Posted by BRIGGS:

Posted by tkf:

[quote]Posted by BRIGGS:

as far as bynum goes, the lakers have to be tickled with what this kid is doing. coming in and averaging what 14 points 7.5 rebounds 1 block and shooting 60%? I didnt expect that

Channing Frue is supposed to be an advanced player with experience is getting tooled on by jerome beasley peter john ramos he s averaging 11 points 4 reb and 33% shooting looks lost on the D--i mean he has been BRUTAL lets be real BRUTAL he knows it we know it the Knicks know it sugar coat it all you want but he beter pick up his play.

dont compare bynum and frye right now because bynum has put frye to shame

Briggs you have lost it man. Just on that note alone, I am done with this topic, this has not only gone way overboard but with that comment and post this has reached a level of ridiculousness that is so far unsurpassed... I know you are reacting upon emotion because you wanted Bynum and I know you are better than that last post, I will just leave it at that...

why because im telling the truth

if bynum is averaging 14 points 7 reb 1 block shooting 60+%
and frye who is 5 years older is avg 11.7 3.7 shooting 33%
so why are we comparing?

I didnt start these threads to compare any player, i just thought it would be interesting to see how bynum faired over his first few games. it posters who have gone on tangents, starting threads bynum fizzles--if bynum fizzled what the h did Channing frye do? what has he done, so far he has proved every doubter right. Now Im only a partial doubter, im on channings side, but my assessment of his play of his focus of his energy of his defense of his ffense--I would really grade him an F so far. And I think isiah would to--i watched the tape of the Orladno game a couple of times, he played well in parts but if you rewatch it Dwight Howard dominated him it that first Q and then seemed to lose interest. Frye went to the FL a lot and that has been the only think in the SL he has done well shoot FT--hes been just plain bad on both ends of the court and if you think otgerwise, I would say go watch the tapes again.

Im going to keep Bynums name off here, we have to many of our own problems to deal with. We dont need to get embarassed comparing guys who will be on two different plains in the nBA.

Posted by gunsnewing:

Posted by TheloniusMonk:

You clkearly said that when Bynum goes on to be the next Amare, KG or O'Neal type you'll basically say 'i told you so'. That's not a direct quote but please don't deny that. That's the exact reason those comparisons started in the first place.

i also listed a ton of other high school guys. the point was to show that Bynum has a very good chance to be a borderline allstar/allstar or maybe even a superstar. And he's making ways by performing shockingly well so far at only 17. He may not play for than 15-20mins this year behind Mihm but I think he will definitely show flashes of whats to come

Posted by TheloniusMonk:

Posted by gunsnewing:

Posted by TheloniusMonk:

2 rebounds in 26 minutes. Watchout Amare, Ben Wallace, Shaq and Abdul-Jabar!

lol

we'll see who will be laughing next time Bynum and Frye plays. you're setting youself up for a major headache!

How so? You haven't even seen Bynum play. Where's the confidence in him coming from? lol

2 rebounds in 26 minutes! Ouch!

If I agreed with you that the summer league is the right time to say 'I told you so' I'd be saying 'I told you so'. But I know better.

Posted by gunsnewing:

Posted by BRIGGS:

Posted by tkf:

[quote]Posted by BRIGGS:

as far as bynum goes, the lakers have to be tickled with what this kid is doing. coming in and averaging what 14 points 7.5 rebounds 1 block and shooting 60%? I didnt expect that

Channing Frue is supposed to be an advanced player with experience is getting tooled on by jerome beasley peter john ramos he s averaging 11 points 4 reb and 33% shooting looks lost on the D--i mean he has been BRUTAL lets be real BRUTAL he knows it we know it the Knicks know it sugar coat it all you want but he beter pick up his play.

dont compare bynum and frye right now because bynum has put frye to shame

Briggs you have lost it man. Just on that note alone, I am done with this topic, this has not only gone way overboard but with that comment and post this has reached a level of ridiculousness that is so far unsurpassed... I know you are reacting upon emotion because you wanted Bynum and I know you are better than that last post, I will just leave it at that...

why because im telling the truth

if bynum is averaging 14 points 7 reb 1 block shooting 60+%
and frye who is 5 years older is avg 11.7 3.7 shooting 33%
so why are we comparing?

I didnt start these threads to compare any player, i just thought it would be interesting to see how bynum faired over his first few games. it posters who have gone on tangents, starting threads bynum fizzles--if bynum fizzled what the h did Channing frye do? what has he done, so far he has proved every doubter right. Now Im only a partial doubter, im on channings side, but my assessment of his play of his focus of his energy of his defense of his ffense--I would really grade him an F so far. And I think isiah would to--i watched the tape of the Orladno game a couple of times, he played well in parts but if you rewatch it Dwight Howard dominated him it that first Q and then seemed to lose interest. Frye went to the FL a lot and that has been the only think in the SL he has done well shoot FT--hes been just plain bad on both ends of the court and if you think otgerwise, I would say go watch the tapes again.

Im going to keep Bynums name off here, we have to many of our own problems to deal with. We dont need to get embarassed comparing guys who will be on two different plains in the nBA.

what would be interesting would be if you posted both their stats in an nba forum....it would be a lot less bias that way