knicks1248 wrote:KnickDanger wrote:LivingLegend wrote:knicks1248 wrote:FrenchFreak wrote:I absolutely love the KP trade tree. It’s almost silly at this point but it shows all the dominoes that fall when you move one player in a league with a salary cap. it’s fascinating. In the case of KP you could argue that- even ignoring all the dominoes that have fallen since- the winner of the trade was the team that didn’t sign KP to a max contract. 😂
I would still take KP over Mitch, Simms and Noel
He's a much better fit with Randle then those guys
Didn’t we get Randle with cap space KP trade provided?
There are those who say we could have signed Randle anyway, but I don't see that happening if we held on to His Doucheness. Not to mention the signing of players like Morris (who became IQ), Burks, Bullock, Noel, etc., and the use of that cap freedom up to the present moment.
We had like 70 mill in cap and over paid a bunch of role players.
One could argue that we got IQ, but Morris's impact was much more than IQ, and Im sure we would have beated ATL with Morris.
KP said I want to win, I want to see progress, Mills said, we don't, we want to tank for Zion.
As I recall, Hornacek told Porzy to stop playing like a p***y, Zinger got mad and skipped the exit interview (where the Knicks were going to ask him to skip EuroBasket due to his health concerns), he ended up injured during the 17-18 season, missed the 18-19 season and was traded in January 19 because he demanded it cause he didn't like how the Knicks were managed and their "dysfunction". Although the FizKnicks were tanking for Zion/Morant/Barrett, Zinger never ended up playing a game that year (for NY or Dallas), meaning his "anti-tankitude" you suggest is unwarranted as he was not in a position to affect outcome.
More specifically, you might argue his issue with the Knicks was more like the September 2017 trade of Carmelo Anthony for Enes Kanter. Rumor being that he had an issue with Melo being traded. Kanter, on the other hand had nothing but positive things to say about Zinger - that is, he thought Zinger was untouchable up to a couple days prior to his trade.
Thing is, the Knicks declined to extend an injured Zinger to his rookie extension 2 months prior to the trade (October 18). Ideally, that move would have opened up 10mm for the Durant/Irving/Leonard free agent class - which the Knicks could have used to add to Zinger. Zinger got annoyed, indicated that he would sign the qualifying offer in the offseason and leave as a FA in 2020.
Knicks traded him pretty quickly thereafter.
You can argue that a winning team doesn't get that same trade demand from KP. I could argue that a healthy Zinger would have been a critical element to a winning team. IMO, an unhealthy Zinger was upset that he didn't get his extension and his amateur brother agent reacted emotionally to get him out of Gotham and down to Dallas. Dallas gives him that extension in June before he hits RFA despite him not playing a game in 18 months.
My takeaways - If Horny thinks he plays like a p***y, man needs to play a little harder. Phil was a great coach in the 1990s but was a bit too Zen and harshed our Melo. That net asset loss to OKC letting a 33 year old Melo go for Kanter was an error. That NY FO has had numerous valuation issues that year (including the THJr contract). Clearing that contract and uncertainty on porzingis migh have cost us that Irving/Durant team up -- though in fairness, that was never certain. BK played themselves into a better position that year to entice these stars.
Re: Morris - he only had a one year contract. There was no certainty the Knicks could/would have re-signed him. Trading him for a 1st at the deadline made plenty of sense. The Knicks had absolutely the same rights to sign him in the offseason that they had to him at the trade deadline. He was a UFA.