Ariza, who no one heard of is unsubstantiated, dubious, uncertain, unconfirmed etc etc(based on nothing at all but opinion just like yours) in it's original form... In which your opinion doesn't count no matter how much you beg and plead. Nix you're stubborn, very unreasonable, and you have a hard time being humble admitting you're wrong. Many of us have been on this board especially myself. I've literally had to apologize, delete several messages and threads to spare myself the embarrassment. Admit you're wrong and move on.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 09-25-2007 4:48 PM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
Nalod
Posts: 72439
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/25/2007  5:45 PM
Isles, Nix is talking like a fan, one that is hopeful.

Remember to stay a fan you have to be winning or have hope.

Despite his mole like postive spin, he projects as one would based no media hype and internet chat.

The guy has yet to face full NBA competition or a camp. Chan has tools, but he might be a flop, or have huge upside. Thats the kind of pick he was, a project!
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

9/25/2007  5:45 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by islesfan:

Again, why don't you just say it this way then: It's my opinion that Chan is GONNA BE a better overall player.
Another way to say what i'm sying is that Chan will prove to be a better player than Ariza is, if he get's a chance to play this year. In saying that you have to feel that he's already a better player. If both are given the same amount of time, I would expect Chan to be the better player.


Nix it's still your OPINION and Earl's was an OPINION stated as a FACT. You tried to use your OPINION to support Earl's OPINION Knocking On Wood that it becomes a FACT. You failed!
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
9/25/2007  5:50 PM
Wow, this is as pointless as the Tim Duncan is garbage thread of the summer of 2005. If you guys can add about 1300 more posts you might eclipse it in the annals of postdum.
I just hope that people will like me
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
9/25/2007  5:57 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

Wow, this is as pointless as the Tim Duncan is garbage thread of the summer of 2005. If you guys can add about 1300 more posts you might eclipse it in the annals of postdum.

This is my preseason. You can't expect me to be at the top of my game already.

I should be close to ready, around the same time Curry is being carried to the finish of the first suicide drill.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
9/25/2007  6:02 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by Bippity10:

Wow, this is as pointless as the Tim Duncan is garbage thread of the summer of 2005. If you guys can add about 1300 more posts you might eclipse it in the annals of postdum.

This is my preseason. You can't expect me to be at the top of my game already.

I should be close to ready, around the same time Curry is being carried to the finish of the first suicide drill.

It is a fact that Curry will be in better shape than Trevor ARiza
I just hope that people will like me
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
9/25/2007  6:15 PM
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by Bippity10:

Wow, this is as pointless as the Tim Duncan is garbage thread of the summer of 2005. If you guys can add about 1300 more posts you might eclipse it in the annals of postdum.

This is my preseason. You can't expect me to be at the top of my game already.

I should be close to ready, around the same time Curry is being carried to the finish of the first suicide drill.

It is a fact that Curry will be in better shape than Trevor ARiza

As always, Bobo is in midseason form.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
9/25/2007  11:37 PM
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by Bippity10:

Wow, this is as pointless as the Tim Duncan is garbage thread of the summer of 2005. If you guys can add about 1300 more posts you might eclipse it in the annals of postdum.

This is my preseason. You can't expect me to be at the top of my game already.

I should be close to ready, around the same time Curry is being carried to the finish of the first suicide drill.

It is a fact that Curry will be in better shape than Trevor ARiza

Eddy will be bigger than Ariza for sure. The question is 2 times bigger or 1.5 times bigger.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Why some NY Knicks fans like Isiah?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy