y2zipper wrote:SwishAndDish13 wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:
Don't think it's obvious. Specially with your response in which all you do is talk about one guy! Who exactly didn't want to come here? You mean everyone that stayed with their previous team to take advantage of extra year. Or those we told they would have to play a position they did not want to play and had offers from a possible chip winner? Or Monroe who picked a squad with more than one good player and a winning record the year before? Yep, it was cuz of Melo. Come on man, stop. And if you think the triangle and weak roster is not the main reason your just not seeing things straight. And yes, all good teams have at least one max player, ussually more. And btw that broken down 31 yr old with bad knees is still leading this sack of **** roster (in points, assist and up there in bounds) that you feel will attract free agents without him.
+1 - Well said. I'm not really sure what's Ewing's question was but I think it's fair to say Melo isn't the reason we are not getting FAs. At some point we will need to come to the realization that maybe NY isn't that attractive to the modern athlete. We have a pretty unreasonable and aggressive fanbase and the worst media. With fixed salaries we can't overpay so it's a tough sell. The only 2 guys we've obtained were Amare and Chandler. In both instances we paid more than any other team was really willing too.
I think it's fair to place some blame on Melo for the Knicks not getting free agents. He's clearly not a player that top guys want to play with because if he was, they'd come play with him. There are other reasons for it, too, which mostly have to do with what went on before Phil Jackson got here. With the Knicks drained of their asset this year because it was traded before Phil got here, Phil has to wait out the year and then re-stock the cupboard when he does have assets. They've got Porzingis, who is hopefully gonna be a cornerstone player in the next 3-4 years, but that's about it unless Grant starts to develop and until they get more picks. You do the Melo deal because maybe you'll get somebody and because Melo won't win a lot of games so you can be in the lottery anyway. On top of that, it takes some of the pressure off of Porzingis. But this is not a situatin where the Knicks are going to try to build around Melo and they shouldn't.
I also think that free agents generally don't move so it's an unrealistic expectation to think that New York was going to get guys anyway. Most of the time, the players you really want just don't move because of the extra year and the extra money. That's just the way the CBA works.
Out of curiosity, who has been available that would actually help this roster that has gone elsewhere? Specifically, in the backcourt. Monroe didn't come, which was a blessing, but others weren't really an option. I am in full agreement that the current CBA has a lot to do with it. Just asking the question of who we think Melo could have realistically brought here that he failed too.
The Knicks are clearly drained of assets with little options. It's depressing.