Clean wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:How confident is everyone that DM can lure another star to NY? My concern is the question stars might be asking themselves. Brunson/Mitchell would likely be a ball dominant backcourt. Where does that leave them?

0% chance if we give Ainge what he wants. Which is why it is important that we don't overpay for him. Whatever we have left from this trade will be all we have left to acquire our last big player.

Yup, i totally agree Clean. This is why RJ should be off the table at this point. With Brunson and Mitchell,there is a chance of RJ flourishing and maybe he becomes the 2nd star for the knicks if not he can be a major piece for the next trade the FO will do to get a star. We all know Randle wont be able to do that in fact talks are the knicks will need to attach a 1st rounder for Randle to be traded. No way he will be the major asset that goes out to get a second star.

Papabear wrote:Papabear Says

The problem with the Knicks is that they never allow thier home grown players to grow in the system. We get rid of them. Now I don't know how good Obi really is or RJ because we don't create a system to let them grow. We get rid of them for a pie in the sky. Donavan Mitchell was a great player for Utah but that dosen't mean he will be the same for the Knicks and if he isn't. after 15 game you'll be shouting trade him he is a bust. We've been bad so long I would say keep the team as it is and give Obi much playing time and see what the rest can do then lets talk trade.

One of the more depressing exercises you can do as a Knicks fan is compare Amare's Knicks stats vs. David Lee's on the Warriors. Plenty of Knicks draft picks have moved on to bigger and better things- I would gladly trade Steve Francis last half season for Trevor Ariza's career. Kevin Knox and Frank Ntilikina though- the Knicks made the right move to move on.

The main reason behind trading RJ would be to hold on to Obi IQ and Grimes. I think all of those guys fit better with a post DM trade rather than RJ. Of those 3 and RJ, I think RJ has the most value in a high usage situation. I just don't see RJ s value as a 4th option. I especially don't think he can get a big contract as a 4th option. My point in trading him is that at the end of the day RJ probably prefers a 100 million contract vs a 60 million one. Nothing wrong with that.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/BigKnickEnergy_/status/1564294270215139328

The did a twitter space talk too, hours before saying their source was linked to Dolan or something

Also Alan Hahn's tweet earlier in the day showed he knew there was a deadline

And bagely's story about RJ days ago, and Macri too have all shown they have legit intel.

wargames wrote:

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1564450531153780736

Woj is talking like the RJ trade kills the Donovan Mitchell trade talks.....

Smells like a leverage tactic. Begley was the only one saying utah wanted Barrett from the start. Most others were saying he wasn’t involved in talks. The fact his name is conveniently thrown in along with the extension means Knicks front office may want people to feel the Knicks got a steal if a deal gets done without Barrett, which is likely.

wargames wrote:

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1564450531153780736

Woj is talking like the RJ trade kills the Donovan Mitchell trade talks.....

So much for the “Ainge isn’t asking for RJ therefore RJ sucks” narrative

I still think we get the deal done for Mitchell. Just give him the 6 first round picks plus Obi and EF already

GustavBahler wrote:How confident is everyone that DM can lure another star to NY? My concern is the question stars might be asking themselves. Brunson/Mitchell would likely be a ball dominant backcourt. Where does that leave them?

If Mitchell comes here and we win games and the Knicks become the exciting story in the nba we will get stars to come here. We don’t even have to be that good. If Mitchell comes here and we are a 4th or 5th seed that will generate interest from players to want to come

SergioNYK wrote:I'm kind of hoping Ainge just trades Spider to another team and we try using our assets for the next star that becomes available. This Spider trade isn't gonna move the needle to contender status and it's gonna hurt us trying to make additional moves to get to that level in the future.

We still wouldn’t be as good as the bucks or Celtics in the East but e wouldn’t be too far off. A backcourt with Brunson/Mitchell, front court of RJ and Mitch who is a defensive beast. We have 8 first round picks the next several years which is the main reason Ainge is talking to us

HofstraBBall wrote:

SergioNYK wrote:Still not buying Ainge wanted RJ. Why would a rebuilding team starting over and tanking for Wembanyama want to acquire a player set to make $120M? MAKES NO SENSE!

He would have flipped him for picks at trade deadline.

I get that Ainge is playing the long game. But not to the point where RJ is considered too old for his timeline. Ainge wants to tank for a high pick But even if RJ was a top ten player, he couldnt singlehandedly ruin their chances of a number one pick on a depleted roster.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/NBA_NewYork/status/1564655264753766401

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/NBA_NewYork/status/1564673633691246593