crzymdups wrote:

crzymdups wrote:Knicks interviewed Hornacek, too.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/732287028218335232

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/732287566771183616

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/732288734293463040

Interesting addendum - Howard Beck posted this back in February

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/HowardBeck/status/696799984713396225

Nice find.

newyorker4ever wrote:

crzymdups wrote:

crzymdups wrote:Knicks interviewed Hornacek, too.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/732287028218335232

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/732287566771183616

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/732288734293463040

Interesting addendum - Howard Beck posted this back in February

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/HowardBeck/status/696799984713396225

Nice find.

He bumped it himself. can't take credit

crzymdups wrote:

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/FisolaNYDN/status/732310048282693632

Phil is lying to us again. I thought he was on vaca doing nothing? What's this Vogel and Hornacek interviewing stuff?!?!? It's so frustrating

martin wrote:

crzymdups wrote:

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/FisolaNYDN/status/732310048282693632

Phil is lying to us again. I thought he was on vaca doing nothing? What's this Vogel and Hornacek interviewing stuff?!?!? It's so frustrating

How dare Phil misdirect the media like this.

crzymdups wrote:

martin wrote:

crzymdups wrote:So the guys who were doggedly defending the potential Rambis hire are now breathing a sigh of relief, huh? That'd be a tough one to have to defend, am I right?

Seriously, who was doggedly defending the potential Rambis hire?

I'd be OK with the hire cause I think continuity would be OK but I'd also be OK and think it would be a better idea to hire Blatt.

Who are the doggedly defending Rambis people?

There were plenty of people who said it wasn't fair to judge him by his record in NY or Minnesota, or by the team's performance in the second half of the season, or by the fact that none of his players have ever said anything nice about him as a coach.

I can try to find the threads - but actually, I'm pretty sure you were one of them and then nixluva, and one of the newyorkforever or newyorkernewyorky guys. If you really want me to find those threads, I can... but really the important point is that hopefully Phil has moved on. I suppose he could always double back and hire Rambis. We'll see.

There is one thing to defend an argument that involves Rambis but what you are suggesting is that there are tons of people who WANT and WOULD ADVOCATE for Rambis. I think you'll find crickets on that.

crzymdups wrote:

martin wrote:

crzymdups wrote:So the guys who were doggedly defending the potential Rambis hire are now breathing a sigh of relief, huh? That'd be a tough one to have to defend, am I right?

Seriously, who was doggedly defending the potential Rambis hire?

I'd be OK with the hire cause I think continuity would be OK but I'd also be OK and think it would be a better idea to hire Blatt.

Who are the doggedly defending Rambis people?

There were plenty of people who said it wasn't fair to judge him by his record in NY or Minnesota, or by the team's performance in the second half of the season, or by the fact that none of his players have ever said anything nice about him as a coach.

I can try to find the threads - but actually, I'm pretty sure you were one of them and then nixluva, and one of the newyorkforever or newyorkernewyorky guys. If you really want me to find those threads, I can... but really the important point is that hopefully Phil has moved on. I suppose he could always double back and hire Rambis. We'll see.

My preference would be Vogal.

Whoever Phil hires as coach there will be specific reasoning behind it. If he hires a big name coach who agreed to run the triangle and everyone was on the same page that's cool. If he hired a big name coach and decided that he would let the coach run what ever he wanted and he would step back. That would be cool. If he can't find a big name coach that's willing to run triangle and he is determined to run it then giving Rambis another season is cool. What's not cool would be hiring a big name coach and then butting heads with him about how the team is being run months later.

As long as we are under the stipulations of Phil wanting to run triangle and wanting to be hands on. Then hiring a big name coach doesn't really matter as much other then have g a big name for the sake of it. How successful was Wilkens, Brown, D'Antoni here as coaches? Y didn't they have more success?

martin wrote:

crzymdups wrote:

martin wrote:

crzymdups wrote:So the guys who were doggedly defending the potential Rambis hire are now breathing a sigh of relief, huh? That'd be a tough one to have to defend, am I right?

Seriously, who was doggedly defending the potential Rambis hire?

I'd be OK with the hire cause I think continuity would be OK but I'd also be OK and think it would be a better idea to hire Blatt.

Who are the doggedly defending Rambis people?

There were plenty of people who said it wasn't fair to judge him by his record in NY or Minnesota, or by the team's performance in the second half of the season, or by the fact that none of his players have ever said anything nice about him as a coach.

I can try to find the threads - but actually, I'm pretty sure you were one of them and then nixluva, and one of the newyorkforever or newyorkernewyorky guys. If you really want me to find those threads, I can... but really the important point is that hopefully Phil has moved on. I suppose he could always double back and hire Rambis. We'll see.

There is one thing to defend an argument that involves Rambis but what you are suggesting is that there are tons of people who WANT and WOULD ADVOCATE for Rambis. I think you'll find crickets on that.

CrushAlot wrote:

martin wrote:

crzymdups wrote:

martin wrote:

crzymdups wrote:So the guys who were doggedly defending the potential Rambis hire are now breathing a sigh of relief, huh? That'd be a tough one to have to defend, am I right?

Seriously, who was doggedly defending the potential Rambis hire?

I'd be OK with the hire cause I think continuity would be OK but I'd also be OK and think it would be a better idea to hire Blatt.

Who are the doggedly defending Rambis people?

There were plenty of people who said it wasn't fair to judge him by his record in NY or Minnesota, or by the team's performance in the second half of the season, or by the fact that none of his players have ever said anything nice about him as a coach.

I can try to find the threads - but actually, I'm pretty sure you were one of them and then nixluva, and one of the newyorkforever or newyorkernewyorky guys. If you really want me to find those threads, I can... but really the important point is that hopefully Phil has moved on. I suppose he could always double back and hire Rambis. We'll see.

There is one thing to defend an argument that involves Rambis but what you are suggesting is that there are tons of people who WANT and WOULD ADVOCATE for Rambis. I think you'll find crickets on that.

I agree. I can't think of a single poster doggedly defending a potential Rambis hire. However, if there is a thread with someone that was I would love a link.

I'm sorry, y'all being ridiculous. Any time I mentioned Rambis would be a bad hire multiple people, predominantly martin and nix, jumped to Phil and Rambis's defense. I'm not going to waste my time arguing it here or looking up threads to remind you of what you said. If you agree Rambis would be a bad hire, why did you jump down my throat whenever I said as much?

And if the idea that Rambis is the first choice is made up by "Phil haters" why has every single NBA writer from Ken Berger to Ramona Shelburne REPORTED IN PUBLISHED REPORTS WHERE THEIR REPUTATION IS AT STAKE said that Rambis is his first preference? Do you think they're making this up? Are they the real Phil haters? This is ridiculous.

crzymdups wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

martin wrote:

crzymdups wrote:

martin wrote:

crzymdups wrote:So the guys who were doggedly defending the potential Rambis hire are now breathing a sigh of relief, huh? That'd be a tough one to have to defend, am I right?

Seriously, who was doggedly defending the potential Rambis hire?

I'd be OK with the hire cause I think continuity would be OK but I'd also be OK and think it would be a better idea to hire Blatt.

Who are the doggedly defending Rambis people?

There were plenty of people who said it wasn't fair to judge him by his record in NY or Minnesota, or by the team's performance in the second half of the season, or by the fact that none of his players have ever said anything nice about him as a coach.

I can try to find the threads - but actually, I'm pretty sure you were one of them and then nixluva, and one of the newyorkforever or newyorkernewyorky guys. If you really want me to find those threads, I can... but really the important point is that hopefully Phil has moved on. I suppose he could always double back and hire Rambis. We'll see.

There is one thing to defend an argument that involves Rambis but what you are suggesting is that there are tons of people who WANT and WOULD ADVOCATE for Rambis. I think you'll find crickets on that.

I agree. I can't think of a single poster doggedly defending a potential Rambis hire. However, if there is a thread with someone that was I would love a link.

I'm sorry, y'all being ridiculous. Any time I mentioned Rambis would be a bad hire multiple people, predominantly martin and nix, jumped to Phil and Rambis's defense. I'm not going to waste my time arguing it here or looking up threads to remind you of what you said. If you agree Rambis would be a bad hire, why did you jump down my throat whenever I said as much?

And if the idea that Rambis is the first choice is made up by "Phil haters" why has every single NBA writer from Ken Berger to Ramona Shelburne REPORTED IN PUBLISHED REPORTS WHERE THEIR REPUTATION IS AT STAKE said that Rambis is his first preference? Do you think they're making this up? Are they the real Phil haters? This is ridiculous.

you are definitely wasting your time and ours. Even nix has said over and over and over again that his preference is not Rambis.

You want to make an argument, you can make it for yourself but no need to put words or arguments into mine. No thanks. Google is your friend, you want to find where others have posted something you need to reference or argue against, please have at it.