franco12 wrote:jrodmc wrote:franco12 wrote:fishmike wrote:SwishAndDish13 wrote:fishmike wrote:SwishAndDish13 wrote:fishmike wrote:franco12 wrote:Was Felton and Chandler & Woodson that great of a supporting cast?I keep saying - but if Melo really is this All Star caliber player, even with a collection of misfits, we should be better.
If Melo is so great, who is holding him back? Who is sabotaging him from winning us a few more games?
Is Fisher this bad of a coach? I mean, if Melo really is this great, then you should be able to pull any coach- someone off the street even- and we would win more than 5 games.
If you believe Melo is this great player, deserving of his massive contract, explain how we are so bad.
This is a fair question but I would ask the opposite. 2 years ago Knicks won 54 games and Melo was 3rd in MVP voting. What is Melo doing differently than he did that year? Ironically I think that was Melo's best year in terms of win shares and he also led the league in usage.So is the problem Melo and building around or does the team just stink?
We've actually never really attempted to build around Melo in his tenure with the Knicks. We basically just try to plug random scraps in and play since we caped ourselves out with the Amare deal and overpaying Tyson. Would have made more sense to eat Melo's first year here rather than set ourselves back another 3-4 years, but that is not what management chose to do.
actually didnt we? Wasnt the 54 win team a build around Melo? You had Melo a bunch of vets and some shooters. That was essentially the type of teams he had in Denver. Good enough to win, be in next the 50 win range but its too easy to defend in the playoffs and Melo isnt consistent enough a shooter to carry a team that way in the post season.
Yes and no. You are right. That team was built around him. However, they basically picked up scraps but they were vets that we could get for next to nothing (except Fat-ton). I was referring to them picking up players that made sense and would be around for more than a year so they could build some chemistry. Looking at that run, I think the backcourt shot 30% or less in the Indy series if my memory is correct. That clearly cost us.
sure... or its another example of Melo failing to elevate the level of play of his teammates 
Its funny. I have no problem with taking shots at Melo. His game has holes. But guys here talk about that team like it didnt happen, or say things like it was Jason Kidd's leadership.. he was the real MVP. He played a nice role. Know how many shots he in 12 playoff games? 3. Dude made 3 baskets.
When the teams win its the team. When they lose its MElo. You might want to write that down.
This is the thing about Melo that bugs me. That 54 win team? I watched it. I kept pinching myself because for the last decade we've been a joke.
But I'm trying to understand the difference between that team and the one we have now.
I thought we overachieved- and Jason Kidd was en fuego at the start of the season, and then plummeted.
This year, I think we're underachieving. OK - we shouldn't have 20 wins - but we have 5.
I think the biggest hole in Melo's game is leadership, and I'm beginning to think he is a negative leadership player - where guys not only don't want to play with him, they don't want to play well with him and want to fail just to drag him down.
This. All dumb pro athletes make this a priority in their careers when playing with people they don't like. Other GM's in the league and Phil will certainly notice this as a great trait to have as an NBA professional. I'm beginning to think THJr is going 0-8 from three just because he doesn't want to play on the see-saw with $124MMeee-low. If Melo was just more likable, I'm sure Dalembert would be Bill Russell by now.
WTF are you beginning to think this is, playground time in the third grade?
If Melo is a prick, is it other people's fault for not liking him?
Hey- I'm not a Melo hater. Maybe Melo just rubs some people the wrong way. I'm like that - some people don't understand my humor and I can be a rude speak my mouth bastard.
But I think people at work like me.
At this stage of the season, I think its fair to ask- is Melo a prick and generally unlikeable? Do we need to surround him with other pricks that don't give a blank about getting along with people.
Does Melo want to win? Or does he only care about getting paid?
With 5 wins, we can provide excuses.
But is Melo buying into the system? Or just trying to float on by?
Kobe's probably one of the world's most documented pricks on earth. MJ was, and for all apparent appearances, still is one of the biggest jackazzes on the planet. IT won two chips and is not even worth talking about as a personality. We are witness to that. I'm sure Dennis Rodman and his rings made for great locker room conversations.
No, obviously Melo wants to lose. He must positively love losing, mis-answering the same questions over and over, saying the same dumb things that the astounding geniuses who populate this board would never say if they had 40 mics shoved in their all-too-intelligent faces after logging more minutes than almost anyone in a league they wouldn't make as underpaid dancers or ballboys.
He plays through injuries instead of sitting every 4 games because he wants to be an overhyped electronic media cartoon for a losing franchise on the biggest stage on the planet. Don't all dopey atheletes want that?
He scores at nearly a 50% clip and gets 5 or 6 assists here and there and logs steals and blocks only because he's an overpaid douche who's singlehandedly destroying professional basketball with his ability to only purely score.
Does Melo know that he would get paid even more if he wins? Does Melo even realize that?
Winning will change everything. I have to believe it's going to turn around, just like it has before. The only other alternative is to whine and beyatch and moan ****inously for the next 5 years.
Or root for Brooklyn.