[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

J. Randle
Author Thread
Panos
Posts: 30063
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
4/17/2021  9:51 AM
fishmike wrote:
martin wrote:
fishmike wrote:yeah man when you look at Randle's ceiling it gets higher and higher because his passing is elevating other players. He's clearly now making others around him better, or at least easier. This is what we were desperate for from Melo. Randle with his 2 way play and team ball is looking more and more like a real cornerstone piece.
Feel like we could reach Tony Wroten level pages if we started to compare Melo and Randle with jrodmc having half those posts.

But it's starting to get legit. May need another season like this one to solidify

Melo is still easily a better scorer and more clutch but in terms of overall impact Randle's defense and passing put him neck and neck (today). Randle also has one year of playing like this under his belt. Melo was like a 5x all star at the same age and one of the NBA's elite scorers.

A guess a "fair" question would be at this point in their career who would you rather have? In terms of impact they are both pretty equal at this age. Hopefully Randle just stays healthy and continues on this arc. Problem with Melo was his cost. With Randle we got lucky and now have massive cap space, extra picks and young players already around him. With Melo we spent everything building a squad around Melo/Amare/Tyson and that was pretty good when they were all healthy but lacked the flexibility to grow beyond a 50ish win 2nd round team.

Respectfully disagree. Melo was *not* clutch in NYC. Missed most of his last possession shots.

AUTOADVERT
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
4/17/2021  10:51 AM
fishmike wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
martin wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
xavier wrote:I’m by no means a Melo fan, probably a good part of that comes from the way he came to the Knicks, and regardless of that, I just didn’t consider him a player who could bring the title as the first option. However, do we compare here best Randle’s season (this one) and Melo’s average for the time he was in NY or do we also take his best season (2012/13)?

If we compare Randle's best season and Melo's average, then Randle is of course better, but if we compare their best seasons, then I would still say Melo was better. He was the league's top scorer that season and led the team to 54 wins, and he didn't have top players around him also.


+1
One word distances Melo from Randle on the better scale: Clutch

As stated, let's beat the chopped meat horse carcass once again, since it apparently needs restating: Not to take anything away from Randle this season, because I'm a huge fanboy, but he's not playing with a bunch of geriatric rejects on their last legs of retirement, or the likes of Fishlips, FluTyson and J(ust)R(eally) S(ycho)mith.

Not that Randle's playing with "top players" but RJ, IQ, Bullock, Burks and the rest are much better.

Melo had geriatric JKidd, Camby, Prigs, Kurt Thomas, Weed Wallace, Kmart. 30 and under crowd: FluT, Novak, useless Amare, Felton, JR, Iman. Hot for a minute: Copeland, Ronnie Brewer.

Hard to compare players.

Melo:    37 minutes, 28.7ppg,  6.9rbs, 2.6 assists, .500efg, 38%3pt.
Julius: 37 minutes, 22.9ppg, 10.8rbs, 6.0 assists, .522efg, 41%3pt.

I think I would take "Fat" Raymond Felton 9/10 over Payton.

No you wouldn't, his last yr here was the worst of his career 29% from 3, 39% overall.

But ask yourself this.....Why sign a bench player to be your starting PG, then get mad at the player for not playing above and beyond, and give him a NTC because he gave you a bit of a discount.

This is all on the FO.

Knicks didnt "give him" a NTC. Thats how those 1 year deals work. Go look it up and quit making **** up

Are you really that DUMB

The knicks offered payton a contract that includes a NTC...I don't give a rats ass how it structured because they didn't have to agree to that BS..Payton didn't hang LEON off a balcony by his LEGS Like SUGE Knight was his AGENT

no they didnt. I have rocks in my garden that are smarter than you. Here's how it works:
someone smarter than 1248 wrote:Bird rights, Early Bird rights and Non-Bird rights are all mechanisms that allow teams to go above the salary cap to retain their own players. Trades usually have no effect on those rights, but that’s not the case with players on one-year contracts. A team that acquires a player on a one-year deal via trade can’t use any form of Bird rights to re-sign that player the following offseason. The player often stands to lose financially in such a case, so the NBA allows players on one-year contracts to block trades. Despite this, some players allow trades to go through anyway, as Marreese Speights did last year when the Grizzlies sent him to the Cavaliers.

So just to sum up it was NOT a no trade clause. Its part of the NBA's CBA for players on 1 year deals.

Ahhh duhhh DUH duhh duuuuuhhhh


He has a NTC that the FO agreed to do no matter the circumstance. They could have put a team option (like mills did) Knowing you were looking to possibly flip these guys if a trade comes up.

Doesn't even matter at this point anyway, the team is playing well and Payton is not as bad as some of you making out to be, he has a lot to do with where we are today.

ES
technomaster
Posts: 23347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
4/17/2021  11:24 AM
Interesting topic... "clutch".
NBA.com has some metrics around this.

Here are the Knicks stats this season: for last 5 minutes, 5 point differential or less, ahead or behind, 4th quarter.
https://go.nba.com/gwci

There are a lot of individual stats to think about (including all normally available stats like rebounding, assists, TO, +/-) - here's a quick summary of our top 4 guys this year:

Randle 2.5ppg; 38.9%FG; 25%3p%; 84%FT (#28 in the league in PPG)
RJ 2.4ppg; 50%FG; 60%3p%; 73.3%FT (#32 in PPG)
Burks 2.1ppg; 34.6%FG; 42.9%3p%; 86.7%FT
Quickley 1.6ppg; 43.8%FG; 28.6%3p%; 92.9%FT

Extremely surprising: Derrick Rose has 0 total clutch points (in 9 clutch game opportunities) as a Knick. It might say something about his conditioning that he's 0-9 from the field, no free throws attempted in these situations.


A few reference points:
* The top 4 scorers in the clutch this season are Lillard (4.9ppg); SGA (4.7ppg); Curry (3.9ppg)
* Rivers (not included above) was quite good in his 7 clutch games with the Knicks: 2.3ppg, 66.7% FG, 66.7% FT%
* During Carmelo's time with the Knicks, and he generally scored between 2.5-3.1ppg in the clutch in his seasons with the Knicks (NBA's analytics system doesn't allow you to select ranges of seasons... so it'd be a pain in the neck)

“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
martin
Posts: 76106
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
4/17/2021  12:20 PM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
martin
Posts: 76106
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
4/17/2021  12:20 PM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/17/2021  12:24 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
martin wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
xavier wrote:I’m by no means a Melo fan, probably a good part of that comes from the way he came to the Knicks, and regardless of that, I just didn’t consider him a player who could bring the title as the first option. However, do we compare here best Randle’s season (this one) and Melo’s average for the time he was in NY or do we also take his best season (2012/13)?

If we compare Randle's best season and Melo's average, then Randle is of course better, but if we compare their best seasons, then I would still say Melo was better. He was the league's top scorer that season and led the team to 54 wins, and he didn't have top players around him also.


+1
One word distances Melo from Randle on the better scale: Clutch

As stated, let's beat the chopped meat horse carcass once again, since it apparently needs restating: Not to take anything away from Randle this season, because I'm a huge fanboy, but he's not playing with a bunch of geriatric rejects on their last legs of retirement, or the likes of Fishlips, FluTyson and J(ust)R(eally) S(ycho)mith.

Not that Randle's playing with "top players" but RJ, IQ, Bullock, Burks and the rest are much better.

Melo had geriatric JKidd, Camby, Prigs, Kurt Thomas, Weed Wallace, Kmart. 30 and under crowd: FluT, Novak, useless Amare, Felton, JR, Iman. Hot for a minute: Copeland, Ronnie Brewer.

Hard to compare players.

Melo:    37 minutes, 28.7ppg,  6.9rbs, 2.6 assists, .500efg, 38%3pt.
Julius: 37 minutes, 22.9ppg, 10.8rbs, 6.0 assists, .522efg, 41%3pt.

I think I would take "Fat" Raymond Felton 9/10 over Payton.

No you wouldn't, his last yr here was the worst of his career 29% from 3, 39% overall.

But ask yourself this.....Why sign a bench player to be your starting PG, then get mad at the player for not playing above and beyond, and give him a NTC because he gave you a bit of a discount.

This is all on the FO.

Knicks didnt "give him" a NTC. Thats how those 1 year deals work. Go look it up and quit making **** up

Are you really that DUMB

The knicks offered payton a contract that includes a NTC...I don't give a rats ass how it structured because they didn't have to agree to that BS..Payton didn't hang LEON off a balcony by his LEGS Like SUGE Knight was his AGENT

no they didnt. I have rocks in my garden that are smarter than you. Here's how it works:
someone smarter than 1248 wrote:Bird rights, Early Bird rights and Non-Bird rights are all mechanisms that allow teams to go above the salary cap to retain their own players. Trades usually have no effect on those rights, but that’s not the case with players on one-year contracts. A team that acquires a player on a one-year deal via trade can’t use any form of Bird rights to re-sign that player the following offseason. The player often stands to lose financially in such a case, so the NBA allows players on one-year contracts to block trades. Despite this, some players allow trades to go through anyway, as Marreese Speights did last year when the Grizzlies sent him to the Cavaliers.

So just to sum up it was NOT a no trade clause. Its part of the NBA's CBA for players on 1 year deals.

Ahhh duhhh DUH duhh duuuuuhhhh


He has a NTC that the FO agreed to do no matter the circumstance. They could have put a team option (like mills did) Knowing you were looking to possibly flip these guys if a trade comes up.

Doesn't even matter at this point anyway, the team is playing well and Payton is not as bad as some of you making out to be, he has a lot to do with where we are today.

the FO didnt "agree" to a NTC clause. That is where you are wrong and a classic example of how you just make **** up, and in this case double down. Its got nothing to do with Knicks and Payton. Its the NBA's CBA. Ya faahkin dodo
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/17/2021  12:27 PM
Panos wrote:
fishmike wrote:
martin wrote:
fishmike wrote:yeah man when you look at Randle's ceiling it gets higher and higher because his passing is elevating other players. He's clearly now making others around him better, or at least easier. This is what we were desperate for from Melo. Randle with his 2 way play and team ball is looking more and more like a real cornerstone piece.
Feel like we could reach Tony Wroten level pages if we started to compare Melo and Randle with jrodmc having half those posts.

But it's starting to get legit. May need another season like this one to solidify

Melo is still easily a better scorer and more clutch but in terms of overall impact Randle's defense and passing put him neck and neck (today). Randle also has one year of playing like this under his belt. Melo was like a 5x all star at the same age and one of the NBA's elite scorers.

A guess a "fair" question would be at this point in their career who would you rather have? In terms of impact they are both pretty equal at this age. Hopefully Randle just stays healthy and continues on this arc. Problem with Melo was his cost. With Randle we got lucky and now have massive cap space, extra picks and young players already around him. With Melo we spent everything building a squad around Melo/Amare/Tyson and that was pretty good when they were all healthy but lacked the flexibility to grow beyond a 50ish win 2nd round team.

Respectfully disagree. Melo was *not* clutch in NYC. Missed most of his last possession shots.

yeah that was really me being more diplomatic than anything else. Melo surely did have tons of big baskets in crunch time and there is surely a stronger body of work there for him vs. what Randle has done.

That being said what Randle is doing is special and RJ is sneaky blossoming under him as well.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
GustavBahler
Posts: 42727
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

4/17/2021  2:49 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/17/2021  2:50 PM
fishmike wrote:
Panos wrote:
fishmike wrote:
martin wrote:
fishmike wrote:yeah man when you look at Randle's ceiling it gets higher and higher because his passing is elevating other players. He's clearly now making others around him better, or at least easier. This is what we were desperate for from Melo. Randle with his 2 way play and team ball is looking more and more like a real cornerstone piece.
Feel like we could reach Tony Wroten level pages if we started to compare Melo and Randle with jrodmc having half those posts.

But it's starting to get legit. May need another season like this one to solidify

Melo is still easily a better scorer and more clutch but in terms of overall impact Randle's defense and passing put him neck and neck (today). Randle also has one year of playing like this under his belt. Melo was like a 5x all star at the same age and one of the NBA's elite scorers.

A guess a "fair" question would be at this point in their career who would you rather have? In terms of impact they are both pretty equal at this age. Hopefully Randle just stays healthy and continues on this arc. Problem with Melo was his cost. With Randle we got lucky and now have massive cap space, extra picks and young players already around him. With Melo we spent everything building a squad around Melo/Amare/Tyson and that was pretty good when they were all healthy but lacked the flexibility to grow beyond a 50ish win 2nd round team.

Respectfully disagree. Melo was *not* clutch in NYC. Missed most of his last possession shots.

yeah that was really me being more diplomatic than anything else. Melo surely did have tons of big baskets in crunch time and there is surely a stronger body of work there for him vs. what Randle has done.

That being said what Randle is doing is special and RJ is sneaky blossoming under him as well.

Melo was the most clutch player in the league for a long time. Was early on for the Knicks. The decline was due to Melo being most of the offense in NY, because Amar'e couldnt stay healthy. The minutes and all that pounding the rock, caught up to him. The more he wore down, the less clutch he was.

From 2016:

According to ESPN Stats & Info, no player has hit more go-ahead field goals in the final five seconds of the fourth quarter or overtime than Anthony since 2003-04.

Melo had a nice long rest. changed his game, sped up his ISO game. Looks like his old self. Melo put getting a near max contract before getting help. He knew what he was getting into.

EwingsGlass
Posts: 27471
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
4/17/2021  6:46 PM
fishmike wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
martin wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
xavier wrote:I’m by no means a Melo fan, probably a good part of that comes from the way he came to the Knicks, and regardless of that, I just didn’t consider him a player who could bring the title as the first option. However, do we compare here best Randle’s season (this one) and Melo’s average for the time he was in NY or do we also take his best season (2012/13)?

If we compare Randle's best season and Melo's average, then Randle is of course better, but if we compare their best seasons, then I would still say Melo was better. He was the league's top scorer that season and led the team to 54 wins, and he didn't have top players around him also.


+1
One word distances Melo from Randle on the better scale: Clutch

As stated, let's beat the chopped meat horse carcass once again, since it apparently needs restating: Not to take anything away from Randle this season, because I'm a huge fanboy, but he's not playing with a bunch of geriatric rejects on their last legs of retirement, or the likes of Fishlips, FluTyson and J(ust)R(eally) S(ycho)mith.

Not that Randle's playing with "top players" but RJ, IQ, Bullock, Burks and the rest are much better.

Melo had geriatric JKidd, Camby, Prigs, Kurt Thomas, Weed Wallace, Kmart. 30 and under crowd: FluT, Novak, useless Amare, Felton, JR, Iman. Hot for a minute: Copeland, Ronnie Brewer.

Hard to compare players.

Melo:    37 minutes, 28.7ppg,  6.9rbs, 2.6 assists, .500efg, 38%3pt.
Julius: 37 minutes, 22.9ppg, 10.8rbs, 6.0 assists, .522efg, 41%3pt.

I think I would take "Fat" Raymond Felton 9/10 over Payton.

No you wouldn't, his last yr here was the worst of his career 29% from 3, 39% overall.

But ask yourself this.....Why sign a bench player to be your starting PG, then get mad at the player for not playing above and beyond, and give him a NTC because he gave you a bit of a discount.

This is all on the FO.

Knicks didnt "give him" a NTC. Thats how those 1 year deals work. Go look it up and quit making **** up

Are you really that DUMB

The knicks offered payton a contract that includes a NTC...I don't give a rats ass how it structured because they didn't have to agree to that BS..Payton didn't hang LEON off a balcony by his LEGS Like SUGE Knight was his AGENT

no they didnt. I have rocks in my garden that are smarter than you. Here's how it works:
someone smarter than 1248 wrote:Bird rights, Early Bird rights and Non-Bird rights are all mechanisms that allow teams to go above the salary cap to retain their own players. Trades usually have no effect on those rights, but that’s not the case with players on one-year contracts. A team that acquires a player on a one-year deal via trade can’t use any form of Bird rights to re-sign that player the following offseason. The player often stands to lose financially in such a case, so the NBA allows players on one-year contracts to block trades. Despite this, some players allow trades to go through anyway, as Marreese Speights did last year when the Grizzlies sent him to the Cavaliers.

So just to sum up it was NOT a no trade clause. Its part of the NBA's CBA for players on 1 year deals.

Ahhh duhhh DUH duhh duuuuuhhhh


He has a NTC that the FO agreed to do no matter the circumstance. They could have put a team option (like mills did) Knowing you were looking to possibly flip these guys if a trade comes up.

Doesn't even matter at this point anyway, the team is playing well and Payton is not as bad as some of you making out to be, he has a lot to do with where we are today.

the FO didnt "agree" to a NTC clause. That is where you are wrong and a classic example of how you just make **** up, and in this case double down. Its got nothing to do with Knicks and Payton. Its the NBA's CBA. Ya faahkin dodo

I’m not one to defend 1248, but if you read his post closely he’s not wrong on all of it, just most of it.

Clearly the FO knew that giving a former player a 1 year deal results in a no trade right in the player. The Mills Team Option argument changes a 1 year deal to technically a 2 year deal, even though the optionality makes it effectively the same deal.

The differences I see is that 1248 presumes that giving the no trade version of the contract was the product of poor contract design. We know that players taking team options with Mills all has buyouts on the option of $1m or more.

So, 1248 presumes two things. First, that the team would be able to get Payton to take a team option (either with or without a buyout). Second, that the team would have preferred a buyout (even if it contained a buyout price) over a right to deny a trade.

What I’ve learned in years of negotiating is that it is impossible to fully reconstruct a negotiation from the end result without witnessing incremental steps. To draw certain conclusions results in false assumptions. Next, to assume that the outcome witnessed was as probable at the time of negotiation results in flawed future reasoning. That is, hindsight is 20/20.

Dollar for dollar, this team got every penny out of Payton’s $4mm ($5mm) contract and saved a million off of his projected existing team option for 2021 (they exercised his $1mm buyout).

Despite my best efforts to criticize Payton, his play has been solid. My arguments about his 3 pt shot are real, but he has outperformed his contract to excess and the Knicks have outperformed expectations with him in the SL.

At some point, I’m not arguing about how the FO structures their deals. As I see it, they saved a million dollars from what 1248 proposed they should have done at the cost of not trading a guy they probably don’t want to trade anyway.

You know I gonna spin wit it
martin
Posts: 76106
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
4/19/2021  1:02 PM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
martin
Posts: 76106
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
4/19/2021  2:57 PM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Knickfury11
Posts: 20290
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/19/2020
Member: #8856
United Kingdom
4/19/2021  3:25 PM
fishmike wrote:Randle is fantastic. He's a 2 way player who can score from anywhere and is a great guy. Total pro. All star. We need more guys like him. Not less. He's also one of the strongest dudes in the league.

Praying we sign another guy ready to take that next step like we did with Randle

Finding another “diamond in the rough” scenario, absolutely. Similar to jerami grant @ DET. Randle has earned every accolade he gets this year, but can’t help but feel if he were not playing under Thibs his numbers would be far more modest. Also worth considering, if role players like Bullock & Burks can benefit from our system and coaching and seemingly thrive, who else could?

Yeah ideally Randle is a second option ( but an excellent stop gap ). I’d ask Thibs ( who’s grossly overachieved in my mind ) please let the young guys play. Still feel like I don’t know what we have with OB1.

Knickfury11
Posts: 20290
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/19/2020
Member: #8856
United Kingdom
4/19/2021  3:30 PM
martin wrote:

Well, when it’s put like that.... in the scenario that we did trade him, we would face so much condemnation league wide.

I mean that’s never happened before.

smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
4/19/2021  3:34 PM
Crazy that this is the same player! Haven’t seen this much improvement from a Knick since... Camby?:

martin
Posts: 76106
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
4/19/2021  3:36 PM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
4/19/2021  3:39 PM
martin wrote:

Yessss! Been great to see him getting recognition for his hard work this season

martin
Posts: 76106
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
4/22/2021  11:59 AM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
martin
Posts: 76106
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
4/22/2021  12:01 PM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34056
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

4/22/2021  12:03 PM
I BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THIS THBREAD

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
NYKBocker
Posts: 38399
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
4/22/2021  8:39 PM
J. Randle

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy