SupremeCommander wrote:martin wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:martin wrote:nyvector16 wrote:martin wrote:ramtour420 wrote:I don't want to do a lateral trade at best to make Philly a title contender. And can we please, for the love of all that's good in this world, stop mentioning Grimes in any trade! He is our best asset and building block after RJ. Grimes is untouchable. Not even for Fox, nor anyone else for that matter.
100%
Totally agree as well.
I can't help but wonder if we would feel the same about Deuce if given the playing time.
He had one really good freaking outing, 15 points, 9 assists, 2-5 from 3pt land, 6-11 overall. Against a bad Houston team but it's still impressive. I think he'll have a nice career if he puts in the work and it looks like he is
I'll be honest, I don't understand the want for Jalen Brunson. I don't see much separation from Jalen and Deuce (other than Brunson having time to develop). Maybe I'm just being a homer though
They came out of college with vastly different PG skill sets. One is much stronger on the defensive side of things while being a very good scorer, the other is more of a traditional PG who was an integral part of that winning Villanova team and is not as strong defensively.
I see them both as flawed, cerebral PGs of similar value. Maybe I'm being oversimplistic here
I don't know what that means.
Deuce has yet to prove he can even exist and flourish in an NBA rotation; he has done super well in a GLeague environment and has had exactly 1 good outing in an NBA game against one of the worst teams in the league that was missing all of their decent players.
The other starts on a playoff bound team and will be demanding around $15-20M per year.
There has to be something that is missing in your "similar value" statement?