[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Bucks trade for Magloire?
Author Thread
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
10/26/2005  7:08 PM
Posted by jaydh:
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by boomann:

Because he talk real big and we love to see ****y people fail


amen. his arrogance is really annoying. more so because he hasn't done jack yet.


chris paul had something like 2pts yesterday in PRE-SEASON is he a bust too?


who knows, but he wasnt the #1 pick. #1 picks should be able to start right away, thats what makes them a #1 pick.


well if you read the 3 previous posts you will see that he is starting alongside Magloire
AUTOADVERT
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
10/26/2005  7:22 PM
Jay, read up a few posts and check out my post that starts with "No one is ever." I don't think any GM in the NBA believes your sentiment about the player being able to start right away, if this was true then Carmelo Anthony would have been selected #1 overall instead of Lebron or Emeka Okafor instead of Dwight Howard. Sure Bogut can start AND HE IS GOING TOO, but he feels better about coming off the bench to start his career. Either way, he's starting now so this is a non-issue.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 10-26-2005 7:24 PM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
10/26/2005  7:34 PM
Good effin' trade for the Bucks. They're going for talented size. It will help them a lot.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
10/26/2005  8:58 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:

No one is ever the next great center in their first year of the league. I would bet the house that Boguts career is benefitted by him coming off the bench to start his career instead of being thrown out into the fire. And since when does #1 mean "ready to play now" I could understand if a championship team was drafting #1 then it would make sense but this is for the long-run and not for this year. I dont think the Bucks scouted Bogut all that time and now all the sudden right before the season started said "Damn this guy isnt going to make it in the NBA, lets go out and get a Center" No. They got a good player for Bogut to play next to. Bogut is going to payoff huge for Milwaukee, maybe not this year but certainly next year and all the years down the road.



[/quote]


exactly why jeopardize wins like every team that's in the lottery every single year do. I'll have a lot more respect for Bogut if he can averaged 19 & 7 off the bench and plays a key role in milwaukee going to the playoffs than if he averaged 17 & 9 and won only 20games like most Rookie of the year winners do

[Edited by - gunsnewing on 10-26-2005 6:11 PM]
[/quote]



Did the magic jeapordize wins playing Howard? actually they were on their way to the playoffs until management traded mobley and injuries set in with Hill and francis. That year only made Howard better starting, as it did for guys like Okafor... You are a lottery team because you need help, you need that player or players to step in. I mean do you think that the bucks are good enough to keep a #1 overall pick on the bench? I don't think so... I honestly think that having the #1 pick this year was almost a curse, and here is why..

I think that marvin williams, chris paul, even frye had more talent than bogut, but not taking bogut #1 with centers comming at a premium, would draw much criticism, and really it is hard to justify going small over big, so you are almost damned if you do, and damned if you don't... Bogut was hyped as being the best player in the draft, i have seen him play and I don't think he was, but who am I vs all these so called basketball people. This is one year where having the #1 pick is tough.. I think bogut will be a good player but I think we will look back a year or two from now and see 5 players clearly better than bogut..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
MX25
Posts: 20591
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/20/2004
Member: #555
USA
10/26/2005  9:07 PM
You guys are missing the point of the trade. You make deals to get better or rebuild. Bucks made a trade to add a top center. Doesn't mean they don't like Bogut. They just added to a weak spot. If i'm Bogut. I'd rather play along side Magloire than Gadz or Joe Smith.

Bucks made a very good trade. They needed another big man and they got him. IMO Bucks are now on par with the middle teams in East (Nets,Cavs,Knicks,Bulls,Wiz and Bucks)
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
10/26/2005  9:09 PM
Posted by MX25:

You guys are missing the point of the trade. You make deals to get better or rebuild. Bucks made a trade to add a top center. Doesn't mean they don't like Bogut. They just added to a weak spot. If i'm Bogut. I'd rather play along side Magloire than Gadz or Joe Smith.

Bucks made a very good trade. They needed another big man and they got him. IMO Bucks are now on par with the middle teams in East (Nets,Cavs,Knicks,Bulls,Wiz and Bucks)


well said MX25!
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
10/26/2005  9:23 PM
I am not confused at all, I am just confused with magloire being a top center. what the hell has this guy been tops at? I can name you 10 F/c in this league that are clearly better!!!
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
10/26/2005  9:48 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:

No one is ever the next great center in their first year of the league.

Actually there have been many next great centers their first year in the league. Here is a list of #1 picks who were centers and their rookie numbers:

ROOKIE NUMBERS:
Patrick Ewing 20 & 9
Hakeem Olajuwon 20 & 12
Tim Duncan 21 & 12
Ralph Sampson 21 & 11
David Robinson 24 & 12
Shaquille O'neal 23 & 14


Hell Alonzo Mourning was drafted #2 right after Shaq (what a draft) and put up 21 & 10 in his rookie season.

Even Brad Daugherty, who was also a #1 pick came in putting up 15 & 8 as a rookie before he got to 20 & 21 point seasons.

So don't gimme that bullshyt about he needs time. He's a #1 pick who guys are comparing to Timmy Duncan!!! That muthaphucka should be dominating the preseason and putting up AT LEAST Brad Daugherty numbers during the regular season!!!!

Where is BRIGGS on this? He said Frye should be putting up 14 & 8 as the #8 and many agreed. Where does that set the bar for Andrew Bogut, the #1 pick?!?!?!?!?

I will not tolerate any backsliding and easing up on Bogut who was hyped without end prior to the draft!! MAN UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! None of the next great centers needed to be eased into the game!!!!!!
MX25
Posts: 20591
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/20/2004
Member: #555
USA
10/26/2005  10:12 PM
Posted by tkf:

I am not confused at all, I am just confused with magloire being a top center. what the hell has this guy been tops at? I can name you 10 F/c in this league that are clearly better!!!
Well people like to say Curry is a top center. If they say he is. Magloire has to be too.

Knight
Posts: 22775
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/21/2005
Member: #968
10/26/2005  10:18 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by nyk4ever:

No one is ever the next great center in their first year of the league.

Actually there have been many next great centers their first year in the league. Here is a list of #1 picks who were centers and their rookie numbers:

ROOKIE NUMBERS:
Patrick Ewing 20 & 9
Hakeem Olajuwon 20 & 12
Tim Duncan 21 & 12
Ralph Sampson 21 & 11
David Robinson 24 & 12
Shaquille O'neal 23 & 14


Hell Alonzo Mourning was drafted #2 right after Shaq (what a draft) and put up 21 & 10 in his rookie season.

Even Brad Daugherty, who was also a #1 pick came in putting up 15 & 8 as a rookie before he got to 20 & 21 point seasons.

So don't gimme that bullshyt about he needs time. He's a #1 pick who guys are comparing to Timmy Duncan!!! That muthaphucka should be dominating the preseason and putting up AT LEAST Brad Daugherty numbers during the regular season!!!!

Where is BRIGGS on this? He said Frye should be putting up 14 & 8 as the #8 and many agreed. Where does that set the bar for Andrew Bogut, the #1 pick?!?!?!?!?

I will not tolerate any backsliding and easing up on Bogut who was hyped without end prior to the draft!! MAN UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! None of the next great centers needed to be eased into the game!!!!!!


Most of those players came to really bad teams who needed them to score--also, players are bigger and stronger so if you are 7ft it doesn't give you the advantage that you may have had in the 80's or early 90's. Bogut could easily get 20 and 10 this year and he might but with other great scorers on that team that won't be his role. Right now he has 11pts in 17 minutes against Denver.
"He only went to Georgia Tech for one year, and that's an engineering school." -LB
Masterplan
Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
10/26/2005  10:18 PM
Posted by MX25:
Posted by tkf:

I am not confused at all, I am just confused with magloire being a top center. what the hell has this guy been tops at? I can name you 10 F/c in this league that are clearly better!!!
Well people like to say Curry is a top center. If they say he is. Magloire has to be too.

that's not necessarily true. curry is a top offensive center no question with shortcomings elsewhere. magloire is not spectacular in any aspect of the game.


islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/26/2005  11:00 PM
Posted by Masterplan:
Posted by MX25:
Posted by tkf:

I am not confused at all, I am just confused with magloire being a top center. what the hell has this guy been tops at? I can name you 10 F/c in this league that are clearly better!!!
Well people like to say Curry is a top center. If they say he is. Magloire has to be too.

that's not necessarily true. curry is a top offensive center no question with shortcomings elsewhere. magloire is not spectacular in any aspect of the game.


Just solid in most. And a former All Star to boot.

It's funny, the same guys dogging Bogut and Magliore are the same guys who were excited about signing Jerome "The Big Stiff" James.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TheloniusMonk
Posts: 21470
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2004
Member: #705
USA
10/26/2005  11:05 PM
Posted by islesfan:

/quote]

It's funny, the same guys dogging Bogut and Magliore are the same guys who were excited about signing Jerome "The Big Stiff" James.

James isn't our future. Curry and Frye are the future of this club. Just like Bogut and Magliore is the future of theirs. Compare the signing of James to the signing center Gadzuric.


'You can catch me in Hollis at the hero shop!' -Tony Yayo
TheloniusMonk
Posts: 21470
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2004
Member: #705
USA
10/26/2005  11:06 PM
Oh and let me not forget Lee and Butler up front.
'You can catch me in Hollis at the hero shop!' -Tony Yayo
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/26/2005  11:13 PM
Posted by TheloniusMonk:
Posted by islesfan:

/quote]

It's funny, the same guys dogging Bogut and Magliore are the same guys who were excited about signing Jerome "The Big Stiff" James.

James isn't our future. Curry and Frye are the future of this club. Just like Bogut and Magliore is the future of theirs. Compare the signing of James to the signing center Gadzuric.


Again you miss the point. They're dogging Bogut and Magliore's basketball skills while James is supposed to be some kind of untapped talent despite showing very poor skills so far in his NBA career.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
HARDCOREKNICKSFAN
Posts: 26191
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 6/24/2002
Member: #263
USA
10/26/2005  11:16 PM
Magliore is a good pickup for the Bucks. It doesn't put any fear in my heart either. This Knick team will wreak complete havoc on this league, and those who see the Orange and Blue storm on the horizon are trying to prepare their teams, especially in the frontcourt.

Another season, and more adversity to persevere through. We will get the job done, even BETTER than last year. GO KNICKS!
TheloniusMonk
Posts: 21470
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2004
Member: #705
USA
10/26/2005  11:22 PM
Posted by HARDCOREKNICKSFAN:

Magliore is a good pickup for the Bucks. It doesn't put any fear in my heart either. This Knick team will wreak complete havoc on this league, and those who see the Orange and Blue storm on the horizon are trying to prepare their teams, especially in the frontcourt.

Right on!

Who cares about Bogut or Magliore or whoever else. My main concern is that we stay focus. Isiah has put together a very neice front court. Something we've been lacking. Let's steamroll over there a$se$!


'You can catch me in Hollis at the hero shop!' -Tony Yayo
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/26/2005  11:24 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by Masterplan:
Posted by MX25:
Posted by tkf:

I am not confused at all, I am just confused with magloire being a top center. what the hell has this guy been tops at? I can name you 10 F/c in this league that are clearly better!!!
Well people like to say Curry is a top center. If they say he is. Magloire has to be too.

that's not necessarily true. curry is a top offensive center no question with shortcomings elsewhere. magloire is not spectacular in any aspect of the game.


Just solid in most. And a former All Star to boot.

It's funny, the same guys dogging Bogut and Magliore are the same guys who were excited about signing Jerome "The Big Stiff" James.
Who's very excited about the James' signing? (Diderton maybe?) We must be reading a different forum.

nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
10/26/2005  11:31 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by nyk4ever:

No one is ever the next great center in their first year of the league.

Actually there have been many next great centers their first year in the league. Here is a list of #1 picks who were centers and their rookie numbers:

ROOKIE NUMBERS:
Patrick Ewing 20 & 9
Hakeem Olajuwon 20 & 12
Tim Duncan 21 & 12
Ralph Sampson 21 & 11
David Robinson 24 & 12
Shaquille O'neal 23 & 14


Hell Alonzo Mourning was drafted #2 right after Shaq (what a draft) and put up 21 & 10 in his rookie season.

Even Brad Daugherty, who was also a #1 pick came in putting up 15 & 8 as a rookie before he got to 20 & 21 point seasons.

So don't gimme that bullshyt about he needs time. He's a #1 pick who guys are comparing to Timmy Duncan!!! That muthaphucka should be dominating the preseason and putting up AT LEAST Brad Daugherty numbers during the regular season!!!!

Where is BRIGGS on this? He said Frye should be putting up 14 & 8 as the #8 and many agreed. Where does that set the bar for Andrew Bogut, the #1 pick?!?!?!?!?

I will not tolerate any backsliding and easing up on Bogut who was hyped without end prior to the draft!! MAN UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! None of the next great centers needed to be eased into the game!!!!!!

Killa, the centers you listed are in the hall of fame are on their way there, there have been plenty of other centers picked 1st who didnt play well in their first year, someone like Michael Olawakandi whom the Clippers picked when they could have taken a chance on a player for the future like Vince Carter. In 1996 if the 76ers thought the same you do then they'd have Marcus Camby and not Allen Iverson becuase they want the big center who needs to perform this year, when infact Marcus Camby has never performed like a #2 pick. Too me that portion of your argument has no validity. Just because Bogut is a center and was picked first that doesn't mean that he has to play as well as those guys did, the logic there seems more then extremely off kilter, the Bucks would much rather Bogut learn the game and hone his skills then play a modest, the learning curve this way is quicker. I think you are also offbase with Tim Duncan comments, I said one day he will put up numbers like that becuase their games are so similar, because of the fundamentals both of them exute. Another thing, I don't recall this board being all over Bogut, in fact if I remember correctly there weren't many people on this board who even knew about him.

Another point, why is Briggs the authority on this manner? Just becuase he made a ridiculous request of Frye averaging 14 and 8 this year, which isn't to say that it isn't attainable, but HE'S A ROOKIE! The only thing he can do is do what the team asks of him. This NBA-Ready crap doesnt play in my book. If they were picking like that then the Cavs wouldn't have Lebron, they'd have Carmelo. The Magic wounldn't have Dwight Howard, they'd have Emeka Okafor. The Rockets wouldn't have Yao Ming, they'd have Jay Williams. The point of the draft is to pick the player that you feel has the best FUTURE I don't know where your disdain for Bogut comes from, probably from never watching a college basketball that had him in it or else you'd see the same thing the Bucks saw in the draft.



"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/26/2005  11:34 PM
Did you really miss all those posts about how James was going to become a player more similar to the anomaly that was his playoff spurt than the first 5 seasons of his career? Oh wait, a bunch of those posts were yours so I guess you didn't.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Bucks trade for Magloire?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy