Posted by TMS:
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by TMS:
Do you really think that if Steph passed the ball MORE that we'd win these games? You really think that?
yeah, i actually do think if he got his teammates involved more early & often, that it would help the team's chances of winning more games... & yeah, i think i know the game too... thanks though.
Tell me just what it is that these other guys are going to do with the ball when they get it and the other team is playing a zone? Who is it that is going to take the perimeter shots or break down the D to create a better scoring opportunity? How liable are they to turn it over considering the alarming rate at which we do that already? The only other guy available right now who can break a team down is Nate and his success rate isn't high enough. Mardy does it on occasion, but he's not yet fully comfortable. Almost none of the guys is comfortable catching and shooting. Frye has been lost and Jared is up and down with his success rate at this point. This isn't Toronto where you have shooters all over the place.
Just to be clear we're talking about the roster as it is right now. Not when we have all of our guys healthy.
my focus is on the big picture... by Marbury trusting his teammates to make plays & putting them into positions to score, i feel the overall improvement in the team is likely to be higher than if Marbury plays his "All Alone" style of ball he's playing now... the overall improvement of the team as a whole over the long haul is ALOT more important than seeing Marbury put up 30 a night & losing games anyway... i could care less what the score is if they're just going to lose games anyway... i'm looking at the big picture & having Marbury dominating the ball & playing 1 on 5 every night is not my idea of nurturing longterm success.
The problem is that people seem to be under the impression that Marbury can play like a Miller, Nash, or Kidd and simply chooses not to. I think that is a misconception. Marbury is not a pure PG and does not have that level of recognition of the game. He is a combo guard with some passing skills. He can run a decent pick and pop and can make the occasional pass into the post or drive and dish, but he is not capable of consistently creating offense for others simply by reading the defense and making high-level passes to his teammates. That is not his game and the sooner people realize that is not his game, the sooner we will start to appreciate what he can do and focus on how this team can work with his skill set, because he is capable of running a team.
Right now, Marbury is passing the ball and trying not to dominate unless the team needs him to score, but as I mentioned, even when he is not dominating the ball, he does not have the skills to consistently create offense for others. That is why Lee, Crawford, and Q were so important. They did not need Marbury to create offense for them. They could create offense for themselves and others, which masked Marbury's shortcomings as a pure passer.
I think Marbury is a fine pg for us if he continues to play like he has been playing. Next year, hopefully Balkman and Collins will come back with improved jumpers and Curry will be better at passing out of the doubleteam. With Crawford, Q, and Lee all back, we should have enough skilled players that we won't need Marbury to create offense for anyone. Rather, we should be able to create offense just by running our system.