Originally posted by TrueBlue:

A few post back in this same thread he said

Nixluva

04-09-2007 3:39 PM Show Profile Reply with Quote I still think the combination of potential talent will be in the Knicks favor. Tyrus and this years pick vs. Curry, Balkman and their Pick. If they end up with #1 or #2, then it's a landslide for Chicago. Let's hope that doesn't happen.

Please don't use the teams current records as any measure of the value of the trade. Chicago is well ahead of us in their team development. It will take us time to get to the point that they're at. Tyrus isn't THE reason that they are as good as they are.

[

He doesn't keep a track of what he says and post purely off emotion. If he'd step back and take a deep breath, instead of his programmed defend my relative's team repsones, he'd proably contribute quality to this board instead of quantity. I've never seen someone contradict himself as much as he does in a matter of minutes.

LOL great catch.

Even nixluva doesn't believe the crap that he spews. If he did, maybe he'd be able to keep his ramblings consistent instead of contradicting himself.
I didn't change my point of view, it was just written poorly. I'm saying the same thing i've said since my 1st post in this thread. You just don't understand how I meant that.

"We have him and IMO Balkman to show for that trade. This year we'll give them our pick and hopfully it won't be #1 or #2. If that's the case then I still believe this will come out in our favor."

The KEY part of that statement is "won't be #1 or #2. I'm not saying that I think the trade is in our favor if they end up with #1 or #2, I just wrote that last sentence in a confusing way. I was saying that if they DON'T get #1 or #2 that it's still in our favor. You guys spend so much time going over everything I write just in an effort to try and catch me out there clearly this was just a poorly written quote.

This was my 1st post in this thread and most everything i've said is the same as this.

Posted by nixluva:

I tend to agree with the article. Tyrus is a decent player but he hasn't really made an impact on the Bulls record. They are about what they have always been and their record reflects a steady growth that was to be expected. Now in this draft the lottery balls would have to take a big turn in their favor. It could happen, but it's not likely that they go from 10 to 1 or 2.

We still got a guy in Balkman that gives us a high energy guy in a similar mold to Tyrus. We'll really have to wait a while to know for sure, but at this point I like what we've gotten out of it.
[/quote]

Posted by nixluva:

Originally posted by TrueBlue:

A few post back in this same thread he said

Nixluva

04-09-2007 3:39 PM Show Profile Reply with Quote I still think the combination of potential talent will be in the Knicks favor. Tyrus and this years pick vs. Curry, Balkman and their Pick. If they end up with #1 or #2, then it's a landslide for Chicago. Let's hope that doesn't happen.

Please don't use the teams current records as any measure of the value of the trade. Chicago is well ahead of us in their team development. It will take us time to get to the point that they're at. Tyrus isn't THE reason that they are as good as they are.

[

He doesn't keep a track of what he says and post purely off emotion. If he'd step back and take a deep breath, instead of his programmed defend my relative's team repsones, he'd proably contribute quality to this board instead of quantity. I've never seen someone contradict himself as much as he does in a matter of minutes.

LOL great catch.

Even nixluva doesn't believe the crap that he spews. If he did, maybe he'd be able to keep his ramblings consistent instead of contradicting himself.

I didn't change my point of view, it was just written poorly. I'm saying the same thing i've said since my 1st post in this thread. You just don't understand how I meant that.

"We have him and IMO Balkman to show for that trade. This year we'll give them our pick and hopfully it won't be #1 or #2. If that's the case then I still believe this will come out in our favor."

The KEY part of that statement is "won't be #1 or #2. I'm not saying that I think the trade is in our favor if they end up with #1 or #2, I just wrote that last sentence in a confusing way. I was saying that if they DON'T get #1 or #2 that it's still in our favor. You guys spend so much time going over everything I write just in an effort to try and catch me out there clearly this was just a poorly written quote.

This was my 1st post in this thread and most everything i've said is the same as this.

Posted by nixluva:

I tend to agree with the article. Tyrus is a decent player but he hasn't really made an impact on the Bulls record. They are about what they have always been and their record reflects a steady growth that was to be expected. Now in this draft the lottery balls would have to take a big turn in their favor. It could happen, but it's not likely that they go from 10 to 1 or 2.

We still got a guy in Balkman that gives us a high energy guy in a similar mold to Tyrus. We'll really have to wait a while to know for sure, but at this point I like what we've gotten out of it.

[/quote]

Nice try at damage control but it's not working.

Luva it doesn't matter how you try to clean up everyone sees how you failed at being consistent and you do this habitually.

Posted by MS:

What I would like to know is how berman has a job and fails to look at the draft right now

Odom
Durant
Wright
Horford
Green
Hibbert
Brewer
Noah

To name a few

To go with

Roy
Foye
Thomas

Would you really rather have curry than a combination of those players, granted we might not have the chance to draft in the top 5 this year, but still we are looking at cap room and a couple of dynmic players that play two way ball

aside from oden and durant, yep.

Posted by nixluva:

Posted by TrueBlue:

I find at least 12 legitimate guys on the list who are centers. I was being generous in taking a few guys away. And Curry has the nerve to be ranked 40th at rebounds per48 from that same list.

Tonight he had 5reb

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 04-09-2007 9:41 PM]

Going back and forth with you on this one stat is not what this thread is about. The thing is that Curry is a LEGIT Center

based on what? On defense he looks more like a legit WNBA cheerleader than a "LEGIT" NBA center (and a ****ing ugly cheerleader at that!).