| Author | Thread |
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
TheGame wrote:Nmreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Grant looks like a solid PG who can shoot and pass. He should have no probably being serviceable, and I think he can get to borderline All-Star level. Derick Harper is a good comp, but I think Grant will be a better scorer. I think the kid will be a 17 pt, 8 ast, 3 RPG, 1 stl type guy. take a look at this thread: http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=47078&page=1 so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
| AUTOADVERT |
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
mreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Nmreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Grant looks like a solid PG who can shoot and pass. He should have no probably being serviceable, and I think he can get to borderline All-Star level. Derick Harper is a good comp, but I think Grant will be a better scorer. I think the kid will be a 17 pt, 8 ast, 3 RPG, 1 stl type guy. Proud to say I never posted in that one. I never liked Timmy. He seemed dumb and selfish. I think it's too early to tell on Grant, but I loved him in college ball, loved the way he played in SL and I think he has a much higher ceiling in the NBA than Timmy. I could easily see Grant being a starting point guard for a very solid playoffs team. Absolutely 100%. Only other recent Knicks rookie I've said that about is Shump, who started for the Cavs in the Finals this year. Other than that? Who knows. Enjoy the ride. Maybe he becomes the next Jrue Holiday, maybe he becomes the first Jerian Grant. ¿ △ ?
|
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Nmreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Grant looks like a solid PG who can shoot and pass. He should have no probably being serviceable, and I think he can get to borderline All-Star level. Derick Harper is a good comp, but I think Grant will be a better scorer. I think the kid will be a 17 pt, 8 ast, 3 RPG, 1 stl type guy. I like grant too but no way can I say that he can 100% be a starter let alone on a playoff team. Then again, charlie ward? so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
mreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Nmreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Grant looks like a solid PG who can shoot and pass. He should have no probably being serviceable, and I think he can get to borderline All-Star level. Derick Harper is a good comp, but I think Grant will be a better scorer. I think the kid will be a 17 pt, 8 ast, 3 RPG, 1 stl type guy. This is your evidence that "many fans were convinced that THJ was the next Reggie Miller"??? Come on man it was at most a couple of posters who MENTIONED Reggie Miller. This is why you and I get into these disagreements. You overstate and exaggerate things to try and make a point. fitzfarm wrote:Thjr is the best rookie the Knicks have had in a long time... The kid kinda reminds me of Reggie miller type that can get to the hole as well. Sky is the limit for thjr... mreinman wrote:Thjr ain't no reggie miller. sheeesh talking about jumping the gun (no disrespect but this is typical in NY). This is TYPICAL whenever someone mentions that a kid REMINDS them of a great player, someone takes it that the poster was saying they were EXACTLY as good as that player, when that's not what was being said. It happens all the freakin time and it's annoying. |
|
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/23/2011 Member: #3538 |
Well to be fair you said no one thought that and someone did.
|
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
nixluva wrote:mreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Nmreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Grant looks like a solid PG who can shoot and pass. He should have no probably being serviceable, and I think he can get to borderline All-Star level. Derick Harper is a good comp, but I think Grant will be a better scorer. I think the kid will be a 17 pt, 8 ast, 3 RPG, 1 stl type guy. how many times to you have sill expectations and end up being wrong. I don't find you annoying anymore though, I find you amusing. http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=47955 Btw, I am guilty of this too sometimes as well. I thought cole was better than I thought based on my amateur eyes but at least I can admit it. Go ahead ... expect grant to be the next Mike Conley. And when he isn't, have your excuses ready. Landry Fields did not turn into Bernard King, D Russell will not be Clyde Frazier, Ok4 is NOT tim duncan etc ... posters say this crap all the time. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/23/2011 Member: #3538 |
So I guess I can stop calling THjr Courtney Lee 2.0
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
mreinman wrote:nixluva wrote:mreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Nmreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Grant looks like a solid PG who can shoot and pass. He should have no probably being serviceable, and I think he can get to borderline All-Star level. Derick Harper is a good comp, but I think Grant will be a better scorer. I think the kid will be a 17 pt, 8 ast, 3 RPG, 1 stl type guy. Sometimes we all make statements that don't turn out to be right. What i'm saying is that often posters are making comps but not saying that they think a player is going to be exactly like a HOF'er or exactly the same as the player they are bringing up. They just see certain characteristics that are similar or they feel they have the potential to be in the same range as a player. Doesn't mean they're gonna be right but there's a huge difference between saying someone is "Kind of Like" or "Reminds me Of" or "A similar Type" and someone saying that they are "exactly the same" or they'll be the "Next" whoever. With regard to Jerian the only thing people are trying to do is make a guess for what they think he has the potential to be as a player. Just because some of our picks didn't reach their potential here doesn't mean that we should never try to make a guess about what a player may be able to do. I'm not seeing any particular argument you've put forward that makes the case for why you think Jerian will be limited to a Charlier Ward type Career. Jerian had a better college basketball career and has shown he's a very capable player. No one is suggesting he'll be a great player and surely hoping for Mike Conley like production isn't going overboard at all. You're saying we should be happy with "serviceable" and I think that's just your own pessimistic take on things that isn't based on any particular evidence or rationale you've observed. Show us why you think Mike Conley levels are so out of bounds. |
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
nixluva wrote:mreinman wrote:nixluva wrote:mreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Nmreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Grant looks like a solid PG who can shoot and pass. He should have no probably being serviceable, and I think he can get to borderline All-Star level. Derick Harper is a good comp, but I think Grant will be a better scorer. I think the kid will be a 17 pt, 8 ast, 3 RPG, 1 stl type guy. Hoping for Mike Conley is not going overboard. Expecting Mike Conley is stupid. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
mreinman wrote:nixluva wrote:mreinman wrote:nixluva wrote:mreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Nmreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Grant looks like a solid PG who can shoot and pass. He should have no probably being serviceable, and I think he can get to borderline All-Star level. Derick Harper is a good comp, but I think Grant will be a better scorer. I think the kid will be a 17 pt, 8 ast, 3 RPG, 1 stl type guy. Obviously we have to see what Jerian does. At this point people are just taking a guess at what kind of talent he has based on what they've seen of him so far. It's always a "hope" since no one can say with certainty what a player is going to be. It's not like when we go thru these kinds of discussions that anyone is saying "I Guarantee that a player is gonna be X". Generally people are just projecting a target. I would suspect that the Lakers are HOPING that Russell is a Steph Curry type or else why take him at #2? Everyone has some kind of expectations on these prospects. I would venture a guess that Phil wasn't trading for Jerian if he thought he was getting a "Serviceable" PG. That would hardly seem to make it worth the effort. Jerian isn't the sexy pick but I think he's shown that he will perform at a high level against good competition. Jerian seems like he will get it done with more guile than raw physical talent like a DRose or John Wall. I think what helps Jerian most is his BB IQ. |
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
crzymdups wrote:Yea... I was curious to see what I said about THjr a year and a half agomreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Nmreinman wrote:TheGame wrote:Grant looks like a solid PG who can shoot and pass. He should have no probably being serviceable, and I think he can get to borderline All-Star level. Derick Harper is a good comp, but I think Grant will be a better scorer. I think the kid will be a 17 pt, 8 ast, 3 RPG, 1 stl type guy. You look at the good players in he league and if their strength is taken away from them they find other ways to help the team. When Timmy is hitting shots hes great. When he's not he does nothing else to help the Knicks. He's a warm body on defense, I never see him handle the ball unless its a fast break and he certainly doesnt help on the boards.So there you go... not to pat myself on the back but calling it like I saw was exactly how it was. mreinman, what your saying about Grant makes zero sense. His success in the league is just a crap shoot? I mean if volume is the only thing that dictates successfuly drafts why hire scouts? I have to say Im not impressed with your arguement that Grant probably wont be much better than Charlie Ward because of draft pick %s. Every draft is different. Taking pick 15 from a very thin draft is not the same as pick 18 from a very deep draft. I was hoping for some observation in his game, lack of ability to go left, slow mechanics on his jumper.. something besides a pure #s game. There's a reason scouts make more money than IT guys who crunch #s. Grant is older and one of the best college players. So was Frank, and we talked about his shortcomings. So was Russell, WCS and a variety of guys whom's flaws we discussed ad nauseum. Tell me about Grant's game and Im interested, even if its a knock. Tell me about his %s based on other guy's history that has nothing to do with him... waste of time. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
so what are our expectations for grant today? same?
so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
meloanyk
Posts: 20768 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/5/2013 Member: #5615 |
Toure Murray
|
|
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/19/2014 Member: #5816 |
meloanyk wrote:Toure Murray Alexey Shved!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |