ESOMKnicks wrote:Must say, the plaintiff's side is doing a very good job right now on the public perceptions front: based on the materials released to the public, I am coming to a view that Rose and his friends really did violate this woman. But we may not have the full detail yet, so the story could still turn either way.

They did violate the woman. That's not in question. She was down with the violations for years. Now she's not getting the benefits she's was getting so she wants money. That's what this is. Rose and his peeps probably cut her off. That's why these charges were filed so late. If Rose was still giving this last all the benefits he was giving her we wouldn't be hearing about this. From the court papers she said her and Rose had a relationship for a couple years. He forced her to have group sex and other things. It was all good while she was getting what she wanted. To me it's typical where ****. If you are going to play these games with these women you need to take care of them. Otherwise you leave yourself open to embarrassment. Again this is a civil case not a criminal case. That says it all

EnySpree wrote:

ESOMKnicks wrote:Must say, the plaintiff's side is doing a very good job right now on the public perceptions front: based on the materials released to the public, I am coming to a view that Rose and his friends really did violate this woman. But we may not have the full detail yet, so the story could still turn either way.

They did violate the woman. That's not in question. She was down with the violations for years. Now she's not getting the benefits she's was getting so she wants money. That's what this is. Rose and his peeps probably cut her off. That's why these charges were filed so late. If Rose was still giving this last all the benefits he was giving her we wouldn't be hearing about this. From the court papers she said her and Rose had a relationship for a couple years. He forced her to have group sex and other things. It was all good while she was getting what she wanted. To me it's typical where ****. If you are going to play these games with these women you need to take care of them. Otherwise you leave yourself open to embarrassment. Again this is a civil case not a criminal case. That says it all

so you agree that the best way to deal with her is to smear her character? because that seems to be what his lawyers are advocating. but what about the alleged drugging of her? doesn't that count for anything?

dk7th wrote:

EnySpree wrote:

ESOMKnicks wrote:Must say, the plaintiff's side is doing a very good job right now on the public perceptions front: based on the materials released to the public, I am coming to a view that Rose and his friends really did violate this woman. But we may not have the full detail yet, so the story could still turn either way.

They did violate the woman. That's not in question. She was down with the violations for years. Now she's not getting the benefits she's was getting so she wants money. That's what this is. Rose and his peeps probably cut her off. That's why these charges were filed so late. If Rose was still giving this last all the benefits he was giving her we wouldn't be hearing about this. From the court papers she said her and Rose had a relationship for a couple years. He forced her to have group sex and other things. It was all good while she was getting what she wanted. To me it's typical where ****. If you are going to play these games with these women you need to take care of them. Otherwise you leave yourself open to embarrassment. Again this is a civil case not a criminal case. That says it all

so you agree that the best way to deal with her is to smear her character? because that seems to be what his lawyers are advocating. but what about the alleged drugging of her? doesn't that count for anything?

All we know is there is enough evidence in question to warrant a civil trail so says the judge.
seems like plaintiff is using threat that this going public to make a money grab of some sorts.
Its possible they tried to negotiate a settlement, we just don't know.
Rose and his attorney's must be pretty confident. A lot of money in on the line here. His endorsements all morality clauses (pretty standard stuff) so one would assume based on "confidence" Rose has an opinion that he'll be ok thru this.

Nalod wrote:

dk7th wrote:

EnySpree wrote:

ESOMKnicks wrote:Must say, the plaintiff's side is doing a very good job right now on the public perceptions front: based on the materials released to the public, I am coming to a view that Rose and his friends really did violate this woman. But we may not have the full detail yet, so the story could still turn either way.

They did violate the woman. That's not in question. She was down with the violations for years. Now she's not getting the benefits she's was getting so she wants money. That's what this is. Rose and his peeps probably cut her off. That's why these charges were filed so late. If Rose was still giving this last all the benefits he was giving her we wouldn't be hearing about this. From the court papers she said her and Rose had a relationship for a couple years. He forced her to have group sex and other things. It was all good while she was getting what she wanted. To me it's typical where ****. If you are going to play these games with these women you need to take care of them. Otherwise you leave yourself open to embarrassment. Again this is a civil case not a criminal case. That says it all

so you agree that the best way to deal with her is to smear her character? because that seems to be what his lawyers are advocating. but what about the alleged drugging of her? doesn't that count for anything?

All we know is there is enough evidence in question to warrant a civil trail so says the judge.
seems like plaintiff is using threat that this going public to make a money grab of some sorts.
Its possible they tried to negotiate a settlement, we just don't know.
Rose and his attorney's must be pretty confident. A lot of money in on the line here. His endorsements all morality clauses (pretty standard stuff) so one would assume based on "confidence" Rose has an opinion that he'll be ok thru this.

but as you know some lawyers are all too happy to tell clients what they want to hear. you have to wonder what the possibilities/probabilities are of that in this case, especially with the wealth of the client. the voir dire will be interesting. how many women will end up on the jury? i think you need 12 jurors in federal civil cases.