Posted by fishmike:
thats where your 100% wrong. The only guy you would have to move is Malik Rose. IF you can do that then in a year and a half you have a choice: stay with what you got or move Marbury for expiring deals and open up close to $20mm in cap space. We could be looking at a roster of Q, Crawford, Nate, Frye, Sweetney, Ariza and David Lee. Keep Marbury if you like think its worth it, or dump him for expiring deals and have $20mm in cap space to work with.
Know your facts... in 2 years thats where we could have been. The Lakers are planning for it, but thats the difference between us and them isnt.. that and the rings.
with only 9-10 people under contract, not re-signing Ariza, not using the LLE or MLE the next 2 yrs we will be under the cap, but that is decieving. So, saying we dump marbs now, we would have 10 people under contract next yr(while still being over the cap). You really think we wont sign anyone to fill those 5 holes and that those 5 players salary wont add up to at least 10+mil? thereby making it so we cant sign a max player. we wont be under the cap, you have to dump more than marbs.
[Edited by - jaydh on 08/10/2005 17:33:31]