Nalod wrote:WaltLongmire wrote:Nalod wrote:To the question at hand, we got Zing, Oka4 and Towns all with great athletic ability. Towns did not play more than 20 minutes most nites and had a lot of help. Oka4 had a lot of minutes, lots of doubles and a nagging ankle for two months. Kristaps looks like a SF whose floor might be Bargnani and ceiling Pau, with Dirk and Gallo in between. Non of the guys are setp right in and be superstars fist year out. If not physical limits then skills not yet perfected and Injuries will hamper any of these guys.
We go with the best player available and upside potential.
Oka4 to me has the Moses Malone/Duncan thing going and could be a monster FUNDAMENTALLY! Malone was a great rebounder because he had the desire and skills. Dwight is monster human but lacks the fundamentals.
Bottom line is we get who drops. We should be grateful Portzingus is rising as he could be ours, or help us in other ways.
Philly has Saric stashed away? They should still take Russell or Mundiay and stick to their plan.
I still see it as:
Towns/Oka4
Oka4/Towns
Russell
And then at the 4 pick........?????
Actually the biggest question is in free agency who can the lakers or knicks get? Monroe gives either team the ability to go with Russell or Mundiay. Other Than Jimmy Butler (restricted)no other 2 is available nearly as good.
Fact is no rookie can be counted on to turn a franchise around in the first year.
There is also Bargnani to consider.
Core upfront of Monroe-Bargnani-Melo is pretty potent offensively. Defense? Gonna have to address that, but the reality is Bargs is not a long term solution. Lets not forget the opponent has to stop these guys once the Triangle sets in and thats not gonna be easy.
its a draft talk so lets talk pieces:
Take the best player available!!!!!!
I always ask this question when I hear or read something about the BPA?How do you actually determine who the BPA is?
This is what we're all fighting about here, and talent evaluators always have battles within their organizations about what constitutes the BPA.
I look at past drafts and see the glaring mistakes made, but someone in a draft room, at some point, said "You have to take Adam Morrison...he's the BPA; you have to take Beasley, he might be the BPA in the entire draft; Bargnani is the BPA, I don't care if he's Southern European!
At some point the BPA stamp of approval becomes almost meaningless.
IM not sure and there is always some luck to whom you pick but there are filters if you DON'T draft position or draft with wanting an NBA now ready player.
The other gotta know is will the franchise support the kid and be patient. Fans don't really have any input so we don't factor. If you take WCS then sell it and maybe we can buy it.
If you gonna take Kristaps then don't starphuch me with it, sell me the long term vision and I'll root for the kid as a project.
While its always possible to turn this thing around quick, more likely is we have to crack 30 wins first and compete on a regular basis.
I think most of us won't be happy with that but thats progress.
Funny that you talk about "selling" a player.
In some ways that is what the Porzingis workout was for. Teams already know this guy- they scouted him before last year's draft, and Orlando allegedly said that they would pick him in the lottery.
Yet fans were, and still are, curious and doubtful about him. In some ways the workout was for people like us or the doubters, as well as to show teams how he might have improved himself.
Look at the reaction on UK- folks who had not taken the time to read about and watch him were stunned, in some ways.
Phil, Hinkie, Saunders, or Kumpchak (did not do that deliberately!)won't take nearly as much flack from fans if their respective teams take him that early, because they can look at the workout and dream about him doing that stuff on their team.
For me the most interesting thing in this entire draft is to see if the Latvian has as much of an impact on who teams choose as I think he will.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?