jrodmc wrote:dk7th wrote:fishmike wrote:dk7th wrote:holfresh wrote:Nalod wrote:5 wins is not on melo, but it speaks to how bad the trade was for the team. We are on our knees at this point with little on the roster. Denver is not that good, but not nearly as bad as we are. The MozTrade they made was pretty good. One day they have to make it work, but while they are disappointed, we are still falling in the abyss.
But u can't ignore the other factors that has brought us here..Like Amare knees and back..Bad decisions from GM and coaches..The trade didn't happen in a vacuum...
Woodson can do better than 5 wins...Decisions..
biggest factor is that players can be great at one price and an abomination at another.
melo has been an abomination not once but twice... to hell with your "other factors"
Do you type this stuff out each time or do you have like templates you can use over and over again?
templates. here's another one:
you don't really have an adequate grasp of the nature of this sport, do you?
you keep talking about sports, but typing about money. Do your yes men applaud your constant lack of coherence?
Tell us with a straight, omniscient face that if Melo was making 12 million a year, you'd be waving pom poms at him?
at 12 million he is a great player to have and leaves room to build a team with. at his price you are forced to build around him not with him... and that is simply a non-starter.
within the parameters of my business i am an expert and though i am open to persuasion like any reasonable leader of men, it is ultimately my responsibility to make sure the enterprise succeeds.
you do know why melo is still a knick, right?
knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%