| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
NardDogNation
Posts: 27692 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 5/7/2013 Member: #5555 |
wargames wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:EnySpree wrote:Rookie wrote:callmened wrote:we have nothing good to offer And how many minutes did Hardaway play this season? I'd be shocked if it even amounted to a standard NBA regulation game. In any case, believe what you want to. We all need to find a way to sleep at night. |
|
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
NardDogNation wrote:wargames wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:EnySpree wrote:Rookie wrote:callmened wrote:we have nothing good to offer What the heck are you talking about? WSJ wrote this article on D-Will today "The Knicks hit the jackpot this summer when they signed free-agent forward Derrick Williams, who had been a disappointment in four seasons with Minnesota and Sacramento. Williams, the No. 2 overall pick in 2011 NBA Draft, seemed destined to become one of the biggest draft busts in history, but instead he has emerged as a key reserve for the Knicks on both ends of the floor. In fact, according to advanced basketball analytics, he leads the Knicks in producing wins for every minute he's on the court. Even better, Williams is just 24 years old despite playing in his fifth NBA season. But there's one drawback to his startling career reversal: It may end up speeding his exit out of town. The 6-foot-8, 240-pound forward has a player option to forgo next year's scheduled $4.4 million salary, according to Spotrac.com, and opt for free agency in an off-season when the NBA salary cap is set to explode. Would Williams, who has yet to start a game this season, be content to continue as one of the NBA's best sixth men? Perhaps not. His combined offensive and defensive value is estimated to be worth a team-best 0.140 wins per 48 minutes of court time. In other words, a team of five players exactly as efficient as Williams would be expected to have a winning percentage of .700, or about 57 wins. This is what was expected from Williams when he entered the NBA after a second-team All-American season at Arizona. But his overall efficiency prior to joining the Knicks was only about half of what it's been this season. That's why the Knicks are Williams's third team in five years. This season, Williams is shooting above his career rate (.441, up from .431), but most important, he's getting to the free-throw line with much greater frequency (about three times more per 36 minutes than he averaged before). As a result, the Knicks are using Williams more frequently when he's on the court for his 16.7 minutes a game, running an estimated 24.4% of their plays through him, versus the 17.4% he received with the Kings." D-Will also has the highest Defensive Rebound rating this season for the whole league. His defense has actually improved. He's not a 3andD guy but he isn't Tim Hardaway either and yeah I would be surprised if a trade for Teague happened and he wasn't the piece being offered. ESPN said the same thing in the article they wrote today about the trade rumor. D-Will or AA would be the center piece and I really doubt the knicks do a trade and don't ship Calderon out, but hey keep dismissing what I wrote, its just professionals agree with me on D-Will's value. The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38391 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
What interests me about Teague is if his salary is just $8mil, and we got rid of Calderon, we might be able to free up enough room to also get Bateman in the offseason. That would give us:
Pg- Teague With maybe Afflalo as sixth man. You could also field a lineup of Teague, Afflalo, batum, Melo and KP |
|
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
smackeddog wrote:What interests me about Teague is if his salary is just $8mil, and we got rid of Calderon, we might be able to free up enough room to also get Bateman in the offseason. That would give us: Yep and if they keep Grant, Gallo, and Lance that's a very strong playoff rotation. The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|
|
Rookie
Posts: 27322 Alba Posts: 28 Joined: 10/15/2008 Member: #2274 |
Does anyone see DWill projecting as a starter on next years team? If so, then you have to pay him and make him a starter. If not, and you can get a starting PG for him (Teague), you can start to see why the Knicks are in the conversation with Atlanta for him. Would love to see the Knicks try and keep the core together, but we need to get the Starting 5 right before we start paying role players big$$.
Beal and Derozan are also FA's next year and could play next to Teague making us a lot more athletic. |
|
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/23/2011 Member: #3538 |
I think AA is more of a need than D.Williams since Mike Scott is playing like we hope Williams can be. Dude has a 62.6 TS% and a .146 ws/48. They are good at the back up combo forward spot. What they probably need is another decent 3 pt shooter then they can move Korver back to the bench.
|
|
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
crzymdups wrote:Also, if KP moves to the five eventually Melo and DWill could play the 3/4. I think keeping DWill is the smarter move at this time.fishmike wrote:TPercy wrote:Yikes Teagues numbers have taken quite the drop this season.this is the game... is this a sell high on DWill before he gets paid and regresses? Or are we seeing the #2 pick in that draft finally coming into his own? Also he's going to cost money... I think a lot of team's eyes have been opened by DWill's play. I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
|
NardDogNation
Posts: 27692 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 5/7/2013 Member: #5555 |
wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:wargames wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:EnySpree wrote:Rookie wrote:callmened wrote:we have nothing good to offer Now after all that is said, go back to where I suggested that D-Will wasn't a valuable player. Hell, go back and find where I said Demarre Carroll is the better player. This game isn't just about getting a bunch of talented players....it is also about fit. That's why a team like the Cavs, who have 3 franchise caliber players, can't seem to beat the Warriors who only have one bona-fided one (Steph Curry). And as I've been saying, D-Will is a poor fit for the Hawks....that has nothing to actually do with how good he is though. For example, Al Jefferson is a pretty good/talented player but he hardly fits any teams' style now. |
|
GustavBahler
Posts: 42864 Alba Posts: 15 Joined: 7/12/2010 Member: #3186 |
Wouldnt want to trade Williams. Despite their pedigree, not just anyone can step in and be an effective (and often dangerous) 6th man. I know that getting a genuine PG in their prime would make things a lot easier on the rest of the starters, at the same time trading Williams would in effect be robbing Peter to pay Paul. This would have a serious impact on the effectiveness of this bench. DWill produces, and gets the rest of the squad fired up.
Months away from free agency, anything could happen. Would rather sit still than give up a key member of the bench, and one of the best spark plugs in the league. |
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
Rookie wrote:Does anyone see DWill projecting as a starter on next years team? If so, then you have to pay him and make him a starter. If not, and you can get a starting PG for him (Teague), you can start to see why the Knicks are in the conversation with Atlanta for him. Would love to see the Knicks try and keep the core together, but we need to get the Starting 5 right before we start paying role players big$$.DWill is a core player. Not having a starting spot doesnt mean much to me. Last 10 games Dwill: 14ppg, 7reb, 26mpg He's constantly trending upward as well. He's 24 years old! This could be a cornerstone piece we are letting go. You need to factor that in "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
NardDogNation
Posts: 27692 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 5/7/2013 Member: #5555 |
Rookie wrote:Does anyone see DWill projecting as a starter on next years team? If so, then you have to pay him and make him a starter. If not, and you can get a starting PG for him (Teague), you can start to see why the Knicks are in the conversation with Atlanta for him. Would love to see the Knicks try and keep the core together, but we need to get the Starting 5 right before we start paying role players big$$. How much is D-Will's cap hold? If we move Jose Calderon (and possibly Kyle O'Quinn) beforehand, couldn't we just sign someone to the max and then exceed the cap to pay D-Will? |
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38391 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
NardDogNation wrote:Rookie wrote:Does anyone see DWill projecting as a starter on next years team? If so, then you have to pay him and make him a starter. If not, and you can get a starting PG for him (Teague), you can start to see why the Knicks are in the conversation with Atlanta for him. Would love to see the Knicks try and keep the core together, but we need to get the Starting 5 right before we start paying role players big$$. As I understand it, we don't have any rights regarding him as he would only have played 1 year with us |
|
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/19/2014 Member: #5816 |
smackeddog wrote:What interests me about Teague is if his salary is just $8mil, and we got rid of Calderon, we might be able to free up enough room to also get Bateman in the offseason. That would give us: I could deal with a lineup like that for sure but it would take some luck to come up with that team while getting rid of Calderon. |
|
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
smackeddog wrote:NardDogNation wrote:Rookie wrote:Does anyone see DWill projecting as a starter on next years team? If so, then you have to pay him and make him a starter. If not, and you can get a starting PG for him (Teague), you can start to see why the Knicks are in the conversation with Atlanta for him. Would love to see the Knicks try and keep the core together, but we need to get the Starting 5 right before we start paying role players big$$. We don't which is why it makes sense to move him. AA is a lot more likely to stay pat at 8 mil a year than D-Will at 5. The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|
|
Rookie
Posts: 27322 Alba Posts: 28 Joined: 10/15/2008 Member: #2274 |
fishmike wrote:Rookie wrote:Does anyone see DWill projecting as a starter on next years team? If so, then you have to pay him and make him a starter. If not, and you can get a starting PG for him (Teague), you can start to see why the Knicks are in the conversation with Atlanta for him. Would love to see the Knicks try and keep the core together, but we need to get the Starting 5 right before we start paying role players big$$.DWill is a core player. Not having a starting spot doesnt mean much to me. Last 10 games Dwill: 14ppg, 7reb, 26mpg Totally agree. |
|
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/19/2014 Member: #5816 |
NardDogNation wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:wargames wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:EnySpree wrote:Rookie wrote:callmened wrote:we have nothing good to offer D.Green is absolutely a franchise player and Klay is a great #2 on a team and who knows if he wasn't playing with Steph he'd probably be shooting a tom more 3 balls and scoring a good amount more. |
|
reub
Posts: 21836 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/13/2016 Member: #6227 |
Atl is looking for a 3 and D wing from what I've read.
Here's my trade: Lance Thomas and Jose Calderon for Teague The salaries match and then we call up Darion Atkins who is Lance 2.0 with more rebounds and blocks to replace LT. |
|
martin
Posts: 80098 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
reub wrote:Atl is looking for a 3 and D wing from what I've read. Just as an FYI to all, LT has a no trade contract. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
|
NardDogNation
Posts: 27692 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 5/7/2013 Member: #5555 |
newyorker4ever wrote:NardDogNation wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:wargames wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:EnySpree wrote:Rookie wrote:callmened wrote:we have nothing good to offer Green is an all-star but you can't expect to build a contender if he's the focal point of the team. Same goes for Klay Thompson who has been widely inconsistent throughout his career. He's a very good ball player but I suspect we'd have a very different opinion of him if he wasn't playing on a team full of excellent passers and had to consistently create his own shot. |