[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

A TRADE OF SHUMP AND AMARE FOR (BORN READY) STEPHENSON
Author Thread
H1AND1
Posts: 21747
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2013
Member: #5648

12/3/2014  1:34 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/3/2014  1:35 PM
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:The point for the OKC trade is actually to help Fisher the coach. Like good coaching, it is imperative to have a vet on the bench to help the young players understand what it is they are doing incorrectly. Like when Kidd and Sheed were on the bench two seasons ago. Or Kidd the coach his first year with the Nets. Without Garnett or Pierce, it would have been a train wreck in Kidd's first year.

I am not saying OKC would do the trade; I am simply highlighting the TYPE of trades that may prove to be valuable for years to come.

Veteran's leadership is a vital tool for young coaches and young players.

Yes, that's what we need: Veteran Leadership. Of course, we're already the 11th oldest team in the league this season, 7th oldest last season, so maybe the issue isn't that we don't have enough veterans but that we suck.

Veterans do not mean Veteran Leaders.

We don't have any Veteran Leaders and that is a huge problem.

Maybe Jose can be that eventually ...

Jose's 35 years old, there is no more "eventually" for him. And I'd love to hear what makes Collison and Perkins veteran leaders.

Jose may be that this year ... not sure that he is the guy.

Collison leads by example. Perfect veteran. Not sure how vocal he is.

Do a google image search for pics of Collison all bloody. A guy who gets plays so hard he gets bloody all the time w/o a care is the kinda player any team needs.

AUTOADVERT
Knicks1969
Posts: 25394
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2014
Member: #5915

12/3/2014  1:36 PM
Have you ever heard what coaches often say about Perkins? The dude was a pupil of Garnett, he is THE glue that keeps OKC together. He is often in the ears of Russel and Kevin. Would OKC let him go is and should be the question.
Thank God Fisher is no longer our coach, now let's get Calderon out of here:)
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

12/3/2014  1:37 PM
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:The point for the OKC trade is actually to help Fisher the coach. Like good coaching, it is imperative to have a vet on the bench to help the young players understand what it is they are doing incorrectly. Like when Kidd and Sheed were on the bench two seasons ago. Or Kidd the coach his first year with the Nets. Without Garnett or Pierce, it would have been a train wreck in Kidd's first year.

I am not saying OKC would do the trade; I am simply highlighting the TYPE of trades that may prove to be valuable for years to come.

Veteran's leadership is a vital tool for young coaches and young players.

Yes, that's what we need: Veteran Leadership. Of course, we're already the 11th oldest team in the league this season, 7th oldest last season, so maybe the issue isn't that we don't have enough veterans but that we suck.

Veterans do not mean Veteran Leaders.

We don't have any Veteran Leaders and that is a huge problem.

Maybe Jose can be that eventually ...

Jose's 35 years old, there is no more "eventually" for him. And I'd love to hear what makes Collison and Perkins veteran leaders.

Jose may be that this year ... not sure that he is the guy.

Collison leads by example. Perfect veteran. Not sure how vocal he is.

Do a google image search for pics of Collison all bloody. A guy who gets plays so hard he gets bloody all the time w/o a care is the kinda player any team needs.

I have always loved the guy. Looks like he is having a rough shooting year so far ... not sure why.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
H1AND1
Posts: 21747
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2013
Member: #5648

12/3/2014  1:46 PM
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:The point for the OKC trade is actually to help Fisher the coach. Like good coaching, it is imperative to have a vet on the bench to help the young players understand what it is they are doing incorrectly. Like when Kidd and Sheed were on the bench two seasons ago. Or Kidd the coach his first year with the Nets. Without Garnett or Pierce, it would have been a train wreck in Kidd's first year.

I am not saying OKC would do the trade; I am simply highlighting the TYPE of trades that may prove to be valuable for years to come.

Veteran's leadership is a vital tool for young coaches and young players.

Yes, that's what we need: Veteran Leadership. Of course, we're already the 11th oldest team in the league this season, 7th oldest last season, so maybe the issue isn't that we don't have enough veterans but that we suck.

Veterans do not mean Veteran Leaders.

We don't have any Veteran Leaders and that is a huge problem.

Maybe Jose can be that eventually ...

Jose's 35 years old, there is no more "eventually" for him. And I'd love to hear what makes Collison and Perkins veteran leaders.

Jose may be that this year ... not sure that he is the guy.

Collison leads by example. Perfect veteran. Not sure how vocal he is.

Do a google image search for pics of Collison all bloody. A guy who gets plays so hard he gets bloody all the time w/o a care is the kinda player any team needs.

I have always loved the guy. Looks like he is having a rough shooting year so far ... not sure why.

Its probably due to the increased volume due to Durant and Westbrook going down. I mean, he was shooting 3's! LOL. Now that they are back he'll probably settle back down.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

12/3/2014  1:51 PM
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:The point for the OKC trade is actually to help Fisher the coach. Like good coaching, it is imperative to have a vet on the bench to help the young players understand what it is they are doing incorrectly. Like when Kidd and Sheed were on the bench two seasons ago. Or Kidd the coach his first year with the Nets. Without Garnett or Pierce, it would have been a train wreck in Kidd's first year.

I am not saying OKC would do the trade; I am simply highlighting the TYPE of trades that may prove to be valuable for years to come.

Veteran's leadership is a vital tool for young coaches and young players.

Yes, that's what we need: Veteran Leadership. Of course, we're already the 11th oldest team in the league this season, 7th oldest last season, so maybe the issue isn't that we don't have enough veterans but that we suck.

Veterans do not mean Veteran Leaders.

We don't have any Veteran Leaders and that is a huge problem.

Maybe Jose can be that eventually ...

Jose's 35 years old, there is no more "eventually" for him. And I'd love to hear what makes Collison and Perkins veteran leaders.

Jose may be that this year ... not sure that he is the guy.

Collison leads by example. Perfect veteran. Not sure how vocal he is.

Do a google image search for pics of Collison all bloody. A guy who gets plays so hard he gets bloody all the time w/o a care is the kinda player any team needs.

I have always loved the guy. Looks like he is having a rough shooting year so far ... not sure why.

Its probably due to the increased volume due to Durant and Westbrook going down. I mean, he was shooting 3's! LOL. Now that they are back he'll probably settle back down.

His 3's are fine. His 2% is the issue.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
H1AND1
Posts: 21747
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2013
Member: #5648

12/3/2014  1:57 PM
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:The point for the OKC trade is actually to help Fisher the coach. Like good coaching, it is imperative to have a vet on the bench to help the young players understand what it is they are doing incorrectly. Like when Kidd and Sheed were on the bench two seasons ago. Or Kidd the coach his first year with the Nets. Without Garnett or Pierce, it would have been a train wreck in Kidd's first year.

I am not saying OKC would do the trade; I am simply highlighting the TYPE of trades that may prove to be valuable for years to come.

Veteran's leadership is a vital tool for young coaches and young players.

Yes, that's what we need: Veteran Leadership. Of course, we're already the 11th oldest team in the league this season, 7th oldest last season, so maybe the issue isn't that we don't have enough veterans but that we suck.

Veterans do not mean Veteran Leaders.

We don't have any Veteran Leaders and that is a huge problem.

Maybe Jose can be that eventually ...

Jose's 35 years old, there is no more "eventually" for him. And I'd love to hear what makes Collison and Perkins veteran leaders.

Jose may be that this year ... not sure that he is the guy.

Collison leads by example. Perfect veteran. Not sure how vocal he is.

Do a google image search for pics of Collison all bloody. A guy who gets plays so hard he gets bloody all the time w/o a care is the kinda player any team needs.

I have always loved the guy. Looks like he is having a rough shooting year so far ... not sure why.

Its probably due to the increased volume due to Durant and Westbrook going down. I mean, he was shooting 3's! LOL. Now that they are back he'll probably settle back down.

His 3's are fine. His 2% is the issue.

Yup, you're right. I Just looked at his stats. Him shooting 3's is a relatively new thing as he never shot them at all until last season when he shot 17 and this year he's already shot 34 of them. But anyway, I assumed that maybe his FG attempts had gone up due to Durant and Westbrook being out but i see that he is only taking 1 more 2pointer a game and youre right he is in a deep slump. Probably average out over time. Maybe just a bad run?

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

12/3/2014  2:00 PM
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:The point for the OKC trade is actually to help Fisher the coach. Like good coaching, it is imperative to have a vet on the bench to help the young players understand what it is they are doing incorrectly. Like when Kidd and Sheed were on the bench two seasons ago. Or Kidd the coach his first year with the Nets. Without Garnett or Pierce, it would have been a train wreck in Kidd's first year.

I am not saying OKC would do the trade; I am simply highlighting the TYPE of trades that may prove to be valuable for years to come.

Veteran's leadership is a vital tool for young coaches and young players.

Yes, that's what we need: Veteran Leadership. Of course, we're already the 11th oldest team in the league this season, 7th oldest last season, so maybe the issue isn't that we don't have enough veterans but that we suck.

Veterans do not mean Veteran Leaders.

We don't have any Veteran Leaders and that is a huge problem.

Maybe Jose can be that eventually ...

Jose's 35 years old, there is no more "eventually" for him. And I'd love to hear what makes Collison and Perkins veteran leaders.

Jose may be that this year ... not sure that he is the guy.

Collison leads by example. Perfect veteran. Not sure how vocal he is.

Do a google image search for pics of Collison all bloody. A guy who gets plays so hard he gets bloody all the time w/o a care is the kinda player any team needs.

I have always loved the guy. Looks like he is having a rough shooting year so far ... not sure why.

Its probably due to the increased volume due to Durant and Westbrook going down. I mean, he was shooting 3's! LOL. Now that they are back he'll probably settle back down.

His 3's are fine. His 2% is the issue.

Yup, you're right. I Just looked at his stats. Him shooting 3's is a relatively new thing as he never shot them at all until last season when he shot 17 and this year he's already shot 34 of them. But anyway, I assumed that maybe his FG attempts had gone up due to Durant and Westbrook being out but i see that he is only taking 1 more 2pointer a game and youre right he is in a deep slump. Probably average out over time. Maybe just a bad run?

Maybe this is what he would look like on the knicks (without KD and Westbrook)??

so here is what phil is thinking ....
H1AND1
Posts: 21747
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2013
Member: #5648

12/3/2014  2:11 PM
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:The point for the OKC trade is actually to help Fisher the coach. Like good coaching, it is imperative to have a vet on the bench to help the young players understand what it is they are doing incorrectly. Like when Kidd and Sheed were on the bench two seasons ago. Or Kidd the coach his first year with the Nets. Without Garnett or Pierce, it would have been a train wreck in Kidd's first year.

I am not saying OKC would do the trade; I am simply highlighting the TYPE of trades that may prove to be valuable for years to come.

Veteran's leadership is a vital tool for young coaches and young players.

Yes, that's what we need: Veteran Leadership. Of course, we're already the 11th oldest team in the league this season, 7th oldest last season, so maybe the issue isn't that we don't have enough veterans but that we suck.

Veterans do not mean Veteran Leaders.

We don't have any Veteran Leaders and that is a huge problem.

Maybe Jose can be that eventually ...

Jose's 35 years old, there is no more "eventually" for him. And I'd love to hear what makes Collison and Perkins veteran leaders.

Jose may be that this year ... not sure that he is the guy.

Collison leads by example. Perfect veteran. Not sure how vocal he is.

Do a google image search for pics of Collison all bloody. A guy who gets plays so hard he gets bloody all the time w/o a care is the kinda player any team needs.

I have always loved the guy. Looks like he is having a rough shooting year so far ... not sure why.

Its probably due to the increased volume due to Durant and Westbrook going down. I mean, he was shooting 3's! LOL. Now that they are back he'll probably settle back down.

His 3's are fine. His 2% is the issue.

Yup, you're right. I Just looked at his stats. Him shooting 3's is a relatively new thing as he never shot them at all until last season when he shot 17 and this year he's already shot 34 of them. But anyway, I assumed that maybe his FG attempts had gone up due to Durant and Westbrook being out but i see that he is only taking 1 more 2pointer a game and youre right he is in a deep slump. Probably average out over time. Maybe just a bad run?

Maybe this is what he would look like on the knicks (without KD and Westbrook)??

Ha! But no, I bet he would "veteran leadership" his way to a .750 FG% while also giving Melo media sensitivity training and giving Fish foot massages at the half so he is more calm and level headed in setting his second half rotations....

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39943
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

12/3/2014  2:12 PM
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:The point for the OKC trade is actually to help Fisher the coach. Like good coaching, it is imperative to have a vet on the bench to help the young players understand what it is they are doing incorrectly. Like when Kidd and Sheed were on the bench two seasons ago. Or Kidd the coach his first year with the Nets. Without Garnett or Pierce, it would have been a train wreck in Kidd's first year.

I am not saying OKC would do the trade; I am simply highlighting the TYPE of trades that may prove to be valuable for years to come.

Veteran's leadership is a vital tool for young coaches and young players.

Yes, that's what we need: Veteran Leadership. Of course, we're already the 11th oldest team in the league this season, 7th oldest last season, so maybe the issue isn't that we don't have enough veterans but that we suck.

Veterans do not mean Veteran Leaders.

We don't have any Veteran Leaders and that is a huge problem.

Maybe Jose can be that eventually ...

Jose's 35 years old, there is no more "eventually" for him. And I'd love to hear what makes Collison and Perkins veteran leaders.

Jose may be that this year ... not sure that he is the guy.

Collison leads by example. Perfect veteran. Not sure how vocal he is.

Do a google image search for pics of Collison all bloody. A guy who gets plays so hard he gets bloody all the time w/o a care is the kinda player any team needs.

I have always loved the guy. Looks like he is having a rough shooting year so far ... not sure why.

Its probably due to the increased volume due to Durant and Westbrook going down. I mean, he was shooting 3's! LOL. Now that they are back he'll probably settle back down.

His 3's are fine. His 2% is the issue.

Yup, you're right. I Just looked at his stats. Him shooting 3's is a relatively new thing as he never shot them at all until last season when he shot 17 and this year he's already shot 34 of them. But anyway, I assumed that maybe his FG attempts had gone up due to Durant and Westbrook being out but i see that he is only taking 1 more 2pointer a game and youre right he is in a deep slump. Probably average out over time. Maybe just a bad run?

Maybe this is what he would look like on the knicks (without KD and Westbrook)??


his field goal percentage at the rim looks Ok, but he's taking less of those shots. Nearly half so his shots are threes, but he's onlyrics shooting 35 percent from there. He is 34, so it makes sensemble that he wouldn'the want to hang inside as much. He also doesn'the have the same lift he once had. Whatever the case, Brooks needs to tell him to cut down on the threes.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

12/3/2014  2:25 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:The point for the OKC trade is actually to help Fisher the coach. Like good coaching, it is imperative to have a vet on the bench to help the young players understand what it is they are doing incorrectly. Like when Kidd and Sheed were on the bench two seasons ago. Or Kidd the coach his first year with the Nets. Without Garnett or Pierce, it would have been a train wreck in Kidd's first year.

I am not saying OKC would do the trade; I am simply highlighting the TYPE of trades that may prove to be valuable for years to come.

Veteran's leadership is a vital tool for young coaches and young players.

Yes, that's what we need: Veteran Leadership. Of course, we're already the 11th oldest team in the league this season, 7th oldest last season, so maybe the issue isn't that we don't have enough veterans but that we suck.

Veterans do not mean Veteran Leaders.

We don't have any Veteran Leaders and that is a huge problem.

Maybe Jose can be that eventually ...

Jose's 35 years old, there is no more "eventually" for him. And I'd love to hear what makes Collison and Perkins veteran leaders.

Jose may be that this year ... not sure that he is the guy.

Collison leads by example. Perfect veteran. Not sure how vocal he is.

Do a google image search for pics of Collison all bloody. A guy who gets plays so hard he gets bloody all the time w/o a care is the kinda player any team needs.

I have always loved the guy. Looks like he is having a rough shooting year so far ... not sure why.

Its probably due to the increased volume due to Durant and Westbrook going down. I mean, he was shooting 3's! LOL. Now that they are back he'll probably settle back down.

His 3's are fine. His 2% is the issue.

Yup, you're right. I Just looked at his stats. Him shooting 3's is a relatively new thing as he never shot them at all until last season when he shot 17 and this year he's already shot 34 of them. But anyway, I assumed that maybe his FG attempts had gone up due to Durant and Westbrook being out but i see that he is only taking 1 more 2pointer a game and youre right he is in a deep slump. Probably average out over time. Maybe just a bad run?

Maybe this is what he would look like on the knicks (without KD and Westbrook)??


his field goal percentage at the rim looks Ok, but he's taking less of those shots. Nearly half so his shots are threes, but he's onlyrics shooting 35 percent from there. He is 34, so it makes sensemble that he wouldn'the want to hang inside as much. He also doesn'the have the same lift he once had. Whatever the case, Brooks needs to tell him to cut down on the threes.

threes are NOT the issue at all. Its his 2's. At this rate he should take more 3's and fewer 2's between 3 and 22 feet.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Knicks1969
Posts: 25394
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2014
Member: #5915

12/3/2014  2:38 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/3/2014  2:53 PM
How do you guys feel about Bismack Biyombo? Length, foot speed, shot blocking, but no offense. However, he is better for this team than Cole Aldrich. With a running PG like Larkin, he could be just fine. He and Acy would be liabilities on offense, but on defense they could wreak havoc for the opposing teams. They play with a contagious motor. He does things that Acy can't do; he plays good help defense. His 9'5" wingspan and agility make him an effective shot blocker and defender. He can become a decent player like Ben Wallace. When Ben Wallace was drafted, he was traded a couple of times and was not revered as an NBA talent until he joined Detroit.
Thank God Fisher is no longer our coach, now let's get Calderon out of here:)
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39943
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

12/3/2014  2:51 PM
mreinman wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:The point for the OKC trade is actually to help Fisher the coach. Like good coaching, it is imperative to have a vet on the bench to help the young players understand what it is they are doing incorrectly. Like when Kidd and Sheed were on the bench two seasons ago. Or Kidd the coach his first year with the Nets. Without Garnett or Pierce, it would have been a train wreck in Kidd's first year.

I am not saying OKC would do the trade; I am simply highlighting the TYPE of trades that may prove to be valuable for years to come.

Veteran's leadership is a vital tool for young coaches and young players.

Yes, that's what we need: Veteran Leadership. Of course, we're already the 11th oldest team in the league this season, 7th oldest last season, so maybe the issue isn't that we don't have enough veterans but that we suck.

Veterans do not mean Veteran Leaders.

We don't have any Veteran Leaders and that is a huge problem.

Maybe Jose can be that eventually ...

Jose's 35 years old, there is no more "eventually" for him. And I'd love to hear what makes Collison and Perkins veteran leaders.

Jose may be that this year ... not sure that he is the guy.

Collison leads by example. Perfect veteran. Not sure how vocal he is.

Do a google image search for pics of Collison all bloody. A guy who gets plays so hard he gets bloody all the time w/o a care is the kinda player any team needs.

I have always loved the guy. Looks like he is having a rough shooting year so far ... not sure why.

Its probably due to the increased volume due to Durant and Westbrook going down. I mean, he was shooting 3's! LOL. Now that they are back he'll probably settle back down.

His 3's are fine. His 2% is the issue.

Yup, you're right. I Just looked at his stats. Him shooting 3's is a relatively new thing as he never shot them at all until last season when he shot 17 and this year he's already shot 34 of them. But anyway, I assumed that maybe his FG attempts had gone up due to Durant and Westbrook being out but i see that he is only taking 1 more 2pointer a game and youre right he is in a deep slump. Probably average out over time. Maybe just a bad run?

Maybe this is what he would look like on the knicks (without KD and Westbrook)??


his field goal percentage at the rim looks Ok, but he's taking less of those shots. Nearly half so his shots are threes, but he's onlyrics shooting 35 percent from there. He is 34, so it makes sensemble that he wouldn'the want to hang inside as much. He also doesn'the have the same lift he once had. Whatever the case, Brooks needs to tell him to cut down on the threes.

threes are NOT the issue at all. Its his 2's. At this rate he should take more 3's and fewer 2's between 3 and 22 feet.


he only shoots 32 percent from 3. How can you say he needs to shoot more of them? He needs to take and make more hoops around the basket. That's the issue.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39943
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

12/3/2014  2:58 PM
Knicks1969 wrote:How do you guys feel about Bismack Biyombo? Length, foot speed, shot blocking, but no offense. However, he is better for this team than Cole Aldrich. With a running PG like Larkin, he could be just fine. He and Acy would be liabilities on offense, but on defense they could wreak havoc for the opposing teams. They play with a contagious motor. He does things that Acy can't do; he plays good help defense. His 9'5" wingspan and agility make him an effective shot blocker and defender. He can become a decent player like Ben Wallace. When Ben Wallace was drafted, he was traded a couple of times and was not revered as an NBA talent until he joined Detroit.

Bismarck is a bad fit for this team as long as we play the triangle. He could be a steal as a reserve for another team.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Knicks1969
Posts: 25394
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2014
Member: #5915

12/3/2014  3:04 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/3/2014  3:04 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:How do you guys feel about Bismack Biyombo? Length, foot speed, shot blocking, but no offense. However, he is better for this team than Cole Aldrich. With a running PG like Larkin, he could be just fine. He and Acy would be liabilities on offense, but on defense they could wreak havoc for the opposing teams. They play with a contagious motor. He does things that Acy can't do; he plays good help defense. His 9'5" wingspan and agility make him an effective shot blocker and defender. He can become a decent player like Ben Wallace. When Ben Wallace was drafted, he was traded a couple of times and was not revered as an NBA talent until he joined Detroit.

Bismarck is a bad fit for this team as long as we play the triangle. He could be a steal as a reserve for another team.

How is he a bad fit when front office think Acy and Cole are good fit? Rodman was once considered a bad fit as well

Thank God Fisher is no longer our coach, now let's get Calderon out of here:)
Nalod
Posts: 71366
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
12/3/2014  4:12 PM
Dream season, knick finally are rebuilding!

All trades make the team potentially better. I want youthier assets, picks, or stashed euros.
Things to make us better in the future.
No vaccines. Time to build immunity and build from draft and cap space.

Knicks1969
Posts: 25394
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2014
Member: #5915

12/3/2014  4:17 PM
Stephenson and Biyombo are young, inexpensive, and can provide what this team has been missing since the last 20 years. We will still need to draft more talents and acquire a 7'.
Thank God Fisher is no longer our coach, now let's get Calderon out of here:)
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

12/3/2014  4:49 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
mreinman wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
mreinman wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:The point for the OKC trade is actually to help Fisher the coach. Like good coaching, it is imperative to have a vet on the bench to help the young players understand what it is they are doing incorrectly. Like when Kidd and Sheed were on the bench two seasons ago. Or Kidd the coach his first year with the Nets. Without Garnett or Pierce, it would have been a train wreck in Kidd's first year.

I am not saying OKC would do the trade; I am simply highlighting the TYPE of trades that may prove to be valuable for years to come.

Veteran's leadership is a vital tool for young coaches and young players.

Yes, that's what we need: Veteran Leadership. Of course, we're already the 11th oldest team in the league this season, 7th oldest last season, so maybe the issue isn't that we don't have enough veterans but that we suck.

Veterans do not mean Veteran Leaders.

We don't have any Veteran Leaders and that is a huge problem.

Maybe Jose can be that eventually ...

Jose's 35 years old, there is no more "eventually" for him. And I'd love to hear what makes Collison and Perkins veteran leaders.

Jose may be that this year ... not sure that he is the guy.

Collison leads by example. Perfect veteran. Not sure how vocal he is.

Do a google image search for pics of Collison all bloody. A guy who gets plays so hard he gets bloody all the time w/o a care is the kinda player any team needs.

I have always loved the guy. Looks like he is having a rough shooting year so far ... not sure why.

Its probably due to the increased volume due to Durant and Westbrook going down. I mean, he was shooting 3's! LOL. Now that they are back he'll probably settle back down.

His 3's are fine. His 2% is the issue.

Yup, you're right. I Just looked at his stats. Him shooting 3's is a relatively new thing as he never shot them at all until last season when he shot 17 and this year he's already shot 34 of them. But anyway, I assumed that maybe his FG attempts had gone up due to Durant and Westbrook being out but i see that he is only taking 1 more 2pointer a game and youre right he is in a deep slump. Probably average out over time. Maybe just a bad run?

Maybe this is what he would look like on the knicks (without KD and Westbrook)??


his field goal percentage at the rim looks Ok, but he's taking less of those shots. Nearly half so his shots are threes, but he's onlyrics shooting 35 percent from there. He is 34, so it makes sensemble that he wouldn'the want to hang inside as much. He also doesn'the have the same lift he once had. Whatever the case, Brooks needs to tell him to cut down on the threes.

threes are NOT the issue at all. Its his 2's. At this rate he should take more 3's and fewer 2's between 3 and 22 feet.


he only shoots 32 percent from 3. How can you say he needs to shoot more of them? He needs to take and make more hoops around the basket. That's the issue.

best shot is withing 0-3. Its not always avail ... next best for him is the 3 (since he has been so awful between 3 feet to the arc). 32% probably equates to an efg of around 50%

so here is what phil is thinking ....
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/3/2014  4:53 PM
Knicks1969 wrote:Stephenson and Biyombo are young, inexpensive, and can provide what this team has been missing since the last 20 years. We will still need to draft more talents and acquire a 7'.

He is not what we need, he's a great talent, but terrible fit from a mental stand point.

ES
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39943
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

12/3/2014  4:58 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/3/2014  5:10 PM
Knicks1969 wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:How do you guys feel about Bismack Biyombo? Length, foot speed, shot blocking, but no offense. However, he is better for this team than Cole Aldrich. With a running PG like Larkin, he could be just fine. He and Acy would be liabilities on offense, but on defense they could wreak havoc for the opposing teams. They play with a contagious motor. He does things that Acy can't do; he plays good help defense. His 9'5" wingspan and agility make him an effective shot blocker and defender. He can become a decent player like Ben Wallace. When Ben Wallace was drafted, he was traded a couple of times and was not revered as an NBA talent until he joined Detroit.

Bismarck is a bad fit for this team as long as we play the triangle. He could be a steal as a reserve for another team.

How is he a bad fit when front office think Acy and Cole are good fit? Rodman was once considered a bad fit as well


Acy is also a bad fit. I think Cole is a good fit as third string center. The difference between Rodman and Biyombi is that rodman was a decent passer and smarter player. Rodman could also dribble and catch.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
F500ONE
Posts: 23899
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5844

12/3/2014  5:08 PM
Collison probably should stay in the painted area

http://vorped.com/1-nba/2014-2015/player/1209/nick-collison/shotchart/


Considering he doesn't 4pt play from 3

Generates all his FTA from 2's


Has missed 22fg shooting outside the arc

Has missed 10fg shooting inside the paint

A TRADE OF SHUMP AND AMARE FOR (BORN READY) STEPHENSON

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy