[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Mozgov Traded 2 Cleveland
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53866
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/8/2015  2:16 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:And Mozgoz was a "throw in" in the Melo deal according to many knick fans and media

He was the third string center there for several years. He was resigned and has done better but they got a ton for him. Someone must have given an ultimatum.

It doesn't matter. What matter is Denver got 2 1st round picks for a guy they strong armed the Knicks into giving up.

You said you were against the Carmelo trade. What were your feelings on Mozgov at the time of the trade?

Indifferent. I thought he played great when he finally got a chance because Stat and Shawne were out. My issue was I thought the Knicks should have kept Wilson or Gallo. I really liked Wilson. Moz wasn't a deal breaker for me. One of the Knicks two best young players should have been kept.

I wanted to keep Wilson or Gallo but had no problem giving up both for Melo. 1 of the 2 wasn't enough. My issues was Dolan forcing Walsh to include Mozgov and get the deal done and the picks. Specially the right to swap. One lottery pick shoul've been enough since we gave them Wilson, Gallo, Felton and Mozgov

We gave up more in the deal because Billups was included in the deal and because we made Fields untouchable.

I'm pretty sure Billups was a salary dump. I remember hearing the Knicks were reluctant to add give up Felton. We as fans were very optimistic about the trade until they started asking for Felton & Mozgov. Thats when Stephen A. Smith, Francesa & kay and the likes went on radio saying you give them whatever they want for a player like Melo. Stephen in particular as he mocked felton & mozgov

talk about being wrong... the guy I was infuritated we traded was Felton. He was playing like a beast under MDA and we swapped him for a walk it up guy in Billups. I thought Felton was blossoming into an upper echelon PG under MDA and he may have been... but eventually the only thing that blossomed was his waistline. You never know.

Who is wrong me?
if so you proved my point. The knicks and fans did not want to give up Felton at the time.
I forget if Denver dumped Billups contract on us or the Knicks asked for Billups since Denver wanted Felton. Most likely Denver dumped his contract on us which was far from expiring

no man I was wrong... Felton ends up being garbage. Billups was there to match the salaries. Remember we picked up his option, then I believe amnestied him and signed Tyson
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

1/8/2015  3:41 PM
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:And Mozgoz was a "throw in" in the Melo deal according to many knick fans and media

He was the third string center there for several years. He was resigned and has done better but they got a ton for him. Someone must have given an ultimatum.

It doesn't matter. What matter is Denver got 2 1st round picks for a guy they strong armed the Knicks into giving up.

You said you were against the Carmelo trade. What were your feelings on Mozgov at the time of the trade?

Indifferent. I thought he played great when he finally got a chance because Stat and Shawne were out. My issue was I thought the Knicks should have kept Wilson or Gallo. I really liked Wilson. Moz wasn't a deal breaker for me. One of the Knicks two best young players should have been kept.

I wanted to keep Wilson or Gallo but had no problem giving up both for Melo. 1 of the 2 wasn't enough. My issues was Dolan forcing Walsh to include Mozgov and get the deal done and the picks. Specially the right to swap. One lottery pick shoul've been enough since we gave them Wilson, Gallo, Felton and Mozgov

We gave up more in the deal because Billups was included in the deal and because we made Fields untouchable.

I'm pretty sure Billups was a salary dump. I remember hearing the Knicks were reluctant to add give up Felton. We as fans were very optimistic about the trade until they started asking for Felton & Mozgov. Thats when Stephen A. Smith, Francesa & kay and the likes went on radio saying you give them whatever they want for a player like Melo. Stephen in particular as he mocked felton & mozgov

talk about being wrong... the guy I was infuritated we traded was Felton. He was playing like a beast under MDA and we swapped him for a walk it up guy in Billups. I thought Felton was blossoming into an upper echelon PG under MDA and he may have been... but eventually the only thing that blossomed was his waistline. You never know.

Did you actually think that Felton was a better player than Billups at that point?

Felton was playing terrible at that point and missing every shot (back to earth).

so here is what phil is thinking ....
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/8/2015  5:05 PM
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:And Mozgoz was a "throw in" in the Melo deal according to many knick fans and media

He was the third string center there for several years. He was resigned and has done better but they got a ton for him. Someone must have given an ultimatum.

It doesn't matter. What matter is Denver got 2 1st round picks for a guy they strong armed the Knicks into giving up.

You said you were against the Carmelo trade. What were your feelings on Mozgov at the time of the trade?

Indifferent. I thought he played great when he finally got a chance because Stat and Shawne were out. My issue was I thought the Knicks should have kept Wilson or Gallo. I really liked Wilson. Moz wasn't a deal breaker for me. One of the Knicks two best young players should have been kept.

I wanted to keep Wilson or Gallo but had no problem giving up both for Melo. 1 of the 2 wasn't enough. My issues was Dolan forcing Walsh to include Mozgov and get the deal done and the picks. Specially the right to swap. One lottery pick shoul've been enough since we gave them Wilson, Gallo, Felton and Mozgov

We gave up more in the deal because Billups was included in the deal and because we made Fields untouchable.

I'm pretty sure Billups was a salary dump. I remember hearing the Knicks were reluctant to add give up Felton. We as fans were very optimistic about the trade until they started asking for Felton & Mozgov. Thats when Stephen A. Smith, Francesa & kay and the likes went on radio saying you give them whatever they want for a player like Melo. Stephen in particular as he mocked felton & mozgov

talk about being wrong... the guy I was infuritated we traded was Felton. He was playing like a beast under MDA and we swapped him for a walk it up guy in Billups. I thought Felton was blossoming into an upper echelon PG under MDA and he may have been... but eventually the only thing that blossomed was his waistline. You never know.

Who is wrong me?
if so you proved my point. The knicks and fans did not want to give up Felton at the time.
I forget if Denver dumped Billups contract on us or the Knicks asked for Billups since Denver wanted Felton. Most likely Denver dumped his contract on us which was far from expiring

no man I was wrong... Felton ends up being garbage. Billups was there to match the salaries. Remember we picked up his option, then I believe amnestied him and signed Tyson

Sorry I misresd what you wrote. Yea we were all amazed with how well Felton was playing for roughly 2-3months. Now you realize he was just another product of Dantoni's system. His skills sets were made for Dantoni the problem was his fatass began to tire. By the time he was traded he was playing like garbage. Of course we didn't know that at the time. This is why I was so vehemently against bringing him back to replace Lin under Woodson. He had periods of good play under woodson especially playing next to kidd then he would revert back to being fat and tired.

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/8/2015  5:07 PM
mreinman wrote:
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:And Mozgoz was a "throw in" in the Melo deal according to many knick fans and media

He was the third string center there for several years. He was resigned and has done better but they got a ton for him. Someone must have given an ultimatum.

It doesn't matter. What matter is Denver got 2 1st round picks for a guy they strong armed the Knicks into giving up.

You said you were against the Carmelo trade. What were your feelings on Mozgov at the time of the trade?

Indifferent. I thought he played great when he finally got a chance because Stat and Shawne were out. My issue was I thought the Knicks should have kept Wilson or Gallo. I really liked Wilson. Moz wasn't a deal breaker for me. One of the Knicks two best young players should have been kept.

I wanted to keep Wilson or Gallo but had no problem giving up both for Melo. 1 of the 2 wasn't enough. My issues was Dolan forcing Walsh to include Mozgov and get the deal done and the picks. Specially the right to swap. One lottery pick shoul've been enough since we gave them Wilson, Gallo, Felton and Mozgov

We gave up more in the deal because Billups was included in the deal and because we made Fields untouchable.

I'm pretty sure Billups was a salary dump. I remember hearing the Knicks were reluctant to add give up Felton. We as fans were very optimistic about the trade until they started asking for Felton & Mozgov. Thats when Stephen A. Smith, Francesa & kay and the likes went on radio saying you give them whatever they want for a player like Melo. Stephen in particular as he mocked felton & mozgov

talk about being wrong... the guy I was infuritated we traded was Felton. He was playing like a beast under MDA and we swapped him for a walk it up guy in Billups. I thought Felton was blossoming into an upper echelon PG under MDA and he may have been... but eventually the only thing that blossomed was his waistline. You never know.

Did you actually think that Felton was a better player than Billups at that point?

Felton was playing terrible at that point and missing every shot (back to earth).

He was playing badly but everyone myself included just figured he was in a slump and would come out of it. Now looking back we know that wasnt the case as he was awful in Denver and Portland

newyorknewyork
Posts: 30168
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
1/8/2015  5:30 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:And Mozgoz was a "throw in" in the Melo deal according to many knick fans and media

He was the third string center there for several years. He was resigned and has done better but they got a ton for him. Someone must have given an ultimatum.

It doesn't matter. What matter is Denver got 2 1st round picks for a guy they strong armed the Knicks into giving up.

You said you were against the Carmelo trade. What were your feelings on Mozgov at the time of the trade?

Indifferent. I thought he played great when he finally got a chance because Stat and Shawne were out. My issue was I thought the Knicks should have kept Wilson or Gallo. I really liked Wilson. Moz wasn't a deal breaker for me. One of the Knicks two best young players should have been kept.

I wanted to keep Wilson or Gallo but had no problem giving up both for Melo. 1 of the 2 wasn't enough. My issues was Dolan forcing Walsh to include Mozgov and get the deal done and the picks. Specially the right to swap. One lottery pick shoul've been enough since we gave them Wilson, Gallo, Felton and Mozgov

We gave up more in the deal because Billups was included in the deal and because we made Fields untouchable.

I'm pretty sure Billups was a salary dump. I remember hearing the Knicks were reluctant to add give up Felton. We as fans were very optimistic about the trade until they started asking for Felton & Mozgov. Thats when Stephen A. Smith, Francesa & kay and the likes went on radio saying you give them whatever they want for a player like Melo. Stephen in particular as he mocked felton & mozgov

talk about being wrong... the guy I was infuritated we traded was Felton. He was playing like a beast under MDA and we swapped him for a walk it up guy in Billups. I thought Felton was blossoming into an upper echelon PG under MDA and he may have been... but eventually the only thing that blossomed was his waistline. You never know.

Who is wrong me?
if so you proved my point. The knicks and fans did not want to give up Felton at the time.
I forget if Denver dumped Billups contract on us or the Knicks asked for Billups since Denver wanted Felton. Most likely Denver dumped his contract on us which was far from expiring

Billups had the same length as Felton. Billups was a more high profile player then Felton. They could have got another draft pick for Billups in a separate deal rather then make him a salary dump if that was the case. He was averaging 16.5pts, 5.3ast, 1st, 43fg% 44 3pt%. They ended up trading Felton for Andre Miller in the off season. They could have traded Billups to Portland instead and probably gotten a pick out of them.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Mozgov Traded 2 Cleveland

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy