[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

sorry, but Isiah's been a disaster
Author Thread
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
3/7/2005  11:32 AM
Posted by fishmike:

lol... cablevision loves you. Keep believing anything Isiah tells you. I basicly praised everything he did up until now, but the Rose and Taylor trades were weak... plain and simple. Sorry if a roster of 5 PFs all under 6'9 and $110mm of retreads and cast offs on a team playing .400 ball doesnt have me dancing in the streets.

But I'm sure we wil be fine.. Isiah said on the radio that Jackie Butler was going to be the next Shaq so I'm sure we will be winning titles in a couple years. MAn... gotta run, I'm off to MSG to sign up for season ticket!!! Whoo-hoo!

Have fun knocking down your strawmen. I don't think I was exactly dancing in the streets in my last reply. In fact, I acknowledge that the deals were questionable and that their success is largely contingent on what Isiah does this summer. But the word "disaster" implies that nothing good comes out of these trades. Mo Taylor looks like he's already one of the best, if not the best, post up/isolation option we have on offense. Rose doesn't seem to bring anything that JYD already brings, but Isiah got draft picks in that trade, which are inherently unknowns. Let's see what Isiah does with those picks before we write off the Rose trade.

Basically: Yes, these latest trades are questionable, and their sense and success will depend largely on future moves. But no, these trades are certainly not unmitigated disasters. You try to paint me as if I'm the one being overly irrational here, but you're the one who's been using the overly strong words.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 71379
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/7/2005  11:34 AM
We should evaluate Isiah on a higher plane than Layden.

Isiah makes things happen, but we have yet to see any substantial results. His moves are abitious, thus we expect to see resuts right away.

This Nazr/rose trade was about picks.

The Mo T. trade was about KT getting traded. If not by the deadline, then it will happen this summer.

Then we can see if this puts us in the right direction.

This season has been a disaster, this we can almost be certain with. I don't think enough time has elapsed since he has been GM to qualify him a success, yet alone an absolute failure.

fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/7/2005  11:39 AM
Tom... here's the thing. We just cant afford to make questionable trades. Can Rose and Tatlor help us and be good players? Of course! I like Rose alot and he's EXACTLY the kind of guy you want your young players around, and Mo can score.

I have basicly sung Isiah's praise for the first year he's been here. While you can see a downside to thje Crawford/Marbury trades the bottom line is we got something out of nothing.

Bottom line is we need to hold this GM to a higher standard. We needed something special to happen and so more we have mostly gotten more of the same.

Now I have touted Isiah as a great talent evaluator (but so was Layden). I would have a lot more confidence going into this offseason had he passed on making these 2 deadline trades but I still have some hope.

There is a notion around here that if you dont praise everything this guy does blindly than your just a hater or negative or whatever. I would say few around here have given him more praise then I have, but these last 2 moves raise a BIG red warning flag to me, and they will hurt us this offseason.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/7/2005  11:41 AM
Now had Isiah pulled off the Gooden for KT trade THAT would have been something special because you get a 23 year old in his rookie contract, NOT a 27 year old making $9mm that was benched in favor of Weatherspoon.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
3/7/2005  11:44 AM
Bonn, you need to get these 43 mm in expiring contracts out of your mind (in terms of trades). I remember some of the players you said we could net with them. So I'll go over them.

Zach Randolf- Another scoring PF. A great scorer at that. Plays for stats however. Doesn't pass the ball nor does he play defense. Not a lick of defense. He is quickly becoming a Portland outcast. HUGE contract. Why would we want him?

Elton Brand- He is NOT an outcast. They probably LOVE him in LA. He's the only guy they refuse to give up for some reason. It just might have to take Marbury to get him here. If not him, then how about ALL of our expiring contracts, Ariza, Sweetney picks, we'd have to take back more bad contracts and more. Probably wont be worth it. I'm sure the Clippers would rather stick with Brand however. A PF who plays defense and isn't selfish and is young and athletic? Why would they want to trade him? They don't.

Paul Pierce- Same story as Brand and Boston loves him. The team is hoping that he and Walker will turn out to be special and will carry them deep in the playoffs. It will take Marbury to get him here.

SAR- Scoring PF who doesn't play defense. Apparently, Isiah loves these guys. I guess that's why he hasn't shown interest in BRAND!

Odom- They traded him for SHAQ. I am pretty sure they would want Marbury in return. Since you LOOOOOVE Marbury, I know you wouldn't do that.

Kwame and Curry. I'd give up a pick for these guys, but no way do I do a big time sign and trade where I have to give up our expiring contracts. They are probably going to want HUGE money. They have not earned HUGE money.

Bonn, PLEEEEASE, when can we realize that it's just best to let these contracts expire.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
3/7/2005  11:47 AM
Stay away from Kwame and Curry, especially now that we can draft a true Center right out of College.....Use our picks wisely. We need to cut cost now, Curry and Kwame will need a new contract if we trade for them...We don't need any more high price players that can't produce consistantly...
The true Knickabocker..........
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/7/2005  11:57 AM
Kwame would be a good MLE risk and Curry would have been a good candidate for a sign and trade if we still had Nazr. Maybe they will take back JYD :)
I dont want to give up our #1 for Curry because I think we can get a franchise caliber swing man in this draft but if we did while I wouldnt agree I woulc at least understand using assets to get a 22 year old 6-11 center that can paly above the rim.

The rebounding defense thing is a big issue.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
3/7/2005  12:10 PM
Posted by fishmike:
I would say few around here have given him more praise then I have, but these last 2 moves raise a BIG red warning flag to me, and they will hurt us this offseason.

This was a much more reasonable post. Isiah is not above reproach, of course (no one is... not even Jerry West, who hasn't quite been doing a bang up job in Memphis, aside from his choice of coaches).

As to whether these moves will hurt us in the offseason... that remains to be seen. Nazr would have been a valuable chip this summer, no doubt. On the other hand, if Isiah plans on doing an expiring contract trade with TT and/or Penny, he'll probably need to throw in some picks or high value, low contract players. Nazr's contract is reasonable, but not small enough that you could flippantly throw it into a max-type trade without fear of gumming things up too much. So, perhaps selling Nazr for Rose + picks was a necessary move to facilitate a larger TT or Penny deal. We'll see soon enough.

As for the other trade, Baker and Norris both have smaller contracts than Nazr. They may have been valuable in evening out salaries in a TT or Penny deal, and thus losing them is potentially losing some flexibility for trading TT/Penny. But if they were not used in such a deal, of what value would they have been as trading chips? Could we have packaged them together and gotten a player much better than Mo Taylor (who, I repeat, for all his shortcomings, is already giving our offense a nice shot in the arm)? I doubt it. Mo is overpaid, but his contract is only one year longer than Baker/Moochie, and it also does not extend past the albatross Houston/Shandom contractual era. So while his acquisition might contribute to some roster glut, NY's contractual obligation to him is hardly crippling.

Even beyond the picks themselves, these trades might actually increase flexibility for trades, insofar as Isiah can look to trade KT and/or Sweetney without needing to immediately restock the frontcourt. In particular, I expect KT to be shopped heavily, and not necessarily for a frontcourt player either. I would hate to see Sweetney go, but all things considered, he's probably our most valuable trading chip right now. Having a similar player who can pick up the slack in the post is actually a tremendous boost in flexibility for trading Sweets. We all bemoan our lack of a shotblocker, but offense in the post has been a weak point for us this season as well, and lest we forget-- a strong post up option is almost as hard to acquire as a strong shotblocker.

So for now, I'm still taking a mostly wait-and-see attitude. This summer will be Isiah's biggest moment as Knick GM to date. He's had time now to get rid of Layden's dreck and stock up on some more valuable trading assets. What he does this summer will go a long way towards making his long term reputation in NY, as well as justifying all the trades he's made since he's been here. Essentially, it's impossible to fully evaluate Isiah's last two trades without the context of what Isiah does this summer.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
MS
Posts: 27060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
3/7/2005  12:43 PM
The serious problem everyone on this board has is evaluating Isiah next to Layden, which just plain makes no sense, the man screwed the Knicks and put them in a terrible whole....We hate him, and thats were it should end

Every stupid poster on this board that uses the example Isiah turned this into that, or Vin Baker into Mo Taylor has no credibility.....

Bad moves?
Giving Baker a contract: there was no reason, especially if he is brining in players

Dealing for Rose: Bad move, draft picks are 29-30, every now and than you get lucky, but taking a bad contract for a one of those picks is terrible

Getting Mo Taylor: Why, so he had a good game against sub-par defenders, he has a long term deal, has an mo for being an underachiever(like some knicks) has plenty of talent but no enough will....

Missed Opportunity: Orlando trade Drew Gooden and Valerjo for Tony Battie? Arroyo for Elden Cambell, Toronto settles for Williams, and WIlliams for Vince Carter, could have made the deal if he gave up crawford with Naz

Lenny Wilkens

Questionable moves:

Trading for Crawford: Had he exchanged Shandon i would have liked the deal, but crawford is another puzzle with no defensive savy, you see the improvement a head fake makes when he throws the extra pass, he gave a player that no one on the open market wanted 55 million, thats alot and took back JYD's contract

Zeke needs to be truthful when he talks not develop new ideas every time he does something different.....

Everyone says money is not a problem, well it is when you have Penny and TT possibly as trade bait at the deadline next year, the flexibility and amount of players on the roster is getting out of control

Long term deals: Marbury, Crawford, KT, Houston, Taylor, Rose, JYD, we are going to have to resign Sweets and Ariza, get a combo guard, and a big man, plus we still have Penny and TT for another year, he is not leaving himself space
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/7/2005  1:43 PM
In too many ways I think Isiah has taken himself out of many options this offseason by moving all his reasonably priced expiring players. I would say something like Nazr, Vin and Moochie could have gotten us something like Desmond Mason and Calvin Booth. Then you address some real needs and get a great explosive young swing man in Mason.

All these type of trades arent an option because all the deals we have are so high priced. If you take back 2-3 guys for a TT or Penny then you have a huge problem with roster spaces. He just didnt leave himself with a lot of options and my fear is with the insane payroll he will be pressured (understandibly) to field a winning team. Good by Ariza and draft picks, Hello Finely and Stackhouse.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
3/7/2005  1:54 PM
Posted by fishmike:

In too many ways I think Isiah has taken himself out of many options this offseason by moving all his reasonably priced expiring players. I would say something like Nazr, Vin and Moochie could have gotten us something like Desmond Mason and Calvin Booth. Then you address some real needs and get a great explosive young swing man in Mason.

All these type of trades arent an option because all the deals we have are so high priced. If you take back 2-3 guys for a TT or Penny then you have a huge problem with roster spaces. He just didnt leave himself with a lot of options and my fear is with the insane payroll he will be pressured (understandibly) to field a winning team. Good by Ariza and draft picks, Hello Finely and Stackhouse.

The more I think of it, the more I realize that as much as I like Rose, it wasn't as good a deal as I originally thought. We could have used Nazr in a trade to net one of those young players, like Mason, or Dalembert. I understand Isiah wanted to get a tough minded defensive player, possibly to just shut up some critics. Rose is a good choice. But we couldn't have gotton him for anyone else? I really thought that Nazr was going to be a MUCH more valueable trading piece than Penny and TT b/c he's a young productive center who's shown some offensive low post skills. I really think we could have either gotton much more for him, or gone for the gold, drafted Bogut, and used Nazr as the backup. That would have been a freaking solid as hell center position. PLEEEEEEASE GOD! Please. Can you become a Knick fan? Even for maybe just a year. Please?
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
MS
Posts: 27060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
3/7/2005  2:39 PM
Bonn terrible analogy, saying we got two picks in the first round means nothing, they are in the 27-29 range, not the 21-25, Isiah made a lot of mistakes so far, and one of them was giving the suns a first round pick we allowed them to become one of the best teams in the league and had to give up a pick on top of taking salary and giving them a couple of prospects....

We could have drafted some potential in Josh Smith, or David Harrison, but we were left with ****, Isiah doesn;t get a pass for this deal until he gets a good player
Nalod
Posts: 71379
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/7/2005  2:41 PM
Posted by diderotn:

Stay away from Kwame and Curry, especially now that we can draft a true Center right out of College.....Use our picks wisely. We need to cut cost now, Curry and Kwame will need a new contract if we trade for them...We don't need any more high price players that can't produce consistantly...

That makes a lot of sense. Uh oh, blue moon rising up today.=!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/7/2005  2:51 PM
The draft picks are primarily trade assets IMO. Guys like Vujanic, Lampe, and Frank were key components of the Marbury trade. (In fact, the Suns GM called the trade the "Lampe Trade.")A team can expect to get at least as good a player as those 3 with picks in the late first round. The picks should have at least as much value in a trade package as Lampe, Vujanic, and Frank W had.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 03/07/2005 14:52:45]
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
3/7/2005  3:03 PM
Based on results none of Isiahs moves have been special.

Though Houston did get hurt after the Marbury trade. If Houston stayed healthy and Tim Thomas played half the way he has been playing now. With Crawford off the bench as combo guard and Sweetney playing the way he is now. This would have been a quality team this yr.

Houston getting hurt and Tim Thomas having the worst season of his career have really killed this team this season.

But I feel there are options out there that can makes us a real competitive team and take us over the mediocracy level. This team needs 2 long range shooters and 2 shot blockers.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
3/7/2005  3:06 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:


But I feel there are options out there that can makes us a real competitive team and take us over the mediocracy level. This team needs 2 long range shooters and 2 shot blockers.

I'd be happy with 1 of each.
all kool aid all the time.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/7/2005  3:14 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:

Based on results none of Isiahs moves have been special.
I didn't expect anything super special after two half seasons. The team has gone from a .350 team under Layden to around a .470 team in about 110 games under Isiah and has added some nice young players who are actually getting playing time, has four 1st round draft picks in the next two years, and large expiring contracts. That's special enough for me to think the team has good options ahead.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
3/7/2005  3:34 PM
When you trade what you traded for Marbury talent wise. And you trade what you traded for Crawford talent wise most expect more than what the results have been.

I guess Houston & TT kinda offset that.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/7/2005  4:22 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:

When you trade what you traded for Marbury talent wise. And you trade what you traded for Crawford talent wise most expect more than what the results have been.

I guess Houston & TT kinda offset that.
What exactly did we give up for Marbury that led you to expect so much immediately in return? Lampe? Vujanic? Antoni McDyess and Howard Eisley? Pick #16 in last summer's draft, which I don't think turned out to be anything special. A future lottery protected (i.e., top 15 protected) pick? Nothing from that list is actually very special IMO.

What did we give up to get Crawford that led you to expect so much? A 40 yr old Mutombo? Othella Harrington and Frank Williams? Nothing we gave up was even remotely special.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 03/07/2005 16:23:11]
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/7/2005  4:37 PM
Has anyone bothered to mention that Mo Taylor is 6'9 and just 29 years old?

Has anyone mentioned he's got inside post up game we desperately need and shooting 70% from the field as a Knick?

Has anyone thought that he could find a basketball home in New York away from the annointed Jeff Van Gundy?

Nah, lets talk about Mo Taylor's salary instead.

It's a work in PROGRESS people. For all his bleatings about Isiah as a disaster even fish.mike cannnot provide one single example of an NBA franchise going from the outhouse to the penthouse in one season.

Or can he?
once a knick always a knick
sorry, but Isiah's been a disaster

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy