[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Even if get crap for melo to Houston (not including Ryan Anderson) would you be ok with it?
Author Thread
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
8/2/2017  12:34 PM
Nalod wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:What's wrong with keeping Melo as a 28 minute 6th man?

How long are you and 1248 going to keep pretending you don't grasp the premise that 25 wins is better than 35 wins?


You think Melo adds 10 wins? Virtually every lineup was worse with him last year. He helped the tanking.

I agree that he made us worse. BUT he also helped KP become a jerk in front of our own eyes with his "leadership". I would take 10 extra wins to remove him from the locker room. We trade him or we buy him out, this notion of asking him to play hard on both sides of the ball is just ridiculous at this point. We have been there done that for six years. As did Karl in Denver before us


I didn't say ask him to play hard. We have to demand it. We have never made his playing time dependent on how he plays. He could screw around, nap when he wanted to, and still get 33 minutes before.

It just doesnt work. I dont want to be insulting but this is just not viable. This is completely ignoring the human, social, and status elements of this equation. Three things that are key in successful team building. Melo is not a rat on a wheel that only gets cheese if he runs really hard. This notion of making Melo play hard by reducing his role or threatening to has no basis in reality and really reflects the ignorance of anyone suggesting it. Briggs you really make yourself look foolish everything you suggest it. How does this play out in your mind? Melo just gets less minutes and waives his towel rooting for Kuz instead from the bench? You think this creates a good team culture? Please just wake up people. Maybe this works with 8 year olds playing soccer. Not so much with million dollar athletes.

No, that's not at all how you approach the situation. Admittedly, now that they've tried so hard to trade him, it would be hard to make this work. But what they needed to do earlier was talk to him about how great a player he is and how great a passer he is. He can be a gifted passer and defender and the team needs more of it. Explain (actually going through the shot charts) why those off-balance mid-range shots don't help the team as much as a great pass from him does. They need to look at the shot charts, look at the data by shot type, and discuss the things he does great as well as the things they want him to reduce. The tone of the meetings has to be - you're a gifted player but we want to use your gifts in a new way. You start that way, and if it doesn't work, eventually things have to start to become more punitive. Then you did everything you can to get him to play the right way, and there's a reasonable rationale for becoming punitive with playing time if it doesn't work out.

If he is back on the team, there is no good option. Maybe Jeff can say that he had nothing to do with the trade rumors and can still talk to him about using his gifts differently. I don't know. There are no good options if he's back. The only other option is to just let him jack up bad shots and take naps on defense. Some people think having him come off the bench for 28 mpg solves the issues. It doesn't. He'll just jack up bad shots and sleep on defense for 28 instead of 33 minutes.

And did you call me, Briggs?! You said Briggs makes himself look foolish with all the things he suggests. LOL. If you did mean me and not Briggs, the issue was just that you made a ton of incorrect assumptions about how I would go about doing this.

so you don't think that knicks have not had this talk to Melo about shot selections, ball movement, etc?
Did not show him charts and how to make his game more efficient?

so when he lead the team in assist the yr before last, were you still saying he doesn't pass enough, or I guess it comes down to "what have you done for me lately"

Hows the team doing with melo the last 7 years? He is and has been our best player. Hows it goink? Dude is 33, we are rebuilding with yoot and its not about him anymore, its about the team.
Its time to move on. Season before last we had Jose and Grant as PG's. Melo is an all star, all good stuff, but how is the team doing with him?
Im not saying its his "Fault", or whose to blame. Look at our roster, we own our own picks, and look at the potential. He has two years on his contract, he needs the ball to be wonderful but he stops the ball to do what he does best.
Playoff teams need what he does. We not there. Time to move on......

How, by kid napping his son..he has a NTC,

We're like the dumbest franchise on earth trying to trade a player with a NTC, by brandishing his FLAWS, and regardless to a youth movement, everyone knows you still need vets, so it's become a bit personal.

I say personally because they went out of there way to sign a veteran like sessions, why shouldn't he be playing on a contender.

ES
AUTOADVERT
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

8/2/2017  12:35 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:What's wrong with keeping Melo as a 28 minute 6th man?

How long are you and 1248 going to keep pretending you don't grasp the premise that 25 wins is better than 35 wins?


You think Melo adds 10 wins? Virtually every lineup was worse with him last year. He helped the tanking.

I agree that he made us worse. BUT he also helped KP become a jerk in front of our own eyes with his "leadership". I would take 10 extra wins to remove him from the locker room. We trade him or we buy him out, this notion of asking him to play hard on both sides of the ball is just ridiculous at this point. We have been there done that for six years. As did Karl in Denver before us


I didn't say ask him to play hard. We have to demand it. We have never made his playing time dependent on how he plays. He could screw around, nap when he wanted to, and still get 33 minutes before.

It just doesnt work. I dont want to be insulting but this is just not viable. This is completely ignoring the human, social, and status elements of this equation. Three things that are key in successful team building. Melo is not a rat on a wheel that only gets cheese if he runs really hard. This notion of making Melo play hard by reducing his role or threatening to has no basis in reality and really reflects the ignorance of anyone suggesting it. Briggs you really make yourself look foolish everything you suggest it. How does this play out in your mind? Melo just gets less minutes and waives his towel rooting for Kuz instead from the bench? You think this creates a good team culture? Please just wake up people. Maybe this works with 8 year olds playing soccer. Not so much with million dollar athletes.

No, that's not at all how you approach the situation. Admittedly, now that they've tried so hard to trade him, it would be hard to make this work. But what they needed to do earlier was talk to him about how great a player he is and how great a passer he is. He can be a gifted passer and defender and the team needs more of it. Explain (actually going through the shot charts) why those off-balance mid-range shots don't help the team as much as a great pass from him does. They need to look at the shot charts, look at the data by shot type, and discuss the things he does great as well as the things they want him to reduce. The tone of the meetings has to be - you're a gifted player but we want to use your gifts in a new way. You start that way, and if it doesn't work, eventually things have to start to become more punitive. Then you did everything you can to get him to play the right way, and there's a reasonable rationale for becoming punitive with playing time if it doesn't work out.

If he is back on the team, there is no good option. Maybe Jeff can say that he had nothing to do with the trade rumors and can still talk to him about using his gifts differently. I don't know. There are no good options if he's back. The only other option is to just let him jack up bad shots and take naps on defense. Some people think having him come off the bench for 28 mpg solves the issues. It doesn't. He'll just jack up bad shots and sleep on defense for 28 instead of 33 minutes.

And did you call me, Briggs?! You said Briggs makes himself look foolish with all the things he suggests. LOL. If you did mean me and not Briggs, the issue was just that you made a ton of incorrect assumptions about how I would go about doing this.

Bonn - What makes you think no one has ever done the above with Melo your that this time it will be different? We know NOTHING about what conversations coaches have with them in the locker room we can't assume no one has ever thought about showing him the data. In fact we can probably safely assume the opposite is true, because all teams rely on these types of analyses now


If they did it, they clearly didn't follow through with the method I laid out since it never reached the point where he lost playing time. They may have done the gentler approach first and then stopped.

Merely asking him being up the ball and pass more instead of wasting the clock led to months of sulking and insubordination under MDA. When he can pull that crap and clearly get away with it, imagine what benching would have resulted in? You are basically asking for continued dysfunction, more media driven drama about the Knicks treating poor Melo unfairly by paying him 27 million to sit on the bench. Be careful what you wish for


Again, I don't want him back here. I'm saying that's what you have to do if he is back. What is your plan if he is back next season?

Buy him out or Ask him to stay home. Don't want him around the young players

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
Nalod
Posts: 71546
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/2/2017  12:40 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:What's wrong with keeping Melo as a 28 minute 6th man?

How long are you and 1248 going to keep pretending you don't grasp the premise that 25 wins is better than 35 wins?


You think Melo adds 10 wins? Virtually every lineup was worse with him last year. He helped the tanking.

I agree that he made us worse. BUT he also helped KP become a jerk in front of our own eyes with his "leadership". I would take 10 extra wins to remove him from the locker room. We trade him or we buy him out, this notion of asking him to play hard on both sides of the ball is just ridiculous at this point. We have been there done that for six years. As did Karl in Denver before us


I didn't say ask him to play hard. We have to demand it. We have never made his playing time dependent on how he plays. He could screw around, nap when he wanted to, and still get 33 minutes before.

It just doesnt work. I dont want to be insulting but this is just not viable. This is completely ignoring the human, social, and status elements of this equation. Three things that are key in successful team building. Melo is not a rat on a wheel that only gets cheese if he runs really hard. This notion of making Melo play hard by reducing his role or threatening to has no basis in reality and really reflects the ignorance of anyone suggesting it. Briggs you really make yourself look foolish everything you suggest it. How does this play out in your mind? Melo just gets less minutes and waives his towel rooting for Kuz instead from the bench? You think this creates a good team culture? Please just wake up people. Maybe this works with 8 year olds playing soccer. Not so much with million dollar athletes.

No, that's not at all how you approach the situation. Admittedly, now that they've tried so hard to trade him, it would be hard to make this work. But what they needed to do earlier was talk to him about how great a player he is and how great a passer he is. He can be a gifted passer and defender and the team needs more of it. Explain (actually going through the shot charts) why those off-balance mid-range shots don't help the team as much as a great pass from him does. They need to look at the shot charts, look at the data by shot type, and discuss the things he does great as well as the things they want him to reduce. The tone of the meetings has to be - you're a gifted player but we want to use your gifts in a new way. You start that way, and if it doesn't work, eventually things have to start to become more punitive. Then you did everything you can to get him to play the right way, and there's a reasonable rationale for becoming punitive with playing time if it doesn't work out.

If he is back on the team, there is no good option. Maybe Jeff can say that he had nothing to do with the trade rumors and can still talk to him about using his gifts differently. I don't know. There are no good options if he's back. The only other option is to just let him jack up bad shots and take naps on defense. Some people think having him come off the bench for 28 mpg solves the issues. It doesn't. He'll just jack up bad shots and sleep on defense for 28 instead of 33 minutes.

And did you call me, Briggs?! You said Briggs makes himself look foolish with all the things he suggests. LOL. If you did mean me and not Briggs, the issue was just that you made a ton of incorrect assumptions about how I would go about doing this.

so you don't think that knicks have not had this talk to Melo about shot selections, ball movement, etc?
Did not show him charts and how to make his game more efficient?

so when he lead the team in assist the yr before last, were you still saying he doesn't pass enough, or I guess it comes down to "what have you done for me lately"

Hows the team doing with melo the last 7 years? He is and has been our best player. Hows it goink? Dude is 33, we are rebuilding with yoot and its not about him anymore, its about the team.
Its time to move on. Season before last we had Jose and Grant as PG's. Melo is an all star, all good stuff, but how is the team doing with him?
Im not saying its his "Fault", or whose to blame. Look at our roster, we own our own picks, and look at the potential. He has two years on his contract, he needs the ball to be wonderful but he stops the ball to do what he does best.
Playoff teams need what he does. We not there. Time to move on......

How, by kid napping his son..he has a NTC,

We're like the dumbest franchise on earth trying to trade a player with a NTC, by brandishing his FLAWS, and regardless to a youth movement, everyone knows you still need vets, so it's become a bit personal.

I say personally because they went out of there way to sign a veteran like sessions, why shouldn't he be playing on a contender.

Your right.
NBA does not hire advance scouts or collect tape on players, so his flaws were a big secret until Phil let the cat out of the bag.
You do need vets. Sessions, Noah, KOQ, Lee, Lance, KP now two years in.........Hardaway.
Sessions is a jouneyman player, not a finishing piece. He is not paid like one.

GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/29/2003
Member: #411
USA
8/2/2017  12:49 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:What's wrong with keeping Melo as a 28 minute 6th man?

How long are you and 1248 going to keep pretending you don't grasp the premise that 25 wins is better than 35 wins?


You think Melo adds 10 wins? Virtually every lineup was worse with him last year. He helped the tanking.

I agree that he made us worse. BUT he also helped KP become a jerk in front of our own eyes with his "leadership". I would take 10 extra wins to remove him from the locker room. We trade him or we buy him out, this notion of asking him to play hard on both sides of the ball is just ridiculous at this point. We have been there done that for six years. As did Karl in Denver before us


I didn't say ask him to play hard. We have to demand it. We have never made his playing time dependent on how he plays. He could screw around, nap when he wanted to, and still get 33 minutes before.

It just doesnt work. I dont want to be insulting but this is just not viable. This is completely ignoring the human, social, and status elements of this equation. Three things that are key in successful team building. Melo is not a rat on a wheel that only gets cheese if he runs really hard. This notion of making Melo play hard by reducing his role or threatening to has no basis in reality and really reflects the ignorance of anyone suggesting it. Briggs you really make yourself look foolish everything you suggest it. How does this play out in your mind? Melo just gets less minutes and waives his towel rooting for Kuz instead from the bench? You think this creates a good team culture? Please just wake up people. Maybe this works with 8 year olds playing soccer. Not so much with million dollar athletes.

No, that's not at all how you approach the situation. Admittedly, now that they've tried so hard to trade him, it would be hard to make this work. But what they needed to do earlier was talk to him about how great a player he is and how great a passer he is. He can be a gifted passer and defender and the team needs more of it. Explain (actually going through the shot charts) why those off-balance mid-range shots don't help the team as much as a great pass from him does. They need to look at the shot charts, look at the data by shot type, and discuss the things he does great as well as the things they want him to reduce. The tone of the meetings has to be - you're a gifted player but we want to use your gifts in a new way. You start that way, and if it doesn't work, eventually things have to start to become more punitive. Then you did everything you can to get him to play the right way, and there's a reasonable rationale for becoming punitive with playing time if it doesn't work out.

If he is back on the team, there is no good option. Maybe Jeff can say that he had nothing to do with the trade rumors and can still talk to him about using his gifts differently. I don't know. There are no good options if he's back. The only other option is to just let him jack up bad shots and take naps on defense. Some people think having him come off the bench for 28 mpg solves the issues. It doesn't. He'll just jack up bad shots and sleep on defense for 28 instead of 33 minutes.

And did you call me, Briggs?! You said Briggs makes himself look foolish with all the things he suggests. LOL. If you did mean me and not Briggs, the issue was just that you made a ton of incorrect assumptions about how I would go about doing this.

Bonn - What makes you think no one has ever done the above with Melo your that this time it will be different? We know NOTHING about what conversations coaches have with them in the locker room we can't assume no one has ever thought about showing him the data. In fact we can probably safely assume the opposite is true, because all teams rely on these types of analyses now


If they did it, they clearly didn't follow through with the method I laid out since it never reached the point where he lost playing time. They may have done the gentler approach first and then stopped.

Merely asking him being up the ball and pass more instead of wasting the clock led to months of sulking and insubordination under MDA. When he can pull that crap and clearly get away with it, imagine what benching would have resulted in? You are basically asking for continued dysfunction, more media driven drama about the Knicks treating poor Melo unfairly by paying him 27 million to sit on the bench. Be careful what you wish for


Again, I don't want him back here. I'm saying that's what you have to do if he is back. What is your plan if he is back next season?

Buy him out or Ask him to stay home. Don't want him around the young players

I don't give in to his demands. If he wont accept the deal NY wants, then pay him to stay away from the team. Sitting out a year will kill him. He wants to retire in the top 10 in scoring.

Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

8/2/2017  12:58 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/2/2017  12:59 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:What's wrong with keeping Melo as a 28 minute 6th man?

How long are you and 1248 going to keep pretending you don't grasp the premise that 25 wins is better than 35 wins?


You think Melo adds 10 wins? Virtually every lineup was worse with him last year. He helped the tanking.

I agree that he made us worse. BUT he also helped KP become a jerk in front of our own eyes with his "leadership". I would take 10 extra wins to remove him from the locker room. We trade him or we buy him out, this notion of asking him to play hard on both sides of the ball is just ridiculous at this point. We have been there done that for six years. As did Karl in Denver before us


I didn't say ask him to play hard. We have to demand it. We have never made his playing time dependent on how he plays. He could screw around, nap when he wanted to, and still get 33 minutes before.

It just doesnt work. I dont want to be insulting but this is just not viable. This is completely ignoring the human, social, and status elements of this equation. Three things that are key in successful team building. Melo is not a rat on a wheel that only gets cheese if he runs really hard. This notion of making Melo play hard by reducing his role or threatening to has no basis in reality and really reflects the ignorance of anyone suggesting it. Briggs you really make yourself look foolish everything you suggest it. How does this play out in your mind? Melo just gets less minutes and waives his towel rooting for Kuz instead from the bench? You think this creates a good team culture? Please just wake up people. Maybe this works with 8 year olds playing soccer. Not so much with million dollar athletes.

No, that's not at all how you approach the situation. Admittedly, now that they've tried so hard to trade him, it would be hard to make this work. But what they needed to do earlier was talk to him about how great a player he is and how great a passer he is. He can be a gifted passer and defender and the team needs more of it. Explain (actually going through the shot charts) why those off-balance mid-range shots don't help the team as much as a great pass from him does. They need to look at the shot charts, look at the data by shot type, and discuss the things he does great as well as the things they want him to reduce. The tone of the meetings has to be - you're a gifted player but we want to use your gifts in a new way. You start that way, and if it doesn't work, eventually things have to start to become more punitive. Then you did everything you can to get him to play the right way, and there's a reasonable rationale for becoming punitive with playing time if it doesn't work out.

If he is back on the team, there is no good option. Maybe Jeff can say that he had nothing to do with the trade rumors and can still talk to him about using his gifts differently. I don't know. There are no good options if he's back. The only other option is to just let him jack up bad shots and take naps on defense. Some people think having him come off the bench for 28 mpg solves the issues. It doesn't. He'll just jack up bad shots and sleep on defense for 28 instead of 33 minutes.

And did you call me, Briggs?! You said Briggs makes himself look foolish with all the things he suggests. LOL. If you did mean me and not Briggs, the issue was just that you made a ton of incorrect assumptions about how I would go about doing this.

so you don't think that knicks have not had this talk to Melo about shot selections, ball movement, etc?
Did not show him charts and how to make his game more efficient?

so when he lead the team in assist the yr before last, were you still saying he doesn't pass enough, or I guess it comes down to "what have you done for me lately"

Hows the team doing with melo the last 7 years? He is and has been our best player. Hows it goink? Dude is 33, we are rebuilding with yoot and its not about him anymore, its about the team.
Its time to move on. Season before last we had Jose and Grant as PG's. Melo is an all star, all good stuff, but how is the team doing with him?
Im not saying its his "Fault", or whose to blame. Look at our roster, we own our own picks, and look at the potential. He has two years on his contract, he needs the ball to be wonderful but he stops the ball to do what he does best.
Playoff teams need what he does. We not there. Time to move on......

How, by kid napping his son..he has a NTC,

We're like the dumbest franchise on earth trying to trade a player with a NTC, by brandishing his FLAWS, and regardless to a youth movement, everyone knows you still need vets, so it's become a bit personal.

I say personally because they went out of there way to sign a veteran like sessions, why shouldn't he be playing on a contender.

Not a matter of should or shouldn't.

Matter of is or isn't.

He's a back-up PG on a team what hasn't made the playoffs in 4 seasons.

Why do you expect this year to be significantly different?

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
8/2/2017  1:02 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:What's wrong with keeping Melo as a 28 minute 6th man?

How long are you and 1248 going to keep pretending you don't grasp the premise that 25 wins is better than 35 wins?


You think Melo adds 10 wins? Virtually every lineup was worse with him last year. He helped the tanking.

I agree that he made us worse. BUT he also helped KP become a jerk in front of our own eyes with his "leadership". I would take 10 extra wins to remove him from the locker room. We trade him or we buy him out, this notion of asking him to play hard on both sides of the ball is just ridiculous at this point. We have been there done that for six years. As did Karl in Denver before us


I didn't say ask him to play hard. We have to demand it. We have never made his playing time dependent on how he plays. He could screw around, nap when he wanted to, and still get 33 minutes before.

It just doesnt work. I dont want to be insulting but this is just not viable. This is completely ignoring the human, social, and status elements of this equation. Three things that are key in successful team building. Melo is not a rat on a wheel that only gets cheese if he runs really hard. This notion of making Melo play hard by reducing his role or threatening to has no basis in reality and really reflects the ignorance of anyone suggesting it. Briggs you really make yourself look foolish everything you suggest it. How does this play out in your mind? Melo just gets less minutes and waives his towel rooting for Kuz instead from the bench? You think this creates a good team culture? Please just wake up people. Maybe this works with 8 year olds playing soccer. Not so much with million dollar athletes.

+1000

explain how your starting kuz or lance ahead of an all star..it's the most ridiculous thing I've heard yet

He isn't an all star.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/2/2017  1:04 PM
Im looking for positive developments and Im trying to win. I dont believe you ever try to tank from game 1.

There is nothing there with Houston. Its not the Knicka fault that melo wont expand his trade destinations.


Id go like this to keep everyone fresh and injury free--play 10

C-Oquinn 25-28
F KP--25 -28
G Timmy Hardaway 25-28
G Frank Nitklina 18-24
G C Lee 26-28 min
6th man Carmelo-25-28 minutes
7th man Willy G 25-28 minutes
G Baker 12-18
G Dotson 12-18
G Sessions 12-18

Kuz
Thomas
Randle
Noah

RIP Crushalot😞
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/2/2017  1:05 PM
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:What's wrong with keeping Melo as a 28 minute 6th man?

How long are you and 1248 going to keep pretending you don't grasp the premise that 25 wins is better than 35 wins?


You think Melo adds 10 wins? Virtually every lineup was worse with him last year. He helped the tanking.

I agree that he made us worse. BUT he also helped KP become a jerk in front of our own eyes with his "leadership". I would take 10 extra wins to remove him from the locker room. We trade him or we buy him out, this notion of asking him to play hard on both sides of the ball is just ridiculous at this point. We have been there done that for six years. As did Karl in Denver before us


I didn't say ask him to play hard. We have to demand it. We have never made his playing time dependent on how he plays. He could screw around, nap when he wanted to, and still get 33 minutes before.

It just doesnt work. I dont want to be insulting but this is just not viable. This is completely ignoring the human, social, and status elements of this equation. Three things that are key in successful team building. Melo is not a rat on a wheel that only gets cheese if he runs really hard. This notion of making Melo play hard by reducing his role or threatening to has no basis in reality and really reflects the ignorance of anyone suggesting it. Briggs you really make yourself look foolish everything you suggest it. How does this play out in your mind? Melo just gets less minutes and waives his towel rooting for Kuz instead from the bench? You think this creates a good team culture? Please just wake up people. Maybe this works with 8 year olds playing soccer. Not so much with million dollar athletes.

No, that's not at all how you approach the situation. Admittedly, now that they've tried so hard to trade him, it would be hard to make this work. But what they needed to do earlier was talk to him about how great a player he is and how great a passer he is. He can be a gifted passer and defender and the team needs more of it. Explain (actually going through the shot charts) why those off-balance mid-range shots don't help the team as much as a great pass from him does. They need to look at the shot charts, look at the data by shot type, and discuss the things he does great as well as the things they want him to reduce. The tone of the meetings has to be - you're a gifted player but we want to use your gifts in a new way. You start that way, and if it doesn't work, eventually things have to start to become more punitive. Then you did everything you can to get him to play the right way, and there's a reasonable rationale for becoming punitive with playing time if it doesn't work out.

If he is back on the team, there is no good option. Maybe Jeff can say that he had nothing to do with the trade rumors and can still talk to him about using his gifts differently. I don't know. There are no good options if he's back. The only other option is to just let him jack up bad shots and take naps on defense. Some people think having him come off the bench for 28 mpg solves the issues. It doesn't. He'll just jack up bad shots and sleep on defense for 28 instead of 33 minutes.

And did you call me, Briggs?! You said Briggs makes himself look foolish with all the things he suggests. LOL. If you did mean me and not Briggs, the issue was just that you made a ton of incorrect assumptions about how I would go about doing this.

Bonn - What makes you think no one has ever done the above with Melo your that this time it will be different? We know NOTHING about what conversations coaches have with them in the locker room we can't assume no one has ever thought about showing him the data. In fact we can probably safely assume the opposite is true, because all teams rely on these types of analyses now


If they did it, they clearly didn't follow through with the method I laid out since it never reached the point where he lost playing time. They may have done the gentler approach first and then stopped.

Merely asking him being up the ball and pass more instead of wasting the clock led to months of sulking and insubordination under MDA. When he can pull that crap and clearly get away with it, imagine what benching would have resulted in? You are basically asking for continued dysfunction, more media driven drama about the Knicks treating poor Melo unfairly by paying him 27 million to sit on the bench. Be careful what you wish for


Again, I don't want him back here. I'm saying that's what you have to do if he is back. What is your plan if he is back next season?

Buy him out or Ask him to stay home. Don't want him around the young players

I don't give in to his demands. If he wont accept the deal NY wants, then pay him to stay away from the team. Sitting out a year will kill him. He wants to retire in the top 10 in scoring.

He is using the NTC that was given to him. I think he is a Rocket or a Knick. I don't think there are any other options. I also think some suggestions regarding how to treat Melo might be seen as punishing him for using his NTC and might not be allowed by the league. Hopefully a trade happens. I am not worried about Melo's influence on the team. The guy was the captain last year, held off season workouts and is well liked. I am worried about the dynamic with Rambis on the bench if Melo comes back. In my opinion, Kurt's presence is close to toxic with Melo gone. If Melo is back I think that gets bumped up to toxic. Ideally both Kurt and Melo are gone.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

8/2/2017  1:16 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Im looking for positive developments and Im trying to win. I dont believe you ever try to tank from game 1.

There is nothing there with Houston. Its not the Knicka fault that melo wont expand his trade destinations.


Id go like this to keep everyone fresh and injury free--play 10

C-Oquinn 25-28
F KP--25 -28
G Timmy Hardaway 25-28
G Frank Nitklina 18-24
G C Lee 26-28 min
6th man Carmelo-25-28 minutes
7th man Willy G 25-28 minutes
G Baker 12-18
G Dotson 12-18
G Sessions 12-18

Kuz
Thomas
Randle
Noah

So to be clear Briggs - despite your constant, wholesale criticisms of the entire Knicks organization, despite win totals of 37, 17, 31 and 32 wins the last 4 seasons, you're in fact optimistic Hornachek can lead THIS roster to the postseason in 2017-18?

It's a yes or no question.

TLover
Posts: 21068
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/12/2003
Member: #381
USA
8/2/2017  1:28 PM
Yes I am asking Houston to trade Anderson, Gordan, Ariza & Capela for Melo & Noah...

Why bc they want really Melo bad to go with Harden & Paul. Also they signed PJ Tucker & Tarrick Black to make up for losing those players. Noah & Nene will play center for them. Heck I'll throw them O'quinn for some of their non-guaranteed contracts.

That's the deal or we keep Melo, which I'm fine with.
These are professionals, they'll deal with hurt feelings.

Management needs to take a stand and not be humiliated like the past regime.

fishmike
Posts: 53899
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/2/2017  1:28 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:What's wrong with keeping Melo as a 28 minute 6th man?

How long are you and 1248 going to keep pretending you don't grasp the premise that 25 wins is better than 35 wins?


You think Melo adds 10 wins? Virtually every lineup was worse with him last year. He helped the tanking.

I agree that he made us worse. BUT he also helped KP become a jerk in front of our own eyes with his "leadership". I would take 10 extra wins to remove him from the locker room. We trade him or we buy him out, this notion of asking him to play hard on both sides of the ball is just ridiculous at this point. We have been there done that for six years. As did Karl in Denver before us


I didn't say ask him to play hard. We have to demand it. We have never made his playing time dependent on how he plays. He could screw around, nap when he wanted to, and still get 33 minutes before.

It just doesnt work. I dont want to be insulting but this is just not viable. This is completely ignoring the human, social, and status elements of this equation. Three things that are key in successful team building. Melo is not a rat on a wheel that only gets cheese if he runs really hard. This notion of making Melo play hard by reducing his role or threatening to has no basis in reality and really reflects the ignorance of anyone suggesting it. Briggs you really make yourself look foolish everything you suggest it. How does this play out in your mind? Melo just gets less minutes and waives his towel rooting for Kuz instead from the bench? You think this creates a good team culture? Please just wake up people. Maybe this works with 8 year olds playing soccer. Not so much with million dollar athletes.

No, that's not at all how you approach the situation. Admittedly, now that they've tried so hard to trade him, it would be hard to make this work. But what they needed to do earlier was talk to him about how great a player he is and how great a passer he is. He can be a gifted passer and defender and the team needs more of it. Explain (actually going through the shot charts) why those off-balance mid-range shots don't help the team as much as a great pass from him does. They need to look at the shot charts, look at the data by shot type, and discuss the things he does great as well as the things they want him to reduce. The tone of the meetings has to be - you're a gifted player but we want to use your gifts in a new way. You start that way, and if it doesn't work, eventually things have to start to become more punitive. Then you did everything you can to get him to play the right way, and there's a reasonable rationale for becoming punitive with playing time if it doesn't work out.

If he is back on the team, there is no good option. Maybe Jeff can say that he had nothing to do with the trade rumors and can still talk to him about using his gifts differently. I don't know. There are no good options if he's back. The only other option is to just let him jack up bad shots and take naps on defense. Some people think having him come off the bench for 28 mpg solves the issues. It doesn't. He'll just jack up bad shots and sleep on defense for 28 instead of 33 minutes.

And did you call me, Briggs?! You said Briggs makes himself look foolish with all the things he suggests. LOL. If you did mean me and not Briggs, the issue was just that you made a ton of incorrect assumptions about how I would go about doing this.

I meant Briggs... he suggests this often. I replied to your comment regarding Melo has never had to earn his minutes. Suggesting that as a viable or realistic option is beyond silly. The bold is the reality only now he's pissed about having his minutes reduced in favor of inferior players.

Every option involving him coming back is silly. What's your plan if he's back here?
My approach was as a last resort, reducing his minutes in favor of player's with a superior approach to the game. That's only once it reaches a point where you've tried everything else and are almost ready to give up on Melo. At that point, you're trying to make sure his negative influence doesn't spread (but still giving him one last shot). The team was almost -300 with him on the court and was close to even with him off it last year. We can't just do nothing and allow that to happen again. What would you do if he's back on the roster?
Easy answer… play it straight. I think Scott Perry is capable of doing this, which would be a first for Knick management.

Melo is human. Treat him as such. Start with simply addressing the situation for what it is. Melo had issues with the prior team president and there was back and forth. Simply be honest. Say we do not agree with how any of the issue were dealt with, and a player of Melo’s stature in the league deserves better than the things that were said and done. So there is the first part.. apologize for Phil being a tool and blasting Melo publicly.

Tell Melo there is zero interest in making an example of him or pushing some agenda. Melo is an excellent basketball player and we value his skill set. There was a time we had hoped to surround you (Melo) with similar caliber talent, but we (Knick management) failed to do that. Many of us here never stopped valuing what you bring to this franchise.

There is no need to spell out expectations for Melo. He’s a pro, the expectation is he shows up in shape and plays his role on the team. Where he plays is up to the coach. I suspect Jeff would not be set in where Melo plays. Noah will miss the first month, Willy is still raw defensively so I suspect the first question would be is KOQ the opening day starting center with Melo at the 3 or is KP center with Melo at 4?

This puts everything on Melo. It’s not that the Knicks don’t want him, its simply they acknowledge their failure to build a winning roster around Melo’s talents, so they are taking steps backward to build for the future. If Melo wants to move on as that doesn’t suit him, he has the same options the Knicks have if they want to move on. Really none. Melo is under contract with the Knicks. He’s gotta show up and play. He can opt out at the end of the year if he wants to leave.

If I am Knick management and Melo tells me he wants to be traded to the Rockets that’s fine also. However the Knicks are under no obligation to do so, and as Knick management I would be more than comfortable sitting down with him and explaining I am more than happy to work with his agent to facilitate a trade, but I don’t do so at the expense of the Knicks.

Go from there. Transparency takes all the pressure away from the Knicks and puts it on Melo. Players appreciate knowing where they stand up front.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
CTKnicksfan
Posts: 20312
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/24/2004
Member: #572
8/2/2017  1:34 PM
IMO it's time to just bite the bullet and do a straight up trade with HOU for Anderson/filler/picks. Knicks are not in line to have significant cap space anyway before 2020 with the THJ and Noah contracts. Knicks need to take a long view here - If the price for dumping Anderson around the rest of the league was supposedly 2 first round picks, then let HOU pay that to us. Don't even bother asking for Ariza or Gordon, just do the deal and move on. Especially if you can get light or no protection on the later pick, when Houston will be on the downside/transitioning (they'll still have Harden even after Melo/CP3 move on, so they likely won't be terrible regardless)

Melo for Anderson + NG filler, 2020 1st (top 10 protected) 2022 first (top 3-5 protected) rights to Hartenstein (Euro stash to bring over in a few years, or future trade bait)

Knicks really needs to be forward looking - have a 3 year plan, and target the summer of 2020 for max cap space. That year will be the 2nd year of KP's max extension (I don't envision any scenario where he plays for the qualifying offer to get to unrestricted FA), Willy will be a FA, but will have a tiny cap hold and we'll have Bird Rights, so we can sign FAs and then go over the cap to pay him. Frank N will be in the last year of his rookie deal (so one more year before his extension kicks in), and we'll have our 2018, 2019, and 2x 2020 picks (ours and Hou) under rookie scale deals. The only other contract on the books will be THJ's last (option) year - assuming he opts in. If he develops well he may opt out for a longterm deal.

KP will hopefully have developed into an All-Star by that point, and he'll still be just 25 years old in 2020. Willy will be 26. Frank will be what, 22? That's the window where we should be looking. Make the next 3 years about developing the core, drafting well, and finding diamonds in the rough to develop. Flip vets like Lee, KOQ, LT, and Kuz for future assets (even second rounders)

fishmike
Posts: 53899
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/2/2017  1:36 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Im looking for positive developments and Im trying to win. I dont believe you ever try to tank from game 1.

There is nothing there with Houston. Its not the Knicka fault that melo wont expand his trade destinations.


Id go like this to keep everyone fresh and injury free--play 10

C-Oquinn 25-28
F KP--25 -28
G Timmy Hardaway 25-28
G Frank Nitklina 18-24
G C Lee 26-28 min
6th man Carmelo-25-28 minutes
7th man Willy G 25-28 minutes
G Baker 12-18
G Dotson 12-18
G Sessions 12-18

Kuz
Thomas
Randle
Noah

So to be clear Briggs - despite your constant, wholesale criticisms of the entire Knicks organization, despite win totals of 37, 17, 31 and 32 wins the last 4 seasons, you're in fact optimistic Hornachek can lead THIS roster to the postseason in 2017-18?

It's a yes or no question.

and least in Melo's mind, and probably reality Melo is better then everyone in the starting 5. But he's supposed to come off the bench why? how's the conversation going?
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

8/2/2017  1:36 PM
TLover wrote:Yes I am asking Houston to trade Anderson, Gordan, Ariza & Capela for Melo & Noah...

Why bc they want really Melo bad to go with Harden & Paul. Also they signed PJ Tucker & Tarrick Black to make up for losing those players. Noah & Nene will play center for them. Heck I'll throw them O'quinn for some of their non-guaranteed contracts.

That's the deal or we keep Melo, which I'm fine with.
These are professionals, they'll deal with hurt feelings.

Management needs to take a stand and not be humiliated like the past regime.

Not a matter of hurt feelings.

You aren't proposing a trade, you're proposing a non-trade. That's the same as not proposing anything at all.


Same as saying "Melo for Irving straight up". That isn't a proposal, it's rhetoric.

Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

8/2/2017  1:38 PM
fishmike wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Im looking for positive developments and Im trying to win. I dont believe you ever try to tank from game 1.

There is nothing there with Houston. Its not the Knicka fault that melo wont expand his trade destinations.


Id go like this to keep everyone fresh and injury free--play 10

C-Oquinn 25-28
F KP--25 -28
G Timmy Hardaway 25-28
G Frank Nitklina 18-24
G C Lee 26-28 min
6th man Carmelo-25-28 minutes
7th man Willy G 25-28 minutes
G Baker 12-18
G Dotson 12-18
G Sessions 12-18

Kuz
Thomas
Randle
Noah

So to be clear Briggs - despite your constant, wholesale criticisms of the entire Knicks organization, despite win totals of 37, 17, 31 and 32 wins the last 4 seasons, you're in fact optimistic Hornachek can lead THIS roster to the postseason in 2017-18?

It's a yes or no question.

and least in Melo's mind, and probably reality Melo is better then everyone in the starting 5. But he's supposed to come off the bench why? how's the conversation going?

Irrelevant.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/2/2017  1:43 PM
CTKnicksfan wrote:IMO it's time to just bite the bullet and do a straight up trade with HOU for Anderson/filler/picks. Knicks are not in line to have significant cap space anyway before 2020 with the THJ and Noah contracts. Knicks need to take a long view here - If the price for dumping Anderson around the rest of the league was supposedly 2 first round picks, then let HOU pay that to us. Don't even bother asking for Ariza or Gordon, just do the deal and move on. Especially if you can get light or no protection on the later pick, when Houston will be on the downside/transitioning (they'll still have Harden even after Melo/CP3 move on, so they likely won't be terrible regardless)

Melo for Anderson + NG filler, 2020 1st (top 10 protected) 2022 first (top 3-5 protected) rights to Hartenstein (Euro stash to bring over in a few years, or future trade bait)

Knicks really needs to be forward looking - have a 3 year plan, and target the summer of 2020 for max cap space. That year will be the 2nd year of KP's max extension (I don't envision any scenario where he plays for the qualifying offer to get to unrestricted FA), Willy will be a FA, but will have a tiny cap hold and we'll have Bird Rights, so we can sign FAs and then go over the cap to pay him. Frank N will be in the last year of his rookie deal (so one more year before his extension kicks in), and we'll have our 2018, 2019, and 2x 2020 picks (ours and Hou) under rookie scale deals. The only other contract on the books will be THJ's last (option) year - assuming he opts in. If he develops well he may opt out for a longterm deal.

KP will hopefully have developed into an All-Star by that point, and he'll still be just 25 years old in 2020. Willy will be 26. Frank will be what, 22? That's the window where we should be looking. Make the next 3 years about developing the core, drafting well, and finding diamonds in the rough to develop. Flip vets like Lee, KOQ, LT, and Kuz for future assets (even second rounders)


I think this might be the best approach. Also, you are right that Anderson and Noah's deal end at the sae time. I also don't hate Anderson as a player. He is just over paid.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

8/2/2017  1:59 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
CTKnicksfan wrote:IMO it's time to just bite the bullet and do a straight up trade with HOU for Anderson/filler/picks. Knicks are not in line to have significant cap space anyway before 2020 with the THJ and Noah contracts. Knicks need to take a long view here - If the price for dumping Anderson around the rest of the league was supposedly 2 first round picks, then let HOU pay that to us. Don't even bother asking for Ariza or Gordon, just do the deal and move on. Especially if you can get light or no protection on the later pick, when Houston will be on the downside/transitioning (they'll still have Harden even after Melo/CP3 move on, so they likely won't be terrible regardless)

Melo for Anderson + NG filler, 2020 1st (top 10 protected) 2022 first (top 3-5 protected) rights to Hartenstein (Euro stash to bring over in a few years, or future trade bait)

Knicks really needs to be forward looking - have a 3 year plan, and target the summer of 2020 for max cap space. That year will be the 2nd year of KP's max extension (I don't envision any scenario where he plays for the qualifying offer to get to unrestricted FA), Willy will be a FA, but will have a tiny cap hold and we'll have Bird Rights, so we can sign FAs and then go over the cap to pay him. Frank N will be in the last year of his rookie deal (so one more year before his extension kicks in), and we'll have our 2018, 2019, and 2x 2020 picks (ours and Hou) under rookie scale deals. The only other contract on the books will be THJ's last (option) year - assuming he opts in. If he develops well he may opt out for a longterm deal.

KP will hopefully have developed into an All-Star by that point, and he'll still be just 25 years old in 2020. Willy will be 26. Frank will be what, 22? That's the window where we should be looking. Make the next 3 years about developing the core, drafting well, and finding diamonds in the rough to develop. Flip vets like Lee, KOQ, LT, and Kuz for future assets (even second rounders)


I think this might be the best approach. Also, you are right that Anderson and Noah's deal end at the sae time. I also don't hate Anderson as a player. He is just over paid.

Stretching a player's $19.3m salary over 3 seasons ($6.4m per) is a lot different under a $100m cap than it was under a $59m cap when the provision was first introduced.

Knicks can generate $13m in cap room in 2019-2020 IF needed that season.

Sure, they can do the same with Anderson in addition, putting $13m on the cap over three years, but Noah is a mistake already made. No sense in doubling down.

TLover
Posts: 21068
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/12/2003
Member: #381
USA
8/2/2017  1:59 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
TLover wrote:Yes I am asking Houston to trade Anderson, Gordan, Ariza & Capela for Melo & Noah...

Why bc they want really Melo bad to go with Harden & Paul. Also they signed PJ Tucker & Tarrick Black to make up for losing those players. Noah & Nene will play center for them. Heck I'll throw them O'quinn for some of their non-guaranteed contracts.

That's the deal or we keep Melo, which I'm fine with.
These are professionals, they'll deal with hurt feelings.

Management needs to take a stand and not be humiliated like the past regime.

Not a matter of hurt feelings.

You aren't proposing a trade, you're proposing a non-trade. That's the same as not proposing anything at all.


Same as saying "Melo for Irving straight up". That isn't a proposal, it's rhetoric.


How is that rhetoric?? Why should we do the Rockets any favors. We are trading the best player in the deal for scraps. I'd rather keep the talent and let our coach utilize his talents. If the coach can't do that then get a new freak'n coach.

It's almost like we're obligated to trade Melo to the Rockets. PHil Jackson is no longer here. If the new regime wants to keep Melo instead of trading him for garbage, so be it.

It's like oh no we're messing up Houston's plan to be a great team.. screw them. Also remember they beat us in the finals in 1994.. not letting them win again.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/2/2017  2:04 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Im looking for positive developments and Im trying to win. I dont believe you ever try to tank from game 1.

There is nothing there with Houston. Its not the Knicka fault that melo wont expand his trade destinations.


Id go like this to keep everyone fresh and injury free--play 10

C-Oquinn 25-28
F KP--25 -28
G Timmy Hardaway 25-28
G Frank Nitklina 18-24
G C Lee 26-28 min
6th man Carmelo-25-28 minutes
7th man Willy G 25-28 minutes
G Baker 12-18
G Dotson 12-18
G Sessions 12-18

Kuz
Thomas
Randle
Noah

So to be clear Briggs - despite your constant, wholesale criticisms of the entire Knicks organization, despite win totals of 37, 17, 31 and 32 wins the last 4 seasons, you're in fact optimistic Hornachek can lead THIS roster to the postseason in 2017-18?

It's a yes or no question.

There has to be explanation--its not yes or no. I want to play positively whether we win or lose. I want Baker Dotson and Frank in the top 10. Using Carmelo as a 6th man in unit 2 should allow the younger players to space out and do their thing with more ease. I want positive developments and I think keeping Melo and using his skills as a conduit to allowing our younger players to have an easier avenue to develop is smart. Its not a W-L question.

RIP Crushalot😞
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

8/2/2017  2:10 PM
TLover wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
TLover wrote:Yes I am asking Houston to trade Anderson, Gordan, Ariza & Capela for Melo & Noah...

Why bc they want really Melo bad to go with Harden & Paul. Also they signed PJ Tucker & Tarrick Black to make up for losing those players. Noah & Nene will play center for them. Heck I'll throw them O'quinn for some of their non-guaranteed contracts.

That's the deal or we keep Melo, which I'm fine with.
These are professionals, they'll deal with hurt feelings.

Management needs to take a stand and not be humiliated like the past regime.

Not a matter of hurt feelings.

You aren't proposing a trade, you're proposing a non-trade. That's the same as not proposing anything at all.


Same as saying "Melo for Irving straight up". That isn't a proposal, it's rhetoric.


How is that rhetoric?? Why should we do the Rockets any favors. We are trading the best player in the deal for scraps. I'd rather keep the talent and let our coach utilize his talents. If the coach can't do that then get a new freak'n coach.

It's almost like we're obligated to trade Melo to the Rockets. PHil Jackson is no longer here. If the new regime wants to keep Melo instead of trading him for garbage, so be it.

It's like oh no we're messing up Houston's plan to be a great team.. screw them. Also remember they beat us in the finals in 1994.. not letting them win again.

You misunderstand. The Knicks should not trade Melo for Anderson. They should not do the Rockets ANY favors. They are no obligated to do anything.

That's a stupid proposal.

Got it?

But all you're doing is countering that stupid proposal that has no chance of happening with your own stupid proposal that has no chance of happening. That is just two rounds of stupid.

Again, it's rhetoric ... rhetoric about how you hate the Rockets and won't do them any favors and screw them.

Even if get crap for melo to Houston (not including Ryan Anderson) would you be ok with it?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy