mreinman wrote:

NardDogNation wrote:Am I the only guy that doesn't view the Wiggins-Love trade as a bad thing for the Cavs? For all his talents, Wiggins is basically a better version of Corey Brewer at the moment. Yeah, he'll improve dramatically over the years but the Cavs needed bonafide star talent to win today, not tomorrow: enter Kevin Love. At his best, Kevin is a 25,15 and 4 stretch-big man that was only 25 years old when the deal was made. Those type of players don't grow on trees. His problem in Cleveland doesn't have anything to do with him or his talent. It has everything to do with a mediocre coach running unimaginative sets that relegate him to being a corner shooter. You guys think Wiggins would be anything more than that on that team?

yup. you are :-) sorry

LOL. It's ****ing lonely on this island. You sure you don't want to join?

Bonn1997 wrote:

franco12 wrote:

jrodmc wrote:Love sounds like a whiny loser.

Pass.

I don't know if he is a whiny loser, but he certainly has not had a positive impact in Cleveland - they went 2 & 9 with Lebron out - what does that say about Love? He puts up numbers, but not wins.

Melo & Love would be a horrible arrangement cap wise and shallow numbers wise(great stats, no wins).

I think I might love to trade Melo for Love- I get younger and maybe a player who while not as good, could perhaps play a valuable role as a stretch 4 and a rebuilding team.

I honestly see him heading to the Lakers- makes so much sense for him & them.

What does the 2-9 say about Irving then? What does the 10-40 record with Melo this year say about Melo?
On a side note, I think Love was out for some of those 11 games but I still wouldn't evaluate a player based just on the team's record anyway.

+1