[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Mike Kurylo Is A Realist Who Gets It
Author Thread
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/20/2015  4:48 PM
fishmike wrote:
nixluva wrote:If I write that I like a kid like Shved then someone goes off about him not being anything more than a journeyman scrub and why am I hyping him? IMO there was no need to take it to that extreme given the initial comment was pretty tame. Now after the typical argument ensues things get more and more intense and all of a sudden it seems like i'm putting Shved in an All Star class. This is what happens over and over on this forum. Not just with me but anyone who posts something remotely positive about one of our players will find himself in an argument like that.
There is something to that.. but thats life when in an environment like this (losing). There are negative people, and pissed off people, that dont want to stop being pissed or negative based on your happy crappy views on some prospect who had a garbage career and a two good weeks as a Knick (this is a dramatization)

For now this is a grin and bare season. We will get good some players from this. Either via cap space or the draft or even from time Galloway/(Shved/hopefully others) were able to take advantage of during a losing season. But the negativity exists because the team is negative. We stink. We are terrible and its humbling.


I know I felt much, much worse after the McDyess injury. I think it was the lowest point for me as a Knick fan outside of the game 7 loss to Houston and the 93 game 5 loss to the Bulls watching Charles Smith fail repeatedly to go up strong. As bad as this team's record is I don't feel anywhere near as depressed as I did that year. The fundamentals of the franchise at this point are much better. I like what Phil and his staff are doing with the franchise, despite the record. Nothing major has happened yet but I think there's more reason for hope for the future. You can see with the type of players that Phil has been targeting that there's some logic to it. Now we need some good moves to happen this summer. As long as the chance exists for a vastly improved roster i'm in a much better mood than in losing seasons of the past. This one just doesn't hurt as much.
AUTOADVERT
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/20/2015  4:51 PM
nixluva wrote:
fishmike wrote:
nixluva wrote:If I write that I like a kid like Shved then someone goes off about him not being anything more than a journeyman scrub and why am I hyping him? IMO there was no need to take it to that extreme given the initial comment was pretty tame. Now after the typical argument ensues things get more and more intense and all of a sudden it seems like i'm putting Shved in an All Star class. This is what happens over and over on this forum. Not just with me but anyone who posts something remotely positive about one of our players will find himself in an argument like that.
There is something to that.. but thats life when in an environment like this (losing). There are negative people, and pissed off people, that dont want to stop being pissed or negative based on your happy crappy views on some prospect who had a garbage career and a two good weeks as a Knick (this is a dramatization)

For now this is a grin and bare season. We will get good some players from this. Either via cap space or the draft or even from time Galloway/(Shved/hopefully others) were able to take advantage of during a losing season. But the negativity exists because the team is negative. We stink. We are terrible and its humbling.


I know I felt much, much worse after the McDyess injury. I think it was the lowest point for me as a Knick fan outside of the game 7 loss to Houston and the 93 game 5 loss to the Bulls watching Charles Smith fail repeatedly to go up strong. As bad as this team's record is I don't feel anywhere near as depressed as I did that year. The fundamentals of the franchise at this point are much better. I like what Phil and his staff are doing with the franchise, despite the record. Nothing major has happened yet but I think there's more reason for hope for the future. You can see with the type of players that Phil has been targeting that there's some logic to it. Now we need some good moves to happen this summer. As long as the chance exists for a vastly improved roster i'm in a much better mood than in losing seasons of the past. This one just doesn't hurt as much.

You don't mean better than 93/94 I hope, right?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/20/2015  5:04 PM
mreinman wrote:
nixluva wrote:
fishmike wrote:
nixluva wrote:If I write that I like a kid like Shved then someone goes off about him not being anything more than a journeyman scrub and why am I hyping him? IMO there was no need to take it to that extreme given the initial comment was pretty tame. Now after the typical argument ensues things get more and more intense and all of a sudden it seems like i'm putting Shved in an All Star class. This is what happens over and over on this forum. Not just with me but anyone who posts something remotely positive about one of our players will find himself in an argument like that.
There is something to that.. but thats life when in an environment like this (losing). There are negative people, and pissed off people, that dont want to stop being pissed or negative based on your happy crappy views on some prospect who had a garbage career and a two good weeks as a Knick (this is a dramatization)

For now this is a grin and bare season. We will get good some players from this. Either via cap space or the draft or even from time Galloway/(Shved/hopefully others) were able to take advantage of during a losing season. But the negativity exists because the team is negative. We stink. We are terrible and its humbling.


I know I felt much, much worse after the McDyess injury. I think it was the lowest point for me as a Knick fan outside of the game 7 loss to Houston and the 93 game 5 loss to the Bulls watching Charles Smith fail repeatedly to go up strong. As bad as this team's record is I don't feel anywhere near as depressed as I did that year. The fundamentals of the franchise at this point are much better. I like what Phil and his staff are doing with the franchise, despite the record. Nothing major has happened yet but I think there's more reason for hope for the future. You can see with the type of players that Phil has been targeting that there's some logic to it. Now we need some good moves to happen this summer. As long as the chance exists for a vastly improved roster i'm in a much better mood than in losing seasons of the past. This one just doesn't hurt as much.

You don't mean better than 93/94 I hope, right?


No lowest point in terms of mood was the year McDyess blew out his knee and that team and front office outlook was dismal. Obviously the other references had to do with how I felt after those specific game losses, not the teams per se.
blkexec
Posts: 28347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
3/20/2015  9:09 PM
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:His arguments in his article are poorly conceived.

The NY Knicks have a limited asset base during the contract timelines of Carmelo Anthony and Phil Jackson.

I don't see how that is poorly conceived. It's just a fact.

For 40 percent of Phil Jackson's contract timeline, the Knicks don't own a draft pick. There's a good chance, in a future year, there will be a lockout. When you only have 1 first round draft pick in a three year period, albeit hopefully a high one, it does put immense pressure on that pick panning out.

The Knicks IMHO have the least talented 15 man roster in the entire league. Or more to point, count how many players on other teams 2nd and 3rd units would be INSTANT starters on the Knicks current team. And ask yourself how many of the current Knicks would even crack the basic 15 man roster of said other teams.

The Knicks will be reliant on free agency to rebuild most of the rest of their roster. Relying heavily on free agency to do such a massive roster makeover, historically considering the NBA's recent past and the turnout of free agents, it's a pretty dicey proposition.

A young rookie, even a first overall ( and the Knicks might not win the draft lottery ) will need time to develop his game. With a lockout and labor war looming, that might be a full season of development in the tubes. That means when said high impact rookie, if he pans out, starts to really stretch his leges, the contract timelines of Melo and Zen Master will be near the end.

I see almost no discussion here, when lots of people talk about getting a top shelf rookie in this draft, that said draft pick won't jump out of the womb running. Picks take time to develop. Players need time to gel with other team mates. It takes time for guys to be put into established roles and understand their place on a team.

I don't think Kurylo's viewpoints are poorly conceived ( though he could have fleshed them out more), I think they cover some unpleasant issues about rebuilding a modern NBA team that some fans don't want to discuss or accept.

The defensive rookies like Towns or Johnson will impact the NBA right away,in their first year, depending on playing time. But for OK4 or Russell, yes I agree. It's normal for them to have an adjustment period on offense.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39944
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

3/20/2015  9:23 PM
blkexec wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:His arguments in his article are poorly conceived.

The NY Knicks have a limited asset base during the contract timelines of Carmelo Anthony and Phil Jackson.

I don't see how that is poorly conceived. It's just a fact.

For 40 percent of Phil Jackson's contract timeline, the Knicks don't own a draft pick. There's a good chance, in a future year, there will be a lockout. When you only have 1 first round draft pick in a three year period, albeit hopefully a high one, it does put immense pressure on that pick panning out.

The Knicks IMHO have the least talented 15 man roster in the entire league. Or more to point, count how many players on other teams 2nd and 3rd units would be INSTANT starters on the Knicks current team. And ask yourself how many of the current Knicks would even crack the basic 15 man roster of said other teams.

The Knicks will be reliant on free agency to rebuild most of the rest of their roster. Relying heavily on free agency to do such a massive roster makeover, historically considering the NBA's recent past and the turnout of free agents, it's a pretty dicey proposition.

A young rookie, even a first overall ( and the Knicks might not win the draft lottery ) will need time to develop his game. With a lockout and labor war looming, that might be a full season of development in the tubes. That means when said high impact rookie, if he pans out, starts to really stretch his leges, the contract timelines of Melo and Zen Master will be near the end.

I see almost no discussion here, when lots of people talk about getting a top shelf rookie in this draft, that said draft pick won't jump out of the womb running. Picks take time to develop. Players need time to gel with other team mates. It takes time for guys to be put into established roles and understand their place on a team.

I don't think Kurylo's viewpoints are poorly conceived ( though he could have fleshed them out more), I think they cover some unpleasant issues about rebuilding a modern NBA team that some fans don't want to discuss or accept.

The defensive rookies like Towns or Johnson will impact the NBA right away,in their first year, depending on playing time. But for OK4 or Russell, yes I agree. It's normal for them to have an adjustment period on offense.

Not necessarily. It took Tyson Chandler, Roy Hibbert and De'Andre Jordan took a while to find their way as well. Big men in general need an adjustment period before they get it. There are going to be gorowing pains. No getting around that.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748

3/20/2015  10:00 PM
Now this is the thread where you get to see peoples real colors.
The Future is Bright!
BigRedDog
Posts: 22195
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #569
3/20/2015  10:41 PM
blkexec wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:His arguments in his article are poorly conceived.

The NY Knicks have a limited asset base during the contract timelines of Carmelo Anthony and Phil Jackson.

I don't see how that is poorly conceived. It's just a fact.

For 40 percent of Phil Jackson's contract timeline, the Knicks don't own a draft pick. There's a good chance, in a future year, there will be a lockout. When you only have 1 first round draft pick in a three year period, albeit hopefully a high one, it does put immense pressure on that pick panning out.

The Knicks IMHO have the least talented 15 man roster in the entire league. Or more to point, count how many players on other teams 2nd and 3rd units would be INSTANT starters on the Knicks current team. And ask yourself how many of the current Knicks would even crack the basic 15 man roster of said other teams.

The Knicks will be reliant on free agency to rebuild most of the rest of their roster. Relying heavily on free agency to do such a massive roster makeover, historically considering the NBA's recent past and the turnout of free agents, it's a pretty dicey proposition.

A young rookie, even a first overall ( and the Knicks might not win the draft lottery ) will need time to develop his game. With a lockout and labor war looming, that might be a full season of development in the tubes. That means when said high impact rookie, if he pans out, starts to really stretch his leges, the contract timelines of Melo and Zen Master will be near the end.

I see almost no discussion here, when lots of people talk about getting a top shelf rookie in this draft, that said draft pick won't jump out of the womb running. Picks take time to develop. Players need time to gel with other team mates. It takes time for guys to be put into established roles and understand their place on a team.

I don't think Kurylo's viewpoints are poorly conceived ( though he could have fleshed them out more), I think they cover some unpleasant issues about rebuilding a modern NBA team that some fans don't want to discuss or accept.

The defensive rookies like Towns or Johnson will impact the NBA right away,in their first year, depending on playing time. But for OK4 or Russell, yes I agree. It's normal for them to have an adjustment period on offense.

I think OK4 is going to be a monster on offense right away in the NBA. I think that part of his game is going to translate very well in the NBA. He has great size, great hands, great footwork and an excellent low post game. I am going to be curious to see the actual measurements of OK4 and Towns before the draft.

fishmike 9/27/2024 11:00 PM Ug I hate this. The idea of Towns is great until you see what a pussy he is. Jules is a dog. DD was a flamethrower locked up cheap for 3 more years. First Leon move I hate
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/20/2015  10:48 PM
Mike is a guy with a blog and an opinion. I disagree with his opinion. I do like his blog. In this case I think calling him a somber is more appropriate.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/20/2015  10:51 PM
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:His arguments in his article are poorly conceived.

The NY Knicks have a limited asset base during the contract timelines of Carmelo Anthony and Phil Jackson.

I don't see how that is poorly conceived. It's just a fact.

For 40 percent of Phil Jackson's contract timeline, the Knicks don't own a draft pick. There's a good chance, in a future year, there will be a lockout. When you only have 1 first round draft pick in a three year period, albeit hopefully a high one, it does put immense pressure on that pick panning out.

The Knicks IMHO have the least talented 15 man roster in the entire league. Or more to point, count how many players on other teams 2nd and 3rd units would be INSTANT starters on the Knicks current team. And ask yourself how many of the current Knicks would even crack the basic 15 man roster of said other teams.

The Knicks will be reliant on free agency to rebuild most of the rest of their roster. Relying heavily on free agency to do such a massive roster makeover, historically considering the NBA's recent past and the turnout of free agents, it's a pretty dicey proposition.

A young rookie, even a first overall ( and the Knicks might not win the draft lottery ) will need time to develop his game. With a lockout and labor war looming, that might be a full season of development in the tubes. That means when said high impact rookie, if he pans out, starts to really stretch his leges, the contract timelines of Melo and Zen Master will be near the end.

I see almost no discussion here, when lots of people talk about getting a top shelf rookie in this draft, that said draft pick won't jump out of the womb running. Picks take time to develop. Players need time to gel with other team mates. It takes time for guys to be put into established roles and understand their place on a team.

I don't think Kurylo's viewpoints are poorly conceived ( though he could have fleshed them out more), I think they cover some unpleasant issues about rebuilding a modern NBA team that some fans don't want to discuss or accept.

Phil will have picks during his tenure. Who knows if he won't be able to add one for 2016. In any event he's been finding other ways to add young prospects to the roster. In addition to the fact that he picked up 3 picks for last draft.


Knicks 1st Round Picks Knicks 2nd Round Picks
2015 - Own 2015 - To HOU

2016 - More favorable of NYK and DEN 2016 - To HOU (via POR to SAC
to DEN then other to TOR then removal of protection from NYK)
(via DEN swap for NYK)

2017 - Own 2017 second round draft pick from Houston

2018 - Own 2018 - Less favorable of NYK and LAC
then other to PHL (via PHL swap of LAC for NYK)

2019 - Own 2019 second round draft pick from Cleveland

2019 second round draft pick from Houston

2020 - Own 2020 - Own

2021 - Own 2021 - Own

What is this notion you keep touting about "unpleasant issues rebuilding a modern NBA team"? The Hawks aren't impossibly constructed when you look at the players they have. It's not impossible to find the kind of players they've collected. What's so special about DeMarre Carroll that we can't bring in a player like him who bounced around the league before finding a home in ATL and really finding a good role this year in ATL? Is a player like Millsap going to be impossible to get? I mean the way Kurylo and you talk about this idea of building a team you make it sound like a search for the Holy Grail or Lost Ark.


Rk Player Age G GS MP REB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
1 Paul Millsap 29 65 65 33.0 8.0 3.0 1.7 0.9 2.4 2.8 16.9
2 Kyle Korver 33 64 64 32.7 4.1 2.5 0.7 0.5 1.5 1.9 12.4
3 DeMarre Carroll 28 58 57 31.4 5.3 1.6 1.3 0.2 0.9 2.3 12.1
4 Jeff Teague 26 62 61 31.0 2.4 7.1 1.7 0.5 2.8 2.0 16.6
5 Al Horford 28 64 64 30.8 7.4 3.3 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.6 15.2
6 Dennis Schroder 21 66 7 19.4 2.0 4.0 0.7 0.0 1.9 1.7 9.4
7 Thabo Sefolosha 30 45 7 19.0 4.3 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 1.3 5.1

8 Kent Bazemore 25 61 7 17.1 2.9 1.0 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.7 5.0
9 Pero Antic 32 52 3 16.3 3.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.8 2.1 5.3
10 Mike Scott 26 62 0 15.8 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.1 7.5
11 Shelvin Mack 24 42 0 14.2 1.3 2.5 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.6 5.3
12 Elton Brand 35 26 2 13.8 3.2 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.4 1.7 2.7
13 John Jenkins 23 17 1 11.0 1.7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 4.9
14 Mike Muscala 23 26 2 9.1 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 3.6
15 Adreian Payne 23 3 0 6.3 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7


The fact that the roster is bad and lacks starting talent doesn't mean that with some key acquisitions that this team can't be competitive. Besides you're doing the same thing that Kurylo did and that is talk about the team in a vacuum. There's no point of reference to what constitutes an acceptable improvement next year and the year after. Since when is this a one season proposition? I thought most teams were a process of development.

In the draft we don't know if the player we draft will be an impact rookie or not. No one can know that for sure. Yes history would suggest that a rookie will have his struggles adjusting to the league but then again he may be able to contribute enough to help, which isn't an outlandish expectation from a top draft pick.

Regarding Free Agency, it remains to be seen just who we pick up. In the NBA a team can be highly competitive if they have at least 6 starting caliber players. We don't need an entire team full of All Stars just to make a substantive improvement. Role players look a lot worse when they have to log heavy minutes and take on a heavier load than they should. When a role player can fill in around a group of Starting caliber players they tend to look a lot better. That's why they call them ROLE PLAYERS. So with the Knicks being aggressive buyers in Free Agency I have to say TOTAL BULLISH to this idea that the Knicks can't be a much improved team next year. Of course they won't be immediate title contenders if they have no depth but we have to take this a step at a time and also allow some of our youth to continue to develop.

Also you assume that Melo is going to drop off the face of the planet real quick and we don't know that. That's purely and pessimistic assumption. Even on one leg Melo was still a dangerous scorer so why should we necessarily be expecting failure from him?

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/21/2015  8:12 AM
TT

You have done the homework and realize that67% of players picked between 1-4 the last 15 years have either been all star or franchise caliber.

RIP Crushalot😞
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
3/21/2015  8:59 AM
I don't think splat or the article is negative. We live by experience, which is just part of your history. When you have experience a lot of BS it's not hard to expect BS in the near future.

THE POSITIVE- We draft well, sign a top FA, and round out the roster with solid role players, fisher becomes a better coach. This is was what the rosey glasses predicts

THE NEGATIVE- We get the 4th pick, despite finishing last in the standings, NO top FA even gives PHIL a visit, we sign a 2nd tier FA, fill out the roster with avg stiffs who shoot jumpers all day, fisher continues his clueless coaching abilities, and he continues to get the benefit of a doubt because he doesn't have 4 all stars on the roster.

THE REALITY Fisher can't even get a bunch of players(in their contract yr) to play hard and smart for him for more then a game. Phil is not a very smart President/GM. We have no idea how any of these potential draftees will turn out, FA's don't sign for less money to play with a team that finish last, and doesn't have any leadership, or a core group, or an elite coach.

ES
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/21/2015  9:22 AM
BRIGGS wrote:TT

You have done the homework and realize that67% of players picked between 1-4 the last 15 years have either been all star or franchise caliber.


Are you using the expected value calculations on 82games.com? I wouldn't go so far as to say those are useless, but they're probably close. Any high or even medium volume player (even Bargnani!) who gets playing time is considered a "star" in that system.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/21/2015  11:33 AM
TripleThreat wrote:Melo and Zen Master have four years left. With virtually nothing on the roster left that anyone else will want in trade. If said draft pick hope develops ( even at the most historic rates possible), he will likely do so when Melo and Zen Master and whatever free agent pick ups this offseason are at the end of their deals.

NOTHING ANYONE CAN SAY HERE WILL RESOLVE THIS TIMELINE CONFLICT. NOTHING. ABSOLUTE NOTHING.


BULLISH! I actually respect your knowledge and great posting but lately you've been off your freakin rocker.

I notice you didn't actually respond to my post but instead went right back to this diatribe of negativity. You've come up with this narrative of utter hopelessness and call it some kind of irrefutable truth. The fact is that you are making up this so called Timeline and you are trying to pass it off as some kind of vetted method when it's all in your head. Regardless of how long Phil or Melo are still here the draft pick could still be here to form part of the teams future along with other young players we're adding now and in the future. He's been adding younger players since he's been here and that trend will likely continue.

Yes So far we don't have a pick in 2016 but we actually have picks in every year after that.

Knicks 1st Round Picks                    Knicks 2nd Round Picks
2015 - Own 2015 - To HOU

2016 - More favorable of NYK and DEN 2016 - To HOU (via POR to SAC
to DEN then other to TOR then removal of protection from NYK)
(via DEN swap for NYK)

2017 - Own 2017 second round draft pick from Houston

2018 - Own 2018 - Less favorable of NYK and LAC
then other to PHL (via PHL swap of LAC for NYK)

2019 - Own 2019 second round draft pick from Cleveland

2019 second round draft pick from Houston

2020 - Own 2020 - Own

2021 - Own 2021 - Own

The idea of having Melo here now is to bridge the gap between now and when our younger players fully develop. It makes sense to have some vets who can actually produce now. In terms of Free Agents as I posted earlier teams can win with smart additions rather than assuming you have to have a bunch of superstars in order to win. This is why I posted the Hawks Roster which at least shows that you can put together a roster intelligently and get a team that is greater than the sum of it's parts. Their roster proves that it is in fact possible for the Knicks to construct a competitive team minus top tier players all over the place. They have a bunch of smart and efficient players that are team oriented.


Rk Player Age G GS MP REB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
1 Paul Millsap 29 65 65 33.0 8.0 3.0 1.7 0.9 2.4 2.8 16.9
2 Kyle Korver 33 64 64 32.7 4.1 2.5 0.7 0.5 1.5 1.9 12.4
3 DeMarre Carroll 28 58 57 31.4 5.3 1.6 1.3 0.2 0.9 2.3 12.1
4 Jeff Teague 26 62 61 31.0 2.4 7.1 1.7 0.5 2.8 2.0 16.6
5 Al Horford 28 64 64 30.8 7.4 3.3 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.6 15.2
6 Dennis Schroder 21 66 7 19.4 2.0 4.0 0.7 0.0 1.9 1.7 9.4
7 Thabo Sefolosha 30 45 7 19.0 4.3 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 1.3 5.1

8 Kent Bazemore 25 61 7 17.1 2.9 1.0 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.7 5.0
9 Pero Antic 32 52 3 16.3 3.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.8 2.1 5.3
10 Mike Scott 26 62 0 15.8 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.1 7.5
11 Shelvin Mack 24 42 0 14.2 1.3 2.5 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.6 5.3
12 Elton Brand 35 26 2 13.8 3.2 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.4 1.7 2.7
13 John Jenkins 23 17 1 11.0 1.7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 4.9
14 Mike Muscala 23 26 2 9.1 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 3.6
15 Adreian Payne 23 3 0 6.3 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7

Now i'm not saying that the Knicks will be as good as the Hawks are now next season. That's not the point. It is however, very possible to eventually have that kind of success if they put this team together intelligently.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/21/2015  12:11 PM
nixluva wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:Melo and Zen Master have four years left. With virtually nothing on the roster left that anyone else will want in trade. If said draft pick hope develops ( even at the most historic rates possible), he will likely do so when Melo and Zen Master and whatever free agent pick ups this offseason are at the end of their deals.

NOTHING ANYONE CAN SAY HERE WILL RESOLVE THIS TIMELINE CONFLICT. NOTHING. ABSOLUTE NOTHING.


BULLISH! I actually respect your knowledge and great posting but lately you've been off your freakin rocker.

I notice you didn't actually respond to my post but instead went right back to this diatribe of negativity. You've come up with this narrative of utter hopelessness and call it some kind of irrefutable truth. The fact is that you are making up this so called Timeline and you are trying to pass it off as some kind of vetted method when it's all in your head. Regardless of how long Phil or Melo are still here the draft pick could still be here to form part of the teams future along with other young players we're adding now and in the future. He's been adding younger players since he's been here and that trend will likely continue.

Yes So far we don't have a pick in 2016 but we actually have picks in every year after that.

Knicks 1st Round Picks                    Knicks 2nd Round Picks
2015 - Own 2015 - To HOU

2016 - More favorable of NYK and DEN 2016 - To HOU (via POR to SAC
to DEN then other to TOR then removal of protection from NYK)
(via DEN swap for NYK)

2017 - Own 2017 second round draft pick from Houston

2018 - Own 2018 - Less favorable of NYK and LAC
then other to PHL (via PHL swap of LAC for NYK)

2019 - Own 2019 second round draft pick from Cleveland

2019 second round draft pick from Houston

2020 - Own 2020 - Own

2021 - Own 2021 - Own

The idea of having Melo here now is to bridge the gap between now and when our younger players fully develop. It makes sense to have some vets who can actually produce now. In terms of Free Agents as I posted earlier teams can win with smart additions rather than assuming you have to have a bunch of superstars in order to win. This is why I posted the Hawks Roster which at least shows that you can put together a roster intelligently and get a team that is greater than the sum of it's parts. Their roster proves that it is in fact possible for the Knicks to construct a competitive team minus top tier players all over the place. They have a bunch of smart and efficient players that are team oriented.


Rk Player Age G GS MP REB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
1 Paul Millsap 29 65 65 33.0 8.0 3.0 1.7 0.9 2.4 2.8 16.9
2 Kyle Korver 33 64 64 32.7 4.1 2.5 0.7 0.5 1.5 1.9 12.4
3 DeMarre Carroll 28 58 57 31.4 5.3 1.6 1.3 0.2 0.9 2.3 12.1
4 Jeff Teague 26 62 61 31.0 2.4 7.1 1.7 0.5 2.8 2.0 16.6
5 Al Horford 28 64 64 30.8 7.4 3.3 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.6 15.2
6 Dennis Schroder 21 66 7 19.4 2.0 4.0 0.7 0.0 1.9 1.7 9.4
7 Thabo Sefolosha 30 45 7 19.0 4.3 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 1.3 5.1

8 Kent Bazemore 25 61 7 17.1 2.9 1.0 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.7 5.0
9 Pero Antic 32 52 3 16.3 3.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.8 2.1 5.3
10 Mike Scott 26 62 0 15.8 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.1 7.5
11 Shelvin Mack 24 42 0 14.2 1.3 2.5 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.6 5.3
12 Elton Brand 35 26 2 13.8 3.2 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.4 1.7 2.7
13 John Jenkins 23 17 1 11.0 1.7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 4.9
14 Mike Muscala 23 26 2 9.1 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 3.6
15 Adreian Payne 23 3 0 6.3 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7

Now i'm not saying that the Knicks will be as good as the Hawks are now next season. That's not the point. It is however, very possible to eventually have that kind of success if they put this team together intelligently.


You don't appear to be contradicting anything he said. You talk often about the fact that it's "very possible" or "not impossible" to build a "successful" team but that doesn't mean anything. Impossible doesn't apply in basketball. If you make as many assumptions as you want about signings and draft picks working out, "succeeding" is always possible.
Can you give some examples of teams that were in situations where eventual success was impossible?
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/21/2015  12:21 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:Melo and Zen Master have four years left. With virtually nothing on the roster left that anyone else will want in trade. If said draft pick hope develops ( even at the most historic rates possible), he will likely do so when Melo and Zen Master and whatever free agent pick ups this offseason are at the end of their deals.

NOTHING ANYONE CAN SAY HERE WILL RESOLVE THIS TIMELINE CONFLICT. NOTHING. ABSOLUTE NOTHING.


BULLISH! I actually respect your knowledge and great posting but lately you've been off your freakin rocker.

I notice you didn't actually respond to my post but instead went right back to this diatribe of negativity. You've come up with this narrative of utter hopelessness and call it some kind of irrefutable truth. The fact is that you are making up this so called Timeline and you are trying to pass it off as some kind of vetted method when it's all in your head. Regardless of how long Phil or Melo are still here the draft pick could still be here to form part of the teams future along with other young players we're adding now and in the future. He's been adding younger players since he's been here and that trend will likely continue.

Yes So far we don't have a pick in 2016 but we actually have picks in every year after that.

Knicks 1st Round Picks                    Knicks 2nd Round Picks
2015 - Own 2015 - To HOU

2016 - More favorable of NYK and DEN 2016 - To HOU (via POR to SAC
to DEN then other to TOR then removal of protection from NYK)
(via DEN swap for NYK)

2017 - Own 2017 second round draft pick from Houston

2018 - Own 2018 - Less favorable of NYK and LAC
then other to PHL (via PHL swap of LAC for NYK)

2019 - Own 2019 second round draft pick from Cleveland

2019 second round draft pick from Houston

2020 - Own 2020 - Own

2021 - Own 2021 - Own

The idea of having Melo here now is to bridge the gap between now and when our younger players fully develop. It makes sense to have some vets who can actually produce now. In terms of Free Agents as I posted earlier teams can win with smart additions rather than assuming you have to have a bunch of superstars in order to win. This is why I posted the Hawks Roster which at least shows that you can put together a roster intelligently and get a team that is greater than the sum of it's parts. Their roster proves that it is in fact possible for the Knicks to construct a competitive team minus top tier players all over the place. They have a bunch of smart and efficient players that are team oriented.


Rk Player Age G GS MP REB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
1 Paul Millsap 29 65 65 33.0 8.0 3.0 1.7 0.9 2.4 2.8 16.9
2 Kyle Korver 33 64 64 32.7 4.1 2.5 0.7 0.5 1.5 1.9 12.4
3 DeMarre Carroll 28 58 57 31.4 5.3 1.6 1.3 0.2 0.9 2.3 12.1
4 Jeff Teague 26 62 61 31.0 2.4 7.1 1.7 0.5 2.8 2.0 16.6
5 Al Horford 28 64 64 30.8 7.4 3.3 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.6 15.2
6 Dennis Schroder 21 66 7 19.4 2.0 4.0 0.7 0.0 1.9 1.7 9.4
7 Thabo Sefolosha 30 45 7 19.0 4.3 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 1.3 5.1

8 Kent Bazemore 25 61 7 17.1 2.9 1.0 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.7 5.0
9 Pero Antic 32 52 3 16.3 3.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.8 2.1 5.3
10 Mike Scott 26 62 0 15.8 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.1 7.5
11 Shelvin Mack 24 42 0 14.2 1.3 2.5 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.6 5.3
12 Elton Brand 35 26 2 13.8 3.2 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.4 1.7 2.7
13 John Jenkins 23 17 1 11.0 1.7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 4.9
14 Mike Muscala 23 26 2 9.1 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 3.6
15 Adreian Payne 23 3 0 6.3 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7

Now i'm not saying that the Knicks will be as good as the Hawks are now next season. That's not the point. It is however, very possible to eventually have that kind of success if they put this team together intelligently.


You don't appear to be contradicting anything he said. You talk often about the fact that it's "very possible" or "not impossible" to build a "successful" team but that doesn't mean anything. Impossible doesn't apply in basketball. If you make as many assumptions as you want about signings and draft picks working out, "succeeding" is always possible.
Can you give some examples of teams that were in situations where eventual success was impossible?
This is what he was referring to:
For 40 percent of Phil Jackson's contract timeline, the Knicks don't own a draft pick.

Also, someone needs to change Phil Jackson's wiki. Apparently he turned 70 in March of 2014.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/21/2015  12:30 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:Melo and Zen Master have four years left. With virtually nothing on the roster left that anyone else will want in trade. If said draft pick hope develops ( even at the most historic rates possible), he will likely do so when Melo and Zen Master and whatever free agent pick ups this offseason are at the end of their deals.

NOTHING ANYONE CAN SAY HERE WILL RESOLVE THIS TIMELINE CONFLICT. NOTHING. ABSOLUTE NOTHING.


BULLISH! I actually respect your knowledge and great posting but lately you've been off your freakin rocker.

I notice you didn't actually respond to my post but instead went right back to this diatribe of negativity. You've come up with this narrative of utter hopelessness and call it some kind of irrefutable truth. The fact is that you are making up this so called Timeline and you are trying to pass it off as some kind of vetted method when it's all in your head. Regardless of how long Phil or Melo are still here the draft pick could still be here to form part of the teams future along with other young players we're adding now and in the future. He's been adding younger players since he's been here and that trend will likely continue.

Yes So far we don't have a pick in 2016 but we actually have picks in every year after that.

Knicks 1st Round Picks                    Knicks 2nd Round Picks
2015 - Own 2015 - To HOU

2016 - More favorable of NYK and DEN 2016 - To HOU (via POR to SAC
to DEN then other to TOR then removal of protection from NYK)
(via DEN swap for NYK)

2017 - Own 2017 second round draft pick from Houston

2018 - Own 2018 - Less favorable of NYK and LAC
then other to PHL (via PHL swap of LAC for NYK)

2019 - Own 2019 second round draft pick from Cleveland

2019 second round draft pick from Houston

2020 - Own 2020 - Own

2021 - Own 2021 - Own

The idea of having Melo here now is to bridge the gap between now and when our younger players fully develop. It makes sense to have some vets who can actually produce now. In terms of Free Agents as I posted earlier teams can win with smart additions rather than assuming you have to have a bunch of superstars in order to win. This is why I posted the Hawks Roster which at least shows that you can put together a roster intelligently and get a team that is greater than the sum of it's parts. Their roster proves that it is in fact possible for the Knicks to construct a competitive team minus top tier players all over the place. They have a bunch of smart and efficient players that are team oriented.


Rk Player Age G GS MP REB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
1 Paul Millsap 29 65 65 33.0 8.0 3.0 1.7 0.9 2.4 2.8 16.9
2 Kyle Korver 33 64 64 32.7 4.1 2.5 0.7 0.5 1.5 1.9 12.4
3 DeMarre Carroll 28 58 57 31.4 5.3 1.6 1.3 0.2 0.9 2.3 12.1
4 Jeff Teague 26 62 61 31.0 2.4 7.1 1.7 0.5 2.8 2.0 16.6
5 Al Horford 28 64 64 30.8 7.4 3.3 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.6 15.2
6 Dennis Schroder 21 66 7 19.4 2.0 4.0 0.7 0.0 1.9 1.7 9.4
7 Thabo Sefolosha 30 45 7 19.0 4.3 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 1.3 5.1

8 Kent Bazemore 25 61 7 17.1 2.9 1.0 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.7 5.0
9 Pero Antic 32 52 3 16.3 3.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.8 2.1 5.3
10 Mike Scott 26 62 0 15.8 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.1 7.5
11 Shelvin Mack 24 42 0 14.2 1.3 2.5 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.6 5.3
12 Elton Brand 35 26 2 13.8 3.2 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.4 1.7 2.7
13 John Jenkins 23 17 1 11.0 1.7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 4.9
14 Mike Muscala 23 26 2 9.1 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 3.6
15 Adreian Payne 23 3 0 6.3 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7

Now i'm not saying that the Knicks will be as good as the Hawks are now next season. That's not the point. It is however, very possible to eventually have that kind of success if they put this team together intelligently.


You don't appear to be contradicting anything he said. You talk often about the fact that it's "very possible" or "not impossible" to build a "successful" team but that doesn't mean anything. Impossible doesn't apply in basketball. If you make as many assumptions as you want about signings and draft picks working out, "succeeding" is always possible.
Can you give some examples of teams that were in situations where eventual success was impossible?
This is what he was referring to:
For 40 percent of Phil Jackson's contract timeline, the Knicks don't own a draft pick.

Also, someone needs to change Phil Jackson's wiki. Apparently he turned 70 in March of 2014.

OK - my comments about "possibility" and "success" apply to most of what he writes though
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/21/2015  1:05 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:Melo and Zen Master have four years left. With virtually nothing on the roster left that anyone else will want in trade. If said draft pick hope develops ( even at the most historic rates possible), he will likely do so when Melo and Zen Master and whatever free agent pick ups this offseason are at the end of their deals.

NOTHING ANYONE CAN SAY HERE WILL RESOLVE THIS TIMELINE CONFLICT. NOTHING. ABSOLUTE NOTHING.


BULLISH! I actually respect your knowledge and great posting but lately you've been off your freakin rocker.

I notice you didn't actually respond to my post but instead went right back to this diatribe of negativity. You've come up with this narrative of utter hopelessness and call it some kind of irrefutable truth. The fact is that you are making up this so called Timeline and you are trying to pass it off as some kind of vetted method when it's all in your head. Regardless of how long Phil or Melo are still here the draft pick could still be here to form part of the teams future along with other young players we're adding now and in the future. He's been adding younger players since he's been here and that trend will likely continue.

Yes So far we don't have a pick in 2016 but we actually have picks in every year after that.

Knicks 1st Round Picks                    Knicks 2nd Round Picks
2015 - Own 2015 - To HOU

2016 - More favorable of NYK and DEN 2016 - To HOU (via POR to SAC
to DEN then other to TOR then removal of protection from NYK)
(via DEN swap for NYK)

2017 - Own 2017 second round draft pick from Houston

2018 - Own 2018 - Less favorable of NYK and LAC
then other to PHL (via PHL swap of LAC for NYK)

2019 - Own 2019 second round draft pick from Cleveland

2019 second round draft pick from Houston

2020 - Own 2020 - Own

2021 - Own 2021 - Own

The idea of having Melo here now is to bridge the gap between now and when our younger players fully develop. It makes sense to have some vets who can actually produce now. In terms of Free Agents as I posted earlier teams can win with smart additions rather than assuming you have to have a bunch of superstars in order to win. This is why I posted the Hawks Roster which at least shows that you can put together a roster intelligently and get a team that is greater than the sum of it's parts. Their roster proves that it is in fact possible for the Knicks to construct a competitive team minus top tier players all over the place. They have a bunch of smart and efficient players that are team oriented.


Rk Player Age G GS MP REB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
1 Paul Millsap 29 65 65 33.0 8.0 3.0 1.7 0.9 2.4 2.8 16.9
2 Kyle Korver 33 64 64 32.7 4.1 2.5 0.7 0.5 1.5 1.9 12.4
3 DeMarre Carroll 28 58 57 31.4 5.3 1.6 1.3 0.2 0.9 2.3 12.1
4 Jeff Teague 26 62 61 31.0 2.4 7.1 1.7 0.5 2.8 2.0 16.6
5 Al Horford 28 64 64 30.8 7.4 3.3 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.6 15.2
6 Dennis Schroder 21 66 7 19.4 2.0 4.0 0.7 0.0 1.9 1.7 9.4
7 Thabo Sefolosha 30 45 7 19.0 4.3 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 1.3 5.1

8 Kent Bazemore 25 61 7 17.1 2.9 1.0 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.7 5.0
9 Pero Antic 32 52 3 16.3 3.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.8 2.1 5.3
10 Mike Scott 26 62 0 15.8 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.1 7.5
11 Shelvin Mack 24 42 0 14.2 1.3 2.5 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.6 5.3
12 Elton Brand 35 26 2 13.8 3.2 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.4 1.7 2.7
13 John Jenkins 23 17 1 11.0 1.7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 4.9
14 Mike Muscala 23 26 2 9.1 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 3.6
15 Adreian Payne 23 3 0 6.3 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7

Now i'm not saying that the Knicks will be as good as the Hawks are now next season. That's not the point. It is however, very possible to eventually have that kind of success if they put this team together intelligently.


You don't appear to be contradicting anything he said. You talk often about the fact that it's "very possible" or "not impossible" to build a "successful" team but that doesn't mean anything. Impossible doesn't apply in basketball. If you make as many assumptions as you want about signings and draft picks working out, "succeeding" is always possible.
Can you give some examples of teams that were in situations where eventual success was impossible?
This is what he was referring to:
For 40 percent of Phil Jackson's contract timeline, the Knicks don't own a draft pick.

Also, someone needs to change Phil Jackson's wiki. Apparently he turned 70 in March of 2014.

OK - my comments about "possibility" and "success" apply to most of what he writes though

The Draft component was a huge aspect of my point, but going further most teams are really built with 6 starting caliber players as their main load carriers. This means that in truth what we're looking at this summer is to try and build a starting 5 and have a 6th man who can be dependable. In my use of the Hawks as an example it's clear that it's not as daunting a scenario as some are trying to make it out to be. There is a greater chance of being able to put together a quality team than there is of failure IMO. It's not an impossible task to find some Millsap, Carroll, Schroder and Sefolosha level players!!!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/21/2015  1:10 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/21/2015  1:24 PM
nixluva wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:Melo and Zen Master have four years left. With virtually nothing on the roster left that anyone else will want in trade. If said draft pick hope develops ( even at the most historic rates possible), he will likely do so when Melo and Zen Master and whatever free agent pick ups this offseason are at the end of their deals.

NOTHING ANYONE CAN SAY HERE WILL RESOLVE THIS TIMELINE CONFLICT. NOTHING. ABSOLUTE NOTHING.


BULLISH! I actually respect your knowledge and great posting but lately you've been off your freakin rocker.

I notice you didn't actually respond to my post but instead went right back to this diatribe of negativity. You've come up with this narrative of utter hopelessness and call it some kind of irrefutable truth. The fact is that you are making up this so called Timeline and you are trying to pass it off as some kind of vetted method when it's all in your head. Regardless of how long Phil or Melo are still here the draft pick could still be here to form part of the teams future along with other young players we're adding now and in the future. He's been adding younger players since he's been here and that trend will likely continue.

Yes So far we don't have a pick in 2016 but we actually have picks in every year after that.

Knicks 1st Round Picks                    Knicks 2nd Round Picks
2015 - Own 2015 - To HOU

2016 - More favorable of NYK and DEN 2016 - To HOU (via POR to SAC
to DEN then other to TOR then removal of protection from NYK)
(via DEN swap for NYK)

2017 - Own 2017 second round draft pick from Houston

2018 - Own 2018 - Less favorable of NYK and LAC
then other to PHL (via PHL swap of LAC for NYK)

2019 - Own 2019 second round draft pick from Cleveland

2019 second round draft pick from Houston

2020 - Own 2020 - Own

2021 - Own 2021 - Own

The idea of having Melo here now is to bridge the gap between now and when our younger players fully develop. It makes sense to have some vets who can actually produce now. In terms of Free Agents as I posted earlier teams can win with smart additions rather than assuming you have to have a bunch of superstars in order to win. This is why I posted the Hawks Roster which at least shows that you can put together a roster intelligently and get a team that is greater than the sum of it's parts. Their roster proves that it is in fact possible for the Knicks to construct a competitive team minus top tier players all over the place. They have a bunch of smart and efficient players that are team oriented.


Rk Player Age G GS MP REB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
1 Paul Millsap 29 65 65 33.0 8.0 3.0 1.7 0.9 2.4 2.8 16.9
2 Kyle Korver 33 64 64 32.7 4.1 2.5 0.7 0.5 1.5 1.9 12.4
3 DeMarre Carroll 28 58 57 31.4 5.3 1.6 1.3 0.2 0.9 2.3 12.1
4 Jeff Teague 26 62 61 31.0 2.4 7.1 1.7 0.5 2.8 2.0 16.6
5 Al Horford 28 64 64 30.8 7.4 3.3 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.6 15.2
6 Dennis Schroder 21 66 7 19.4 2.0 4.0 0.7 0.0 1.9 1.7 9.4
7 Thabo Sefolosha 30 45 7 19.0 4.3 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 1.3 5.1

8 Kent Bazemore 25 61 7 17.1 2.9 1.0 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.7 5.0
9 Pero Antic 32 52 3 16.3 3.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.8 2.1 5.3
10 Mike Scott 26 62 0 15.8 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.1 7.5
11 Shelvin Mack 24 42 0 14.2 1.3 2.5 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.6 5.3
12 Elton Brand 35 26 2 13.8 3.2 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.4 1.7 2.7
13 John Jenkins 23 17 1 11.0 1.7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 4.9
14 Mike Muscala 23 26 2 9.1 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 3.6
15 Adreian Payne 23 3 0 6.3 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7

Now i'm not saying that the Knicks will be as good as the Hawks are now next season. That's not the point. It is however, very possible to eventually have that kind of success if they put this team together intelligently.


You don't appear to be contradicting anything he said. You talk often about the fact that it's "very possible" or "not impossible" to build a "successful" team but that doesn't mean anything. Impossible doesn't apply in basketball. If you make as many assumptions as you want about signings and draft picks working out, "succeeding" is always possible.
Can you give some examples of teams that were in situations where eventual success was impossible?
This is what he was referring to:
For 40 percent of Phil Jackson's contract timeline, the Knicks don't own a draft pick.

Also, someone needs to change Phil Jackson's wiki. Apparently he turned 70 in March of 2014.

OK - my comments about "possibility" and "success" apply to most of what he writes though

The Draft component was a huge aspect of my point, but going further most teams are really built with 6 starting caliber players as their main load carriers. This means that in truth what we're looking at this summer is to try and build a starting 5 and have a 6th man who can be dependable. In my use of the Hawks as an example it's clear that it's not as daunting a scenario as some are trying to make it out to be. There is a greater chance of being able to put together a quality team than there is of failure IMO. It's not an impossible task to find some Millsap, Carroll, Schroder and Sefolosha level players!!!

Holy cow! You're going out on the line here. At the moment, I don't think we have any healthy players who are NBA starters. If Melo comes back, healthy, we still need to add 5 to get 6 starting caliber players. I'd say the odds against that happening in one off-season are 10 to 1 generously and 1000 to 1 pessimistically. How often does a team get an entire starting lineup in one off-season? The six Hawks you're citing were added over a period of about seven years!
I could make the question even more difficult and say, how often does that happen for GM's whose plan A was a historic failure, but we'll keep it simpler and stick with the previous question.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/21/2015  1:29 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:Melo and Zen Master have four years left. With virtually nothing on the roster left that anyone else will want in trade. If said draft pick hope develops ( even at the most historic rates possible), he will likely do so when Melo and Zen Master and whatever free agent pick ups this offseason are at the end of their deals.

NOTHING ANYONE CAN SAY HERE WILL RESOLVE THIS TIMELINE CONFLICT. NOTHING. ABSOLUTE NOTHING.


BULLISH! I actually respect your knowledge and great posting but lately you've been off your freakin rocker.

I notice you didn't actually respond to my post but instead went right back to this diatribe of negativity. You've come up with this narrative of utter hopelessness and call it some kind of irrefutable truth. The fact is that you are making up this so called Timeline and you are trying to pass it off as some kind of vetted method when it's all in your head. Regardless of how long Phil or Melo are still here the draft pick could still be here to form part of the teams future along with other young players we're adding now and in the future. He's been adding younger players since he's been here and that trend will likely continue.

Yes So far we don't have a pick in 2016 but we actually have picks in every year after that.

Knicks 1st Round Picks                    Knicks 2nd Round Picks
2015 - Own 2015 - To HOU

2016 - More favorable of NYK and DEN 2016 - To HOU (via POR to SAC
to DEN then other to TOR then removal of protection from NYK)
(via DEN swap for NYK)

2017 - Own 2017 second round draft pick from Houston

2018 - Own 2018 - Less favorable of NYK and LAC
then other to PHL (via PHL swap of LAC for NYK)

2019 - Own 2019 second round draft pick from Cleveland

2019 second round draft pick from Houston

2020 - Own 2020 - Own

2021 - Own 2021 - Own

The idea of having Melo here now is to bridge the gap between now and when our younger players fully develop. It makes sense to have some vets who can actually produce now. In terms of Free Agents as I posted earlier teams can win with smart additions rather than assuming you have to have a bunch of superstars in order to win. This is why I posted the Hawks Roster which at least shows that you can put together a roster intelligently and get a team that is greater than the sum of it's parts. Their roster proves that it is in fact possible for the Knicks to construct a competitive team minus top tier players all over the place. They have a bunch of smart and efficient players that are team oriented.


Rk Player Age G GS MP REB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
1 Paul Millsap 29 65 65 33.0 8.0 3.0 1.7 0.9 2.4 2.8 16.9
2 Kyle Korver 33 64 64 32.7 4.1 2.5 0.7 0.5 1.5 1.9 12.4
3 DeMarre Carroll 28 58 57 31.4 5.3 1.6 1.3 0.2 0.9 2.3 12.1
4 Jeff Teague 26 62 61 31.0 2.4 7.1 1.7 0.5 2.8 2.0 16.6
5 Al Horford 28 64 64 30.8 7.4 3.3 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.6 15.2
6 Dennis Schroder 21 66 7 19.4 2.0 4.0 0.7 0.0 1.9 1.7 9.4
7 Thabo Sefolosha 30 45 7 19.0 4.3 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 1.3 5.1

8 Kent Bazemore 25 61 7 17.1 2.9 1.0 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.7 5.0
9 Pero Antic 32 52 3 16.3 3.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.8 2.1 5.3
10 Mike Scott 26 62 0 15.8 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.1 7.5
11 Shelvin Mack 24 42 0 14.2 1.3 2.5 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.6 5.3
12 Elton Brand 35 26 2 13.8 3.2 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.4 1.7 2.7
13 John Jenkins 23 17 1 11.0 1.7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 4.9
14 Mike Muscala 23 26 2 9.1 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 3.6
15 Adreian Payne 23 3 0 6.3 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7

Now i'm not saying that the Knicks will be as good as the Hawks are now next season. That's not the point. It is however, very possible to eventually have that kind of success if they put this team together intelligently.


You don't appear to be contradicting anything he said. You talk often about the fact that it's "very possible" or "not impossible" to build a "successful" team but that doesn't mean anything. Impossible doesn't apply in basketball. If you make as many assumptions as you want about signings and draft picks working out, "succeeding" is always possible.
Can you give some examples of teams that were in situations where eventual success was impossible?
This is what he was referring to:
For 40 percent of Phil Jackson's contract timeline, the Knicks don't own a draft pick.

Also, someone needs to change Phil Jackson's wiki. Apparently he turned 70 in March of 2014.

OK - my comments about "possibility" and "success" apply to most of what he writes though

The Draft component was a huge aspect of my point, but going further most teams are really built with 6 starting caliber players as their main load carriers. This means that in truth what we're looking at this summer is to try and build a starting 5 and have a 6th man who can be dependable. In my use of the Hawks as an example it's clear that it's not as daunting a scenario as some are trying to make it out to be. There is a greater chance of being able to put together a quality team than there is of failure IMO. It's not an impossible task to find some Millsap, Carroll, Schroder and Sefolosha level players!!!

Holy cow! You're going out on the line here. At the moment, I don't think we have any healthy players who are NBA starters. If Melo comes back, healthy, we still need to add 5 to get 6 starting caliber players. I'd say the odds against that happening in one off-season are 10 to 1 generously and 1000 to 1 pessimistically. How often does a team get an entire starting lineup in one off-season?
I could make the question even more difficult and say, how often does that happen for GM's whose plan A was a historic failure, but we'll keep it simpler and stick with the previous question.

There are varying levels of starting caliber players. Besides which it doesn't have happen all at once. That's the goal but we can't feel like it's a complete failure if we end up with 3 free agents and have to rely on our draft pick and current players like Shved, Galloway and Bargs to comprise much of the rotation. We may not feel these players are any good because they're on the Knicks but they aren't as bad as we make them out to be. Remember that Galloway is a rookie and still improving.


PLAYER GP GS MIN PPG OFFR DEFR RPG APG SPG BPG TPG FPG A/TO PER
Carmelo Anthony, SF 40 40 35.7 24.2 1.8 4.8 6.6 3.1 1.00 0.43 2.2 2.2 1.4 21.8
Alexey Shved, PG† 15 8 27.1 15.1 0.9 3.8 4.7 3.7 1.00 0.33 1.5 1.6 2.4 21.3
Andrea Bargnani, C 20 13 26.6 14.4 1.1 3.3 4.4 1.6 0.10 0.80 1.4 1.9 1.1 16.7
Tim Hardaway Jr., SG 63 26 23.5 11.3 0.2 2.1 2.2 1.7 0.29 0.21 1.1 1.7 1.6 12.3
Langston Galloway, PG 32 28 31.0 11.1 0.9 3.4 4.3 3.0 1.03 0.28 1.3 2.9 2.3 12.2

Jose Calderon, PG 42 42 30.2 9.1 0.5 2.5 3.0 4.7 0.74 0.00 1.8 1.8 2.6 11.4
Lance Thomas, SF† 27 11 23.9 7.8 0.9 2.3 3.2 1.1 0.63 0.22 1.3 1.4 0.8 8.4
Jason Smith, PF 69 28 21.2 7.6 1.2 2.6 3.7 1.6 0.36 0.43 1.1 2.5 1.4 11.6
Lou Amundson, PF† 28 26 21.7 6.7 2.5 3.6 6.1 1.8 0.50 1.25 1.1 3.0 1.5 14.6
Shane Larkin, PG 63 14 22.7 5.8 0.4 1.7 2.1 2.5 1.21 0.13 1.0 1.9 2.6 11.0
Quincy Acy, SF 55 21 19.1 5.4 1.2 3.3 4.5 1.0 0.38 0.31 0.9 2.2 1.1 11.0
Cole Aldrich, C 51 12 16.1 5.2 1.7 3.7 5.4 1.2 0.61 1.06 0.9 2.0 1.3 17.1
Cleanthony Early, SF 31 7 16.1 4.7 0.5 1.8 2.3 0.8 0.55 0.32 0.8 1.4 1.0 7.3
Travis Wear, SF 50 1 13.3 3.9 0.5 1.5 2.0 0.8 0.30 0.22 0.7 1.1 1.1 8.5

The Draft will be important as will who Phil is able to bring in thru Free Agency but it's a very achievable goal to put together a good 6 man core.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/21/2015  1:33 PM
nixluva wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:Melo and Zen Master have four years left. With virtually nothing on the roster left that anyone else will want in trade. If said draft pick hope develops ( even at the most historic rates possible), he will likely do so when Melo and Zen Master and whatever free agent pick ups this offseason are at the end of their deals.

NOTHING ANYONE CAN SAY HERE WILL RESOLVE THIS TIMELINE CONFLICT. NOTHING. ABSOLUTE NOTHING.


BULLISH! I actually respect your knowledge and great posting but lately you've been off your freakin rocker.

I notice you didn't actually respond to my post but instead went right back to this diatribe of negativity. You've come up with this narrative of utter hopelessness and call it some kind of irrefutable truth. The fact is that you are making up this so called Timeline and you are trying to pass it off as some kind of vetted method when it's all in your head. Regardless of how long Phil or Melo are still here the draft pick could still be here to form part of the teams future along with other young players we're adding now and in the future. He's been adding younger players since he's been here and that trend will likely continue.

Yes So far we don't have a pick in 2016 but we actually have picks in every year after that.

Knicks 1st Round Picks                    Knicks 2nd Round Picks
2015 - Own 2015 - To HOU

2016 - More favorable of NYK and DEN 2016 - To HOU (via POR to SAC
to DEN then other to TOR then removal of protection from NYK)
(via DEN swap for NYK)

2017 - Own 2017 second round draft pick from Houston

2018 - Own 2018 - Less favorable of NYK and LAC
then other to PHL (via PHL swap of LAC for NYK)

2019 - Own 2019 second round draft pick from Cleveland

2019 second round draft pick from Houston

2020 - Own 2020 - Own

2021 - Own 2021 - Own

The idea of having Melo here now is to bridge the gap between now and when our younger players fully develop. It makes sense to have some vets who can actually produce now. In terms of Free Agents as I posted earlier teams can win with smart additions rather than assuming you have to have a bunch of superstars in order to win. This is why I posted the Hawks Roster which at least shows that you can put together a roster intelligently and get a team that is greater than the sum of it's parts. Their roster proves that it is in fact possible for the Knicks to construct a competitive team minus top tier players all over the place. They have a bunch of smart and efficient players that are team oriented.


Rk Player Age G GS MP REB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
1 Paul Millsap 29 65 65 33.0 8.0 3.0 1.7 0.9 2.4 2.8 16.9
2 Kyle Korver 33 64 64 32.7 4.1 2.5 0.7 0.5 1.5 1.9 12.4
3 DeMarre Carroll 28 58 57 31.4 5.3 1.6 1.3 0.2 0.9 2.3 12.1
4 Jeff Teague 26 62 61 31.0 2.4 7.1 1.7 0.5 2.8 2.0 16.6
5 Al Horford 28 64 64 30.8 7.4 3.3 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.6 15.2
6 Dennis Schroder 21 66 7 19.4 2.0 4.0 0.7 0.0 1.9 1.7 9.4
7 Thabo Sefolosha 30 45 7 19.0 4.3 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 1.3 5.1

8 Kent Bazemore 25 61 7 17.1 2.9 1.0 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.7 5.0
9 Pero Antic 32 52 3 16.3 3.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.8 2.1 5.3
10 Mike Scott 26 62 0 15.8 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.1 7.5
11 Shelvin Mack 24 42 0 14.2 1.3 2.5 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.6 5.3
12 Elton Brand 35 26 2 13.8 3.2 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.4 1.7 2.7
13 John Jenkins 23 17 1 11.0 1.7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 4.9
14 Mike Muscala 23 26 2 9.1 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 3.6
15 Adreian Payne 23 3 0 6.3 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7

Now i'm not saying that the Knicks will be as good as the Hawks are now next season. That's not the point. It is however, very possible to eventually have that kind of success if they put this team together intelligently.


You don't appear to be contradicting anything he said. You talk often about the fact that it's "very possible" or "not impossible" to build a "successful" team but that doesn't mean anything. Impossible doesn't apply in basketball. If you make as many assumptions as you want about signings and draft picks working out, "succeeding" is always possible.
Can you give some examples of teams that were in situations where eventual success was impossible?
This is what he was referring to:
For 40 percent of Phil Jackson's contract timeline, the Knicks don't own a draft pick.

Also, someone needs to change Phil Jackson's wiki. Apparently he turned 70 in March of 2014.

OK - my comments about "possibility" and "success" apply to most of what he writes though

The Draft component was a huge aspect of my point, but going further most teams are really built with 6 starting caliber players as their main load carriers. This means that in truth what we're looking at this summer is to try and build a starting 5 and have a 6th man who can be dependable. In my use of the Hawks as an example it's clear that it's not as daunting a scenario as some are trying to make it out to be. There is a greater chance of being able to put together a quality team than there is of failure IMO. It's not an impossible task to find some Millsap, Carroll, Schroder and Sefolosha level players!!!

Holy cow! You're going out on the line here. At the moment, I don't think we have any healthy players who are NBA starters. If Melo comes back, healthy, we still need to add 5 to get 6 starting caliber players. I'd say the odds against that happening in one off-season are 10 to 1 generously and 1000 to 1 pessimistically. How often does a team get an entire starting lineup in one off-season?
I could make the question even more difficult and say, how often does that happen for GM's whose plan A was a historic failure, but we'll keep it simpler and stick with the previous question.

There are varying levels of starting caliber players. Besides which it doesn't have happen all at once. That's the goal but we can't feel like it's a complete failure if we end up with 3 free agents and have to rely on our draft pick and current players like Shved, Galloway and Bargs to comprise much of the rotation. We may not feel these players are any good because they're on the Knicks but they aren't as bad as we make them out to be. Remember that Galloway is a rookie and still improving.


PLAYER GP GS MIN PPG OFFR DEFR RPG APG SPG BPG TPG FPG A/TO PER
Carmelo Anthony, SF 40 40 35.7 24.2 1.8 4.8 6.6 3.1 1.00 0.43 2.2 2.2 1.4 21.8
Alexey Shved, PG† 15 8 27.1 15.1 0.9 3.8 4.7 3.7 1.00 0.33 1.5 1.6 2.4 21.3
Andrea Bargnani, C 20 13 26.6 14.4 1.1 3.3 4.4 1.6 0.10 0.80 1.4 1.9 1.1 16.7
Tim Hardaway Jr., SG 63 26 23.5 11.3 0.2 2.1 2.2 1.7 0.29 0.21 1.1 1.7 1.6 12.3
Langston Galloway, PG 32 28 31.0 11.1 0.9 3.4 4.3 3.0 1.03 0.28 1.3 2.9 2.3 12.2

Jose Calderon, PG 42 42 30.2 9.1 0.5 2.5 3.0 4.7 0.74 0.00 1.8 1.8 2.6 11.4
Lance Thomas, SF† 27 11 23.9 7.8 0.9 2.3 3.2 1.1 0.63 0.22 1.3 1.4 0.8 8.4
Jason Smith, PF 69 28 21.2 7.6 1.2 2.6 3.7 1.6 0.36 0.43 1.1 2.5 1.4 11.6
Lou Amundson, PF† 28 26 21.7 6.7 2.5 3.6 6.1 1.8 0.50 1.25 1.1 3.0 1.5 14.6
Shane Larkin, PG 63 14 22.7 5.8 0.4 1.7 2.1 2.5 1.21 0.13 1.0 1.9 2.6 11.0
Quincy Acy, SF 55 21 19.1 5.4 1.2 3.3 4.5 1.0 0.38 0.31 0.9 2.2 1.1 11.0
Cole Aldrich, C 51 12 16.1 5.2 1.7 3.7 5.4 1.2 0.61 1.06 0.9 2.0 1.3 17.1
Cleanthony Early, SF 31 7 16.1 4.7 0.5 1.8 2.3 0.8 0.55 0.32 0.8 1.4 1.0 7.3
Travis Wear, SF 50 1 13.3 3.9 0.5 1.5 2.0 0.8 0.30 0.22 0.7 1.1 1.1 8.5

The Draft will be important as will who Phil is able to bring in thru Free Agency but it's a very achievable goal to put together a good 6 man core.


Well, right now, I still think we have zero healthy players who would be in the top 6 rotation on a contender. You can't be any further than we are from a contending roster. The 6 players that you keep citing on the Hawks were added over a seven year period. That would take us into Melo's next super max contract!
Mike Kurylo Is A Realist Who Gets It

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy