Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
rvhoss
Posts: 24943 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/2/2004 Member: #777 Switzerland |
![]() i agree earl 110%...but, it's their board.
it's mob mentality. all kool aid all the time.
|
kip3f
Posts: 20227 Alba Posts: 3 Joined: 10/11/2004 Member: #762 |
![]() Posted by gunsnewing:Posted by simrud: I agree, Isiah has said that he wants to get more tradable players: "The problem is he spent a lot of money, but he spent it on bad He said that we are rebuilding: "...The only thing I want is time to fix it, because it'sand that Ariza, Sweetney, Marburry and Crawford are our "core". Isiah said that he wants to put a good team on the floor now, as well as rebuild: "I like the position that we're in today much better than I did So there you have it, in his own words. The Knick's advantage is their pocketbook. One of Isiah's big goals is to get more tradable players, which means players with more reasonable contracts. He is also trying to build a present and a future. The recent deadline-deals contributed to all 3 goals: the vets improve the present, the picks improve the future, and rose and taylor will potentially be valuable expiring deals. If you think about the whole Nazr story, we got a backup center, got him a lot of minutes, and turned that into draft picks and a nice player. I'm sure that the plan was always to develop Nazr, then flip him for some other piece(s). Isiah had a good deal on the table from the Spurs, and he took it instead of waiting to see what was available during the summer. I mean, what were people expecting from Nazr? If we traded him for another 5 who had comparable skill, what would be the point? I bet that the plan all along was to trade big for small. PS: Isiah quotes from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/09/sports/basketball/09rhoden.html |
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
![]() I doubt the Spurs would have given up 2 picks for Kurt
|