[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Mta strike begins
Author Thread
Panos
Posts: 29914
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
12/21/2005  7:47 AM
Posted by crzymdups:

unions and the labor force in general have been getting the shaft for a long time. at one point this country was built on it's blue collar work force, now it's a bunch of service industries. the twu is probably 50/50 service and blue collar, but I think it's a good thing that they are standing up for their rights. but knowing the attitude this country has towards its working class, I'm guessing they won't win. I hope they do.

I wish some local democrats would come out in support of the TWU more strongly and help explain why this is important and why unions like these are responsible for all of us having things like weekends.

This is so ignorant. The reason that the country is not longer built
on blue collar workers is because the Unions have been so successful
at getting increasing favorable terms for blue collar workers that it
the country is now incapable of competing with other countries' labor
costs (Japan, Germany, France, etc. are in the same boat).
Not saying right or wrong, but if you want blue collar jobs,
you have to allow companies to pay for it at a level
where they can actually make a profit. Within the next 3 years,
GM and Ford will go bust because of the huge cost of
pensions (like 25% of the cost of the car that you buy) and there will
be that many fewer blue collar jobs, and the U.S. will be essentially
out of the auto business. Either that or the tax payer will pick up
the tab and bail them out, which translates into socialism
i.e., taxes paying for industry.


[Edited by - panos on 12-21-2005 07:53 AM]
AUTOADVERT
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
12/21/2005  8:18 AM
Hey everyone who is claiming that the strike is costing lives, please post the death toll thus far.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
Killa4luv
Posts: 27768
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
12/21/2005  10:24 AM
Many of you guys do not understand unions, labor movements, or capitalism very well. It was the labor movement (including anarchists and communists) who fought and were executed by the government because they were fighting for an 8 hour work day. Not because they wanted goo-gobs of money, they just wanted to have an 8 hour work day, and got hanged for it. The incident is called the haymarket riot. The tactics the gov't used are called Facism.

There is alot anti-labor talk in here that is mostly based on revisionist history.

Panos: American car companies, and american companies in general go bust because American executives (who are rarely mentioned in peoples posts) have BY FAR, the highest salaries relative to the workers who actually build cars, than any other country. In other countries the numbers are far less skewed. Not to mention the fact that American cars are basically inferior products in commparison to most foreign cars. American CEO's easily make over 300 times what average workers make. Factor that into the equation and you'll see that it makes a huge difference in whether a product is profitable or not. And that is only one part of the answer.

TemujinKnick: Yes there is a price to pay for striking. There is a price to pay for any fight that is worth fighting. Would you have been telling MLK not to fight for civil rights because he'll be killed? Some fights need to be fought, and the fact that there are consequences, does not deter courageous individuals for fighting for what is right.

You have done a great job at making the argument for cowardice. The people who fought for the 8 hour work day were sentenced to death by the US courts. Aren't you glad they did that, so you (and your children) don't have to work 14 hour work days? Or wold you rather that they stopped midway because they were facing obstacles?

If the TWU is forced into unreasonable concessions (accepting decent raises, but selling out future workers with worse benefits, pensions, AND pay) what does that mean for the rest of us who are not in a union, or in a much smaller one? If the TWU wins, it is a victory for all workers. The city throws money away all the time, but they can't ever seem to find money for workers.

Lastly, this is not only about money and benefits. This is also largely about the safety of the workers, and US as well. 1000 people on a train with 1 driver who knows nothing about safety, terrorism, cpr, emergency life-saving techniques? It doesn't make sense.

A train station with a bunch of metro card machines and no workers? I wouldn't want my wife on the train.

There are issues here that CLEARLY impact our lives as riders on the train, but all anyone focusses on are raises, and the fact that they had to walk to work. Its much bigger than that.
Haymarket Square Riot

The growth of American industrial might in the 1870s and 1880s was paralleled by the emergence of unions representing the workers. Foremost among the early labor organizations was the Knights of Labor, which listed more than 700,000 members by the mid-1880s. Working conditions at the time were abysmal—little concern for safety existed in most factories, pay was low, benefits were nonexistent and the work day was often 10 to 12 hours, six days a week. The immediate focus of the K.O.L. and other unions was to achieve the eight-hour day.

On May Day 1886, the workers at the McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. in Chicago began a strike in the hope of gaining a shorter work day. On May 3, police were used to protect strikebreakers and a scuffle broke out; one person was killed and several others injured.

The following day, May 4, a large rally was planned by anarchist leaders to protest alleged police brutality. A crowd of 20,000 demonstrators was anticipated at Haymarket Square, where area farmers traditionally sold their produce. Rain and unseasonable cold kept the numbers down to between 1,500 to 2,000. The gathering was peaceful until a police official, in contravention of the mayor's instructions, sent units into the crowd to force it to disperse. At that juncture, a pipe bomb was thrown into the police ranks; the explosion took the lives of seven policemen and injured more than 60 others. The police fired into the crowd of workers, killing four.

A period of panic and overreaction followed in Chicago. Hundreds of works were detained; some were beaten during interrogation and a number of forced confessions was obtained. In the end, eight anarchists were put on trial and seven were convicted of conspiracy to commit murder. Four were hanged in November 1887, one committed suicide and three were later pardoned by Illinois governor, John Peter Altgeld.

Clearly the ranks of the Knights of Labor and other unions were filled with many socialists and anarchists; some were committed to violent disruption of the capitalist system. However, no evidence was provided at the time, nor has any been discovered since, which connected the eight convicted workers to the bomb-throwing. Widespread fear of unionism and other radicalism influenced most of the public to support harsh treatment of the accused.

The Haymarket Riot was a signal event in the early history of American labor. It was largely responsible for delaying acceptance of the eight-hour day, as workers deserted the K.O.L. and moved toward the more moderate American Federation of Labor. For many years the police at Haymarket Square were regarded as martyrs and the workers as violent anarchists; that view moderated to a large extent in later times.

[Edited by - killa4luv on 12-21-2005 10:25 AM]
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
12/21/2005  10:50 AM
any of you guys do not understand unions, labor movements, or capitalism very well. It was the labor movement (including anarchists and communists) who fought and were executed by the government because they were fighting for an 8 hour work day. Not because they wanted goo-gobs of money, they just wanted to have an 8 hour work day, and got hanged for it. The incident is called the haymarket riot. The tactics the gov't used are called Facism.
There is alot anti-labor talk in here that is mostly based on revisionist history.

Panos: American car companies, and american companies in general go bust because American executives (who are rarely mentioned in peoples posts) have BY FAR, the highest salaries relative to the workers who actually build cars, than any other country. In other countries the numbers are far less skewed. Not to mention the fact that American cars are basically inferior products in commparison to most foreign cars. American CEO's easily make over 300 times what average workers make. Factor that into the equation and you'll see that it makes a huge difference in whether a product is profitable or not. And that is only one part of the answer.

TemujinKnick: Yes there is a price to pay for striking. There is a price to pay for any fight that is worth fighting. Would you have been telling MLK not to fight for civil rights because he'll be killed? Some fights need to be fought, and the fact that there are consequences, does not deter courageous individuals for fighting for what is right.

You have done a great job at making the argument for cowardice. The people who fought for the 8 hour work day were sentenced to death by the US courts. Aren't you glad they did that, so you (and your children) don't have to work 14 hour work days? Or wold you rather that they stopped midway because they were facing obstacles?

If the TWU is forced into unreasonable concessions (accepting decent raises, but selling out future workers with worse benefits, pensions, AND pay) what does that mean for the rest of us who are not in a union, or in a much smaller one? If the TWU wins, it is a victory for all workers. The city throws money away all the time, but they can't ever seem to find money for workers.

Lastly, this is not only about money and benefits. This is also largely about the safety of the workers, and US as well. 1000 people on a train with 1 driver who knows nothing about safety, terrorism, cpr, emergency life-saving techniques? It doesn't make sense.

A train station with a bunch of metro card machines and no workers? I wouldn't want my wife on the train.

There are issues here that CLEARLY impact our lives as riders on the train, but all anyone focusses on are raises, and the fact that they had to walk to work. Its much bigger than that.

Excellent post Killa.

I think many people are taking their cue from Mayor Bloomberg. I would like to point out that Mayor Bloomberg claims to support the working man, yet he only came to agreements with many unions right before his election, after many years of putting them off. He does not support the working man in the least bit. He is a classic "profits over people" type of mogul, so any propaganda he spews forth should be taken with a shaker of salt. If this were a hundred years ago, he would be an old-fashioned union-busting, goon-employing fat cat.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
EnySpree
Posts: 44917
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

12/21/2005  11:58 AM
Another thing about Bloomberg.......The union did not endorse him......that's why he is spitting so much fire towards the workers that basically run the city.

The goverment leaders should spend more time trying to fix what the problem is than trying to find more ways to fine us in order scare us back to work.

[Edited by - enyspree on 12-21-2005 11:59 AM]
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC?t=z5pqPMhdiAZNwzcCGMkiFw&s=09
EnySpree
Posts: 44917
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

12/21/2005  12:01 PM
FYI.....

Picketing sucks.

Not as bad as walking across the Brooklyn Bridge though.

I'm telling you.....the people should organize a boycott of the MTA and just continue to walk to work. Purchase bikes and just continue to car pool. Peaceful Boycott. A Boycott might lead to layoffs for us but who cares about that? The MTA needs to be stopped. They are a monopoly and the goverment needs to see that the people are not stupid and know that they are just as much to blame as anyone involved.

[Edited by - enyspree on 12-21-2005 12:04 PM]
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC?t=z5pqPMhdiAZNwzcCGMkiFw&s=09
TemujinKnick
Posts: 20771
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/3/2005
Member: #1022

12/21/2005  12:15 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:

Many of you guys do not understand unions, labor movements, or capitalism very well. It was the labor movement (including anarchists and communists) who fought and were executed by the government because they were fighting for an 8 hour work day. Not because they wanted goo-gobs of money, they just wanted to have an 8 hour work day, and got hanged for it. The incident is called the haymarket riot. The tactics the gov't used are called Facism.

There is alot anti-labor talk in here that is mostly based on revisionist history.

Panos: American car companies, and american companies in general go bust because American executives (who are rarely mentioned in peoples posts) have BY FAR, the highest salaries relative to the workers who actually build cars, than any other country. In other countries the numbers are far less skewed. Not to mention the fact that American cars are basically inferior products in commparison to most foreign cars. American CEO's easily make over 300 times what average workers make. Factor that into the equation and you'll see that it makes a huge difference in whether a product is profitable or not. And that is only one part of the answer.

TemujinKnick: Yes there is a price to pay for striking. There is a price to pay for any fight that is worth fighting. Would you have been telling MLK not to fight for civil rights because he'll be killed? Some fights need to be fought, and the fact that there are consequences, does not deter courageous individuals for fighting for what is right.

You have done a great job at making the argument for cowardice. The people who fought for the 8 hour work day were sentenced to death by the US courts. Aren't you glad they did that, so you (and your children) don't have to work 14 hour work days? Or wold you rather that they stopped midway because they were facing obstacles?

If the TWU is forced into unreasonable concessions (accepting decent raises, but selling out future workers with worse benefits, pensions, AND pay) what does that mean for the rest of us who are not in a union, or in a much smaller one? If the TWU wins, it is a victory for all workers. The city throws money away all the time, but they can't ever seem to find money for workers.

Lastly, this is not only about money and benefits. This is also largely about the safety of the workers, and US as well. 1000 people on a train with 1 driver who knows nothing about safety, terrorism, cpr, emergency life-saving techniques? It doesn't make sense.

A train station with a bunch of metro card machines and no workers? I wouldn't want my wife on the train.

There are issues here that CLEARLY impact our lives as riders on the train, but all anyone focusses on are raises, and the fact that they had to walk to work. Its much bigger than that.
Haymarket Square Riot

The growth of American industrial might in the 1870s and 1880s was paralleled by the emergence of unions representing the workers. Foremost among the early labor organizations was the Knights of Labor, which listed more than 700,000 members by the mid-1880s. Working conditions at the time were abysmal—little concern for safety existed in most factories, pay was low, benefits were nonexistent and the work day was often 10 to 12 hours, six days a week. The immediate focus of the K.O.L. and other unions was to achieve the eight-hour day.

On May Day 1886, the workers at the McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. in Chicago began a strike in the hope of gaining a shorter work day. On May 3, police were used to protect strikebreakers and a scuffle broke out; one person was killed and several others injured.

The following day, May 4, a large rally was planned by anarchist leaders to protest alleged police brutality. A crowd of 20,000 demonstrators was anticipated at Haymarket Square, where area farmers traditionally sold their produce. Rain and unseasonable cold kept the numbers down to between 1,500 to 2,000. The gathering was peaceful until a police official, in contravention of the mayor's instructions, sent units into the crowd to force it to disperse. At that juncture, a pipe bomb was thrown into the police ranks; the explosion took the lives of seven policemen and injured more than 60 others. The police fired into the crowd of workers, killing four.

A period of panic and overreaction followed in Chicago. Hundreds of works were detained; some were beaten during interrogation and a number of forced confessions was obtained. In the end, eight anarchists were put on trial and seven were convicted of conspiracy to commit murder. Four were hanged in November 1887, one committed suicide and three were later pardoned by Illinois governor, John Peter Altgeld.

Clearly the ranks of the Knights of Labor and other unions were filled with many socialists and anarchists; some were committed to violent disruption of the capitalist system. However, no evidence was provided at the time, nor has any been discovered since, which connected the eight convicted workers to the bomb-throwing. Widespread fear of unionism and other radicalism influenced most of the public to support harsh treatment of the accused.

The Haymarket Riot was a signal event in the early history of American labor. It was largely responsible for delaying acceptance of the eight-hour day, as workers deserted the K.O.L. and moved toward the more moderate American Federation of Labor. For many years the police at Haymarket Square were regarded as martyrs and the workers as violent anarchists; that view moderated to a large extent in later times.

[Edited by - killa4luv on 12-21-2005 10:25 AM]

Of course, when arguments fail compare what you are doing to the struggles of the Martin Luther King and accuse those who don't buy it of ignorance. That's going to work so well.

Yes, the labor movement did a lot of good, but it has also done a lot of bad. This strike is a total failure and fits with the bad actions by the movement in history.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
12/21/2005  12:40 PM
Of course, when arguments fail compare what you are doing to the struggles of the Martin Luther King and accuse those who don't buy it of ignorance. That's going to work so well.

I don't think the arguments failed. Your main point seems to be that the strike is making it hard for a lot of people and for that you blame, even resent, the TWU.

The counter argument is that workers have to stand up for fair treatment of themselves and future members of their chosen profession even at a very high cost to themselves. (I don't find the comparisons to MLK to be apt myself.)

I myself find the workers standing up for themselves far more compelling than: "Boo Hoo, I had to walk"... There are worse things in life.

Yes, the labor movement did a lot of good, but it has also done a lot of bad. This strike is a total failure and fits with the bad actions by the movement in history.

You've been calling the strike a failure practically from the first minute...how is it a failure? Just because you are unhappy with it? Because the TWU was well aware of the fines etc. before they striked.

oohah



[Edited by - oohah on 12-21-2005 12:43 PM]
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
TemujinKnick
Posts: 20771
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/3/2005
Member: #1022

12/21/2005  1:09 PM
It's a failure because the demands are not going to be met, the union is being bankrupted, and the workers are likely to be held in contempt of court as well... which will mean much, much larger penalties than the 2 days pay for each day on strike. Success vs failure should be measured on whether you achieve your goals and what cost you have to pay in the process. This strike, for the union and the workers, is a very high cost / very low reward action.

Whether it is right or wrong, and who is to blame, is a different part of the larger discussion.

I've been saying two things: This strike is wrong, but even worse than wrong it's just stupid.

Here is a good example of that from today's news:
Michael A. Cardozo, New York City's corporation counsel, said the city would ask a judge Wednesday to issue a temporary restraining order directing union members to return to work. If the order is granted, Cardoza said, the city could ask for the $25,000-a-day fines — a punishment that goes beyond the docked-pay penalty that workers already are experiencing for the illegal strike.

"We're doing everything possible to make the union obey the law," he said, adding that union members need to "realize the economic consequences of their actions."

According to various estimates by the city and business analysts, the strike was expected to cost city government and the economy hundreds of millions of dollars per day.

On Tuesday, a judge fined the Transport Workers Union $1 million for each day of the strike for violating a state law that bars public employees from striking. Union lawyer Arthur Schwartz said the fine could deplete the union's treasury in the matter of days.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/nyc_transit_strike

If the strike continues, TWU members are facing penalties of $25,000 a DAY. On average, that will be 1 year's pay for every 2 days off the job. Don't think it won't happen and be upheld either.

[Edited by - TemujinKnick on 12-21-2005 1:23 PM]
EnySpree
Posts: 44917
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

12/21/2005  1:26 PM
Posted by TemujinKnick:

It's a failure because the demands are not going to be met, the union is being bankrupted, and the workers are likely to be held in contempt of court as well... which will mean much, much larger penalties than the 2 days pay for each day on strike. Success vs failure should be measured on whether you achieve your goals and what cost you have to pay in the process. This strike, for the union and the workers, is a very high cost / very low reward action.

Whether it is right or wrong, and who is to blame, is a different part of the larger discussion.

I've been saying two things: This strike is wrong, but even worse than wrong it's just stupid.

So when Master cracks the whip you just have to deal with it.......cuz that is basically what you are saying. Everyone else should just watch and fear what the Master will do to these slaves that decided to stand up. As soon as they put us back in our place with the lynching of capitalism everyone BETTER get back to work and forget what happened, living life "as normal"......just like Katrina. No one talks about the in justice that went on there and will continue to go on for the poor that used to live there.



You are also suggesting that everyone ignore how the goverment has handled this and how the MTA seemingly have no compassion for it's workers. Shouldn't the MTA be fined to for not handling its work force with more responsibility. They should have been saying lets extend the deadline.....The workers were supposed to strike on the 16th but didn't and made an informal extention. The MTA was like whatever....they had the nerve to issue a final offer. We had no choice. The strike was supposed to be at 12am but the hard decision was made at 3am so the mid-night crews and AM crews could make it in and help out with securing the work place.

What more is there to say about it?



[Edited by - enyspree on 12-21-2005 1:27 PM]
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC?t=z5pqPMhdiAZNwzcCGMkiFw&s=09
EnySpree
Posts: 44917
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

12/21/2005  1:44 PM
Just wanna add.....if the city can issue fines and other things to force the workers back to work.....can't they also step in and say look go back to work and the goverment will settle this all in arbitration......And fine both the MTA and the Union alike.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC?t=z5pqPMhdiAZNwzcCGMkiFw&s=09
Killa4luv
Posts: 27768
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
12/21/2005  4:03 PM
Posted by TemujinKnick:
Of course, when arguments fail compare what you are doing to the struggles of the Martin Luther King and accuse those who don't buy it of ignorance. That's going to work so well.

You missed the entire point.
Yes, the labor movement did a lot of good, but it has also done a lot of bad. This strike is a total failure and fits with the bad actions by the movement in history.
That is truly an incredible analysis. The labor movement has done alot of good and alot of bad.
Thanks for clearing that up.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
12/21/2005  4:17 PM
It's a failure because the demands are not going to be met, the union is being bankrupted, and the workers are likely to be held in contempt of court as well... which will mean much, much larger penalties than the 2 days pay for each day on strike. Success vs failure should be measured on whether you achieve your goals and what cost you have to pay in the process. This strike, for the union and the workers, is a very high cost / very low reward action.

So the strike is a failure because YOU THINK that their demands won't be met...sorry, I think you are simply unhappy with the effect this is having on you.

I asked you before, what other choice did they have? Please tell me if you can. Save the stuff about "get another job" or "vote in someone who will help you", because we both know that is nonsense.

oohah





[Edited by - oohah on 12-21-2005 4:23 PM]
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
12/21/2005  4:30 PM
Very passionate thread Spry.
I always plized to see people who care about something except his own good. Especially in America.
I am originally from a country with very good public transportation system. In Riga (the capital of Latvia) where I am from you can reach any place in the city by Bus, Trolleybus, Tram, or Train.
The workers of this system are working for government. They have the same Union, benefits, and salaries as Police, Military, government workers, court workers, medical workers (a lot of hospitals and clinics are not private).
There are some problems of course but government treats public transportation as important as army, police, hospitals... So this prevents the kind of problems we see here with MTA. The taxes paid by companies and workers are used to support transportation system which brings workers to companies. Looks logical – isn’t it. So if there is a problem with buses or drivers salaries companies and workers will ask where the hell our money are going.

This is just another result of Republicans agenda that the society should regulated by itself using the rules of Free market economy. I am not socialist but our society is too complex to live it by its own. It's not a Wild West time any more but some guys (Bush, & Co) probably stuck in the Wild West times.

The MTA problem in NY is just one the upcoming problems in US society and not the worst one...
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
12/21/2005  4:47 PM
I got out my bicycle today, filled the tires with air and rode it around for a while to make sure it's okay. I haven't ridden for a while - I got paranoid about all the prostate stuff. So I also bought a special bicycle seat that puts less pressure on the prostate.

This whole situation is stupid. For what it is costing the city, we could give these workers the pension deal they want. The problem is that the state controls the MTA and Giuliani... er... Pataki and the state don't give a f*** since it is the city that bears the expense.

I sure hope the union leaders know what they're doing. So far they don't seem to be winning the PR war. $1,000,000 a day is a lot of money for them - they may have to sell their building. (I read somewhere that Roger Toussaint would like to sell the building anyway.)

As for me, it was good to get back on the bike. I'm able to take it inside my office, so it'll be a good way to travel to work. I can ride down the bike path that goes down the west side.

After the last strike, a lot of people who'd gotten used to traveling by other means didn't go back to using the subways and buses, at least not for a good long while.



[Edited by - BASKETBALLJONES on 12-21-2005 4:49 PM]
https:// It's not so hard.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
12/21/2005  5:11 PM
I don't know why anyone in NYC would care what Pataki says. Pataki is no friend to NYC. His main actions towards the City has been to cut all sorts of funding. Among his first acts as Governer was to cut CUNY funding leaving it the shell that it is today. He hasn't delivered funding to our public schools equal to the suburbs. He is a true tool of Republican Washington and he can go f!ck himself as far as I am concerned.

oohah



[Edited by - oohah on 12-21-2005 5:12 PM]
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
LongIslandKnicksFan
Posts: 21187
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 11/18/2003
Member: #496
USA
12/21/2005  6:46 PM
I am from LI and need to get into the city tomorrow for a very important meeting. What times can I get into the city without being asked to turn back? I need to get into the city and the LONG ISLAND EXPRESSWAY might be my only option, alongside with VAN DAM to the 59TH STREET BRIDGE. Need to get to 145 5th Avenue. Any best way to go from the city? Will I be able to park?
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
12/21/2005  6:51 PM
Posted by LongIslandKnicksFan:

I am from LI and need to get into the city tomorrow for a very important meeting. What times can I get into the city without being asked to turn back? I need to get into the city and the LONG ISLAND EXPRESSWAY might be my only option, alongside with VAN DAM to the 59TH STREET BRIDGE. Need to get to 145 5th Avenue. Any best way to go from the city? Will I be able to park?


You'll only be turned back if you try to enter the city with fewer than 4 passengers between 5:00 and 11:00 am. So if you can come in after 11:00 you don't have to worry about being turned back. If you're coming in earlier, you'll have to pick up some passengers.

Here's a resource on each entity's contingency plans and a list of carpool staging areas if you need passengers:

NY1's Stike Contingency Plans Page:
https:// It's not so hard.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
12/21/2005  6:58 PM
By the way, 5th avenue is closed to traffic between 23rd and 96th streets. Also, alternate side of the street parking is suspended for the duration of the strike.
https:// It's not so hard.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
12/21/2005  8:07 PM
I am from LI and need to get into the city tomorrow for a very important meeting. What times can I get into the city without being asked to turn back? I need to get into the city and the LONG ISLAND EXPRESSWAY might be my only option, alongside with VAN DAM to the 59TH STREET BRIDGE. Need to get to 145 5th Avenue. Any best way to go from the city? Will I be able to park?

If you can, take the LIRR and walk to 145 5th Ave, which seems to be at 20th street: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=145+5th+Ave+new+york%2C+ny which is less than a mile walk from Penn Station.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
Mta strike begins

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy