Posted by oohah:
That said... would you have preferred the trade that much more if it included Crawford instead of Ariza?
Definitely! While it still would have ended up a bad trade because of Francis' knee, we would not have traded a young promising player, and I really don't care for the inconsistency of JC. He tantalizes, but he never realizes. He can kill his team or the other team on any given night.
I'm not one to defend Jamal, but I wouldn't have liked the trade any better with him in it. For all his faults, I still think he's a more unique player to this team and the league than Ariza. For instance, who already present on this team makes Jamal expendable?
I always liked Ariza, and while I was probably posting more on realgm than here at the time, anyone who read that thread I imported of unflattering Franbury nicknames knows I opposed the deal, but I was not crushed we gave up Ariza. The reason being, I felt he was being routinely outplayed by Barnes, Woods and Lee. Even if he were here now I think he'd struggle for minutes behind Q (when healthy), Lee and Balkman (let alone Skinny, who starts.)
And that as a 19/20 year old 2nd round pick, with but one year of college under his belt, he also felt justified in carping about losing his starting role while being outplayed by his teammates didn't help my feelings on the matter... but that played a very minor role in the larger scheme of things for me.
Good kid, but very non-essential.