Posted by kam77:
I agree with you that we don't need the Bulls to win the lottery to realize how bad the Curry deal was but I think it would clue some fans in.
I'm wondering where the line is drawn. You're admitting you have an agenda here that would be strengthened if the Bulls win the lotto.
So it stands to reason that the TRADE should be judged on assets given up. Would you have said its a bad deal if last year we picked 9th instead of 2nd? Last year all the very good picks were gone by 9.
My only "agenda" is for the Knicks to get championships as soon and often as possible. What's yours?
The trade would have been less bad but still a disaster in that scenario. Giving up even one lottery pick in one draft for lazy Eddy is a disaster.
[Edited by - bonn1997 on 04-24-2007 12:30 PM]
