Posted by tkf:

Posted by TheGame:

Posted by tkf:

I have a question. If Isiah made frye the focus of this teams offense,do you think the knicks would be better off. Do you also think frye's post game would be developed along a little further? just curious to see how you guys feel?

Before teams started double teaming Curry, I would definitely say no. Curry was simply unstoppable one-on-one. However, teams are now doubling him on a regular basis and he is still having trouble passing out of the double team. I think Frye, while not as dominate, can be a fairly effective scorer down low and he is a better passer out of the double team. Would the Knicks be better off is hard to say, but I do think that the team could survive running the offense through Frye. I think Frye needs to bulk up 10-15 more pounds before he is strong enough to consistently score in the post against some of the better defenders in the league.

what worries me is not the bad passes curry makes, but the open guys he never sees. I think he can improve, but at much as he gets doubled, he needs to become a very good passer,just not adequate.

Posted by Bonn1997:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TheGame:

Posted by tkf:

I have a question. If Isiah made frye the focus of this teams offense,do you think the knicks would be better off. Do you also think frye's post game would be developed along a little further? just curious to see how you guys feel?

Before teams started double teaming Curry, I would definitely say no. Curry was simply unstoppable one-on-one. However, teams are now doubling him on a regular basis and he is still having trouble passing out of the double team. I think Frye, while not as dominate, can be a fairly effective scorer down low and he is a better passer out of the double team. Would the Knicks be better off is hard to say, but I do think that the team could survive running the offense through Frye. I think Frye needs to bulk up 10-15 more pounds before he is strong enough to consistently score in the post against some of the better defenders in the league.

what worries me is not the bad passes curry makes, but the open guys he never sees. I think he can improve, but at much as he gets doubled, he needs to become a very good passer,just not adequate.

You need to be versatile on offense. If he's not gonna become a shooting threat or a dribbling threat, he's going to have to be a great passer. Shaq's had great success and his offense consists of nothing but low-post scoring and excellent passing.

Posted by MaTT4281:

Posted by Bonn1997:

Posted by tkf:

Posted by TheGame:

Posted by tkf:

I have a question. If Isiah made frye the focus of this teams offense,do you think the knicks would be better off. Do you also think frye's post game would be developed along a little further? just curious to see how you guys feel?

Before teams started double teaming Curry, I would definitely say no. Curry was simply unstoppable one-on-one. However, teams are now doubling him on a regular basis and he is still having trouble passing out of the double team. I think Frye, while not as dominate, can be a fairly effective scorer down low and he is a better passer out of the double team. Would the Knicks be better off is hard to say, but I do think that the team could survive running the offense through Frye. I think Frye needs to bulk up 10-15 more pounds before he is strong enough to consistently score in the post against some of the better defenders in the league.

what worries me is not the bad passes curry makes, but the open guys he never sees. I think he can improve, but at much as he gets doubled, he needs to become a very good passer,just not adequate.

You need to be versatile on offense. If he's not gonna become a shooting threat or a dribbling threat, he's going to have to be a great passer. Shaq's had great success and his offense consists of nothing but low-post scoring and excellent passing.

Shaq comparison may be out of place. He can create his own shot much more regularly than Curry can...not to mention, Diesel got handle!