SupremeCommander wrote:

nixluva wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

nixluva wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

nixluva wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

crzymdups wrote:I said it before and I'll say it again - and I said it before DRose was a Knick - there is something extremely fishy about this case. I don't know if it'll be a mistrial, but I don't see a bad outcome for Rose at this point. And I certainly don't see any criminal charges being filed.

Rose still did a bad thing IMO. Criminal charges or not it doesnt mean he is this great guy. Thankfully he is only here a year. Im excited about jennnings possibly being here a few years like he said he wanted to

You keep saying this kind of thing but really what are you basing it on? You can never really know the whole truth in situations like this.

Also you don't know that Rose will not sign a new contract here. Let's just see what happens.

dude quit apologizing for Rose on this - it's disgusting

First of all it's a free country and I have an opinion just like you!!! It seems to me that you aren't fully aware of the facts of this case as they've been updated.

Rose's sexual habits being what they are, you and I may not agree with it, but that doesn't mean he raped this woman. You seem to have made up your mind about him based on your own morals but your views are your own as are mine. Just cuz you wouldn't perhaps agree with his lifestyle doesn't mean consenting adults are not free to do what they want in the bedroom legally.

don't give me that free country bull**** when all you did was say "wah, don't post what you think about Rose" previously

Dude you are all over the place!!! I can't even begin to understand your position. I haven't said Rose is guilty or innocent. I'm just saying you nor I can really put our own morality on him just as you wouldn't want someone to put their morality on you for how you choose to live. Just cuz we have some info on his bedroom activity it's easy to point fingers but no one knows what you do so they can't judge you. If he did not rape this woman then you really should just keep your own views on his legal sex life to yourself. There are people who have sexual behavior that may not conform to the so called NORMS of the average person but if it's not illegal who are you to judge???

I'm all over the place? You're entitled to say your opinion whenever you want and I'm not allowed to say anything negative about your new Knickerbockers man crush? All I'm doing is pointing out that you are a hypocrite

Still not making any sense! Why are you accusing me of having a man crush on Rose? What have I said that warrants such an accusation? Just cuz I presented the other side of the story which some want to ignore? I haven't said he was guilty or innocent or liable in this case! Me pointing out the facts about Doe's behavior is not hypocritical. If she is not telling the truth then that should be known. If she is telling the truth then Rose should pay.

Also why are you attacking me personally as if I did something to you? I think you need to check yourself before you continue to attack me and make accusations about me that you can't prove.

GustavBahler wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

blkexec wrote:

crzymdups wrote:Well, this seems to be unconnected to the case... but weird...

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/SBondyNYDN/status/786255570575642624

Money and power is a different ball game.....

um... Mr. Rose, I, uh, take back everything I said and apologize from the bottom of my heart

" Five steps to the rim is fine...Mr. Rose"

I bet that prosecutor that made a joke about Rose's mom is terrified right now.

nixluva wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

nixluva wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

nixluva wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

nixluva wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

crzymdups wrote:I said it before and I'll say it again - and I said it before DRose was a Knick - there is something extremely fishy about this case. I don't know if it'll be a mistrial, but I don't see a bad outcome for Rose at this point. And I certainly don't see any criminal charges being filed.

Rose still did a bad thing IMO. Criminal charges or not it doesnt mean he is this great guy. Thankfully he is only here a year. Im excited about jennnings possibly being here a few years like he said he wanted to

You keep saying this kind of thing but really what are you basing it on? You can never really know the whole truth in situations like this.

Also you don't know that Rose will not sign a new contract here. Let's just see what happens.

dude quit apologizing for Rose on this - it's disgusting

First of all it's a free country and I have an opinion just like you!!! It seems to me that you aren't fully aware of the facts of this case as they've been updated.

Rose's sexual habits being what they are, you and I may not agree with it, but that doesn't mean he raped this woman. You seem to have made up your mind about him based on your own morals but your views are your own as are mine. Just cuz you wouldn't perhaps agree with his lifestyle doesn't mean consenting adults are not free to do what they want in the bedroom legally.

don't give me that free country bull**** when all you did was say "wah, don't post what you think about Rose" previously

Dude you are all over the place!!! I can't even begin to understand your position. I haven't said Rose is guilty or innocent. I'm just saying you nor I can really put our own morality on him just as you wouldn't want someone to put their morality on you for how you choose to live. Just cuz we have some info on his bedroom activity it's easy to point fingers but no one knows what you do so they can't judge you. If he did not rape this woman then you really should just keep your own views on his legal sex life to yourself. There are people who have sexual behavior that may not conform to the so called NORMS of the average person but if it's not illegal who are you to judge???

I'm all over the place? You're entitled to say your opinion whenever you want and I'm not allowed to say anything negative about your new Knickerbockers man crush? All I'm doing is pointing out that you are a hypocrite

Still not making any sense! Why are you accusing me of having a man crush on Rose? What have I said that warrants such an accusation? Just cuz I presented the other side of the story which some want to ignore? I haven't said he was guilty or innocent or liable in this case! Me pointing out the facts about Doe's behavior is not hypocritical. If she is not telling the truth then that should be known. If she is telling the truth then Rose should pay.

Also why are you attacking me personally as if I did something to you? I think you need to check yourself before you continue to attack me and make accusations about me that you can't prove.

http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=54927&page=2

You have consistently tried to sweep the Rose story under the rug and told me to stop talking about it in Derrick Rose threads. You should check yourself you friggin hypocrite. Go get a Rose poster, hand lotion, and a towel. This time your Knicks Rose Colored Galsses DISGUST ME

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/sports/basketball/judge-rules-derrick-rose-case-will-continue.html?ref=basketball&_r=0

dk7th wrote:the trial will indeed continue-- how many more games will rose miss?

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/sports/basketball/judge-rules-derrick-rose-case-will-continue.html?ref=basketball&_r=0

I think I read it should finish around Friday (evidence wise) - hopefully won't be too much longer

CrushAlot wrote:

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/juliakmarsh/status/786586334567604225

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/juliakmarsh/status/786669609768275968

So that kinda sounds like all testimony could be wrapped up by tomorrow? Not sure how long a verdict might take... I guess we'll see...

EwingsGlass wrote:

crzymdups wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/juliakmarsh/status/786586334567604225

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/juliakmarsh/status/786669609768275968

So that kinda sounds like all testimony could be wrapped up by tomorrow? Not sure how long a verdict might take... I guess we'll see...

Have they entered the motion for 'dat b---- crazy' defense yet? And yes I am bromancing on Rose cause I do think all civil rape trials are about money and not disgrace.

If she wins, ever wonder if her family will be disgraced by sharing in her millions?

CrushAlot wrote:

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/NancyDillonNYDN/status/787046422432522240

Hope that she has her psychology PhD ready to enter into evidence . . .

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/juliakmarsh/status/787089779586240513

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/juliakmarsh/status/787090173678845952

Finestrg wrote:My gut was telling me this was nothing more than a money grab weeks ago but I was willing to let it play out to see. After all, rape is a terrible thing and needs to be taken seriously. But come on--Doe and her lawyers hiding texts, her ex-friend calling her a liar on the stand today...and this is on top of so many other questionable things surrounding her and he charges. She honestly does not come off credible here at all to me. No wonder she wants to remain anonymous--it's to a point now where I feel like she's embarrassing herself already. She didn't want her family to know she was raped?? Wouldn't family members be one of the first ones you turn to for advice/support?? I dunno man...You know the one thing that really gets me right from the beginning--if the whole idea was to lure her and her friend to his place to gang rape her/them, how come nothing happen there? Sounds like they partied and the 2 girls left--no sex. Then she contacts Rose about a hour later or whatever and tells him to come over, even questioning why no one had sex with the friend? Then she charges that they broke in? Oh yeah? Where's the evidence? Broken door, windows, no police report, even by the others who live there?? Then there's the roommate coming home reporting no break in and nothing unusual the rest of the night (no commotion, screaming, etc.). Then no police report until years later, only after a civil suit was filed?? Then there's the text by Doe to Rose after the fact, not accusing him of rape but saying 'what's up with you? You owe me money for a sex belt and a cab.'?????? Isn't that the time you should be talking to the police, going to the hospital?? Then the partying in Vegas a couple of weeks after. On and on...Seriously man, I was willing to take her charges as serious as anyone but I can't take any more of this. This is annoying now. Can we please get our PG back already?? Season's about to start. Thanks..

All this is the truth. It's unfortunate. Rose deserves the stress behind it because when you do dirt you have to clean it up. This is the ramifications of messing with women like this. Gotta mature and grow up.