[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Id try to get rid of all cap space including CA
Author Thread
Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

2/10/2016  8:09 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
Chandler wrote:This is total crazy talk! Lets blow up the team, and mimic GS

Trying to mimic the GS system is a recipe for ultimate defeat. To be clear, you won't beat GS at such a game unless you think (1) you can get better personnel than them or (2) a better coach, and realistically you might need both. Copying is not the answer. Even if you got equivalent personnel you'd lose because GS would have the benefit of all that experience together

Our best hope is to have a different system. I think the triangle can work. Reasonable minds can differ about what system they like.

Let GS run all over the court, but let's limit them to outside shots and take our lumps with that. Then let's keep them out of the paint, and use our length to get all the rebounds and take our shots closer to the basket.

NO we're not close to contending with GS yet. But the idea of let's do what the other guys are doing is short-sighted. It might get you some wins in the short term but it won't get what you really want, which is a title.

GS just got it right fast. We have a great player in KP--hes going to be great. Getting a mobile 4 like Batum--even overpaying for him sets up a beautiful frontline if we can get Boban for 5 years 22mm and keeping Thomas(for now) that gives us a LOT of skill rim protection and mobility on both units. And YEP Id be copy catting the Warriors by finding 6 guards. I can keep Affalo and Grant--I think they can work --we need a SECOND PG to play WITH GRant. Thats what he had at Notre Dame with Jackson. Deozan would he come here? I mean youre betting hed come to NY instead of Toronto--its a much better bet than almost any other FA. These two FA have some legitimacy of coming here. Im not spending max money on Mike Conley. If Im giving up Lopez and CA I need picks and I need them this year. I need certain players--so it all goes together.

Its much easier to say lets keep it together and add a PG right? But CA isnt going to stay healthy Lopez and KP TOGETHER are too slow and we need to put together a 2 and 3 rd unit that MAKES sense--not have guys because they are vets etc.. have guys that fit the team and have a couple of spots that house future players. Having a Lou Admundson did absolutely nothing for this team AT the bottom line it had ZERO value. We have a player we can play faster with--why do I want to pair him with a slow 7-0 260 guy for???? This not 1998 anymore. I want guys who are VERY smart skilled passers guards with diversity etc... that I can put a unit out for any 48 minutes that brings force and or speed--that puts tremendous pressure on the other squad.

Your right about 1 thing, stocking the back of the roster with washed up vets is pointless. Id rather go with young players from the Dleague. At least you might have some chance of finding a legit rotation player.

Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
AUTOADVERT
Chandler
Posts: 26917
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

2/10/2016  8:18 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Chandler wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Chandler wrote:
franco12 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
fishmike wrote:Melo trades are as equally entertaining as threads regarding who we will pick if we make the lottery. Both an equal waste of time.

I never understood that attiude. People in your camp pretend that NTCs can't be waived. KG had two and was traded both times despite him being emmensely loyal. Needless to say, Melo can and hopefully will be dealt (stated by a huge Melo fan that is a bigger Knick fan).

right... I equally dont understand the attitude that because something immensely rare happening one place means it can happen in another. Also KG waived it after being convinced by Paul Pierce, and waived it again when the Brooklyn situation was a total disaster. KG waiving his clause does not mean "it happens."

Got any other examples? Is there anything in the KG situation that resembles ours? Pretty sure the answer is a big NO to both, but feel free to write a few paragraphs. If you are thinking up trade scenarios with Melo you must have time on your hands. Entertain us...

fish - congratulations on regaining exclusive control of the Fish moniker with only a slight reference to a past Knick coach.

Be careful lest you end up like him- tossed out like yesterdays Briggs thread of instanta fix knick roster overnight transformation into G State 2.0 East.

I will say I think we should be smart to evaluate trade scenarios at the deadline that involve us considering selling assets in return for long term prospects. I'd even consider trading Porzingas if the deal was obscene enough - think Boston and all their draft picks.

Is a Melo trade likely? No. I wish, because I think he has too many miles on his body to remain healthy and productive enough over the life of his contract.

Hope I'm wrong!

does this forum ban posters? you said the ineffable

LOL, everyone has a pricetag in the NBA. Should the Pelicans decide to jettison their big contracts, along with Anthony Davis and rebuild...I'd be willing to pony up Porzingis....if I wanted to win-now. Add Russell Westbrook in 2017 and you have the makings for a young, gimmicky contender, lol.

I'm reporting you to the banning authorities too

Totally against. Bad karma and bad luck. Not saying it hasn't happened I just can't remember. what trade like that has been a success for us? Melo? Mcdyess? Larry johnson?

KP is a unicorn I have a hard time remembering any rookie who looked like the best player on the court so often. Once he gets consistency and develops one or two go-to moves we'll be an elite team. He needs one when guarded by smal guys and another for bigs. It's in his capabilities. Just not in his Arsenal yet.


What trade like that or anything else has been a success for us?
I'm excited about KP but I understand the principle he's stating. Steph Curry is the only untradeable player in the league right now, and even that I'm not 100% sure of.

Guys c'mon. This is going viral. The grass always looks greener on the other side

The reality is It takes work to create (or maintain) green grass

Enough of this let's trade or buy (via FA) our way to success. It doesn't work (with rare exception)

When it does it's because the FA or other player truly wants to be on the new team and not simply because of money or outside interests (eg when LJ wanted Miami or Shaquille wanted LA)

Phil has it right when he says he wants players who want to be here. It makes a difference. Phil is doing this right. However being patient sucks.

(5)(7)
Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

2/10/2016  8:27 AM
Chandler wrote:
Phil has it right when he says he wants players who want to be here. It makes a difference. Phil is doing this right. However being patient sucks.

Yep it sucks but a lot of this isnt Phils fault. His first year we had zero flexibility. This year we have no lottery pick. In reality we are going to need two high level young players on controlled deals for this team to be a legit contender. I was hoping Grant would surprise us and speed up the development of the team but he is terrible. We will have to be awful again next year before we get this turned around

Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
Chandler
Posts: 26917
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

2/10/2016  8:37 AM
Jmpasq wrote:
Chandler wrote:
Phil has it right when he says he wants players who want to be here. It makes a difference. Phil is doing this right. However being patient sucks.

Yep it sucks but a lot of this isnt Phils fault. His first year we had zero flexibility. This year we have no lottery pick. In reality we are going to need two high level young players on controlled deals for this team to be a legit contender. I was hoping Grant would surprise us and speed up the development of the team but he is terrible. We will have to be awful again next year before we get this turned around

I'm a bit more optimistic. Grant can be fixed. He needs a more define role consistent w his current capabilities. And he needs a summer to develop a couple of reliable shots.

We also need more guard talent and depth. Phils job IMO is stick to value. The only guy I would max on is KD. Dont overspend or over rely on anyone else (eg Conley)

(5)(7)
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/10/2016  3:55 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
helloharv wrote:that actually looks terrible and I would be so pissed .....

I agree. We're going to clear the roster so we can use the cap space to build the offense around 2 guys who barely shoot 40%?! They have mediocre advanced stats too career-wise. Why don't we just ask Allen Iverson to come out of retirement?

Sadly Iverson and Marbury would be a major upgrade over the guards we have now sans Galloway

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/10/2016  3:57 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
helloharv wrote:that actually looks terrible and I would be so pissed .....

I agree. We're going to clear the roster so we can use the cap space to build the offense around 2 guys who barely shoot 40%?! They have mediocre advanced stats too career-wise. Why don't we just ask Allen Iverson to come out of retirement?

Sadly Iverson and Marbury would be a major upgrade over the guards we have now sans Galloway


True but I still wouldn't want the offense built around them
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/10/2016  4:01 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/10/2016  4:07 PM
Jmpasq wrote:
Chandler wrote:
Phil has it right when he says he wants players who want to be here. It makes a difference. Phil is doing this right. However being patient sucks.

Yep it sucks but a lot of this isnt Phils fault. His first year we had zero flexibility. This year we have no lottery pick. In reality we are going to need two high level young players on controlled deals for this team to be a legit contender. I was hoping Grant would surprise us and speed up the development of the team but he is terrible. We will have to be awful again next year before we get this turned around

Yup there is nothing left to discuss unless we are talking about stock piling picks and cap space. Which we should've done 15yrs ago. Anything else is typical Knicks chasing their own tail, going in circles and running on a hamster wheel. We are incredibly fortune to have netted a lottery stud in KP not we need a lottery Curry/Westbrook so they can grow together and dominate the East for the next 15+ years.

In this current state no significant free agent is going to even consider coming here to play with an injury riddled maxed out declining star. So it's either we give up on the silly notion of attracting free agents and start a true rebuild. Win first and then become an attractive destination or we keep attracting Aaron Affalo types. What do you guys prefer? A true Rebuild we've desperately needed for the past 15yrs to set up 15yrs of greatness or continue riding the hamster wheel for another 5,10, 15yrs?

Sambakick
Posts: 21479
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/8/2013
Member: #5646

2/10/2016  4:17 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
fishmike wrote:Melo trades are as equally entertaining as threads regarding who we will pick if we make the lottery. Both an equal waste of time.

I never understood that attiude. People in your camp pretend that NTCs can't be waived. KG had two and was traded both times despite him being emmensely loyal. Needless to say, Melo can and hopefully will be dealt (stated by a huge Melo fan that is a bigger Knick fan).

Melo and Lala like NYC. NYC aint Minny,

Everything in moderation. Even moderation.
NardDogNation
Posts: 27692
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

2/10/2016  7:00 PM
Chandler wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Chandler wrote:
franco12 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
fishmike wrote:Melo trades are as equally entertaining as threads regarding who we will pick if we make the lottery. Both an equal waste of time.

I never understood that attiude. People in your camp pretend that NTCs can't be waived. KG had two and was traded both times despite him being emmensely loyal. Needless to say, Melo can and hopefully will be dealt (stated by a huge Melo fan that is a bigger Knick fan).

right... I equally dont understand the attitude that because something immensely rare happening one place means it can happen in another. Also KG waived it after being convinced by Paul Pierce, and waived it again when the Brooklyn situation was a total disaster. KG waiving his clause does not mean "it happens."

Got any other examples? Is there anything in the KG situation that resembles ours? Pretty sure the answer is a big NO to both, but feel free to write a few paragraphs. If you are thinking up trade scenarios with Melo you must have time on your hands. Entertain us...

fish - congratulations on regaining exclusive control of the Fish moniker with only a slight reference to a past Knick coach.

Be careful lest you end up like him- tossed out like yesterdays Briggs thread of instanta fix knick roster overnight transformation into G State 2.0 East.

I will say I think we should be smart to evaluate trade scenarios at the deadline that involve us considering selling assets in return for long term prospects. I'd even consider trading Porzingas if the deal was obscene enough - think Boston and all their draft picks.

Is a Melo trade likely? No. I wish, because I think he has too many miles on his body to remain healthy and productive enough over the life of his contract.

Hope I'm wrong!

does this forum ban posters? you said the ineffable

LOL, everyone has a pricetag in the NBA. Should the Pelicans decide to jettison their big contracts, along with Anthony Davis and rebuild...I'd be willing to pony up Porzingis....if I wanted to win-now. Add Russell Westbrook in 2017 and you have the makings for a young, gimmicky contender, lol.

I'm reporting you to the banning authorities too

Totally against. Bad karma and bad luck. Not saying it hasn't happened I just can't remember. what trade like that has been a success for us? Melo? Mcdyess? Larry johnson?

KP is a unicorn I have a hard time remembering any rookie who looked like the best player on the court so often. Once he gets consistency and develops one or two go-to moves we'll be an elite team. He needs one when guarded by smal guys and another for bigs. It's in his capabilities. Just not in his Arsenal yet.

Oh no, I completely agree with you sir. But for whatever reason, people think we should build a contender with Melo to inevitably get slaughtered by LeBron and the LeBronettes, Spurs, or the Warriors. Getting a guy like Anthony Davis would further that goal but makes little sense to me when we consider the promise of Porzingis. It'd be like dealing Tim Duncan for Kevin Garnett or Chris Webber for a Dirk Nowitizki, except our guy has a more healthy track-record.

Deal Melo and rebuild around Porzingis, on the other hand, would fall more in line with my thinkings.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27692
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

2/10/2016  7:03 PM
Sambakick wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
fishmike wrote:Melo trades are as equally entertaining as threads regarding who we will pick if we make the lottery. Both an equal waste of time.

I never understood that attiude. People in your camp pretend that NTCs can't be waived. KG had two and was traded both times despite him being emmensely loyal. Needless to say, Melo can and hopefully will be dealt (stated by a huge Melo fan that is a bigger Knick fan).

Melo and Lala like NYC. NYC aint Minny,

KG didn't like Minny? Then why did he sign extensions there and forego an opportunity to play for a contender in order to return?

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/10/2016  7:31 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
Sambakick wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
fishmike wrote:Melo trades are as equally entertaining as threads regarding who we will pick if we make the lottery. Both an equal waste of time.

I never understood that attiude. People in your camp pretend that NTCs can't be waived. KG had two and was traded both times despite him being emmensely loyal. Needless to say, Melo can and hopefully will be dealt (stated by a huge Melo fan that is a bigger Knick fan).

Melo and Lala like NYC. NYC aint Minny,

KG didn't like Minny? Then why did he sign extensions there and forego an opportunity to play for a contender in order to return?

Melo has never remotely indicated he wants out of NY, IF a championship was the bottom line, the NTC would be a formality. But he has said over and over, that he has no intentions on asking for a trade or giving up, so you can count on him to be here for (at the bare minimum) 2 more yrs..so why entertain trades with him involve.


80% of NBA teams will have over 20 mill in cap space, and this includes a handful of contenders, players will have more options than they ever had in the history of the NBA..

Melo and KPs chemistry is strong, and FA's will look at that, That's a 2 piece, and we have some fries, all we need is a hot roll and a cold drink..AKA a 3rd option and solid coach.

ES
NardDogNation
Posts: 27692
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

2/10/2016  7:44 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/10/2016  7:52 PM
fishmike wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
fishmike wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
fishmike wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
fishmike wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
fishmike wrote:Melo trades are as equally entertaining as threads regarding who we will pick if we make the lottery. Both an equal waste of time.

I never understood that attiude. People in your camp pretend that NTCs can't be waived. KG had two and was traded both times despite him being emmensely loyal. Needless to say, Melo can and hopefully will be dealt (stated by a huge Melo fan that is a bigger Knick fan).

right... I equally dont understand the attitude that because something immensely rare happening one place means it can happen in another. Also KG waived it after being convinced by Paul Pierce, and waived it again when the Brooklyn situation was a total disaster. KG waiving his clause does not mean "it happens."

Got any other examples? Is there anything in the KG situation that resembles ours? Pretty sure the answer is a big NO to both, but feel free to write a few paragraphs. If you are thinking up trade scenarios with Melo you must have time on your hands. Entertain us...

No-trade clauses are by definition, rare. So you criticize the KG situation as being "rare" or an exception to the rule seems....misguided. Aside from him, I can only think of Kobe who has one....maybe Duncan on the Spurs. And if that is the case, then no-trade clauses have been waived 33%-50% of the time, which isn't exactly a "rare" occurrence.

ok, how about common sense? Why did Melo sign a contract to play in NY?

At least make these stupid proposals a viable destination, and there is really only 1... LA. Do you really think he's waiving his clause to play in Utah or some of these other places? Is that common sense? Waste of time and space.

Dude, calm your ass down. If views that differ from your own are so upsetting then maybe a forum for the exchange of ideas isn't for you.

To answer your question, Melo re-signed here because it was the more financially viable option. He managed to get higher annual raises, an additional year to his contract and immediate access to the largest economic market on the face of the Earth ALL gauranteed. Simply put, we were a sound business decision especially for a guy entering the twilight of his career and whose body is about to pull an Amar'e. I also think that the idea of playing for Phil Jackson made him feel a bit more optimistic about us being competitive. But given Melo's track record, money and the bright lights are what is appealing to him (which is why he left a better DEN team to come here via trade instead of free agency).

The NTC was not some act of undying loyalty for the franchise on his part, it was a means to ensure that his fascination with the "bright lights", the only element of his contract that was NOT guaranteed, could be maintained even if it wasn't in NY. Now, he has the ability to pick where he wants to go with his gauranteed money. And fortunately for him, there are other cities that break about even with us given their financial markets AND ability to be a contender. Like you mentioned LAC is one of them. I also think that MIA and CHI, the 4th and 3rd largest markets in the country, have a puncher's chance as well. All 3 teams can produce compelling packages that would allow them to still be a contender if they traded for him and have the spare assets to satisfy us. Outside of those 3, I don't see Melo going anywhere. But those 3 are compelling enough where I think it would happen when we are ready to pull the plug.

Im calm. Its what I am asking you to do. You seem to follow the league and have some fundamental understanding of how things work, which makes the CA trade props even more puzzling.

What makes a CA trade so improbable, NTC aside? This is what puzzles me.

thats like asking what makes going to moon so tough? Gravity aside....

for Melo to leave
Needs to be attractive enough to waive his NTC
Needs to be a situation he can leave to go to and save some face. These (NYK) are his team.
Needs to be a team willing to match salaries, and remember not only does Melo make the max he has a trade kicker that jacks his salary up if traded (that cant be waived)
Needs to be a location that Melo approves for his brand, business and family. Remember his son's school and and his wife's life were big factors in ensuring he stays in NY
Needs to be a situation he has influence. Phil talked to him about firing Fisher. Melo knew about the KP draft before it happened (ask DK for a link). Melo has influence and pull with the NYK. Comfort, familiarity.

So even if he did waive his NTC, something I dont see probable at all, actually making the trade is loaded with its own challenges.

Also do you think Melo no longer believes in Phil? Do you think Melo's relationship with KP is pretend? He's got a young player with star potential he likes and trusts to lean on as he gets older...

I could kind of do this all day... there are about 1000 reasons Mell would simply shake his head no thanks.

Didnt even mention the team owner who loves Melo as well....

So thus the German's bombing Perl Harbor comment... why let logic or reason stop anything? Carry on! Lets talk Melo trades!

Big?

No. Not at all. Melo maintains a home in California that his family lives in during the offseason, so clearly he has no objectons about his family spending an extended period of time there. Also of note is the fact that his wife is an entertainer as well, still trying to re-establish her career, which makes being in California an appealing endeavor.

And do you really think that if Melo walked into the Staples Center, he wouldn't have the same pull he has here? His friend, CP3, seems to have a run-of-the-mill having already handpicked Doc Rivers to be head coach. Think that Melo wouldn't be offered those same opportunities if for no other reason than his relationship with Paul?

And more importantly, much of Melo's "financial portfolio" involves start-up tech companies in Silicon Valley, aka California's backyard. You don't think Steve "I'm that mother****er that was with Microsoft from the ground-floor" Ballmer is an extremely valuable contact to leverage for future ventures?

Yes, New York has its appeal to Melo in spite of the losing....but that doesn't mean other destinations can't match or exceed said appeal.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27692
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

2/10/2016  7:50 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/10/2016  7:52 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Sambakick wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
fishmike wrote:Melo trades are as equally entertaining as threads regarding who we will pick if we make the lottery. Both an equal waste of time.

I never understood that attiude. People in your camp pretend that NTCs can't be waived. KG had two and was traded both times despite him being emmensely loyal. Needless to say, Melo can and hopefully will be dealt (stated by a huge Melo fan that is a bigger Knick fan).

Melo and Lala like NYC. NYC aint Minny,

KG didn't like Minny? Then why did he sign extensions there and forego an opportunity to play for a contender in order to return?

Melo has never remotely indicated he wants out of NY, IF a championship was the bottom line, the NTC would be a formality. But he has said over and over, that he has no intentions on asking for a trade or giving up, so you can count on him to be here for (at the bare minimum) 2 more yrs..so why entertain trades with him involve.


80% of NBA teams will have over 20 mill in cap space, and this includes a handful of contenders, players will have more options than they ever had in the history of the NBA..

Melo and KPs chemistry is strong, and FA's will look at that, That's a 2 piece, and we have some fries, all we need is a hot roll and a cold drink..AKA a 3rd option and solid coach.

That's all good and well if you presume that Melo can stay healthy in his 30s. I'm, however, extremely skeptical of that given how physical his play is and his recent medical history. At this current pace, we'll wear him down into a knub before we ever have the opportunity to build a real contender. And then that contender would have the privilege of being slaughtered by the LeBronettes, Spurs or Warriors, which makes little sense to me. Why settle on a 2-3 year window when we could have the opportunity to rule an entire decade instead?

NardDogNation
Posts: 27692
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

2/10/2016  8:01 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/10/2016  9:09 PM
I COMPLETELY forgot about the fact that the Bulls own the Kings' (top 10 protected) first round pick in this year's draft. There is a distinct possibility that they do get it....and if they do, it'd appeal heavily to me in a Melo deal. If he hypothetically waived his NTC to be dealt there that pick (and additional assets) could wield a host of options....

Like I've droned on about in multiple threads, the Pelicans are idiots. If we get that pick back, I could easily see them agreeing to a 1st round pick swap and some 2nd rounders coming our way if we were willing to give up Aaron Afflalo and Robin Lopez for expirers. That could potentially put us into the top 6 of a draft that is becoming pretty interesting, Ben Simmons aside. I think it'd be too heavily swayed to our favor but if we could walk away with Nikola Mirotic, Bobby Portis, Tony Snell, Doug McDermott (Derrick Rose's awful play and contract), as well as a 6th pick for Melo, Lopez and Afflalo.....I'd be ****ing ecstatic.

Check it out (plus the Pelicans pick coming our way):

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=gqftr3y

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/10/2016  8:16 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
Chandler wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Chandler wrote:
franco12 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
fishmike wrote:Melo trades are as equally entertaining as threads regarding who we will pick if we make the lottery. Both an equal waste of time.

I never understood that attiude. People in your camp pretend that NTCs can't be waived. KG had two and was traded both times despite him being emmensely loyal. Needless to say, Melo can and hopefully will be dealt (stated by a huge Melo fan that is a bigger Knick fan).

right... I equally dont understand the attitude that because something immensely rare happening one place means it can happen in another. Also KG waived it after being convinced by Paul Pierce, and waived it again when the Brooklyn situation was a total disaster. KG waiving his clause does not mean "it happens."

Got any other examples? Is there anything in the KG situation that resembles ours? Pretty sure the answer is a big NO to both, but feel free to write a few paragraphs. If you are thinking up trade scenarios with Melo you must have time on your hands. Entertain us...

fish - congratulations on regaining exclusive control of the Fish moniker with only a slight reference to a past Knick coach.

Be careful lest you end up like him- tossed out like yesterdays Briggs thread of instanta fix knick roster overnight transformation into G State 2.0 East.

I will say I think we should be smart to evaluate trade scenarios at the deadline that involve us considering selling assets in return for long term prospects. I'd even consider trading Porzingas if the deal was obscene enough - think Boston and all their draft picks.

Is a Melo trade likely? No. I wish, because I think he has too many miles on his body to remain healthy and productive enough over the life of his contract.

Hope I'm wrong!

does this forum ban posters? you said the ineffable

LOL, everyone has a pricetag in the NBA. Should the Pelicans decide to jettison their big contracts, along with Anthony Davis and rebuild...I'd be willing to pony up Porzingis....if I wanted to win-now. Add Russell Westbrook in 2017 and you have the makings for a young, gimmicky contender, lol.

I'm reporting you to the banning authorities too

Totally against. Bad karma and bad luck. Not saying it hasn't happened I just can't remember. what trade like that has been a success for us? Melo? Mcdyess? Larry johnson?

KP is a unicorn I have a hard time remembering any rookie who looked like the best player on the court so often. Once he gets consistency and develops one or two go-to moves we'll be an elite team. He needs one when guarded by smal guys and another for bigs. It's in his capabilities. Just not in his Arsenal yet.

Oh no, I completely agree with you sir. But for whatever reason, people think we should build a contender with Melo to inevitably get slaughtered by LeBron and the LeBronettes, Spurs, or the Warriors. Getting a guy like Anthony Davis would further that goal but makes little sense to me when we consider the promise of Porzingis. It'd be like dealing Tim Duncan for Kevin Garnett or Chris Webber for a Dirk Nowitizki, except our guy has a more healthy track-record.

Deal Melo and rebuild around Porzingis, on the other hand, would fall more in line with my thinkings.

Exactly I don't see how we build to challenge the Warriors or even the Spurs or Cavs for that matter around an injured Melo. Even if everyone gets their wish and we bring in Conley & Batum/Derozan. It gets us in the playoffs but by the team Melo's max deal is off the books and we have the cap space to sign a star these guys will all be older. If we want to build a consistent winner for 10+ years We have to draft a stud guard to grow with KP. Free Agency is fools gold in today's game. The days robbing small market teams of their young superstar players went out the window when in order to protect those small market teams the NBA made it so these players can get the most money by staying put. Bird rights. The sooner the Knicks get out of their 90s mindset and enter the new age the sooner we will build a contender. This is why I've always been in favor of hiring a modern young basketball mind to run this team. Obviously you make an exception for a legend like Phil. Phil can still make that guy his GM which I was hoping he would after last year's 17win debacle but Mills has to do the right thing and resign

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/10/2016  8:28 PM
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
NardDogNation
Posts: 27692
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

2/10/2016  8:54 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Chandler wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Chandler wrote:
franco12 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
fishmike wrote:Melo trades are as equally entertaining as threads regarding who we will pick if we make the lottery. Both an equal waste of time.

I never understood that attiude. People in your camp pretend that NTCs can't be waived. KG had two and was traded both times despite him being emmensely loyal. Needless to say, Melo can and hopefully will be dealt (stated by a huge Melo fan that is a bigger Knick fan).

right... I equally dont understand the attitude that because something immensely rare happening one place means it can happen in another. Also KG waived it after being convinced by Paul Pierce, and waived it again when the Brooklyn situation was a total disaster. KG waiving his clause does not mean "it happens."

Got any other examples? Is there anything in the KG situation that resembles ours? Pretty sure the answer is a big NO to both, but feel free to write a few paragraphs. If you are thinking up trade scenarios with Melo you must have time on your hands. Entertain us...

fish - congratulations on regaining exclusive control of the Fish moniker with only a slight reference to a past Knick coach.

Be careful lest you end up like him- tossed out like yesterdays Briggs thread of instanta fix knick roster overnight transformation into G State 2.0 East.

I will say I think we should be smart to evaluate trade scenarios at the deadline that involve us considering selling assets in return for long term prospects. I'd even consider trading Porzingas if the deal was obscene enough - think Boston and all their draft picks.

Is a Melo trade likely? No. I wish, because I think he has too many miles on his body to remain healthy and productive enough over the life of his contract.

Hope I'm wrong!

does this forum ban posters? you said the ineffable

LOL, everyone has a pricetag in the NBA. Should the Pelicans decide to jettison their big contracts, along with Anthony Davis and rebuild...I'd be willing to pony up Porzingis....if I wanted to win-now. Add Russell Westbrook in 2017 and you have the makings for a young, gimmicky contender, lol.

I'm reporting you to the banning authorities too

Totally against. Bad karma and bad luck. Not saying it hasn't happened I just can't remember. what trade like that has been a success for us? Melo? Mcdyess? Larry johnson?

KP is a unicorn I have a hard time remembering any rookie who looked like the best player on the court so often. Once he gets consistency and develops one or two go-to moves we'll be an elite team. He needs one when guarded by smal guys and another for bigs. It's in his capabilities. Just not in his Arsenal yet.

Oh no, I completely agree with you sir. But for whatever reason, people think we should build a contender with Melo to inevitably get slaughtered by LeBron and the LeBronettes, Spurs, or the Warriors. Getting a guy like Anthony Davis would further that goal but makes little sense to me when we consider the promise of Porzingis. It'd be like dealing Tim Duncan for Kevin Garnett or Chris Webber for a Dirk Nowitizki, except our guy has a more healthy track-record.

Deal Melo and rebuild around Porzingis, on the other hand, would fall more in line with my thinkings.

Exactly I don't see how we build to challenge the Warriors or even the Spurs or Cavs for that matter around an injured Melo. Even if everyone gets their wish and we bring in Conley & Batum/Derozan. It gets us in the playoffs but by the team Melo's max deal is off the books and we have the cap space to sign a star these guys will all be older. If we want to build a consistent winner for 10+ years We have to draft a stud guard to grow with KP. Free Agency is fools gold in today's game. The days robbing small market teams of their young superstar players went out the window when in order to protect those small market teams the NBA made it so these players can get the most money by staying put. Bird rights. The sooner the Knicks get out of their 90s mindset and enter the new age the sooner we will build a contender. This is why I've always been in favor of hiring a modern young basketball mind to run this team. Obviously you make an exception for a legend like Phil. Phil can still make that guy his GM which I was hoping he would after last year's 17win debacle but Mills has to do the right thing and resign

Yeah, it boggles my ****ing mind that with all the money we have, we still haven't pouched the entire San Antonio Spurs front office for the same money we're paying Phil. Yes, we need people with a proven track record but I could never understand why we have been so diametrically opposed to it being young talent, like you say. Those are the types of men that build the next generation contenders e.g. Joe Lacob in GSW, Neil Olshey intially in LAC, Sam Presti in OKC, etc. Can you imagine how far along we'd be if we had Sam Presti managing the team for all these years instead of Glen Grunwald and the peanut gallery?

To Phil's credit though, he did come through in a major way with Porzingis. That was no-sure fire thing but he nailed it! And the beauty about drafting him is that he is officially HALF of an entire puzzle for a true contender. We only really need one more quasi-all-star/2nd tier star via the draft and we'd be well on our way to having the groundfloor perennial juggernaut. Hell, if we deal Melo to MIA, I got a feeling that Justise Winslow could be that guy!

The rest of the roster is what could be fleshed out with cap space, etc. It's how the Spurs did it. It's how the Warriors are doing it. It's how OKC did it. It's kind of how the Cavs kinda did it (albeit James and Irving are from two seperate eras). Time to stop trying to re-invent the wheel and build a freaking wheel.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27692
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

2/10/2016  9:21 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/10/2016  9:23 PM
NardDogNation wrote:I COMPLETELY forgot about the fact that the Bulls own the Kings' (top 10 protected) first round pick in this year's draft. There is a distinct possibility that they do get it....and if they do, it'd appeal heavily to me in a Melo deal. If he hypothetically waived his NTC to be dealt there that pick (and additional assets) could wield a host of options....

Like I've droned on about in multiple threads, the Pelicans are idiots. If we get that pick back, I could easily see them agreeing to a 1st round pick swap and some 2nd rounders coming our way if we were willing to give up Aaron Afflalo and Robin Lopez for expirers. That could potentially put us into the top 6 of a draft that is becoming pretty interesting, Ben Simmons aside. I think it'd be too heavily swayed to our favor but if we could walk away with Nikola Mirotic, Bobby Portis, Tony Snell, Doug McDermott (Derrick Rose's awful play and contract), as well as a 6th pick for Melo, Lopez and Afflalo.....I'd be ****ing ecstatic.

Check it out (plus the Pelicans pick coming our way):

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=gqftr3y

I also like this wrinkle to the trade:

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=zvsjpbh

...with the Raptors sending their first round pick to Chicago to entice them to give up the SAC pick. It doesn't make sense from a value perspective for Toronto but you'd have to figure that they'd have an extra incentive in helping us to "blow it up". The worse we perform, the better our 2016 pick that they have. As a result, I could see Toronto helping us add value to any deal that involves us moving Melo.

From what I hear as well, the Raptors are no longer a big fan of Terrence Ross at his expected pricetag and would not mind moving him to relieve themselves of that obligation. I know that the analytics might not be pretty on the guy but he does seem to be pretty talented albeit not the sharpest crayon in the box. Given what our circumstances would be, I wouldn't be opposed to bitting the bullet on his contract to see how he performs/improves over the next 4 years (at the expense of losing a consummate role player in Tony Snell).

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/10/2016  9:27 PM
Yup you team KP up with a Curry/Westbrook/Simmons and everything falls into place effortlessly. Instead of adding flawed "stop gap" players every year in hopes that a declining/broken down Kevin Durant may or may not want to sign to play in New York
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/10/2016  9:36 PM
Phil has done a half ass job to this point, whille he did ok with the roster, he has set us back with a back-in-the-day coaching staff. With soft practices, and baffling rotations
ES
Id try to get rid of all cap space including CA

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy