jrodmc wrote:GustavBahler wrote:DrAlphaeus wrote:The haters thing was referring to what nyknickzingas said. But jeez, it's really not that serious.
Just asking. Im trying to fathom what made Malcolm choose a system over a team. I guess its like going to a restaurant because of the chef. Hard to have the same bond with a team that you would have with a restaurant, unless you are Eddy Curry.
That's just cold, Gustav.
IMHO, Since Dr. A's managed to fugazy this whole conversation down a rabbit hole, i believe the whole Triangular sensitivity is a reaction to all the anti-Phil, "he's a not-with-it, game's-passed-him-by" sentiments people were regurgitating somewhat before, and definitely during and after last year's tank job. So even a Coach K is not safe from the shrapnel of Knicks (Phil birthed) success.
Now that things have turned around for this franchise, I guess it's payback time.
Triangles, squares, circles, WGAF? Just keep winning!
Not sure if Malcolm is just having some fun as an eccentric poster at times... but he talks about more than just the offense we call the Triangle- he's associating the Triangle with team play, selflessness, and sacrifice.
Actually ordered Winter's Triple Post book yesterday so I don't feel like a rural Latvian with little knowledge of the English language when reading Nixluva's posts.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
