TPercy wrote:fishmike wrote:this stuff gets silly... I know about as much about Darion Atkins as most Knick fans on this board do.. almost nothing.Let the FO do their job and fill out these spots. It seems like they have brought in some guys they hope to catch on the upside, but they have brought in some lunch pale support type guys as well. I like the balance. In the past we would never have seen projects like Ledo or Thanasis get any burn because we had to have solid vets that could help us win now (as in win 36 games).
Folks are getting pretty heated about the 14th and 15th guys on the bench and roster invitees. There is a lot of young talent on the team. Im looking forward to see how it all shakes out.
Ive read on this forum guys talking about losing NDour as the beginning of the end! That the Knicks have been outbit on key guys like NDour and Monroe and this just shows Phil's ineptness and why he will fail as a GM.
Unbelievable. So what you are saying is that we should not say anything and just move along with it.who here is saying that Phil has failed as a GM? Me? Common. What makes the most sense is that Darion Atkins will likely get a D League spot and work on his offensive skills so that come training camp next year he cann show that he will make this team and take Lou amundson or Lance Thomas's spot. I just think it does not make any sense to give a 6 foot 8 guy as a third stringer who will likely end up playing back up minutes due to robin lopez injury history. It is a forum. Nobody is whining.
Say anything you want. Everyone wants their guy. Im not telling anyone how they should feel or what they should do. We are talking about roster invites and a population of players of which 95% will never see real NBA action. But yea man.. have at it.
How much do you know about Darion Atkins? His work ethic? Athleticism? What kind of program does he comes from? What kind of game does he have? Do you? I dont at all.
All these guys are unknowns, so I do find it amusing to see people throw their emotion behind their opinions on such players.
For me its simple. Does this part of the team building yield anything? So far it has yielded Langston Galloway, who looks like a nice NBA role player. Thats a good job. This is a new year. Hopefully we get another. I think if you can find a guy worthy of rotation minutes every year from this pool you are doing great as an organization with this pretty limited talent pool. Chris Copeland was a nice find, although he's struggled post Knicks some.
I dont think your wining. However there is some perspective there. We are talking about the 14th, 15th type guys on the roster. When has a franchise's success been hung on the impact of the last guy at the end of the bench?
I think your 100% in your right to disagree or prefer a different type of pick here. Its also fair for folks to say that being so passionate about the 14th and 15th roster spots is wining when you dont get your guy. I mean do you like your steak or are you going to be bitch and moan about the quality of the parsley garnish?
Yes.. you can like the overall job a GM is doing and not agree with every move along the way. However no GM gets every move right. Every GM makes bad trades and picks, EVERY GM. What you look at is body of work and over all results. Phil doesnt have much of a body of work here.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs